NYC Mayor Eric Adams insists he isn't ending his reelection campaignNew Foto - NYC Mayor Eric Adams insists he isn't ending his reelection campaign

NEW YORK (AP) — New York City Mayor Eric Adams insisted Wednesday that he isn't droppinghis reelection campaignafter reports he had been approached about potentially taking a job with the federal government. Trump administration intermediaries recently reached out to people close to Adams, a Democrat, to discuss whether he would be open to abandoning his reelection campaign to take a federal job, according to a person familiar with those conversations. The person spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because of the private nature of those conversations. It was unclear how far those talks progressed, but as media reports about them multiplied, Adams insisted in interviews and through a spokesperson that he had no intention of dropping out of the contest againstDemocratic nominee Zohran Mamdani, former Gov. Andrew Cuomo and Republican candidate Curtis Sliwa. "Mayor Adams has not met withDonald Trump— don't believe the noise. He is not dropping out of the race," said his campaign spokesperson, Todd Shapiro. After Mamdani romped in the Democratic primary, which Adams had skipped, some pundits suggested that the 33-year-old democratic socialist might be unbeatable in the general election unless either Cuomo or Adams dropped out. During a series of television interviews where he had intended to talk about his efforts to fight crime in the city, Adams battled back against the idea that he might leave the race. "If there's any changes in this race, I will announce that," Adams told Fox 5. "Right now, we're moving straight ahead to do — No. 1, serve this city as we're currently doing, doing a darn good job. And we're looking forward to reelection." After spending Tuesday in Florida after his 65th birthday, Adams was asked whether he met with anyone from the Trump administration while there. The mayor would only say that he "met with several political figures," including Miami's Republican mayor. "I met with several political figures in Florida," he told PIX11, saying the trip was to "deal with some personal issues." Adams, in that interview, pushed back against questions about whether he would exit the contest but added: "I've never had a problem finding jobs as I transition." Later Wednesday, Adams reiterated at an unrelated news conference that he's still running for reelection and didn't go to Florida to "seek a job," adding that he often receives job offers from boards, educational institutions and others who have been impressed with what he's done with the city. The White House did not immediately respond to a message seeking comment Wednesday night. Mamdani held a news conference in Manhattan on Wednesday, calling the reports "an affront to democracy." "We know that this city will decide its own future. And we know that it is New Yorkers that we will turn to to make that decision in November, not the White House in Washington, D.C.," he said. Adams had previously quit the Democratic primary after he was charged in a federal corruption case. The Trump administrationsuccessfully movedto drop the case so the mayor could better assist with the president'simmigrationagenda, which freed Adams up to run as an independent in the general election, but has not helped his image in the overwhelmingly Democratic city. A spokesperson for Cuomo, who is now running as an independent candidate, did not immediately return a request for comment. ___ Associated Press writer Michelle L. Price in Washington contributed.

NYC Mayor Eric Adams insists he isn't ending his reelection campaign

NYC Mayor Eric Adams insists he isn't ending his reelection campaign NEW YORK (AP) — New York City Mayor Eric Adams insisted Wednesday t...
These states are dumping RFK's CDC with a new vaccine allianceNew Foto - These states are dumping RFK's CDC with a new vaccine alliance

Responding to thefederal government's shifting guidanceonvaccinesand turmoilat the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, health officials in California, Oregon and Washington state have formed a new West Coast Health Alliance. The alliance's goal is to "ensure residents remain protected by science, not politics," according toa joint announcementon Sept. 3 from CaliforniaGov. Gavin Newsom, Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek and Washington Gov. Bob Ferguson. The three Democratic governors said the alliance will provide recommendations to residents on immunizations and ensure the public gets credible information on vaccine safety and efficacy. The governors calledthe alliance a unified response to what they called the Trump administration's "destruction" of the CDC, the federal agency responsible forvaccine guidance. "President Trump's mass firing of CDC doctors and scientists – and his blatant politicization of the agency – is a direct assault on the health and safety of the American people," the governors said in a statement. "The CDC has become a political tool that increasingly peddles ideology instead of science, ideology that will lead to severe health consequences. California, Oregon, and Washington will not allow the people of our states to be put at risk." The announcement came the same day that a group of more than 1,000 current and former Department of Health and Human Services employeesreleased a letterdemanding that SecretaryRobert F. Kennedy Jr.resign. The Sept. 3 letter, addressed to Kennedy and Congress, said Kennedy "continues to endanger the nation's health." Kennedy's HHS has been the subject of several controversies, including thecuts to funding of mRNA vaccine developmentand an apparent conflict that led to the White House's firing ofCDC Director Susan Monarez. Kennedy is a longtime vaccine skeptic and has spreadconspiracy theories and misinformationabout vaccines, childhood diseases and COVID-19. Meanwhile, PresidentDonald Trump, in a Sept. 1Truth Social post, demanded drug companies"justify their success" in combating the COVID-19 virus, requesting theimmediate release of internal company data. "Many people think they are a miracle that saved Millions of lives. Others disagree!" said Trump about COVID-19 vaccines created by Pfizer, Moderna and other drug companies. "With CDC being ripped apart over this question, I want the answer, and I want it NOW." Letter urges RFK Jr. leave post:More than 1,000 HHS workers demand RFK Jr. resigns Health officials from Massachusetts, Maine, Vermont, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania reportedly met in August to discuss coordinating their own vaccine recommendations separate from the federal government. However, it's not the first time California, Oregon, and Washington have teamed up on health-related issues. At the height of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, the three states formed the"Western States Pact"to review federal vaccine recommendations and coordinate pandemic restrictions. Two more states, Colorado and Nevada, later joined the pact. California, Oregon, and Washington became the final three states in America to lift their mask mandates. As part of the West Coast Health Alliance, the three states said they will coordinate health guidelines by aligning immunization recommendations informed by respected national medical organizations. "This will allow residents to receive consistent, science-based recommendations they can rely on – regardless of shifting federal actions," they said. Accessing a COVID-19 vaccine:RFK Jr., the CDC and confusing vaccine recommendations. What to know right now. In June, Kennedyfired all 17 membersof the CDC advisory panel that makes recommendations about who should receive vaccinations, replacing many of them with so-called vaccine skeptics. Newsom, Kotek and Fergusoncondemnedthat move. On Aug. 27, the Food and Drug Administrationset stricter guidelinesabout who can receive the latest COVID-19 vaccines, recommending the shots to only people over the age of 65 or those with existing health problems. Previously, nearly everyone 6 months and older could get vaccinated. These changescould hinder access to vaccines, as health insurers typically only cover vaccines that are recommended by the CDC. "When federal agencies abandon evidence-based recommendations in favor of ideology, we cannot continue down that same path," Washington State Secretary of HealthDennis Worshamsaid in a statement. "Our commitment is to the health and safety of our communities, protecting lives through prevention, and not yielding to unsubstantiated theories that dismiss decades of proven public health practice." Public health agency in turmoil:There's a major CDC shakeup underway. What's going on? The alliance added they will "finalize shared principles to strengthen public confidence in vaccines and in public health" in the coming weeks, they said. "Together, our states depend on the best science and knowledge available to protect public health, including scientific information about immunizations," Newsom said in a statement. "We have grave concerns about the integrity and transparency of upcoming federal vaccine recommendations and will continue to collaborate to ensure that science and sound medicine prevail to prevent any loss of life." This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Three states ditch RFK's CDC with new vaccine alliance

These states are dumping RFK's CDC with a new vaccine alliance

These states are dumping RFK's CDC with a new vaccine alliance Responding to thefederal government's shifting guidanceonvaccinesand ...
Anthony Rizzo's World Series Ring Was Lost in Lake Michigan — Until a Swimmer Somehow Found ItNew Foto - Anthony Rizzo's World Series Ring Was Lost in Lake Michigan — Until a Swimmer Somehow Found It

Jennifer Stewart/MLB Photos via Getty; Dennis Wierzbicki-USA TODAY Sports Anthony Rizzo reportedly dropped his World Series ring in Lake Michigan and it was retreived by a professional diver who found it at the bottom The MLB star was awarded the ring after his former team, the Chicago Cubs, won the 2016 World Series over the Cleveland Guardians Rizzo, who last played professionally with the New York Yankees in the 2024 MLB season, has yet to comment on the ring incident Anthony Rizzodropped the ball (ehem, ring). The baseball star, 36, allegedly lost his World Series ring in Lake Michigan before it was ultimately retrieved by professional diver Yohei Yamada, who recalled the incident when speaking withBlock Club Chicago. According to Yamada, the first baseman — who was playing for the Chicago Cubs when they won the World Series in 2016 — accidentally lost his ring in the Great Lake because it didn't fit him anymore. "Rizzo had lost weight and washed his hands in his boat. He shook them dry, and the ring flew off," Yamada told the outlet during the interview published on Tuesday, Sept. 2. Dennis Wierzbicki-USA TODAY Sports Then, Yamada said that "somebody gave him my number" and the diver — who built a living on reuniting boaters with valuables that they've dropped into Lake Michigan — got to work. "Rings are the hardest to find, but the phones are everywhere," he shared, adding, "They work after three days in the water, so it's worth it. … If I'm already suited up, I'll go get it for $100." Per the outlet, Rizzo reportedly gave Yamada "a few dry $100 bills" as a generous tip for retrieving the valuable from the bottom of the lake. Gregory Shamus/Getty The MLB star has yet to comment on the World Series ring incident at Lake Michigan. Rizzo is currently a free agent, and last played for the New York Yankees during the 2024 season. In January, the baseball player announced that he and his wife, Emily, areexpecting their first babytogether. They shared the exciting news onInstagramwith the help of their dog. "Kev dog is gonna be a big brother!!!!" he captioned his post, tagging the pup in the post and added a series of blue heart emojis. Anthony Rizzo Instagram His then-Yankees teammate, slugger Aaron Judge, commented on the post, writing, "Let's goo." Yankees outfielder Alex Verdugo also sent his well wishes, adding, "Dad Gang!!!🔥🔥." While there's no official announcement on Rizzo's Instagram page of their baby's arrival, the athlete posted acarousel of imagesin late August featuring two two pictures of what appears to be their latest addition to their family. "A balancing act," he simply captioned the post. Read the original article onPeople

Anthony Rizzo's World Series Ring Was Lost in Lake Michigan — Until a Swimmer Somehow Found It

Anthony Rizzo's World Series Ring Was Lost in Lake Michigan — Until a Swimmer Somehow Found It Jennifer Stewart/MLB Photos via Getty; De...
Amanda Anisimova upsets Iga Swiatek at the U.S. Open after 6-0, 6-0 loss to her in Wimbledon's finalNew Foto - Amanda Anisimova upsets Iga Swiatek at the U.S. Open after 6-0, 6-0 loss to her in Wimbledon's final

NEW YORK (AP) —Amanda Anisimovaupset Iga Swiatek 6-4, 6-3 in theU.S. Openquarterfinals Wednesday, less than two months after losing to the six-time Grand Slam champion in the Wimbledon final bya 6-0, 6-0 score. The No. 8-seeded Anisimova reached her third major semifinal and first at Flushing Meadows. "To come back from Wimbledon like that is really special to me," said Anisimova, a 24-year-old who was born in New Jersey and grew up in Florida. "I feel like I worked so hard to try and turn around from that. ... Today is really special." The powerful strokes and poise she displayed in Arthur Ashe Stadium againstNo. 2 Swiatek— the 2022 U.S. Open champion — were such a striking contrast to what happened at the All England Club's Centre Court on July 12. That title match lasted just 57 minutes, and Anisimova only managed to win 24 points that day, a total she eclipsed about midway through the first set this time. "Everybody knows how Amanda can play. Yeah, she didn't play well in Wimbledon," said Swiatek, a 24-year-old from Poland, "but it's not like she's always going to do the same mistakes or feel the same." Anisimova cried during her runner-up speech during the trophy ceremony at Wimbledon; on Wednesday, she was all smiles while addressing thousands of supportive spectators who kept interrupting her on-court interview with cheers. "Playing here is so freaking special," Anisimova told them, "and I've been having the run of my life here." On Thursday, Anisimova will try to reach a second consecutive major final. She'll face four-time Grand Slam champion Naomi Osaka — who eliminated Coco Gauff on Monday — after the No. 23 seed beat No. 11 Karolina Muchova 6-4, 7-6 (3). After one game against Swiatek in the quarterfinals Wednesday, Anisimova might have been forgiven for thinking, "Oh, no. Not this again." That's because Anisimova served first and got broken immediately when she lost three points in a row by missing forehands — one into the net, one wide, one long. But Anisimova broke right back and soon was the one dictating points with her strong, flat groundstrokes that wound up contributing to 23 total winners, 10 more than Swiatek accumulated. Anisimova also played quite cleanly, making just 12 unforced errors. "She moved better, she played better," Swiatek said, comparing this match to the one at Wimbledon. "Everything was different." Swiatek's serve was problematic: She only put in 50% of her first serves and was broken four times. "I couldn't win today's match playing like that, serving like that," Swiatek said, "and with Amanda being so aggressive on the returns." In the second set, Anisimova fell behind early again, this time 2-0. But she again regrouped and quickly gained the upper hand. Swiatek was the one looking increasingly frustrated, shaking her head or slumping her shoulders between points, spreading her arms wide and looking to her coach for advice, and leaning back in her changeover chair as if pondering what, exactly, she could do differently. When Swiatek double-faulted to trail 5-3 in the second set, that allowed Anisimova to serve out the victory. "From the get-go, I was trying to fire myself up," Anisimova said. "She is one of the toughest players I've ever played. I knew I was going to have to dig deep." ___ More AP tennis:https://apnews.com/hub/tennis

Amanda Anisimova upsets Iga Swiatek at the U.S. Open after 6-0, 6-0 loss to her in Wimbledon's final

Amanda Anisimova upsets Iga Swiatek at the U.S. Open after 6-0, 6-0 loss to her in Wimbledon's final NEW YORK (AP) —Amanda Anisimovaupse...
President Trump says he may send National Guard to New Orleans next instead of ChicagoNew Foto - President Trump says he may send National Guard to New Orleans next instead of Chicago

WASHINGTON –President Donald Trumpsuggested he may send National Guard troops next to New Orleans ‒ not Chicago, as he has repeatedly threatened ‒ as he looks to expand his crime crackdown to states where federal intervention is welcome. One day after he declared,"We're going in" about plans for Chicago,Trump on Sept. 3 said his administration still hadn't decided whether it would deploy troops to the nation's third-largest city. Trump instead pointed to New Orleans, a city in a Republican-led state, in contrast to Democratic-led Illinois. "We're making a determination now," Trump said in the Oval Office to reporters. "Do we go to Chicago or do we go to a place like New Orleans, where we have a great governor, Jeff Landry, who wants us to straighten out a very nice section of this country that's become quite, you know, quite tough, quite bad?" "So, we're going to be going to maybe Louisiana," Trump added. More:Trump says federal troops are headed to Chicago. 'We're going in.' Trump emphasized that he wants Democratic Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker to request help from the Trump administration to combat Chicago's crime. "We could straighten out Chicago. All they have to do is ask us," Trump said. Pritzker, however, has resisted Trump's threats to send the National Guard to Chicago, accusing the president ofnot being serious about fighting crime but rather "testing his power." "I want to go into Chicago, and I have this incompetent governor who doesn't want us," Trump said. Trump is more thanthree weeks into his crime crackdown in Washington, DC, which has involved deploying more than 2,200 National Guard troops to patrol the streets. But unlike other American cities, DC's status as a federal enclave gives Trump special authority to deploy National Guard troops to the nation's capital, in contrast to governors traditionally overseeing mobilizations in their states. More:'None of this is about fighting crime': Illinois responds to Trump's troop plans Trump signed an executive order on Aug. 11directing Defense SecretaryPete Hegsethto "coordinate with state governors" to determine whether National Guard troops are needed in their communities. While both Chicago and New Orleans have Democratic mayors ‒ Brandon Johnson and LaToya Cantrell, respectively ‒ Louisiana presents an opportunity for cooperation with the state's governor, Republican Jeff Landry, while Chicago does not. "We will take President@realDonaldTrump's help from New Orleans to Shreveport!"Landry said in a poston X shortly after Trump's remarks. Both Chicago and New Orleans have well-documented struggles with crime. New Orleans has the third-highest homicide rate in 2025, while Chicago ranks 10th, according to a listcompiled from the nonprofit Freedom for All Americansbased on local data. DC ranks 19th on the same list. Trump has also discussed targeting Baltimore, Los Angeles, Oakland, California and New York City in future crackdowns. Yet the president, in his Sept. 3 remarks, signaled he may not deploy the National Guard to these cities unless he is asked. "The politicians are not in tune with the people. The people in Chicago, the people in Baltimore, the people in all the places we talk about, they want to see us there," Trump said, but added, "I think we are pretty much waiting until we are asked." His comments marked a shift in rhetoric from one day earlier, on Sept. 2, when Trump claimed that he planned to send troops into Chicago whether or not they asked for help. "If the governor of Illinois would call me up, I would love to do it," Trump said 24 hours earlier. "Now, we're going to do it anyway. We have the right to do it because I have an obligation to protect this country." More:Judge blocks Trump deployment of National Guard in California A federal judge in Californiaruled on Sept. 2 that Trump's deploymentof National Guard troops this year in Los Angeles in response to protests was illegal because it violated a federal law prohibiting the use of the military to enforce domestic laws. However, the narrow ruling does not require Trump to withdraw the remaining 300 National Guard troops from Los Angeles, nor does it apply to other states. Memphis, St. Louis, Kansas City and Cleveland are other cities that ‒ like New Orleans ‒ rank among the top 10 in homicide rates and are in states with Republican governors. Trump, however, has not cited them as potential targets. Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee, a Republican ally of Trump, told reporters last week he hadn'tplanned to ask for federal troops for Memphis. "We have no plans to put the National Guard there now," Lee said. Reach Joey Garrison on X @joeygarrison. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Trump says he may send National Guard to New Orleans over Chicago

President Trump says he may send National Guard to New Orleans next instead of Chicago

President Trump says he may send National Guard to New Orleans next instead of Chicago WASHINGTON –President Donald Trumpsuggested he may se...
Left and right are joining forces to ban lawmakers from trading stockNew Foto - Left and right are joining forces to ban lawmakers from trading stock

WASHINGTON (AP) — An unusual alliance emerged in theHouseon Wednesday as lawmakers who agree on little else rallied support for a bill that would prohibit members of Congress and their families from owning and trading individual stocks. The group included darlings of the far right, the left, moderates and many in between. They gathered to promote a ban that polls well with voters and appears to be finding new momentum after stalling out in previous sessions of Congress. "It's not every day you see this cast of characters up here," saidRep. Brian Fitzpatrick, a moderate Republican who represents a perennial swing district in Pennsylvania. "You're all smirking out there. That's a good thing. It speaks to the power of this cause." Congress has discussed proposals for years to keep lawmakers from engaging in trading individual stocks, nodding to the idea that there's a potential conflict of interest when they are often privy to information and decisions that can dramatically move markets. A Senate committee has approved legislation fromGOP Sen. Josh Hawley of Missourithat would also extend the prohibition on stock trading to future presidents and vice presidents — while notably exempting Republican PresidentDonald Trump. The House bill unveiled this week is limited to Congress, but the sponsors said they were open to extending it to the executive branch if enough support emerged. Under current law, federal lawmakers are required to disclose their stock sales and purchases. The bill requiring disclosure, The Stock Act, was signed into law in 2012. At the time, lawmakers and government watchdogs predicted that public disclosure would shame lawmakers out of actively buying and selling stock. That hasn't happened. The sponsors said they merged their own, individual bills on banning stocks and came together with a single bipartisan effort. Rep.Chip Royof Texas, the bill's lead sponsor, said the group had been meeting for the last several months, and some sponsors had actually been working on this for years. About a dozen lawmakers from both parties joined Roy onstage. It was an unusually festive moment as the partisan lines in Congress have rarely been sharper. "I don't agree with some of these people on anything," said Rep.Tim Burchett, a Tennessee Republican often aligned with the the ultra-conservative House Freedom Caucus. Progressive Rep.Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., followed Burchett to the podium and fist-bumped him when doing so. She said she felt like the coalition showed how Congress should actually work. "It feels foreign and it feels alien and it's like, what's going on here?" she said. While the legislation would not allow lawmakers to own individual stocks and bonds, they would be allowed to own diversified mutual funds and ETFs and certain commodities. Lawmakers who currently own individual stocks and bonds would have 180 days to divest. New members would have 90 days to divest upon taking office. The mood was celebratory at Wednesday's unveiling, but even if the bill were to pass the House, it would face a more difficult climb in the Senate. At least 60 votes would be needed to advance the legislation in that chamber and some senators have expressed concerns about the concept. Rep. Seth Magaziner, D-R.I., acknowledged that members opposed to banning stocks are "persistent." "Those of us who support banning stock trading in Congress are very vocal in our position, but that doesn't mean that there aren't opponents," Magaziner said. Some members expressed urgency in moving the bill through the House. Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., said they have "asked nicely for leadership to put this on the floor" and set a deadline for the end of the month before she would seek to force a vote. A version of the trading ban that advanced out of one Senate panel was described by Republican Sen.Ron Johnsonof Wisconsin as "legislative demagoguery." "We do have insider trading laws. We have financial disclosure. Trust me, we have financial disclosure," Johnson said. "So I don't see the necessity of this."

Left and right are joining forces to ban lawmakers from trading stock

Left and right are joining forces to ban lawmakers from trading stock WASHINGTON (AP) — An unusual alliance emerged in theHouseon Wednesday ...
The biggest storylines to watch this NFL seasonNew Foto - The biggest storylines to watch this NFL season

The 2025 NFL season is finally here, and as always there is no shortage of storylines to watch. Can the Philadelphia Eagles repeat as Super Bowl champions or is this finally the year Lamar Jackson or Josh Allen take their teams all the way? What impact will Micah Parsons have on the Green Bay Packers' chances? Could Aaron Rodgers actually be a difference-maker for the Pittsburgh Steelers? All of that will soon be answered. Here's how NBC News' sports staff sees the season playing out. Greif: Remember the San Francisco 49ers? They went from a trendy pick to make their second consecutive Super Bowl last season to a 6-11 record while being devastated by injuries to starters such as running back Christian McCaffrey, key offensive lineman Trent Williams and nearly everyone capable of catching passes. The reason to believe San Francisco has a chance as a contender, even in a conference boasting the defending champion Eagles, rests on the fact that the team is healthier now and that key players aren't the only familiar faces returning. Robert Salah, who was the defensive coordinator during San Francisco's run to the Super Bowl in 2020, is back to man his previous post. San Francisco will also play what is projected to be one of the league's easiest schedules. That doesn't mean the 49ers' roster is back to where it was during their trips to multiple Super Bowls. To pay quarterback Brock Purdy $181 million guaranteed as part of an extension that could reach $265 million, they had to prune the rest of their depth chart. Deebo Samuel, once a top playmaker, is gone, as are key defenders Dre Greenlaw and Talanoa Hufanga. Nadkarni:The Las Vegas Raiders underwent a significant makeover this offseason, and it was a much-needed one for a team that's made the playoffs only once in the last eight seasons. Former Super Bowl champ Pete Carroll is now the head coach, and Geno Smith should provide both a major upgrade and stability at quarterback. That could very well be enough for the Raiders to go from 4-13 to a postseason appearance. Carroll made the playoffs in his first season with both the New England Patriots and the Seattle Seahawks, and at 73 he is one of the most experienced football minds in the world. Combining his exuberance with Smith's competence, Las Vegas is in line for a serious turnaround. While the Raiders may not be Super Bowl material — and will have to contend with playing in a stacked division — the new faces should bring a much more professional approach to Sun City. Nadkarni:Though they have an incredible coaching staff and elite talent at important positions, it's hard for me to see the Minnesota Vikings having another season close to 14 wins. The Vikings will be turning over quarterback duties to J.J. McCarthy, their first-round pick in 2024 who missed his rookie campaign because of injury. Head coach Kevin O'Connell has proved he can make the most with seemingly any signal caller. But McCarthy is both unproven and inexperienced, which is a tough combination for a player who is stepping into a situation in which the expectations will be very high. McCarthy could be very good and Minnesota would still have a tough time winning 14 games again. Combining the uncertainty at quarterback with the gauntlet that is the NFC North, the Vikings seem due to fall back on some level. Greif: Kansas City. Picking the Chiefs is an invitation to end up with proverbial egg on one's face. I don't feel great about doing this. But after they went 9-0 in one-score games in 2023 and 10-0 last season, I'm betting against their one-score mastery being so sustainable again in 2025. This isn't a prediction they will miss the playoffs; even in a division filled with accomplished coaches in Jim Harbaugh, Pete Carroll and Sean Payton, Kansas City can still win the AFC West if it can manage without receiver Rashee Rice as he serves his six-game suspension to begin the season. My concern is more about how the Chiefs will stack up against the top of the AFC. With Baltimore and Buffalo finally trying to prove this can be their year to make the Super Bowl, we shouldn't pencil in Kansas City just yet. Greif: I'm not picking Micah Parsons in Green Bay or Aaron Rodgers in Pittsburgh because they're obvious, just as I'm not going with the one-man, two-way threat in Jacksonville's Travis Hunter because he's a rookie. For this exercise, I'm watching Mekhi Becton with the Los Angeles Chargers. If the Chargers are ever going to contend, they will need to protect quarterback Justin Herbert and develop a running game that's better than the one a season ago, which ranked in the NFL's bottom 10 in yards per carry. The massive Becton, who is back after missing several weeks of training camp, is vital to both, and even more so since key offensive lineman Rashawn Slater suffered a season-ending injury during the preseason. Nadkarni:If we're talking strictly football and not podcasts, I have to admit I'm interested to see what we get from Aaron Rodgers this season. Has Rodgers really lost what made him great? Or did he just need to get away from the stink of the New York Jets? Rodgers will have both an elite wide receiver (D.K. Metcalf) and one of the league's most respected coaches (Mike Tomlin) with the Steelers this year, which should take a little weight off his shoulders. Also, with Rodgers basically admitting this upcoming season will be his last ride, I imagine he will do everything in his power to avoid going out with a whimper. And frankly, even if time has caught up to Rodgers and this turns out to be a disaster, at the very least, whatever happens in Pittsburgh will be fascinating to watch. Greif: Ravens over Packers Lamar Jackson gets over the hump with Baltimore, which gets to the Super Bowl by beating Buffalo for the AFC title. With Jordan Love healthy all season and a pass rush energized by Micah Parsons, Green Bay takes over the NFC North and beats Philadelphia in the NFC championship game. Nadkarni: Lions over Bills Perhaps it's the romantic in me, but I think we get a matchup of two long-suffering fan bases in the Super Bowl. The Lions and the Bills have both been two of the better teams in the NFL of late, yet neither has made it to the championship round. Their multiple years of success are impressive in their own way, even if the finishes have ultimately come up short. Detroit is still one of the better teams in a relatively open NFC, and Buffalo was literally inches from finally knocking off the Chiefs last season. This is the year both franchises finally exorcise their demons and break through. Only one can win, though, and I believe Dan Campbell's gambling ways would pay off richly on the game's biggest stage.

The biggest storylines to watch this NFL season

The biggest storylines to watch this NFL season The 2025 NFL season is finally here, and as always there is no shortage of storylines to wat...

 

MARIO VOUX © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com