Books backing Bills, Eagles, Ravens as Super Bowl favoritesNew Foto - Books backing Bills, Eagles, Ravens as Super Bowl favorites

The Philadelphia Eagles begin the 2025 season as heavy favorites to win their season opener Thursday night, but oddsmakers see significant threats in their pursuit of back-to-back Super Bowl titles. The Buffalo Bills and Baltimore Ravens are the co-Super Bowl favorites at +600 at DraftKings, slightly ahead of the Eagles at +700. The Kansas City Chiefs are next at +850, with no other team having shorter odds than the Green Bay Packers at +1200. Meanwhile, BetRivers is offering the Ravens and Eagles as +650 co-favorites, followed by the Bills (+700), Chiefs (+800) and the Packers (+1300) along with the Detroit Lions. The New Orleans Saints are the biggest longshot at both books -- +30000 at BetRivers and +5000 at DraftKings. Philadelphia is considered to have a smoother path to the Super Bowl than its AFC counterparts. The Eagles are +350 to win the NFC title at DraftKings, ahead of the Packers (+600) and Lions (+650). The Bills and Ravens are the co-+330 favorites in the AFC, followed by the Chiefs at +400. That trio is well ahead of the pack, with the Denver Broncos owning the fourth shortest AFC title odds at +1100. Ravens quarterback Lamar Jackson opens the season as the +550 favorite to win Most Valuable Player honors, ahead of Bills reigning league MVP Josh Allen and Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow at +600. The shortest non-quarterback odds belong to Eagles running back Saquon Barkley at +6000. Las Vegas running back Ashton Jeanty begins the season as the +275 offensive rookie of the year favorite ahead of No. 1 overall pick Cam Ward. The Tennessee Titans quarterback is being offered at +350, followed by Los Angeles Chargers running back Omarion Hampton at +850 and Jacksonville Jaguars dual threat Travis Hunter at +1000. The shortest defensive rookie of the year odds belong to New York Giants pass rusher Abdul Carter at +225. He's well ahead of a trio at +1200 that includes San Francisco pass rusher Mykel Williams, Ravens linebacker Mike Green and Atlanta Falcons pass rusher Jalon Walker. --Field Level Media

Books backing Bills, Eagles, Ravens as Super Bowl favorites

Books backing Bills, Eagles, Ravens as Super Bowl favorites The Philadelphia Eagles begin the 2025 season as heavy favorites to win their se...
Eagles raise Super Bowl 59 banner before Week 1 vs. Cowboys as team stays in locker roomNew Foto - Eagles raise Super Bowl 59 banner before Week 1 vs. Cowboys as team stays in locker room

PHILADELPHIA —Nick Siriannihad no reason to lead anybody astray earlier this week when he said thePhiladelphia Eagleswould not be watching the Super Bowl 59 banner ceremony Thursday at Lincoln Financial Field. Indeed, the defending champions were not present on the field during the four-minute ceremony. Owner Jeffrey Lurie and former defensive lineman Brandon Graham carried the team's two Lombardi Trophies onto the field following a stadium lights show as the sold-out crowd, already seated, went wild. The black covering that blocked the banner came down and "2024 World Champions" was displayed for all to see. Two replica (giant) Lombardis were rolled onto the field for the ceremony and theEagles' (many) highlights from that evening played. Graham called Lurie "the best owner in sports" and led the stadium into a spirited rendition of "Fly Eagles Fly." Eagles superfan and "It's Always Sunny In Philadelphia" star and creator Rob Mac introduced the Eagles as the defending champs took the field. Philadelphia throttled the Kansas City Chiefs 40-22in the Super Bowl in New Orleans; quarterbackJalen Hurtswasnamed the game's MVP. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Eagles raise Super Bowl 59 banner before Week 1 vs. Cowboys

Eagles raise Super Bowl 59 banner before Week 1 vs. Cowboys as team stays in locker room

Eagles raise Super Bowl 59 banner before Week 1 vs. Cowboys as team stays in locker room PHILADELPHIA —Nick Siriannihad no reason to lead an...
Ousted CDC chief warns that RFK Jr. is politicizing public healthNew Foto - Ousted CDC chief warns that RFK Jr. is politicizing public health

Susan Monarez, who was recently fired as director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, warned Thursday that Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was actively seeking to undermine the scientific process used to make influential public health recommendations. In an editorialpublished in The Wall Street Journal, Monarez wrote that Kennedy's move to replace the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), which makes suggestions about who should get certain vaccines, risked ignoring science in favor of ideology. "Once trusted experts are removed and advisory bodies are stacked, the results are predetermined. That isn't reform. It is sabotage," Monarez wrote. Monarez, who wasabruptly fired last weekafter just 29 days on the job, described a meeting with Kennedy on Aug. 25 in which she was told to preapprove recommendations from the new ACIP panel that is scheduled to meet Sept. 18-19. "One of the troubling directives from that meeting more than a week ago: I was told to preapprove the recommendations of a vaccine advisory panel newly filled with people who have publicly expressed antivaccine rhetoric," she wrote. Kennedyfired the panel's previous members in Juneandreplaced them with a slate of vaccine skeptics. She added that she had "serious concerns" following the Aug. 25 meeting and was ultimately fired for putting evidence over ideology. "The Senate confirmed me to ensure that unbiased evidence serves our nation's health, and for doing that, I lost my job. America's children could lose far more," she wrote. "Parents deserve a CDC they can trust to put children above politics, evidence above ideology and facts above fear," she added. "I was fired for holding that line." Monarez said it is "imperative that the panel's recommendations aren't rubber-stamped but instead are rigorously and scientifically reviewed before being accepted or rejected." Almost immediately after Monarez was ousted, several top officials resigned in protest, including Dr. Demetre Daskalakis, who directed the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases. Their resignation letters contained similar language to Monarez's Wall Street Journal editorial, expressing concerns about their ability to safeguard public health under the secretary's leadership. "I am unable to serve in an environment that treats CDC as a tool to generate policies and materials that do not reflect scientific reality and are designed to hurt rather than to improve the public's health,"Daskalakis wrote in his letter. In a hearing Thursday before the Senate Finance Committee, Kennedy denied Monarez's claim and said she was lying about any order related to preapproving ACIP's findings. The staff shakeup at the CDC follows a shooting at the agency's headquarters in Atlanta last month in which a gunman fired hundreds of rounds and killed a police officer. The gunmanblamed a Covid vaccinefor his mental health issues, including depression. At an agency all-hands meeting that addressed the shooting, Monarez — then just a week into her job —pointed to the harms of misinformationand the need to rebuild trust. She reiterated that call in her editorial Thursday. "Amid the trauma, hundreds of CDC employees told me the same thing: We need to take immediate steps to rebuild public trust," she wrote. "That's the CDC I know: service before self."

Ousted CDC chief warns that RFK Jr. is politicizing public health

Ousted CDC chief warns that RFK Jr. is politicizing public health Susan Monarez, who was recently fired as director of the Centers for Disea...
Poll: Gavin Newsom leads 2028 Democratic primary field, edges out Trump in head-to-head matchupNew Foto - Poll: Gavin Newsom leads 2028 Democratic primary field, edges out Trump in head-to-head matchup

In recent months, California's Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom has been acting a lot like a presidential candidate-in-waiting. He'sset up fundraising committees. He'svisited key battleground states. He'shosted national political players on his podcast. He'smocked President Trump on social media. And he's convinced the California Legislature to "fight fire with fire" bymatching Texas's partisan redistricting push. "It's not about whether we play hardball anymore," the governor recently told his fellow Democratic officials. "It's about how we play hardball." And now Newsom's new brand of hardball has coincided with a rise in poll support — at least when it comes to boosting his own political brand. According to the latest Yahoo/YouGov poll, Newsom has surged to the front of the Democratic Party's 2028 presidential primary pack, with 21% of registered Democratic voters and registered voters who lean Democratic now picking him as their preferred nominee. That puts Newsom slightly ahead of former Vice President Kamala Harris (19%), the party's 2024 nominee and perhaps the most familiar name on the list — and well ahead of New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (12%), former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg (10%), Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker (7%), Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz (4%), Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro (4%) and Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer (2%). The survey of 1,690 U.S. adults, which was conducted from Aug. 29 to Sept. 2, also finds that if the 2028 general election were "held today," 49% of registered voters say they would cast their ballots for Newsom — while only 41% say they would choose Trump. Trump, of course, is constitutionally prohibited from running for a third term. But Newsom (49%) leads Vice President JD Vance (41%) by 8 points as well. Caveats apply here. For one thing, the 2028 contest won't start in earnest for another 16 months; hypothetical matchups this far out are not — and never have been — predictive. For another, the Yahoo/YouGov poll didn't pair President Trump or Vance with other potential Democratic challengers, so it's impossible to say whether Newsom is performing better or worse than the alternatives. It's clear, however, that Newsom's recent turn in the national spotlight has changed how Democrats see him. While this is the first time the Yahoo/YouGov poll has asked the party's voters who they would prefer as their 2028 nominee, an Economist/YouGov poll posed a similar question in April, asking which candidate would be "your ideal choice?" In that survey — conducted before the California redistricting push — Newsom registered at 8%, on par with Buttigieg (9%), Ocasio-Cortez (7%) and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders (6%). In contrast, 29% of Democrats opted for Harris. According to the new Yahoo/YouGov poll, overall perceptions of Newsom as a politician are not that different from overall views of Trump. As befitting the Californian's lower national profile, more Americans say they're "not sure" what to think of him — but the usual partisan polarization is very much in effect among those whodoknow what they think. Newsom's overall favorable rating is 31% favorable to 41% unfavorable, with Democrats mostly positive (62% favorable, 14% unfavorable), Republicans even more negative (7% favorable, 66% unfavorable) and independents net negative (32% favorable, 43% unfavorable). Trump's overall favorable rating is 42% favorable to 56% unfavorable, with Republicans mostly positive (89% favorable, 10% unfavorable), Democrats even more negative (4% favorable, 94% unfavorable) and independents net negative (34% favorable, 65% unfavorable). Likewise, 32% of Americans say Newsom is focused on California and America's most important problems, while 41% say he is focused on less important issues (and 27% are unsure). For Trump, 39% say he is focused on America's most important problems, while 50% say he is focused on less important issues (and 10% are unsure). Yet for the moment, at least, Americans seem to view Newsom's redistricting countermeasures more favorably than the president's own moves in that area. U.S. House redistricting efforts — the process of redrawing the boundaries of each district — typically take place every 10 years, after each new census reveals changes in population distribution. But last month, Trump encouragedRepublican legislators in Texas to pass new congressional district boundariesfive years earlier than normal to help Republicans win five additional U.S. House seats in the 2026 midterm elections. In response, Newsom similarly backed an effort by Democratic legislators in California to create new congressional district boundaries five years earlier than normal to help Democrats win five additional U.S. House seats in the 2026 midterm elections. To be sure, redistricting itself — defined for poll respondents as "the practice by which politicians redraw congressional districts to help their own party win" — has few fans. Just 11% of Americans say they favor it; 58% are opposed. Democrats in particular are anti-redistricting (5% favor, 73% oppose, 23% not sure); Republicans are more divided (23% favor, 36% oppose, 41% not sure). Yet while just 25% of Americans approve (and 49% disapprove) of Trump's recent redistricting push in Texas, the numbers for Newsom's response in California are significantly closer: 33% approve to 39% disapprove. Similarly, only 22% of Americans say they approve of Trump's overall approach to redistricting — described for respondents as him "prais[ing] Texas over its redistrictingwhile saying he willsue California over redistricting there." A majority (54%) disapproves. In contrast, more Americans approve (39%) than disapprove (37%) of Newsom's approach: saying "Democrats need to 'play hardball' in California and elsewhere in response to the Trump administration's efforts to 'advance Republicans' power.'" Why the difference? The poll shows that Democratic disapproval of Trump's Texas redistricting push (80%) is significantly higher than Republican opposition to Newsom's California response (56%) — and Republican support for what Trump is doing in Texas (56%) is modestly lower than Democratic support for what Newsom is doing in California (62%). This partisan asymmetry skews overall approval in favor of Newsom's efforts. Despite his improving numbers, the new Yahoo/YouGov survey highlights three possible risks for Newsom going forward. First, more Americans see Trump as a "stronger leader" (44%) than Newsom (32%) — largely because the number of Republicans who view the president that way (91%) is much higher than the number of Democrats who say the same about his California counterpart (66%). Second, younger Democrats and Democratic leaners — adults under 45 — prefer both Harris (27%) and Ocasio-Cortez (22%) to Newsom (13%) as a potential 2028 presidential nominee. Newsom's strength is largely concentrated among Democrats over 45, among whom he leads Harris 26% to 13%. Finally, Newsom's recent shift in social media strategy is not especially popular. When told in the poll that "Newsom and his team have started to satirize Donald Trump's social media presence, imitating his aggressive, all-caps style, mocking his looks and his masculinity and accusing him of cheating to win," just 33% of respondents said they approve; 43% said they disapprove. One bright spot here for the governor? Trump's own use of social media is even less popular, with just 29% of Americans saying they approve and a majority — 52% — saying they disapprove. __________________ The Yahoo survey was conducted by YouGov using a nationally representative sample of 1,690 U.S. adults interviewed online from Aug. 29 to Sept. 2, 2025. The sample was weighted according to gender, age, race, education, 2024 election turnout and presidential vote, party identification and current voter registration status. Demographic weighting targets come from the 2019 American Community Survey. Party identification is weighted to the estimated distribution at the time of the election (31% Democratic, 32% Republican). Respondents were selected from YouGov's opt-in panel to be representative of all U.S. adults. The margin of error is approximately 3.1%.

Poll: Gavin Newsom leads 2028 Democratic primary field, edges out Trump in head-to-head matchup

Poll: Gavin Newsom leads 2028 Democratic primary field, edges out Trump in head-to-head matchup In recent months, California's Democrati...
What to watch: College football Week 2 viewer's guideNew Foto - What to watch: College football Week 2 viewer's guide

The Week 2 schedule looks a lot different than Week 1's slate did. We won't go so far as to call Week 2 a letdown — you can never count out an unexpected upset or three — but the weekend features just one game between ranked opponents after the 2025 season officially began with three games between top-10 teams. Yes, the slate is pretty light. But there's still some intrigue. Especially for college football diehards. Here's what to watch as September is now in full swing. Iowa State has won two of the last three Cy-Hawk rivalry games after Iowa won six straight from 2015 through 2021. A season ago, ISU kicker Kyle Konrardy hit a 54-yard field goal as time expired to give the Cyclones a 20-19 win in Iowa City. This year, Iowa State is favored after it beat Kansas State in Week Zero and Iowa's offense showed many of its familiar — and not great — traits in a Week 1 win over FCS Albany. [Join or create a Yahoo Fantasy Football league for the 2025 NFL season] The Hawkeyes won 34-7 and held the Great Danes to just 134 yards. Iowa rushed 53 times for 310 yards and three scores, but the passing offense was sluggish again. South Dakota State transfer Mark Gronowski made his first start for Iowa and was just 8-of-15 passing for 44 yards and a score. That's not going to get it done against Iowa State. The Cyclones moved to 2-0 with a blowout win over South Dakota. As Gronowski struggled against an FCS opponent, Rocco Becht set an ISU record for completion percentage against the Cyclones' FCS opposition as he was 19-of-20 passing for 278 yards and three scores. Yes, it's not the greatest week of football. But this is a game that would be intriguing even if there were three top-10 matchups again in Week 2. This is a must-win for an Illinois team that would like to be this year's Indiana and make the College Football Playoff alongside the Big Ten's heavyweights. The Illini bring back a ton of contributors from a team that went 10-3 in 2024 and overwhelmed Western Illinois in Week 1. The Illini averaged over seven yards a play and were up 31-0 at halftime. New Duke QB Darian Mensahmade a strong first impression against Elon. Mensah was 27-of-34 passing for 389 yards as the Blue Devils outscored the Phoenix 35-7 in the second half. Mensah was the first big QB transfer of the offseason as he made the move from Tulane to Duke to replace Maalik Murphy as the Blue Devils' starting quarterback. Like Illinois, Duke also had a strong season that went under the radar in 2024. The Blue Devils were 9-4 and nearly beat SMU. The Wildcats dealt a huge blow to Ole Miss' playoff hopes a season ago with a surprise 20-17 win in Oxford. It was Kentucky's first victory at Ole Miss since 1978 and Ole Miss entered the game as a 15.5-point favorite. It was the highlight of a disappointing season for UK as the Wildcats lost four straight games after that Ole Miss win and six of their last seven to finish the year at 4-8. Former Texas A&M and Auburn QB Zach Calzada made his first start for Kentucky in Week 1 against Toledo and struggled in the 24-16 win. He was just 10-of-23 passing for 85 yards and an interception. Ole Miss blew out Georgia State 63-7 in Week 1 as Austin Simmons threw for 341 yards and three scores. Missouri transfer Kewan Lacy rushed 16 times for 108 yards and three TDs while former Penn State WR Harrison Wallace had five catches for 130 yards and a TD. The trip to Kentucky is the start of a stretch for Ole Miss that includes six SEC games over its next eight with the lone non-conference contests being against Tulane and Washington State. The longtime rivals are finally meeting on the football field again. Missouri and Kansas have rekindled their basketball rivalry in recent seasons but Saturday is the first time the schools have met on the football field since Missouri moved from the Big 12 to the SEC after the 2011 season. Kansas is 2-0 after wins over Fresno State and Wagner. QB Jalon Daniels already looks much more like his 2023 self after a down season in 2024 and has thrown seven touchdowns over those two games. KU is a sneaky sleeper in the Big 12 this season — a win over the Tigers in Columbia would get a lot of people's attention. Mizzou entered Week 1 with a quarterback competition between Penn State transfer Beau Pribula and Sam Horn. The job is now Pribula's after his strong performance against Central Arkansas and because Horn suffered what appeared to be a significant right leg injury on his first play of the game. Pribula was 23-of-28 passing for 283 yards and two scores while rushing 10 times for 65 yards and two other touchdowns. Missouri kicker Blake Craig also suffered a torn ACL in the opener and is out for the season. That could matter at some point over the course of the season as the Tigers go for their third straight 10-win season. The only matchup between ranked teams this weekend could have far-reaching postseason effects at the end of the season. Both the Wolverines and Sooners harbor playoff hopes, and it's especially hard to see Oklahoma making a playoff push with a loss on Saturday given its ridiculously tough SEC schedule. Freshman Bryce Underwood was 21-of-31 passing for 251 yards and a TD against New Mexico in Week 1. And that performance would have been the best of the 2024 season — by far — for any Michigan QB. A season ago, Michigan threw for over 200 yards in a game just twice. Davis Warren had 204 yards passing against Texas and Jack Tuttle had 208 yards passing against Illinois. Both of those games were losses. It's safe to say the ceiling is much higher for Michigan in 2025 with Underwood at QB. Oklahoma also brought in a new QB to improve upon the porous play the Sooners got from the position in 2024. John Mateer followed offensive coordinator Ben Arbuckle to Norman after leading the country in total touchdowns a season ago and had over 400 total yards and four touchdowns against Illinois State. We don't need to tell you that Michigan will be a much tougher test for the revamped Oklahoma offense than Illinois State. James Madison at Louisville (-13.5), 7 p.m. Friday (ESPN):The Dukes may need to win this game to have any shot of being a Group of Six contender for the College Football Playoff. Louisville, meanwhile, should be one of the best teams in an ACC that looks even more crowded with a potential resurgence of Florida State. Baylor at SMU (-2.5), Noon (CW):How will the Bears bounce back after a Week 1 home loss to Auburn? The line here is a little more tilted toward Baylor than you'd initially think given what SMU brings back from its College Football Playoff team. Virginia at NC State (-2.5), Noon (ESPN2):Virginia had a strong showing in Week 1 with a 48-7 home win over Coastal Carolina. NC State, meanwhile, needed a late stop to secure a 24-17 home win over East Carolina. Virginia QB Chandler Morris is set to start for the Cavaliers after he left the game against the Chanticleers in the third quarter due to a helmet-to-helmet hit. Oklahoma State at Oregon (-28.5), 3:30 p.m. (CBS):Yeah, this is a four-touchdown spread. It's probably not going to be close. But you may want to tune in for the postgame handshake after the expectation-setting Mike Gundy put out into the world regarding the disparity in NIL budgets between the programs. Oklahoma State will start Zane Flores at QB after Hauss Hejny suffered a foot injury in Week 1. South Florida at Florida (-17.5), 4:15 p.m. (SEC Network):A close game will go a long way for the Bulls to show that their Week 1 win over Boise State wasn't a fluke. Florida, meanwhile, needs to not look past South Florida to a Week 3 showdown with LSU. Arizona State (-6.5) at Mississippi State, 7:30 p.m. (ESPN2):The defending Big 12 champions are favored by less than a touchdown against the worst team in the SEC in 2024. A win against ASU would equal a 2-0 start for a Bulldogs team that was 2-10 a season ago. UCLA (-2.5) at UNLV, 8 p.m. (CBS Sports Network):UCLA was steamrolled by Utah in Week 1. The Rebels, meanwhile, got pushed around in Week Zero by Idaho State and beat Sam Houston in Week 1. If UNLV can move to 3-0, it could be the start of a long season for the Bruins.

What to watch: College football Week 2 viewer's guide

What to watch: College football Week 2 viewer's guide The Week 2 schedule looks a lot different than Week 1's slate did. We won'...
Bill Belichick bans Patriots scouts from attending UNC practicesNew Foto - Bill Belichick bans Patriots scouts from attending UNC practices

One of the greatestNFLhead coaches of all time is also being petty. North Carolina head football coachBill Belichickhas banned New England Patriots scouts from attendingTar Heelspractices, a person with direct knowledge of the situation confirmed to USA TODAY Sports. The person spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter. Podcaster John Middlekauff was first to report the story. The banned access message was sent by North Carolina football general manager Mike Lombardi. The Patriots and Belichick "mutually" parted ways after the 2023 season. Belichick won six Super Bowl titles during his 24 seasons in New England, but the franchise saw a steep decline during his final two years – finishing below .500 in each of his last two seasons. North Carolina hired Belichick to become the school's head coach in December of 2024. North Carolina head coach Bill Belichick stares from the sideline after his Tar Heels' debut ended in a 48-14 defeat to the TCU Horned Frogs. Belichick's time in Chapel Hill has gotten off to a rocky start. The Tar Heels were trounced by TCU 48-14 in their nationally televised season opener at home with the likes of Michael Jordan and Lawrence Taylor in attendance. There was a noticeable discrepancy in talent between the two college football programs. And now, at least Patriots scouts, aren't permitted to view North Carolina's players who are attempting to play in the NFL. Follow USA TODAY Sports' Tyler Dragon on X@TheTylerDragon. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Bill Belichick bans Patriots scouts from attending UNC practices

Bill Belichick bans Patriots scouts from attending UNC practices

Bill Belichick bans Patriots scouts from attending UNC practices One of the greatestNFLhead coaches of all time is also being petty. North C...
Justice Department opens criminal investigation into Fed Governor Lisa Cook: SourcesNew Foto - Justice Department opens criminal investigation into Fed Governor Lisa Cook: Sources

The Department of Justice has opened a criminal investigation into Federal Reserve GovernorLisa Cook, sources familiar with the matter said Thursday. Bill Pulte, the Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, sent the Department of Justice two criminal referral letters about Cook last month regarding Cook's properties in Georgia and Michigan. Federal investigators have begun issuing subpoenas and are utilizing grand juries in both states as part of their investigation, the sources said. MORE: Here's a list of the individuals, including Lisa Cook, targeted so far by the Trump administration TheWall Street Journalfirst reported the existence of the criminal investigation. As President Donald Trump seeks to reshape the balance of the Federal Reserve central banking system, Pulte's allegations have become the basis of Trump'seffort to terminate Cook"for cause" -- a controversial and legally fraught move that is actively being challenged in court. In anAug. 15 letterto Attorney General Pam Bondi and Special Attorney for Mortgage Fraud Ed Martin, Pulte alleged that Cook "falsified bank documents and property records to acquire more favorable loan terms, potentially committing mortgage fraud under the criminal statute." Pulte has claimed that the referral was based on publicly available information but has declined to comment about the tip that prompted his investigation. The first referral focused on Cook's properties in Georgia and Michigan. Reached for comment regarding the DOJ probe, attorneys for Cook said in a statement, "Predictably and recognizing the flaws in challenging their illegal firing of Governor Cook, the administration is scrambling to invent new justifications for its overreach." "This Justice Department -- perhaps the most politicized in American history -- will do whatever President Trump demands. He wants cover, and they are providing it," said attorney Abbe Lowell. "The questions over how Governor Cook described her properties from time to time, which we have started to address in the pending case and will continue to do so, are not fraud, but it takes nothing for this DOJ to undertake a new politicized investigation, and they appear to have just done it again." Following the Aug. 15 referral, Martin sent a letter to Federal Reserve Chairman Jermone Powell encouraging him to fire Cook because of the ongoing investigation. "At this time, I encourage you to remove Ms. Cook from your Board. Do it today before it is too late! After all, no American thinks it is appropriate that she serve during this time with a cloud hanging over her," Martin wrote. Days later, Trump attempted to fire Cook based on the allegations that she designated both her homes in Georgia and Michigan as her primary residence. Cook has denied wrongdoing, said she would continue to serve in her role, andsued to challenge Trump's attemptto remove her. "President Trump has no authority to remove Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook. His attempt to fire her, based solely on a referral letter, lacks any factual or legal basis. We will be filing a lawsuit challenging this illegal action," said Lowell. MORE: Fed Governor Lisa Cook sues Trump over attempted ouster Later that month, on Aug. 28, Pulte sent asecond referral letterto the Department of Justice, alleging that Cook had made "multiple false representations" while serving as a Federal Reserve governor, including listing an apartment in Massachusetts as both an investment property and a second home. In the following days, Pulte has made multiple comments on social media accusing Cook of crimes and calling for her prosecution, unusual steps during an ongoing investigation before any formal determinations of wrongdoing. "The damage currently being done to the integrity of the Federal Reserve, by Lisa Cook and Jerome Powell, cannot be overstated," he wrote inone post. On Thursday, Pulte originally planned to hold a press conference in front of the Elijah Barrett Prettyman U.S. Courthouse in Washington, D.C. where he said he would share new information about Cook. He later canceled the press conference, writing on social media, "Out of respect for the process, I will be delaying this press conference."

Justice Department opens criminal investigation into Fed Governor Lisa Cook: Sources

Justice Department opens criminal investigation into Fed Governor Lisa Cook: Sources The Department of Justice has opened a criminal investi...

 

MARIO VOUX © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com