FSU freshman linebacker Ethan Pritchard is in intensive care after shooting, school saysNew Foto - FSU freshman linebacker Ethan Pritchard is in intensive care after shooting, school says

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (AP) — A Florida State linebacker is in critical but stable condition after being shot while visiting family, the Seminoles said Monday. Ethan Pritchard, a 6-foot-2, 224-pound freshman from Sanford, was in intensive care at a Tallahassee-area hospital. He was shot Sunday evening while inside a vehicle outside apartments in Havana, according to the Gadsden County Sheriff's Office. "The Pritchard family is thankful for the support from so many people, as well as the care from first responders and medical professionals, and asks that their privacy be respected at this time," FSU said in a statement. "Further updates will be provided as they are available." Pritchard did not play in Florida State's season opener, a31-17 victory Saturday over No. 8 Alabamain Tallahassee. "Thoughts and prayers with Ethan Pritchard and his family," FSU coach Mike Norvell said Monday. "Obviously an extremely tragic event for the young man. I got a chance to be there last night with him, his dad and family. Grateful for all of the medical support that he was able to receive. Our football team, coaches, family were all there to support him. "We're praying for all parts of him and the journey that's ahead. Definitely appreciate the support from the community that we feel." ___ Get poll alerts and updates on the AP Top 25 throughout the season. Sign uphere. AP college football:https://apnews.com/hub/ap-top-25-college-football-pollandhttps://apnews.com/hub/college-football

FSU freshman linebacker Ethan Pritchard is in intensive care after shooting, school says

FSU freshman linebacker Ethan Pritchard is in intensive care after shooting, school says TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (AP) — A Florida State linebacker...
Dolphins' Tyreek Hill not among team captainsNew Foto - Dolphins' Tyreek Hill not among team captains

Miami Dolphins players decided to strip the captain's patch off the chest of teammate Tyreek Hill. The Dolphins announced their 2025 team captains on Monday, and for the first time since 2022, the five-time All-Pro wide receiver is not among them. Hill, a controversial figure throughout his career, created a stir at the end of the 2024 season when he removed himself from a loss to the New York Jets in the season finale. He also suggested he wanted out of Miami, though he walked back those comments with an apology later. The Dolphins players voted to return quarterback Tua Tagovailoa, fullback Alec Ingold and defensive tackle Zach Sieler as captains. Joining them are center Aaron Brewer as well as linebackers Jordyn Brooks and Bradley Chubb. "We were focused on giving the keys to captaincy to guys that had earned it each and every day," head coach Mike McDaniel said, per ESPN. "That's what speaks to me the most is a football team that knows who it wants to be led by." Hill, 31, spent the first six seasons of his career with the Kansas City Chiefs. In 141 career games (123 starts), he has 798 receptions for 11,098 yards with 82 touchdowns. He has caught more than 1,100 yards six times, including an NFL leading 1,799 yards in 2023. --Field Level Media

Dolphins' Tyreek Hill not among team captains

Dolphins' Tyreek Hill not among team captains Miami Dolphins players decided to strip the captain's patch off the chest of teammate ...
From Jackson to McKinley: What Trump's shift of presidential hero says about his evolving goalsNew Foto - From Jackson to McKinley: What Trump's shift of presidential hero says about his evolving goals

WASHINGTON (AP) — In his first term,Donald Trump'sfavorite president, other than himself, wasAndrew Jackson, the hatchet-faced, self-made populist who relished turning Washington upside down. Now he's partial to the barrel-chested, unfailingly politeWilliam McKinley, a champion of American expansionism as well as oftariffs,Donald Trump's favorite second-term policy. Trump's shift, rather than merely swapping one infatuation for another, demonstrates how his mindset and priorities have evolved. The Republican president's admiration for McKinley fits with his current politics, which are different from when Trump first took office in 2017. A key political target for Trump back then was the elites, which his administration predicted might crumble in the face of a Jackson-like working class uprising. In his secondinaugural address, Trump lauded McKinley as a "natural businessman" who "made our country very rich through tariffs and through talent." Trump used a Day 1 order torestore the name of North America's tallest peakto Mount McKinley and he has repeatedly named-checked the 25th president more recently, while hisweighty tariffshave left the world bracing for the kind of trade war not seen since the days of theMcKinley Tariff Act of 1890. Jackson has hardly warranted a mention. "In the first term, well, McKinley was a fat cat," said H.W. Brands, a history professor at the University of Texas and author of "Andrew Jackson: His Life and Times." "So, if you're going to be a populist, you're not going to be a McKinley." But Jackson, Brands noted, hated tariffs. "So, if tariffs are your thing, Andrew Jackson's not your guy anymore. You have to look around to find somebody whose name is connected to a tariff." The White House says the shift isn't a departure from Trump's first-term goals, but simply his leaning harder into new tools — in this case, tariffs — to achieve them. "President Trump has never wavered from his commitment to putting working-class Americans above special interests, and his channeling of President McKinley's tariffs agenda is indicative of how he is using every lever of executive power to deliver for the American people," said spokesman Kush Desai. Still, many of Trump's current top advisers are veterans of the financial sector eager to help the president bend the economic system to his will, rather than reshaping it from the bottom up. That's meant Trump focusing political ire on foreign countries and "globalists" who embraced international free trade. He wants to impose anew economic orderthat puts U.S. interests first, and has settled onsteep import taxesto get America's trading partners to negotiate more favorable deals — as the way to most efficiently do that. Trump's shifting economic priorities The president's Jacksonian impulses aren't all dormant. He imposed some first-term tariffs and now is shaking up Washington with his efforts toslash the federal workforceandstock the bureaucracywith loyalists. He's also prioritized antagonizing "elites" at Ivy League universities and top law firms. In his rhetoric, Trump also has mythologized the power of tariffs, despite history telling a different story. Tariffs in the McKinley era, which loosely tracked theGilded Age, led to more income for the federal government, but also a highly stratified society of haves and have-nots. But just as Jackson allowed first-term Trump — a magnate who had little in common with many working-class voters he wooed — to take up the mantle of modern populist, McKinley gives Trump an intellectual justification and historical precedent for his love of tariffs. "It's a vibe shift for sure," said Eric Rauchway, a history professor at the University of California, Davis, and author of "Murdering McKinley: The Making of Theodore Roosevelt's America." It's also an example of Trump taking policy actions to move the country in a certain direction — or simply declaring what he wants to be true — then working backward to come up with an argument on why his instincts were correct all along. "Trump's relationship to history, and so many other things, is entirely transactional," said Daniel Feller, a professor emeritus at the University of Tennessee and former longtime editor of "The Papers of Andrew Jackson." From the 'People's President' to the 'Napoleon of Protection' Jackson was the founder of the Democratic Party, though many on the left nowreject himfor being a slaveholder who imposed the "Trail of Tears" on Native Americans. Orphaned at 14, Jackson taught himself the law and eventually became wealthy. Yet he created a political persona around advocating for everyday Americans. Trump, during his first term, referred to Jackson as the "People's President." McKinley, who was assassinated in 1901, six months into his second term, was born in Niles, Ohio, outside Youngstown. He fought with the Union army and preferred throughout his political career to be called "Major," the Civil War honorary title he earned. As a congressman, McKinley was known as the "Napoleon of Protection" for promoting the 1890 Tariff Act, which sharply raised import taxes on thousands of goods in an effort to protect American producers when there was no federal income tax. It ultimately increased prices domestically, hurt U.S. exporters and helped spark the Panic of 1893, the worst economic downturn until the Great Depression. McKinley also represents a burst of American colonial expansion. He annexed Hawaii and oversaw the U.S. taking control of the Philippines. His administration also acquired new territories in Guam and Puerto Rico, established a military government in Cuba and sent troops to China. Today, Trump has talked about the U.S. invadingPanamaandGreenland, makingCanada the 51st stateandturning the Gaza Strip into the "Riviera" of the Middle East. In July, in comments aboutwhich of his predecessors got prime White House wall space, Trump mentioned "the Great Andrew Jackson." But he praised McKinley, saying that the U.S. "was the wealthiest" from 1870 to 1913, when it was "an all-tariff country." "We had a couple of presidents that were very, very strong," Trump told his Cabinet then. "McKinley, I guess, more than anybody." On social media last week, a Trump aide posted a picture of a new, gold-framed portrait in the West Wing featuring Trump alongside McKinley, Abraham Lincoln, Thomas Jefferson, and Henry Clay, over the title "The Tariff Men." Lincoln used high tariffs for Civil War funding, Jefferson was a free-trade advocate but supported some tariffs to bolster domestic industries. Clay, as House speaker, helped pass a major tariff act in 1824. Tariffs hurt Republicans in McKinley's day What Trump doesn't mention is that McKinley's tariffs helped cost the GOP its House majority in 1890, with McKinley himself among those defeated. He returned to Ohio, was elected governor and, despite going bankrupt over a bad investment in a tin plate company, won the White House in 1896. After that, though, Rauchway said, McKinley actually didn't push tariffs as much following his experience with them in Congress. Just before he was killed, McKinley also talked up the need for international trade. That didn't stop Trump, inannouncing sweeping tariffsaround the globe in April, from saying the U.S. had been "looted, pillaged, raped and plundered by nations near and far." His championing of tariffs isn't totally new. In his first term, Trump ordered some higherimport taxeson solar panels, washing machines and steel and aluminum imports. He also occasionally praised McKinley, then, as when he said in a 2019 speech that the 25th president "was very strong on protecting our assets, protecting our country." But Trump conceded in that same speech, "I'm totally off script." That's no longer the case. Trump continually promotes McKinley's place in history. "McKinley was a great president," Trump said during last month's Cabinet meeting. "Who never got credit."

From Jackson to McKinley: What Trump's shift of presidential hero says about his evolving goals

From Jackson to McKinley: What Trump's shift of presidential hero says about his evolving goals WASHINGTON (AP) — In his first term,Dona...
Trump wants to mandate voter IDs. Can he do that?New Foto - Trump wants to mandate voter IDs. Can he do that?

WASHINGTON –President Donald Trumpis plowing ahead with efforts to change election rules despite initial court rulings that he doesn't have the power to do so. TrumpsaidAug. 30 that he would sign an executive order requiring voters provide identification in every election. Anexecutive orderTrump signed in March requiring people to show government-issued proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote in federal elections has been blocked by the courts. "The Constitution does not grant the president any specific powers over elections," U.S. District Judge Denise Casper in Massachusettswrotein June. In April, a federal judge in Washington, D.C., reached the same conclusion. Here's what you need to know. In aposton Truth Social, Trump said: "Voter I.D. Must Be Part of Every Single Vote. NO EXCEPTIONS! I Will Be Doing An Executive Order To That End!!!" He did not say what type of identification he wants to require, when he would sign the order or why he has the authority to impose the rule. More:Trump says he will sign executive order mandating voter ID requirement Thirty-six states require voters to show some form of identification at the polls,according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.Depending on the state, the identification can be a photo ID, such as a driver's license, or a nonphoto ID, such as a bank statement. States that require neither check a voter's identity a different way, most often by comparing the voter's signature with one on file, according to the state legislatures conference. Those backing voter ID requirements argue they prevent people from casting votes in someone else's name and say the rules increase public confidence in elections. Opponents say the type of fraud the rules aim to prevent rarely happens and ID requirements are an unnecessary burden on voters. The Supreme CourtupheldIndiana's photo ID requirement for voters in 2008. "In sum, on the basis of the record that has been made in this litigation, we cannot conclude that the statute imposes `excessively burdensome requirements' on any class of voters," Justice John Paul Stevens wrote for the 6-3 majority. Indiana hadn't offered evidence of fraud, but the challengers hadn't produced witnesses at the trial who claimed they would be unable to meet the law's requirements. After he retired, Stevenssaidin a 2016 interview that the ruling was a "fairly unfortunate decision" that was nonetheless required because he had to stick to the evidence in the record. More:Supreme Court to decide if challenge to Illinois' grace period for mail-in ballots can proceed Trump's proof-of-citizenship directive for voter registration was immediately challenged in court. In April, U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly in Washington sided with the League of Women Voters Education Fund, the League of United Latin American Citizens, the Democratic National Committee and other challengers. Kollar-Kotelly blocked Trump's order from moving forward as the case is being litigated,rulingthat the president likely exceeded his authority. "Our Constitution entrusts Congress and the States − not the President − with the authority to regulate federal elections," she wrote. More:Trump wants to eliminate mail-in voting. But 1 in 3 voters use it. In June, Casper, the federal judge in Massachusetts, ruled on a separate lawsuit brought by 19 states. Casper said the states showed that the citizenship requirement for registration and Trump's attempt to prevent states from counting mail ballots received after Election Day are likely to disenfranchise eligible voters. The Constitution's so-calledelections clausesays that the "Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof." The clause also says Congress can "make or alter such Regulations." Trump's executive order is expected to be challenged in court once he signs it. Trump has long questioned the U.S. electoral system and continues to falsely claim that his 2020 loss to Democratic PresidentJoe Bidenwas the result of widespread fraud. The president and his Republican allies have also made baseless claims about widespread voting by noncitizens, which is illegal and rarely occurs. Contributing: Swapna Venugopal Ramaswamy This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Trump wants to mandate voter IDs. Here's what you need to know.

Trump wants to mandate voter IDs. Can he do that?

Trump wants to mandate voter IDs. Can he do that? WASHINGTON –President Donald Trumpis plowing ahead with efforts to change election rules d...
RB Jaylen Warren, Steelers agree to 2-year extensionNew Foto - RB Jaylen Warren, Steelers agree to 2-year extension

Running back Jaylen Warren and the Pittsburgh Steelers are in agreement on a two-year contract extension. His agent, David Canter, posted the news on social media Monday. Warren was set to earn $5.3 million in 2025 but now will receive $7 million this year, NFL Network reported. The new deal includes $12 million guaranteed and is worth nearly $17.5 million through the 2027 season, per the report. Warren is tops on the Steelers' depth chart at running back after backing up Najee Harris, who signed a free-agent deal with the Los Angeles Chargers in March. The Steelers originally signed Warren as an undrafted free agent in 2022. In 48 games in a reserve role, Warren has totaled 1,674 rushing yards with six touchdowns. He has added 894 yards on 127 receptions. Behind him on the depth chart is rookie Kaleb Johnson, a third-round draft pick from Iowa. The Steelers open the season Sunday at the New York Jets. --Field Level Media

RB Jaylen Warren, Steelers agree to 2-year extension

RB Jaylen Warren, Steelers agree to 2-year extension Running back Jaylen Warren and the Pittsburgh Steelers are in agreement on a two-year c...
Is Jaxson Dart or Jameis Winston the Giants' Week 1 backup QB? Coach Brian Daboll isn't sayingNew Foto - Is Jaxson Dart or Jameis Winston the Giants' Week 1 backup QB? Coach Brian Daboll isn't saying

NEW YORK (AP) — Coach Brian Daboll on Monday refused to reveal whether rookie Jaxson Dart or veteran Jameis Winston will serve as the New York Giants' backup quarterback for their season opener Sunday at Washington. Russell Wilson is set to startagainst the Commanders. Dart, the first-round pick who is being groomed as the QB of the future,impressed in training campand preseason games, though Winston has more than 100 games of NFL experience and was listed second with Dart third on thefirst unofficial depth chartreleased during camp. "Any roster decisions based on who's going to be the backup, we'll have that out there on Sunday," Daboll said on a video call with reporters. He also declined to announce whether Deonte Banks or Cor'Dale Flott will start as the No. 2 cornerback opposite free agent addition Paulson Adebo, or whether Greg Van Roten or converted tackle Evan Neal won the competition for the starting right guard position. Van Roten took the first-team snaps and is expected to get the nod. "We have a good idea of how we're going to play, with the players we're going to play with," Daboll said. "That'll all come out on Sunday." The Giants aimed for standout left tackle Andrew Thomas to be ready for Week 1 afteropening campon thephysically unable to perform listand not playing in any of their three exhibition games while rehabbingfrom foot surgerylast October. It's not clear if that will happen, with Daboll saying only that he expected everyone to participate in a walkthrough Monday. That would also seemingly include top receiver Malik Nabers, who has beendealing with a toe injuryand did not participate in the preseason. Nabers is coming off catching 109 passes for 1,204 yards and seven touchdowns as a rookie. The league does not require teams to share injury information until the regular season, and Daboll repeatedly has said he would not talk about why players were not on the field. The first injury disclosures are expected Wednesday, when teams playing Sunday are required to publish which players did or did not practice and why. ___ AP NFL:https://apnews.com/hub/nfl

Is Jaxson Dart or Jameis Winston the Giants' Week 1 backup QB? Coach Brian Daboll isn't saying

Is Jaxson Dart or Jameis Winston the Giants' Week 1 backup QB? Coach Brian Daboll isn't saying NEW YORK (AP) — Coach Brian Daboll on...
Trump administration demands state voter data, including partial Social Security numbersNew Foto - Trump administration demands state voter data, including partial Social Security numbers

The Trump administration has stepped up efforts to obtain personal information about tens of millions of voters across the country, including seeking sensitive data such as partial Social Security numbers. The push, overseen by the Department of Justice, comes as President Donald Trump asserts a larger federal role in elections ahead of next year's midterms, which are set to determine which party controls Congress during his last two years in the White House. In recent weeks, state election officials have received letters from Harmeet Dhillon, who oversees the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division, seeking unredacted copies of states' voter registration databases. The information includes voters' names, birthdates, addresses, and driver's license numbers or the last four digits of their Social Security numbers. The agency has told states that the information is necessary to ensure compliance with a federal law that requires states to maintain accurate voter registration rolls. But some state officials who have received the missives argue that the Justice Department is overstepping its authority, given that states, and not the federal government, run elections and carry out voter-roll maintenance. Election officers in several states are refusing to comply with the demands, citing the need to guard voters' privacy. "We're going to fight as far as we have to against this," Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes, a Democrat, told CNN in an interview. "I'm not going to give up the personal identifying information of my voters. It's just not going to happen." State officials such as Fontes say they already have procedures in place to review the accuracy of their voting lists on a rolling basis. Any dataset about voters that states might send to the federal government would offer just a snapshot in time of a state's voting population, and the information quickly becomes out of date, he added. In Pennsylvania, the state's top election official, Al Schmidt, also is declining to share voters' sensitive personal data. In a letter he wrote to Dhillon, Schmidt called the DOJ's request a "concerning attempt to expand the federal government's role in our country's electoral process." In addition to Arizona and Pennsylvania, election chiefs in California, Illinois, Maine, Minnesota and Oregon have also received the recent data requests from the Justice Department, officials in those states have told CNN. Michael Kang, an election law expert at Northwestern University, said it's not clear why the Justice Department needs the information it seeks. "I don't think you need people's Social Security numbers for voter-list maintenance oversight," he said. DOJ officials did not respond to inquiries. But in a previous statement to CNN, Dhillon noted that her division has a "statutory mandate to enforce our federal voting rights laws." "Clean voter rolls and basic election safeguards are requisites for free, fair, and transparent elections," she said at the time. Federal law gives the Justice Department the authority to ensure that states have procedures to maintain their voter rolls and remove those who have died, moved or are otherwise not eligible to vote where are registered. The law does not specifically give the DOJ the power to manage the lists. Dhillon's letters also cite a federal civil rights statute enacted in 1960 that gives the Justice Department broad authority to inspect election records. The new requests have aroused suspicion among some Democratic officials that the administration is seeking data to advance claims of voter fraud in upcoming elections. "They are looking, essentially, to say that, 'Well, we found somebody who died who's still on the rolls, and therefore there's fraud, and therefore these elections are fraudulent and should be overturned,'" Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker told reporters recently, according to Capitol News Illinois. Since May, the Justice Department has contacted at least 26 states, seeking a broad array of information ranging from voter rolls to the identities of election officials responsible for maintaining them, according to atrackermaintained by the liberal-leaning Brennan Center for Justice at New York University's law school. Election officials in several states responded to earlier DOJ requests this summer for voter data by providing information generally available to the public or to political committees and removing sensitive personal details about individual voters. The new letters from Dhillon make explicit that the DOJ wants states to provide "all fields" – including personal information – contained in their voter registration datasets to the federal government. The DOJ has told the National Association of Secretaries of State – the umbrella organization for state election chiefs – that it plans outreach to all 50 states, according to the association's spokesperson, Maria Benson. "Americans should be very concerned" about the agency's moves, said David Becker, executive director of the nonprofit Center for Election Innovation & Research and a former lawyer in the Justice Department's voting rights section. "The DOJ is asking states to take this data, which they are charged under federal and state law with protecting, and hand it over for unclear reasons and with no clear indications of how it will be used," Becker said. Justin Riemer, a veteran Republican election lawyer who runs Restoring Integrity and Trust in Elections, said that the Justice Department "has every right to enforce federal voting laws" and seeking access to the complete voter rolls is one method of doing so. "I'm not 100% sure you can determine whether or not a state is following laws to remove ineligible voters and keep the voter rolls current without actually reviewing the contents of voter registration lists," he said. J. Christian Adams is the president and general counsel of the conservative Public Interest Legal Foundation, which has repeatedly challenged the accuracy of states' voter lists. Adams called the resistance to the federal requests a sign of "Trump derangement syndrome." "The Attorney General has the power to say, 'Show me your work,'" he told CNN. "This is not a close call." Trump has moved to insert himself into elections, falsely asserting that states must obey his orders despite the Constitution not giving the president any explicit authority to regulate elections. "They must do what the Federal Government, as represented by the President of the United States, tells them, FOR THE GOOD OF OUR COUNTRY, to do,"he wrotein a recent post on Truth Social. A Trumpexecutive orderearlier this year instructed the Department of Government Efficiency to assist in a review of state voter rolls to identify potential noncitizens. The directive, which also demands proof of citizenship to register to vote, is facing several legal challenges and parts of it have been blocked temporarily by the courts. Over the weekend, Trumpsaidhe would sign an executive order requiring voter identification for elections. He has also tried to give his partyan edgein next year's midterms by urging GOP-controlled states to redraw congressional maps to eke out more US House seats for Republicans. Missouri is holding aspecial legislative session starting Wednesdayto target one of the state's two Democrat-held seats. Texas already passed a new map which will likely give Republicans five more seats. The confrontation over access to voter data is likely to end up in court. The Justice Department opted tosueOrange County, California, as part of a federal probe into alleged non-citizen voting. Orange County officialshave so far declinedto share the individuals' personal information with DOJ without a court order. In Minnesota, Democratic Secretary of State Steve Simon is refusing to share voters' personal information. A group of Republican state lawmakers on an elections panelrecently urged Simon to relent, arguing he is setting up the state for "costly" litigation with the federal government. Simon said he's not backing down and was confident Minnesota would win in court. "I don't have a sense at this point what the Justice Department really wants and aims to do with this data," he said. "A reasonable person could conclude that the stated reason they want the information isn't the real reason they want the information." For more CNN news and newsletters create an account atCNN.com

Trump administration demands state voter data, including partial Social Security numbers

Trump administration demands state voter data, including partial Social Security numbers The Trump administration has stepped up efforts to ...

 

MARIO VOUX © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com