Dodgers activate Max Muncy from injured list, but also put Tommy Edman on the shelfNew Foto - Dodgers activate Max Muncy from injured list, but also put Tommy Edman on the shelf

LOS ANGELES (AP) — TheLos Angeles Dodgersactivated Max Muncy from the injured list and put fellow infielder Tommy Edman on the list Monday. Muncy has been out since July 2, missing nearly five weeks with a bone bruise in his knee aftera collision on a tag playduring a game against the Chicago White Sox. The veteran slugger had been on a monthlong roll at the time of his injury, boosting his OPS to .832 with 13 homers and 55 RBIs. Muncy returned more quickly than the initial six-week projection for his recovery. He was batting fifth and playing third base at Dodger Stadium on Monday night when Los Angeles opened a homestand against the St. Louis Cardinals. "He's put in a lot of work to get back with this timeline," Dodgers manager Dave Roberts said. "Getting him back lengthens and strengthens our lineup." But just when Muncy is healthy enough to return, the NL West-leading Dodgers are losing Edman after he aggravated his injured right ankle. Edman left a game in Boston last week after apparently spraining his ankle while running the bases, and he came out of the Dodgers' game against Tampa Bay on Sunday with pain from running the bases again. "Don't know how long it's going to be, but I do think that he'll be back at some point," Roberts said. "The main thing is when he gets back, how we can make sure that this doesn't happen again. It's kind of a ligament strain, tendons, whatever it is." Edman also missed time in May with a sprained ankle. Last year's NLCS MVP is batting .228 with 12 homers and 44 RBIs this season. Edman joins the lengthy list of Dodgers hoping to return soon from injuries to bolster the defending World Series champions' repeat bid. Los Angeles didn't make a bold move at the trade deadline last week, deciding to roll with its current roster while aiming for full health in October. Utilityman Kiké Hernández went out last month with a sprained left elbow, and he isn't close to returning despite undergoing multiple procedures including platelet-rich plasma therapy and cortisone shots. "We're not there yet, as far as worrying the season is lost" for Hernández, Roberts said. Other injury news is more encouraging: Second baseman Hyeseong Kim is swinging a bat and taking grounders in anticipation of returning from left shoulder bursitis as early as this weekend, while reliever Tanner Scott will throw another batting practice session soon in his recovery from left elbow inflammation. Roki Sasaki is still on the injured list on his bobblehead night Monday. The rookie right-hander has been out since May 8 with a right shoulder injury, but he will throw three live innings Friday after hitting mid-90s velocity in his most recent mound session. If his arm continues to feel good, he will get a minor league rehab assignment next week, Roberts said. ___ AP MLB:https://apnews.com/MLB

Dodgers activate Max Muncy from injured list, but also put Tommy Edman on the shelf

Dodgers activate Max Muncy from injured list, but also put Tommy Edman on the shelf LOS ANGELES (AP) — TheLos Angeles Dodgersactivated Max M...
DHS bars trans women athletes from 'extraordinary ability' visasNew Foto - DHS bars trans women athletes from 'extraordinary ability' visas

The Department of Homeland Security will update visa policies to prevent transgender women from traveling to the United States to participate in elite women's sporting events. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Servicesissued guidanceMonday intended to bar trans women athletes from obtaining "extraordinary ability" visas to compete in female sports, the conservative news website The Daily Wire first reported. The guidance builds onan executive order President Donald Trump issuedduring the early weeks of the second term of his presidency that intended to bar trans women from competing in female sports. The guidance doesn't use the word "transgender" or refer to trans women; rather, it refers to "male athletes" who seek to compete in women's sports. Matthew Tragesser, a spokesperson for USCIS,said in a statementthat the agency is "closing the loophole for foreign male athletes whose only chance at winning elite sports is to change their gender identity and leverage their biological advantages against women." "It's a matter of safety, fairness, respect, and truth that only female athletes receive a visa to come to the U.S. to participate in women's sports," Tragesser said in the statement. "The Trump Administration is standing up for the silent majority who've long been victims of leftist policies that defy common sense." The policy update applies to three visa categories for people who possess "extraordinary ability" in science, art, education, business or athletics. It also affects national interest waivers, which allow applicants to self-petition to waive the labor certification for green cards if they can show that their work serves the national interest. The updated guidance clarifies that USCIS "considers the fact that a male athlete has been competing against women as a negative factor" in determining whether they are among the top in the sport. The guidance adds that it is not in the national interest of the United States to waive the labor certification requirement for trans women athletes "whose proposed endeavor is to compete in women's sports." USCIS did not respond to a request for comment about how many people the new policy could affect or whether there are recent examples of trans female athletes' traveling to the United States under the affected visa categories. Within the NCAA, the nonprofit group that regulates college athletics, about25,000 international student-athletescompete in NCAA sports out of the more than500,000 total who competeeach year, according to the association. While it is unclear how many NCAA athletes are trans, the association's president, Charlie Baker,told a Senate committee in Decemberthat he is aware of fewer than 10. The USCIS policy update may have affected athletes who planned to travel to Los Angeles for the 2028 Summer Olympics; however, the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committeebarred trans women from competingin female sports last month. Only a handful of trans athletes have ever competed in the Olympics. Weightlifter Laurel Hubbardbecame the first out trans athlete to competein the Olympics in the Tokyo Games in 2021, though she did not medal. American skateboarder Alana Smith and Canadian soccer star Quinn also competed in the Tokyo Games, and Quinnbecame the first nonbinary and trans athleteto ever medal when their team won gold that year.

DHS bars trans women athletes from 'extraordinary ability' visas

DHS bars trans women athletes from 'extraordinary ability' visas The Department of Homeland Security will update visa policies to pr...
Ghislaine Maxwell's prison transfer adds to Trump's Epstein morassNew Foto - Ghislaine Maxwell's prison transfer adds to Trump's Epstein morass

The Trump administration made interviewing Jeffrey Epstein's accomplice,Ghislaine Maxwell, a key part of its efforts to climb out from beneath its Epstein files problems. Over a week later, we still don't know what transpired during that meeting. But the Maxwell situation has only grown to epitomize a series of very curious maneuvers that call into question precisely what everyone in the administration is thinking and suggest the controversy is going nowhere fast. Indeed, it's almost as if those involved aretryingto make this look bad. We learned Friday that Maxwell had beenmoved from a low-security federal prison in Floridato a minimum-security prison camp in Texas called Camp Bryan – a significant upgrade for an inmate serving a 20-year sentence. Neither the Justice Department, the Bureau of Prisons nor Maxwell's lawyer has addressed precisely why the transfer was made. We don't know who was involved. But it's conspicuous for a host of reasons. To wit: News of the transfer broke after Maxwell met with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, a political appointee and Trump's former defense lawyer, in a meeting that remains shrouded in secrecy. Maxwell doesn't appear to have been eligible for such a transfer, unless someone granted her a waiver.Bureau of Prisons policystates that anyone who had "sexual contact with a minor," as Maxwell did when she participated in the sexual abuse, "will be housed in at least a Low security level institution," without such a waiver. (Maxwell was sentenced in 2022 for carrying out a years-long scheme with Epstein to groom and sexually abuse underage girls.) Experts have said such a transfer is highly unusual. Prison consultant Holli Coulman on Fridaytold CNN's Phil Mattinglythat she had "never seen this in my life. Never seen it by women that I've either served time with, clients, never have seen this. This is unprecedented." Maxwell's upgrade comes as Trump has repeatedly seemed todangle a favor – specifically, a potential pardon– as she spoke with the Justice Department and entered into talks to testify to Congress. The White House told CNN last week that "no leniency is being given or discussed" for Maxwell, but then Trump againconspicuously noted that he had the power to pardon her. A lower-security prison could certainly be construed as a form of "leniency." Trump has a history of suggesting favors for those whose actions could impact him. He dangled pardons over witnesses in the Russia investigation in ways that special counsel Robert Mueller saidcould have impacted their decisions on cooperating with the government. And more recently, Trump's Justice Department seemed to tie the dismissal of New York Mayor Eric Adams's criminal charges tohim helping with Trump's immigration crackdown. The favorable prison transfer comes even as Maxwell's lawyer has openly sought concessions for her. There is plenty we don't know about all of this, in large part because the key players aren't talking. It's theoretically possible this is all just a major coincidence. But it certainly raises questions that the key officials involved would seem to have motivation to put to rest – and quickly. Maxwell's testimony could bear on Trump personally, given continuing revelations abouthis ties to Epsteinand his desire to put the entire Epstein files fiasco to rest. Now we learn she got a highly unusual perk. And it's merely the latest in a series of very questionable developments. The other concession the Trump administration made after failing to produce the Epstein documents that it had promised was moving to unseal grand jury testimony. But its own filing last week reinforcedthat information is likely to be quite limited, if it even sees the light of day. Trump has been very slow to acknowledge his own proximity to Epstein. Last week, after days of confusion, the president ultimately said he had been aware in real time that Epstein "stole" one of his Mar-a-Lago employees,a then-minor named Virginia Giuffrewho became one of Epstein's highest-profile accusers. Given Giuffre's age at the time and a paper trail that suggests Trump's awareness of Epstein's affinity for young women and girls, that raises valid questions aboutwhat Trump knew or might have suspected at the time. Family members of Giuffre's have raised the possibility that Trump knows more than he has let on, but the president has balked at expanding on his statements about why this episode made him decide Epstein was a "creep." Trump, who has not been accused of wrongdoing in connection with Epstein, claimed Thursday that "I don't know really why" Epstein was taking his employees. But he's repeatedly madefalse and misleading claims about hispastties to Epstein. Most recently, he denied that Attorney General Pam Bondi had told him his name was in the Epstein files, whichCNN later reportedshe had – back in May. What's more, the timeline suggests the administration's reversal on promising full disclosurecoincided with Trump being told he was in the files. And then there is the Maxwell situation. Even before the news of her prison transfer, the administrationtook very little care to make its handling of her appear proper. It sent Blanche,Trump's former personal lawyer, to meet with her. Blanche has called Maxwell's lawyer his "friend." Maxwell's lawyer has been solicitous of Trump. And, of course, Trump has repeatedly left open a pardon. Trump late last week said he didn't know what would be produced from the Blanche meeting, saying, "I don't know because I haven't spoken about it." But he again suggested it might be limited by a desire not to create suspicion of people who haven't been charged with crimes. The confusion around all of this only seems to be growing, in large part because of Trump's and the administration's own actions and lack of transparency. And perhaps nothing looms larger right now than the unanswered questions about the prison transfer. For more CNN news and newsletters create an account atCNN.com

Ghislaine Maxwell’s prison transfer adds to Trump’s Epstein morass

Ghislaine Maxwell's prison transfer adds to Trump's Epstein morass The Trump administration made interviewing Jeffrey Epstein's ...
White House Claims It Has Achieved Net Negative MigrationNew Foto - White House Claims It Has Achieved Net Negative Migration

U.S. Marine Corps deployed at the southern border in San Diego, reinforce the US-Mexico border wall as pictured from Colonia Libertad in Tijuana, Baja Calif. state, Mexico on Feb. 5, 2025. Credit - Guillermo Arias—AFP/Getty Images President Donald Trump'sWhite House has been celebrating reports that 2025 could be the first year in at least 50 years that the United States could have negative net migration. The Administrationpromoted a segment on CNNMonday that claimed Trump's "hawkish" immigration policies will lead to net negative migration, down from anet 2.8million-person increase in population in 2024. "The United States is on track to see negative net migration for the first time in at least five decades, according to CNN, as President Donald J. Trump fulfills his promise to end the migrant invasion and deport criminal illegal immigrants from our communities," the press release reads. The White House laterposted a graphicon X that appeared to claim it had already met that target. The graphic showed a border patrol agent and was emblazoned with the words: "NEGATIVE NET MIGRATION for the First Time in 50 Years" and "Promises made, promises kept." Read More:What the Data Reveals About Trump's Push to Arrest and Deport More Migrants It did not provide any evidence to back up that claim, and the CNN story originally shared by the White House did not make that claim. The CNN report was nonetheless celebrated online by Administration officials, including by Trump's Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, who is often credited with shaping Trump's hardline immigration policies. "During the last period in which America was the undisputed global superpower — finically [sic], culturally, militarily — immigration was net negative. All population growth was from family formation," Millerwrote on XSunday afternoon. When asked by TIME if it had achieved negative net migration already, the White House initially responded by sharing a link to Miller's tweet. In a later statement to TIME, White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said that "President Trump was elected on his promise to end illegal immigration, deport criminal illegal aliens, and put Americans First – that's exactly what he's doing." "For the third month in a row, there have been zero illegal aliens released into the country," she said. "And last month, Border Patrol averaged just 141 apprehensions per day, which is unheard of for the nearly 2,000-mile-long southern border. Since President Trump took office, all employment gains have gone to American workers. President Trump's policies are delivering for the Americans who elected him." Here's what you need to know. Negative net migration is the term to describe a scenario in which the number of people leaving a country is greater than the number immigrating. In such a situation, population growth is mostly dependent on those being born within the country. While he didn't specifically campaign for a second term on achieving negative net migration, Trump promised the largest mass deportation effort in U.S. history. "I don't believe this is sustainable for a country, what's happening to us, with probably 15 million and maybe as many as 20 million by the time Biden's out. Twenty million people, many of them from jails, many of them from prisons, many of them from mental institutions," Trump told TIME in May 2024. TIME had fact-checkedthis claim,finding that the number of undocumented people in the United States was estimated to be closer to 11 million. During the first six months of Trump's second term, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has recorded nearly 150,000 deportations — or an average of more than 800 per day. If those continue at the same pace, the agency should carry out more than 300,000 deportations by the end of the year, which would be the highest annual tally since 2014. AJuly 2025 reportfrom the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), a conservative think tank, estimated that migration levels in 2025 would reach somewhere between negative 525,000 and negative 115,000, "reflecting a dramatic decrease in inflows and somewhat higher outflows." This is just one prediction, though. In a separate report, the Federal Reserve Bank in San Franciscoestimated on July 17that the 2025 net international migration (NIM) numbers would decrease significantly from 2024. They write that NIM levels for 2025 are currently on track to be around 1.0 million—over 1.5 million less than 2024 and 2.5 million less than in 2025—but this still would not substantiate a net negative. Still, Trump's aggressive immigration tactics at the border are, undoubtedly, causing a decrease in those entering the United States. The Federal Reserve Bank in San Francisco highlights how the overall number of encounters at the border has drastically declined since 2024, and the Migration Policy Institute reports that the Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) at the U.S.-Mexico border has reached record lows, not seen since the 1960s,with border patrol claiming just over 6,000 apprehensionsin June. Despite all that, some experts are skeptical. Julia Gelatt, Associate Director of the U.S. Immigration Policy Program at the Migration Policy Institute, said it's "hard for [her] to imagine" there will be a negative net migration this year, despite Trump's policies. "Border arrivals are down a lot this year (building on declines that started last year), and all of the parole pathways that the Biden administration opened—for Ukrainians, Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans, Venezuelans, and others—have now closed," she told TIME over email. "On the other side of the equation, well over a million people come legally to the United States each year as permanent and temporary immigrants. We haven't yet seen the kinds of big changes to legal immigration policies or practices that would drastically slow legal immigration, though it could happen," she added. However, she said she expects net migration to be "significantly lower this year than in the past couple of years." TheU.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics datashows that foreign-born individuals contributed more than half of the total new workers to the labor force in the years 2022 through 2024. In fact, a Federal Reserve Bank of Dallasstudyin July 2024 found that in the aftermath of the pandemic, immigrant laborers helped boost job growth while keeping inflation down. Read More:What to Know About the Jobs Report That Led Trump to Fire the Labor Statistics Chief Amid Trade War Fallout Economists have warned that the sharp drop in immigrants coming into the U.S., and Trump's aggressive deportation policies, could have detrimental effects on the country's economy. The Economic Policy Institutewrote in Julythat Trump's deportation efforts will reduce jobs for immigrants and U.S.-born workers alike, as deportations will "[threaten] the ability of employers to generate revenue and pay for business expenses like rent, machinery, and even the labor of any remaining workers." A new study from Dallas' Federal Reserve Bank in 2025showed thatdeclining immigration is "weighing" on the country's gross domestic product (GDP). In their simulations on GDP growth, they found that "[r]educed immigration inflows at the border, not deportations, account for most of the negative effect on GDP growth." The Center for Budget and Policy Prioritiesalso shared a reportthat immigration benefits the Social Security Trust Fund, and that "plans to drastically cut immigration and increase deportations would significantly worsen Social Security's financial outlook." This happens as theSocial Security Administration is already feeling the weightof hefty cuts from the Trump Administration. Contact usatletters@time.com.

White House Claims It Has Achieved Net Negative Migration

White House Claims It Has Achieved Net Negative Migration U.S. Marine Corps deployed at the southern border in San Diego, reinforce the US-M...
Mookie Betts slump update: Dodgers star amid struggles, 'It's up to God at this point'New Foto - Mookie Betts slump update: Dodgers star amid struggles, 'It's up to God at this point'

As theLos Angeles Dodgerslook to repeat as World Series Champions, the historic franchise will need its star-studded roster to rise to the occasion again this season. Among those stars isMookie Betts, who has accomplished just about everything the sport of baseball has to offer. The latest hurdle in his career is his season-long slump. Dodgers manager Dave Roberts had briefly benched Betts before moving him to the leadoff spot in the lineup on July 20. Roberts tried switching Betts and Shohei into the first two spots for 11 games, hoping it would create a spark for Betts. "I've done everything possible," Betts told reporters on Sunday in Tampa. "It's just kind of the same result. I'm out of answers. I've done everything I can do. It's up to God at this point." The manager decided to move Betts back to second in the batting order on Sunday with Ohtani now back to leadoff in the lineup. He would go 0-for-3 and is now 0-for-16 over the last four games. Betts has a .233 batting average this season with 93 hits, 11 home runs and 48 runs batted in. He has a career-low .664 OPS this season. Betts has averaged 142 hits, 94 runs, 24 home runs, and 73 RBI throughout his career. He also has a .290 career batting average and a .881 career OPS. Dodgers manager Dave Roberts recently moved Betts from the leadoff spot to second in the lineup with the hope that it can help make a difference. "I thought yesterday in a vacuum that he had a good offensive day," Roberts told reporters before Sunday's game. "I really did. I thought he had good at-bats. … Other days it looks like he is lost." Roberts did not completely shy away from the possibility of still moving Betts around in the lineup, but a lot of it may depend on what he sees from Betts going forward and what the rest of the roster looks like in terms of health. Max Muncy is expected to return to the Dodgers' lineup soon and has been playing for the Triple-A Oklahoma City Comets this past weekend. There is a possibility that Betts could continue to shift around in the lineup after Muncy returns. On Betts, Roberts expressed his desire to "instill my faith in him and confidence in him." "I know he is frustrated and obviously at a point now where he wants results, which I can appreciate, but hopefully he can build off the at-bats quality from yesterday," Roberts added. Betts continues to work closely with his hitting coaches to refine his mechanics at the plate, but the Dodgers manager believes that there may be a mental aspect contributing to the slump. Off the field, it has been just as tough a season for Betts. Before the start of the season, Betts was dealing with an undiagnosed illness that caused him to lose approximately 18 pounds in a two-week span and he was throwing up every time he had solid foods. He did undergo necessary blood work and vital tests, but everything came back normal. Betts recently spent a few days away from the Dodgers to be with his family, located in Nashville. "My stepdad passed, so I had to go home," Betts told reporters on July 27. "(He's) been there in my life from fourth grade until now, so that was tough for me and the family. "I just had to be there for my mom and my brothers and sisters. It's just a tough time and there's no real way to really explain something like that outside of just being there and spending time with the family." Betts and the Dodgers will play six games at home this week. The St. Louis Cardinals will start a three-game series with the Dodgers on Monday, Aug. 4 at 10:10 p.m. ET. The Toronto Blue Jays will visit Dodger Stadium for a three-game series starting Friday, Aug. 8. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Mookie Betts, Dodgers continue looking for answers to brutal slump

Mookie Betts slump update: Dodgers star amid struggles, 'It’s up to God at this point'

Mookie Betts slump update: Dodgers star amid struggles, 'It's up to God at this point' As theLos Angeles Dodgerslook to repeat a...
Arch Manning expectations have Texas at No. 1 in preseason poll. Are we sure he is ready?New Foto - Arch Manning expectations have Texas at No. 1 in preseason poll. Are we sure he is ready?

If everything we know about Texas' starting quarterback was exactly the same except that his name was Art Janning instead of Arch Manning, theLonghornswould not bethe No. 1 teamin thepreseason US LBM Coaches Poll. No disrespect intended, of course. The Longhorns have established themselves as one of the nation's elite programs under Steve Sarkisian, a talent-accumulating factory that might already have a national championship if not for a shaky play call from the 1-yard line in the fourth quarter of last season's semifinal against Ohio State. But to believe the Longhorns are a deserving No. 1 – which is where a plurality of voters in the coaches' poll have them heading into 2025 – requires corresponding conviction that Manning is ready to live up to his family name and high school reputation. I just have one question about that: Are we sure? Pull the name off the jersey. Forget about the maturity, the presumed intangibles, the osmosis of a lifetime spent in proximity to two uncles who did some pretty good things on the football field. What do we really see? We see a player who has thrown a mere 95 passes in two seasons on campus, a player who didn't play a meaningful snap against a good team last season outside of some situation-specific quarterback run packages. We also see a quarterback who was apparently not a viable option for Sarkisian in the second half of last season, even when it was clear that starter Quinn Ewers was not 100 percent healthy and dragging down the potential of Texas' offense. Maybe it's not fair to read into that. Coaches are notoriously weird about quarterbacks, hypersensitive to locker room dynamics and public perception if they even acknowledge the possibility of a change. If Sarkisian's loyalty to Ewers wavered even an inch, it would have unleashed a cacophony of noise around the Texas program that might have been worse than watching his quarterback throw six interceptions over the final five games. That said, if Manning wasn't ready to give Texas a better chance to win a national title last year when the deck was stacked in the Longhorns' favor everywhere else on their roster, isn't it fair to be a little skeptical that he's going to be ready now? Most folks, it seems, are not skeptical. Manning begins the 2025 season as the betting favorite to win the Heisman Trophy at some prominent sports books. Texas was the far-and-away choice among SEC media members to win the league in their preseason poll, with Manning being named to the all-conference third team. And in perhaps the most outrageous bout of Arch Madness we've seen yet, ESPN/SEC Network commentator Paul Finebaum predicted he would be "the best college quarterback we have seen since Tim Tebow entered the scene in 2006." Mind you, since Tebow's Heisman run in 2007, we've seen Cam Newton, Johnny Manziel, Jameis Winston, Marcus Mariota, Lamar Jackson, Baker Mayfield, Joe Burrow, Caleb Williams and Jayden Daniels come through college football. If Manning is even in the top half of that group, then yes, Texas will probably be this year's national champion. But can't we just slow down a little bit given, you know, the lack of on-field evidence that Manning deserves this level of expectation? A year ago, Manning in fact did get his chance to start for Texas when Ewers strained his oblique muscle in the middle of their third game against Texas-San Antonio. Manning remained at the controls for the next two home games against Louisiana-Monroe and Mississippi State and was largely good. Not transcendently great, but good. Then Ewers return from injury, and that was pretty much Manning's season for all intents and purposes. Two full games and a little more than half of a third, all against bad opponents. And that was with the best and most experienced offensive line in college football protecting him. It's not a critique of Manning whatsoever to say we didn't learn much about what he's capable of. Sarkisian talks about Manning in far more measured tones. He understands what the two-year buildup of hype has created and the potential for narratives to turn quickly if his quarterback plays poorly in the opener against No. 2 Ohio State. He also knows that turning over four starters on the offensive line is a wildcard that will probably make things incrementally more challenging for his inexperienced quarterback. "He's a great guy. He's a great teammate," Sarkisian said last month at SEC Media Days. "He's got an unbelievable work ethic. And I think, if he stays true to himself, that's going to help him navigate these waters as they present themselves. We've got to do a great job of supporting him around him, as coaches, as players, and ultimately, I think he's prepared for the moment. But now it's just time for him to go do it and enjoy doing it quite frankly." Notice that's quite a bit different than how Sarkisian spoke the same day about "the deepest and most talented defense that we've had" or the receiving corps that "we're really excited about." Maybe that's just Sarkisian intentionally lowering the temperature, with the full understanding that his fan base has been frothing to watch Manning finally take his place in Texas history. Or maybe there's a tiny part of him that's skeptical his quarterback can live up to the trail of hosannas laid in front of him based more on name and reputation than on-field accomplishment. One way or another, after more than half a decade of hearing about the next-in-line to the Manning quarterback dynasty, we won't have to wait long for an answer. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Arch Manning, Texas top preseason poll Top 25 with huge expectations

Arch Manning expectations have Texas at No. 1 in preseason poll. Are we sure he is ready?

Arch Manning expectations have Texas at No. 1 in preseason poll. Are we sure he is ready? If everything we know about Texas' starting qu...
August recess can't hide tensions ahead for Congress on spending and Trump nominationsNew Foto - August recess can't hide tensions ahead for Congress on spending and Trump nominations

WASHINGTON (AP) — Lawmakers have left Washington for the annual August recess, but a few weeks of relative quiet on the U.S. Capitol grounds can't mask the partisan tensions that are brewing on government funding and PresidentDonald Trump'snominees. It could make for a momentous September. Here's a look at what's ahead when lawmakers return following theLabor Dayholiday. A bitter spending battle ahead Lawmakers will use much of September to work on spending bills for the coming budget year, which begins Oct. 1. They likely will need to pass a short-term spending measure to keep the government funded for a few weeks while they work on a longer-term measure that covers the full year. It's not unusual for leaders from both parties to blame the other party for a potential shutdown, but the rhetoric began extraearly this year, signaling the threat of a stoppage is more serious than usual. On Monday, Senate Democratic leaderChuck Schumerand House Democratic leaderHakeem Jeffriessent their Republican counterparts a sharply-worded letter calling for a meeting to discuss "the government funding deadline and the health care crisis you have visited upon the American people." They said it will take bipartisanship to avert a "painful, unnecessary shutdown." "Yet it is clear that the Trump Administration and many in your party are preparing to go it alone and continue to legislate on a solely Republican basis," said the letter sent to Senate Majority LeaderJohn Thuneand House SpeakerMike Johnson. Republicans have taken note of the warnings and are portraying the Democrats as itching for a shutdown they hope to blame on the GOP. "It was disturbing to hear the Democrat leader threaten to shut down the government in his July 8 Dear Colleague letter," Thune said on Saturday. "... I really hope that Democrats will not embrace that position but will continue to work with Republicans to fund the government." Different approaches from the House and Senate So far, the House has approved two of the 12 annual spending bills, mostly along party lines. The Senate has passed three on a strongly bipartisan basis. The House is pursuing steep, non-defense spending cuts. The Senate is rejecting many of those cuts. One side will have to give. And any final bill will need some Democratic support to generate the 60 votes necessary to get a spending measure to the finish line. Some Democratic senators are also wanting assurances from Republicans that there won't be more efforts in the coming weeks toclaw backor cancel funding already approved by Congress. "If Republicans want to make a deal, then let's make a deal, but only if Republicans include an agreement they won't take back that deal a few weeks later," said Sen.Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass. Rep. Chuck Fleischmann, R-Tenn., a veteran member of the House Appropriations committee, said the Democratic minority in both chambers has suffered so many legislative losses this year, "that they are stuck between a rock and their voting base." Democrats may want to demonstrate more resistance toDonald Trump, but they would rue a shutdown, he warned. "The reality would be, if the government were shut down, the administration, Donald Trump, would have the ability to decide where to spend and not spend," Fleischmann said. "Schumer knows that, Jeffries knows that. We know that. I think it would be much more productive if we start talking about a short-term (continuing resolution.)" Republican angry about pace of nominations Republicans are considering changes to Senate rules to get more of Trump's nominees confirmed. Thune said last week that during the same point inJoe Biden'spresidency, 49 of his 121 civilians nominees had been confirmed on an expedited basis through a voice vote or a unanimous consent request. Trump has had none of his civilian nominees confirmed on an expedited basis. Democrats have insisted on roll call votes for all of them, a lengthy process than can take days. "I think they're desperately in need of change," Thune said of Senate rules for considering nominees. "I think that the last six months have demonstrated that this process, nominations is broken. And so I expect there will be some good robust conversations about that." Chuck Schumersaid a rules change would be a "huge mistake," especially as Senate Republicans will need Democratic votes to pass spending bills and other legislation moving forward. The Senate held a rare weekend session as Republicans worked to get more of Trump's nominees confirmed. Negotiations focused on advancing dozens of additional Trump nominees in exchange for some concessions on releasing some already approved spending. At times, lawmakers spoke of progress on a potential deal. But it was clear that there would be no agreement when TrumpattackedSchumer on social media Saturday evening and told Republicans to pack it up and go home. "Tell Schumer, who is under tremendous political pressure from within his own party, the Radical Left Lunatics, to GO TO HELL!" Trump posted on Truth Social. __ Associated Press writers Mary Clare Jalonick and Joey Cappelletti contributed to this report.

August recess can't hide tensions ahead for Congress on spending and Trump nominations

August recess can't hide tensions ahead for Congress on spending and Trump nominations WASHINGTON (AP) — Lawmakers have left Washington ...

 

MARIO VOUX © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com