For Trump, Russia's nuclear saber-rattling may be a useful distractionNew Foto - For Trump, Russia's nuclear saber-rattling may be a useful distraction

There's something faintly undignified about a president of the United States being goaded by aminor Russian officialinto making nuclear threats on social media. But that's exactly what President Donald Trump has now done by ordering the repositioning of two US nuclear submarines, allowing himself to appear rattled by the hollow saber-rattling of Dmitry Medvedev, an outspoken but long-sidelined former Russian president. In a series of bombastic posts on social media, Medvedev, who has styled himself as a virulent anti-Western critic in recent years, slammed Trump's soon to expire deadline on Russia for a peace deal in Ukraine, saying that each new ultimatum was a "step towards war" – not between Russia and Ukraine, but "with his own country." The US president should remember "how dangerous the fabled 'Dead Hand' can be," Medvedev wrote, in a provocative reference to Russia's Soviet-era automatic nuclear retaliation system, which can initiate the launch of intercontinental ballistic missiles if it detects a nuclear strike. Trump's own secretary of state, Marco Rubio, played down the Russian's recent posts, pointing out that Medvedev isn't a decision-maker in Moscow anymore. It is a view shared by many Russians, for whom Medvedev is widely seen as politically irrelevant, with little authority,let alone the power to launch a nuclear strike. It begs the question as to why Trump would even engage with what he himself described as "foolish" statements, and issue such a strident public response which ratchets up the rhetoric between Washington and Moscow. One possible answer is that it's a convenient way for Trump to appear tough on Moscow, singling out a public figure often dubbed "little Dima" in Russia because of his small stature, without directly confronting the real power in the Kremlin, President Vladimir Putin, or indeed making any concrete changes to the US nuclear posture. Trump said his order for two nuclear submarines "to be positioned in the appropriate regions" came in case Medvedev's "foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that." But there are multiple US nuclear submarines, armed with hundreds of nuclear warheads, patrolling the world's oceans on any given day. Given the multi-thousand-mile range of the missiles they carry, as well as the vast size of Russia, it is unlikely any repositioning would make a significant difference to their ability to strike Russian targets. But, as ever, the timing is key. Trump's Mideast envoy, Steve Witkoff, in his dual role as a makeshift Russia mediator, is set to hold more talks with the Russian leadership in the coming days. He is likely to again press for a ceasefire as a deadline set by Trump, for the Kremlin to agree to peace in Ukraine or face stiff tariffs, is set to expire. Few realistically expect the Kremlin, which has stubbornly insistedon achieving its stated military objectivesbefore ending the Ukraine conflict, to back down. The latest escalating nuclear rhetoric is unlikely to change that hardline position. But, again, as Trump weighs – and possibly backs away from – the potentially self-damaging impact of imposing secondary sanctions on countries such as India and China who buy Russian oil, as he has threatened to do, the phantom of increased nuclear readiness may prove to be a useful distraction. In fact, creating a distraction from mounting political problems at home may be a welcome byproduct of the escalating nuclear rhetoric. Talk of mounting nuclear readiness towards Russia, which has more atomic weapons than any other country in the world, could overshadow more trifling domestic matters, like the Epstein scandal, for instance. Of course, any mention of nuclear escalation between the world's biggest nuclear superpowers rightly attracts serious attention. But the broader relationship between Washington and Moscow, though under renewed pressure, is nowhere near nuclear confrontation. And while the seemingly flippant use of nuclear threats by both nations may be concerning, it does not signal that a nuclear confrontation is on the way. For more CNN news and newsletters create an account atCNN.com

For Trump, Russia’s nuclear saber-rattling may be a useful distraction

For Trump, Russia's nuclear saber-rattling may be a useful distraction There's something faintly undignified about a president of th...
Democrats work to transcend weak party brand by exploiting Trump's problemsNew Foto - Democrats work to transcend weak party brand by exploiting Trump's problems

WASHINGTON — As members of Congress prepare to head home for summer recess, both parties are reckoning with their respective weaknesses and monitoring key changes to the emerging 2026 landscape. Democrats, saddled with record-low ratings for their party, are seeking a jolt of energy from appealing local candidates who can credibly claim distance from the national brand and the disappointments of 2024. Republicans are looking to sell voters on the most popular aspects of President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill," though Trump's own ratings have slid this year and polls show the sweeping law to be unpopular overall. It all comes as both parties are gearing up for next year's midterm elections, which historically tend to be a referendum on the president. Republicans control both chambers of Congress, with Democrats needing to net three seats to take control of the House and four to flip the Senate. The president's party traditionally loses seats in a midterm year, thoughnew Republican redistricting effortscould bolster Trump's GOP. Democrats face a steeper climb in the Senate, with most of the Republican seats up in 2026 in red states. Still, Democrats are more optimistic lately that voters' disdain for their party will subside — and that a combination of unpopular Trump policies, strong Democratic candidates, high base enthusiasm and a fragile Republican coalition could tilt the midterm battlefield in their favor. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., who chairs the party's Senate campaign arm, said she sees Democratic prospects improving and predicted a "backlash" reminiscent of the 2006 midterms, when she was first elected to Congress and Democrats pulled off surprise wins in red states. "I think the Republican majority is at risk because of a series of recruitment failures, damaging primaries and their very toxic plan that slashes Medicaid and spikes costs," she said. Republicans stress that they remain in a strong position. "We feel very confident. Certainly not complacent, but confident," said Alex Latcham, executive director of the Senate Leadership Fund, the GOP super PAC aligned with Senate Majority Leader John Thune. "We're taking nothing for granted." While they feel optimistic about their midterm prospects, Democrats acknowledge that they have a brand problem. Polls taken throughout 2025have shown record-low ratings for the Democratic Party, with the GOP faring better, though also in net-negative territory. AQuinnipiac pollthis month found that voters gave Democrats in Congress a dismal 19% approval rating, with 72% disapproving. Even self-identified Democrats disapproved by a 13-point margin. Rep. Suzan DelBene, D-Wash., who chairs Democrats' House campaign committee, acknowledged her party's brand problem in a recent conversation with reporters. She said House Democrats have to work to transcend it with "great candidates" who offer "authentic" messages for their districts. Voters "are absolutely frustrated with the dysfunction, the chaos that they see in Washington, D.C. And they want strong representatives who are going to stand up for them," DelBene said. DelBene suggested more than a dozen House Democrats were able to win last year even as Trump carried their districts "because we had people who were talking directly to voters, who were talking about the issues that matter." Some Democrats also note that the low ratings are driven in part by Democratic voters who are unhappy with their own party but who won't be inclined to support Republicans. Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., said the polls show "there are a lot of Democrats out there who want us to be fighting harder," arguing that his party can turn the problem into an advantage. "Trump is lighting our democracy on fire, and so it's frankly a good sign that there's a lot of Americans who see the threat that he poses to people's health care, to our way of life, to our very democracy, and want their leaders here to be standing up and fighting," Murphy told NBC News. "I understand that those numbers look kind of harrowing for Democrats, but at some level, it's a good sign." Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., who is retiring, also warned that the Democrats' low rating won't save the GOP next fall. He noted that the Republican Party's broad brand was in terrible shape the year before the 2010 GOP wave election. NBC News' July 2009 poll showed 28% of respondents viewing the Republican Party positively, versus 41% who viewed it negatively. "I would go back and remind everybody to look at roughly the 2009 time frame when the same sort of assessments were being made in reverse," Tillis said. "We should take nothing for granted. We should all assume we're running from behind." Both the House and Senate majorities run through territory Trump won in 2024. House Republicans are defending just three districts Trump lost last year, while 13 Democrats are defending seats Trump carried, according to an analysis of election results from the NBC News Decision Desk. Senate Democrats, meanwhile, need to net four seats to take control of the chamber, and just one Republican, Maine's Susan Collins, represents a state that also backed former Vice President Kamala Harris last year. Any path to the majority requires Democrats to win a few states Trump carried by double digits. Pressed on which seats she sees as competitive enough for Democrats to flip, Gillibrand declined to name states but said "there's at least seven or eight states that are going to be in play because of the nature of their agenda." Joanna Rodriguez, a spokeswoman for the National Republican Senatorial Committee, laughed when asked about Gillibrand's contention that seven pickups are a possibility. "Democrats are facing historically low approval ratings of 19% because their delusional leaders focus on radical policies that are unpopular with voters," she said, adding that Republicans are working to "lower costs of living, eliminate government fraud and waste, and keep males out of girls' sports." Democrats are trying to cut into the red-tinted map with specific candidates who have demonstrated crossover appeal before. Former North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper, who just jumped into the race to succeed Tillis, has won six statewide elections since 2000. He's on a collision course with Republican National Committee Chair Michael Whatley, who launched his own campaign Thursday after Trump asked him to run. Tillis warned Tuesday that Cooper will "no doubt" be a formidable candidate. In Ohio, a state unlikely to have a heavily contested Senate race without a particularly strong Democratic candidate, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer has twice traveled to the state in recent months as part of an aggressive recruitment effort targeting former Sen. Sherrod Brown, who lost his seat to Republican Bernie Moreno last year despite outrunning the top of the ticket. Schumer's latest visit came last week, a source familiar with the meeting confirmed to NBC News. (The meeting wasfirst reported by Axios.) Brown has been contemplating a comeback but is torn between the idea of running for Senate or running for governor in 2026, which would give his party a top-tier candidate to take on Trump-endorsed Vivek Ramaswamy. In Texas, meanwhile, some Republicans are worried about scandal-tarred Attorney General Ken Paxton defeating Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, in the primary and jeopardizing a safe seat in the general election. "Number one, he's not going to win. But number two, if he were to win, I think it would jeopardize the president's agenda," Cornyn told NBC News. "It would be the first loss of a statewide race by Republicans in 30 years. So it'd be a disaster." "All that money could be used to pick up Senate seats in Georgia, New Hampshire and Michigan," he added. "But we don't need — we don't expect to give Democrats that opportunity." Democrats have also been buoyed by recent polls with warning signs for Trump and Republicans defending their slim majorities in Congress. The president's approval rating has declined by a net 8 points since April, per a recentFox News poll. Voters remain unhappy with the cost of living, and the president's ratings on handling prices and the economy have tanked — though voters also split evenly on the question of which party they trusted more to handle those issues. Trump's "big, beautiful" law, which both parties call the defining issue in the midterms, is also broadly unpopular, although some provisions get high marks. And the GOP faces a unique challenge: turning out Trump supporters who don't show up as regularly when he isn't on the ballot. Democrats have also stumbled on an issue that provides a rare opening to drive a wedge between Trump and his base: encouraging MAGA-world criticism of how the administration has handled government files surrounding convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. As they prepared for the monthlong August recess, House Democratic leaders distributed a memo encouraging their members to highlight the issue back in their states and districts. Republicans, meanwhile, urged their members to campaign on the "big beautiful bill." The National Republican Congressional Committee issued a memo on Monday urging GOP lawmakers to hold local events and engage with local media to tout popular provisions in the bill, like making the 2017 tax cuts permanent, increasing the child tax credit, cutting taxes on tips and overtime pay, and boosting funds for border security. "Out of touch House Democrats voted to raise taxes, kill jobs, gut national security, and allow wide open borders — it's no surprise their polling is in the gutter," NRCC spokesman Mike Marinella said in a statement. "We will use every tool to show voters that the provisions in this bill are widely popular and that Republicans stood with them while House Democrats sold them out." Republicans have started to tout the measure on the airwaves. One Nation, the nonprofit arm of the main Senate GOP super PAC, haslaunched adspraising it as a "working family tax cut." The GOP also plans to nationalize New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, a democratic socialist whose focus on affordability and grassroots energy powered his campaign. "While President Trump and Republicans are delivering real results by lowering costs and securing the border, Democrats are embracing radical candidates like socialist Zohran Mamdani and fomenting violence against ICE and Border Patrol agents," Republican National Committee spokeswoman Kiersten Pels said. Still, Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., warned that Democrats' weak brand won't save the GOP in the 2026 election. "It'll be a referendum on the party in power, which would be us," Hawley said, adding that his party can only win "by delivering for the people who elected you, which would be my humble suggestion to my Republican friends."

Democrats work to transcend weak party brand by exploiting Trump's problems

Democrats work to transcend weak party brand by exploiting Trump's problems WASHINGTON — As members of Congress prepare to head home for...
Damian Lillard announces he's taking over as general manager of Weber State basketballNew Foto - Damian Lillard announces he's taking over as general manager of Weber State basketball

Damian Lillard is staying true to his roots this offseason. Less than two weeks after the team he spent his first 11 NBA seasons with officially welcomed him home with an introductory press conference, Lillard announced he's going to take over as the general manager of his college alma mater. The Portland Trail Blazers star broke the news Saturday in Ogden, Utah, where he hosted the Weber State Basketball Alumni Classic for the sixth time. "It's something that, my relationship with coach [Eric] Duft and this program means a lot to me, and seeing the success of the program means a lot to me," Lillard said at the event, per theStandard-Examiner. "I feel like I can do a lot to help the program be successful, to help the players even individually continue to grow their careers past college, that's something that I'm passionate about." [Join or create a Yahoo Fantasy Football league for the 2025 NFL season] A legacy continues in Ogden. Wildcat legend Damian Lillard is officially joining Weber State Men's Basketball as the new General Manager.Dame is stepping into a leadership role that will help shape the future of Wildcat hoops.A new era begins now.#WeberStateGreat#DameTimepic.twitter.com/MV3bVHX6st — Weber State Men's Basketball (@WeberStateMBB)August 3, 2025 Lillard played for Weber State from 2008-2012. During his senior season, he averaged 24.5 points per game while shooting 44.6% from the field, including 40.9% from 3. In the process, he won Big Sky Player of the Year for the second time and became a third-team All-American. The Blazers selected him No. 6 overall in the 2012 NBA Draft. Lillard immediately made an impact, collecting NBA Rookie of the Year honors in 2013. He's a nine-time NBA All-Star and two-time NBA 3-Point Contest champion, and he has five top-10 MVP finishes. Lillard signed athree-year, $42 million dealwith the Blazers after the Milwaukee Bucks waived him at the start of free agency. Lillard, 35, is still owed $113 million from the Bucks, whom he wasn't able to win a championship with in his two seasons in Milwaukee. Heruptured his left Achillesin Game 4 of the team's first-round series against the Indiana Pacers. Lillard isn't expected to play during the 2025-26 season. He'll likely serve as a quasi-assistant coach for the Blazers while he recovers. But now he has another non-playing role. In anews release, Weber State said Lillard "will work closely with the coaching staff and athletic department leadership to provide insight, mentorship, and guidance, using his experience at the collegiate and professional levels to elevate the program." In 2015, Lillard finished his degree at Weber State. His No. 1 jersey was retired two years later. Four years after that, in 2021, he was inducted into the WSU Athletics Hall of Fame. "College athletics is constantly evolving, and building a strong program requires time, trust, and commitment," Lillard said in that samenews release. "I believe in what this program represents and the culture that continues to grow at Weber State. The support of our community is vital to the program's success, and I am committed to playing a greater role in that effort." He added: "This opportunity allows me to be even more involved in shaping the future of Weber State basketball."

Damian Lillard announces he's taking over as general manager of Weber State basketball

Damian Lillard announces he's taking over as general manager of Weber State basketball Damian Lillard is staying true to his roots this ...
Victoria Mboko stuns Coco Gauff to reach quarterfinals in MontrealNew Foto - Victoria Mboko stuns Coco Gauff to reach quarterfinals in Montreal

Canadian teenager Victoria Mboko delivered the biggest victory of her career on Saturday when she dominated top-seeded Coco Gauff 6-1, 6-4 to advance to the quarterfinals of the National Bank Open in Montreal. Mboko needed just 62 minutes to dispose of the two-time Grand Slam champion. "It's incredible," Mboko said in French in her on-court interview, according to the WTA. "I'm so happy to beat such a great champion." Mboko, 18, received a wild card entry into the tournament and has dropped just one set in four matches. She is the youngest Canadian quarterfinalist at this event since 17-year-old Helen Kelesi in 1987. Mboko began the year ranked No. 333. She was at No. 85 entering this event and rose to No. 53 with the win over Gauff. Mboko, a Toronto resident, saved all five of her break-point opportunities and converted 4 of 5 against Gauff. She won 15 of 27 points (55.6 percent) against Gauff's second serve. "Coming into the match, I was so locked in," Mboko said in a postmatch interview with Sportsnet. "I tried to keep my composure as much as I could, especially playing in front of so many people. This is a very special experience for me." In May, Gauff lost the first set in a second-round match in Rome against Mboko before rallying to win the next two. The second meeting belonged to Mboko. "I'm sure we're going to have many more battles in the future," Gauff said after the loss. "Yeah, I think she's going to have a lot of success on tour." Gauff again had troubles with her serve as she committed six double faults for a three-match tournament total of 43. In the second round, she had 23 while narrowly beating Danielle Collins in a third-set tiebreaker in the second round and then followed up with 14 in a three-set, third-round win over Russia's Veronika Kudermetova. Mkobo will face unseeded Jessica Bouzas Maneiro in the quarters. The Spaniard beat China's Lin Zhu 7-5, 1-6, 6-2. Bouzas Maneiro had all seven of the match's aces and saved half of the 16 break points she faced while converting nine of the 13 chances she had to break Zhu. No. 9 seed Elena Rybakina of Kazakhstan advanced to the quarterfinals with a 5-7, 6-2, 7-5 victory over No. 30 Dayana Yastremska of Ukraine. Rybakina overcame nine double faults while recording seven aces and converting 5 of 9 break points. Yastremska was one game away from winning before Rybakina won the final three games. The clincher came when she converted her fourth-match point attempt of the decisive game. Yastremska had four aces against seven double faults. Rybakina will face No. 24 seed Marta Kostyuk on Monday. The Ukrainian rallied for a 5-7, 6-3, 6-3 victory over No. 28 McCartney Kessler. Both players had substantial serving issues. Kostyuk scored the lone ace of the match but had 10 double faults. Kessler was worse with 12. Kessler pulled within 4-3 in the third set before Kostyuk won the final two games to sew up the win. --Field Level Media

Victoria Mboko stuns Coco Gauff to reach quarterfinals in Montreal

Victoria Mboko stuns Coco Gauff to reach quarterfinals in Montreal Canadian teenager Victoria Mboko delivered the biggest victory of her car...
The Justice Department seeks voter and election information from at least 19 states, AP findsNew Foto - The Justice Department seeks voter and election information from at least 19 states, AP finds

NEW YORK (AP) — The requests have come in letters, emails and phone calls. The specifics vary, but the target is consistent: The U.S. Department of Justice is ramping up an effort to get voter data and other election information from the states. Over the past three months, the department's voting sectionhas requestedcopies of voter registration lists from state election administrators in at least 15 states, according to an Associated Press tally. Of those, nine are Democrats, five are Republicans and one is a bipartisan commission. In Colorado, the department demanded "all records" relating to the 2024 election and any records the state retained from the 2020 election. Department lawyers have contacted officials in at least seven states to propose a meeting about forging an information-sharing agreement related to instances of voting or election fraud. The idea, they say in the emails, is for states to help the department enforce the law. The unusually expansive outreach has raised alarm among some election officials because states have the constitutional authority to run elections and federal law protects the sharing of individual data with the government. It also signalsthe transformationof the Justice Department's involvement in elections underPresident Donald Trump. The department historically has focused on protecting access to the ballot box. Today, it istaking stepsto crack down on voter fraud and noncitizen voting, both of which arerarebut have been the subject of years of false claims fromTrump and his allies. The department's actions come alongside a broader effort by the administration toinvestigate past electionsand influence the 2026 midterms. The Republican president hascalled for a special prosecutorto investigate the 2020 election that he lost to Democrat Joe Biden and continues tofalsely claimhe won. Trump also has pushed Texas Republicans toredraw their congressional mapsto create more House seats favorable to the GOP. The Justice Department does not typically "engage in fishing expeditions" to find laws that may potentially have been broken and has traditionally been independent from the president, said David Becker, a former department lawyer who leads the nonprofit Center for Election Innovation and Research. "Now it seems to be operating differently," he said. The department responded with an emailed "no comment" to a list of questions submitted by the AP seeking details about the communications with state officials. Requests to states vary and some are specific Election offices in Alaska, Arizona, California, Florida, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Hampshire, New York, Utah, andWisconsinconfirmed to the AP that they received letters from the voting section requesting their statewide voter registration lists. At least one other, Oklahoma, received the request by phone. Many requests included basic questions about the procedures states use to comply with federal voting laws, such as how states identify and remove duplicate voter registrations or deceased or otherwise ineligible voters. Certain questions were more state-specific and referenced data points or perceived inconsistencies from a recent survey from the U.S. Election Assistance Commission, an AP review of several of the letters showed. The Justice Department already hasfiled suitagainst the state election board in North Carolina alleging it failed to comply with a part of the federal Help America Vote Act that relates to voter registration records. More inquiries are likely on the way There are signs the department's outreach isn't done. It told the National Association of Secretaries of State that "all states would be contacted eventually," said Maria Benson, a NASS spokeswoman. The organization has asked the department to join a virtual meeting of its elections committee to answer questions about the letters, Benson said. Some officials have raised concerns about how the voter data will be used and protected. Election officials in at least four California counties — Los Angeles, Orange, San Diego and San Francisco —said the Justice Department sent them letters asking for voter roll records. The letters asked for the number of people removed from the rolls for being noncitizens and for their voting records, dates of birth and ID numbers. Officials in Arizona, Connecticut, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, Rhode Island and Wisconsin confirmed to the AP that they received an email from two department lawyers requesting a call about a potential "information-sharing agreement." The goal, according to several copies of the emails reviewed by the AP, was for states to provide the government with information about instances of election fraud to help the Justice Department "enforce Federal election laws and protect the integrity of Federal elections." One of those sending the emails was a senior counsel in the criminal division. The emails referred to Trump's Marchexecutive order on elections, part of which directs the attorney general to enter information-sharing agreements with state election officials to the "maximum extent possible." Skeptical state election officials assess how to reply Election officials in several states that received requests for their voter registration information have not responded. Some said they were reviewing the inquiries. Officials in some other states provided public versions of voter registration lists to the department, with certain personal information such as Social Security numbers blacked out. Elsewhere, state officials answered procedural questions from the Justice Department but refused to provide the voter lists. In Minnesota, the office of Secretary of State Steve Simon, a Democrat, said the federal agency is not legally entitled to the information. In a July 25 letter to the Justice Department's voting section, Simon's general counsel, Justin Erickson, said the list "contains sensitive personal identifying information on several million individuals." He said the office had obligations under federal and state law to not disclose any information from the statewide list unless expressly required by law. In a recent letter, Republican lawmakers in the state called on Simon to comply with the federal request as a way "to protect the voting rights of the citizens of Minnesota." Maine's secretary of state, Democrat Shenna Bellows, said the administration's request overstepped the federal government's bounds and that the state will not fulfill it. She said doing so would violate voter privacy. The department "doesn't get to know everything about you just because they want to," Bellows said. Some Justice Department requests are questionable, lawyers say There is nothing inherently wrong with the Justice Department requesting information on state procedures or the states providing it, said Justin Levitt, a former deputy assistant attorney general who teaches at Loyola Law School. But the department's requests for voter registration data are more problematic, he said. That is because of the Privacy Act of 1974, which put strict guidelines on data collection by the federal government. The government is required to issue a notice in the Federal Register and notify appropriate congressional committees when it seeks personally identifiable information about individuals. Becker said there is nothing in federal law that compels states to comply with requests for sensitive personal data about their residents. He added that while the outreach about information-sharing agreements was largely innocuous, the involvement of a criminal attorney could be seen as intimidating. "You can understand how people would be concerned," he said. ___ Fields reported from Washington. Associated Press state government reporters from around the country contributed to this report.

The Justice Department seeks voter and election information from at least 19 states, AP finds

The Justice Department seeks voter and election information from at least 19 states, AP finds NEW YORK (AP) — The requests have come in lett...
Transcript: U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan"

The following is the transcript of an interview with U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer that airs on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan" on Aug. 3, 2025. MARGARET BRENNAN: And we're joined now by United States Trade Representative, Jamieson Greer. Ambassador, good to have you here. JAMIESON GREER: Great to be here. Thank you. MARGARET BRENNAN: So the President signed this executive order on Thursday, raises tariff rates on about 70 countries. Should we expect those to be negotiated down in the coming days? JAMIESON GREER: I don't, I don't think they will be in the coming days. I think a lot of these, well I know a lot of these, are set rates pursuant to deals. Some of these deals are announced,  some are not, others depend on the level of the trade deficit or surplus we may have with the country. So, so these, these tariff rates are pretty much set. I expect I do have my phone blowing up. There are trade ministers who, who want to talk more and see how they can work in a different way with the United States, but I think that we have, we're seeing truly the contours of the President's tariff plan right now with these rates. MARGARET BRENNAN: I was reading some interviews you had given, and you said at some point the President's view is maybe a tariff is better than a deal. Are you saying there are countries that just, they have no shot of avoiding a tariff? JAMIESON GREER: Well, I would say that, in fact, most countries in the world, they just have a tariff assigned to them, right? Whether it's– MARGARET BRENNAN: It'll be the 10 percent or 15 percent. JAMIESON GREER: 10 or 15 or the higher level tariff. Because, again, when the President is looking at this, he looks at potential deals, and we bring him potential concessions from countries and the things they might want to do. And he compares that to the potential tariff that might be applied to try to get that deficit down. And then talking to his advisors, he makes a call on this. And you know, sometimes a country will come back and make additional concessions that, that make it more appropriate. He's trying to get at the deficit. He's trying to reshore manufacturing. And so those are the factors he's looking at when he's looking at when he's determining whether he's just going to have a tariff or he'll take a deal. MARGARET BRENNAN: Trying to reshore manufacturing, bring manufacturing jobs back to America. But we just saw in this unemployment data that while the level is pretty low overall, it's pretty steady, good. Manufacturing in particular, we saw it contract for the fifth straight month in July, factory employment dropped to lowest levels in five years. What does that data indicate to you about the impact of your tariffs? JAMIESON GREER: Yeah, I saw that and my own view is that I think a lot of companies were waiting to see if the tax bill was going to come through with the expensing for capital goods and things like that. And so I think now you know a lot of that data comes pre "One Big Beautiful Bill". Now that we have "One Big Beautiful Bill", and we have a better sense of where the taxes are going, I think we're going to see a much, we're going to see more investment, all the, all the commitments on investment we've seen countries making, that's going to come through. And like you said, it's a relatively small number. So I don't, I don't read tariff policy into that number. I think that is kind of pre-bill policy. MARGARET BRENNAN: So you believe the executives are making strategic decisions with hiring, but the President just announced that the head of Labor Statistics is being fired because of the weak jobs report, claiming the data was faked. JAMIESON GREER: Well, I think you know, and I saw what the president did, and he also talked about the, just the record from BLS, you know, last year– MARGARET BRENNAN: Labor Statistics Bureau. JAMIESON GREER: That's right, yeah, exactly. You know, even last year during the campaign, there were enormous swings in the jobs numbers and so it sounds to me like the President has real concerns. You know, not just based on today's but everything we saw last year. You want to be able to have somewhat reliable numbers. There are always revisions, but sometimes you see these revisions go in really extreme ways. And it's, you know, the President is the President. He can choose who works in the executive branch. MARGARET BRENNAN: But you were just saying you weren't really doubting the data. JAMIESON GREER: No, I wasn't– You asked me what I thought about the data– MARGARET BRENNAN: Right. JAMIESON GREER:–And was it reflected in the tariff policy? The answer is no. I mean, my view is, to the extent that there's some kind of, you know, information about manufacturing jobs, you know, I think that we're going to see a big increase in manufacturing jobs now that we have the "one big, beautiful bill" passed, now that we have the expensing going in. And I think that, you know, our manufacturers know that they have a clear and certain path forward on that now. MARGARET BRENNAN: Are you confident, though – because you have to deal in legal terms, in details, with facts and data when you are negotiating a legal agreement – do you trust that if you bring hard data to the president, he takes your counsel, even if it's an inconvenient fact? JAMIESON GREER: Always, yes. I mean, I've spent the- I spend many hours with the president almost every day, and that's what we're talking about is data. We're looking - and I'm on the trade side, of course - and we're looking at import figures, export figures, investment levels, et cetera. And that's how we're making this decision. So I'm very comfortable with that. MARGARET BRENNAN: So you've seen that Apple estimates, for the full year, tariffs are going to cost them more than a billion dollars. For the automakers - GM, Stellantis, Ford - they all came out and said they are going to take a hit from this. AMBASSADOR GREER: Well, so that's exactly the issue, right? We have, over decades, we've had these large manufacturers, advanced manufacturing, that have gone overseas. They've gone to other countries. They've taken advantage of unfair trading practices, and the fact that the US has had low tariffs while other countries haven't, and they've taken advantage of that. That's what businesses do. We're all capitalists. And so if now they have to pay a tariff or build here, the President is creating incentives to bring them back here. That's why GM has announced investments here in the United States, and that's why we have all these companies and countries announcing investment in the US. Because the tariffs create the incentive to do so. MARGARET BRENNAN: But reductions in profits come at a cost, right? And as CEOs are making decisions, how long do you expect this pain to last for corporate America? AMBASSADOR GREER: Well, you know, again, when we look at- you know, when we look at the numbers and the data, we're seeing predictions of more investment here. That's what we want. The President isn't doing this so much for the companies. He's doing it for American workers who have seen their jobs offshored to Mexico, to Vietnam, to China. So when we hear companies having to make hard choices about supply chain changes. We have to do that. I mean the status quo, where we keep making things overseas, because we can do it a little bit cheaper in the short run. That is not preferable to having that investment and employment here in the United States. MARGARET BRENNAN: But we haven't seen that reshoring happen. AMBASSADOR GREER: Well, we have- we have announced AstraZeneca announced they're going to have a $50 billion investment in pharmaceuticals. GM has announced $5 billion. Hyundai Steel has said they're going to do a $21 billion investment in Louisiana. So this is- this is actually happening. These are things from the company saying it right, and they have to say it. And they have, you know, earnings reports, and they have and- they have filings. They can't just make this stuff up. This is real investment that we're seeing. MARGARET BRENNAN: Let me ask you about Canada, which is our second largest- largest trading partner. The president increased tariffs to 35%. It applies, though, to just about 10% of what Canada sells here. Why bother to do this now in the middle of negotiations? AMBASSADOR GREER: So I would say, first of all, you know, Canada is subject to 50% tariffs on steel, aluminum. 25% tariffs on autos, and again, the 35% tariff on- on goods that don't follow the rules of USMCA. And, you know, early on, the president posed a 25% tariff on Canada, and that was really about fentanyl and border issues, right? It's- it's- it's a separate regime from the reciprocal tariff. And what did Canada do in response? You know, they talked about helping at the border. And I'm not, you know, I'm not the drug czar or anything. But what I do know, as the trade guy, is that Canada retaliated. The only other country in the world who retaliated on tariffs was the Chinese. And so if the president's going to take an action and the Canadians retaliate, the United States needs to maintain the integrity of our action, the effectiveness. So we have to go up too. MARGARET BRENNAN: So, you're talking about the things that the former Prime Minister Trudeau put in place, not the  current Prime Minister-- AMBASSADOR GREER: -- And are still in place-- MARGARET BRENNAN: -- That are still in place. But the current prime minister has held off, largely, on retaliation here. That's the guy you're negotiating with and his team. So what's the strategy here? And aren't you worried that this will hurt the broader free trade deal if you truly do want to renegotiate it next year. AMBASSADOR GREER: Well- well, the President's view with with every country, whether it's Canada or Mexico, and regardless of the kind of trade agreement we have in place, is that the net result of the trading system, whether it's our WTO agreements or our existing trade agreements, the net result has been that a lot of the manufacturing has gone overseas, and when that's the net result, you can't continue with that system. So you know, I'm not concerned that it's going to complicate things with Canada. Our view is the President is trying to fix the terms of trade with Canada, and if there's a way to a deal, we'll find it. And if it's not, we'll have the tariff levels that we have. MARGARET BRENNAN : So I hear you drawing distinctions when you say I'm the trade guy, I'm not the drug czar. AMBASSADOR GREER: Correct. MARGARET BRENNAN: I'm the trade guy. I'm not handling these other things. But the President is kind of blending all these things together, because he cited fentanyl once again when it came to tariffs-  to the policy with Canada. He also said on social media, Canada's decision to back statehood for Palestine is going to make it hard for us to make a trade deal. How does that have anything to do with financial and trade agreements? AMBASSADOR GREER: So, so- so, first of all, the president United States has his foreign affairs power where he can- he can manage relations under the Constitution with foreign countries. Second of all, you know, Congress delegated to the president the ability to take economic action in response to national emergencies in the International Economic Emergency Powers Act. And for example, the Treasury Department, they have a number of sanctions where they can actually cut off a country's trade with the United States, prohibit goods, cut them off from our financial system for geopolitical reasons. So the fact that they can do that- almost certainly the President can do something that's not as expansive and just- and just put a fee on those goods, which is a- which is a tariff. So if you-- MARGARET BRENNAN: --But can and should are different things, right? And- and I'm asking this-- JAMIESON GREER: --But to- to go- but- but listen, if you're going to sanction somebody and essentially prohibit trade, you almost certainly can do something that's softer, which is to allow the trade and just put a tariff on it. MARGARET BRENNAN: So let me ask you about Brazil, because the U.S. has a trade surplus with Brazil. That means, you know, we sell them more than we buy from them. So it doesn't seem to be consistent here, when you have the President put 50% tariffs on Brazil, one of the highest of any countries. And at the same time, the President is bringing up things that have nothing to do with trade when he's justifying them. He sent a letter to the current government complaining about the prosecution of his ally, Bolsonaro, who is- who allegedly staged a coup when he lost the last election. The President called it a witch hunt. This seems politically motivated and not about trade. AMBASSADOR GREER: Well, two things. First of all, there's a 10% tariff on Brazil because we have a surplus with them. That's the reciprocal tariff. And then there's a 40% tariff that the President has chosen to do under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, like we would do any sanction where we see geopolitical issues. The President has seen in Brazil, like he's seen in other countries, a misuse of law, a misuse of democracy, what one might call lawfare. It is normal to use these tools for geopolitical issues. I mean, sanctions, we've been using them for years with all kinds of countries, including countries we like-- MARGARET BRENNAN: You view tariffs and sanctions as the same? AMBASSADOR GREER: They're just different in degree. I mean, tariffs are actually lighter than a sanction- a sanction, you're cutting off a country from your financial system. You're prohibiting trade with them. A tariff, you're allowing trade. You're just putting a fee on it. It's a- it's a lesser MARGARET BRENNAN: --But now AMBASSADOR GREER: step than sanctions-- MARGARET BRENNAN: --You- you have moved far away from from dealing with the deficit. Now-- AMBASSADOR GREER: --Well the deficit has a 10% tariff-- MARGARET BRENNAN: --you are talking about politically motivated trade actions here. I mean, the president sent a letter to President Lula, saying that tariffs are due in part to Brazil's insidious attacks on free elections. He also, at the same time, sanctioned the Supreme Court justice overseeing Bolsonaro's trial. Why are you trying to influence a criminal trial of an ally of President Trump? AMBASSADOR GREER: So, so, so the president of United States, historically, whether it's a Democrat or Republican, they have used IEEPA to impose sanctions for all kinds of geopolitical reasons in all kinds of countries. Sometimes it's countrywide, sometimes it's specific to certain, you know, individuals and often foreign leaders and foreign officials. So this is not, this is not way outside the market. If anything, the President could have gone farther in the type of sanction that was used. Instead he just used a tariff instead of cutting them off from the financial system altogether. MARGARET BRENNAN: So you were fully on board with it. It sounds like. AMBASSADOR GREER: With the president of the United States? My boss? Of course I am-- MARGARET BRENNAN: --But with intervening in criminal trials-- AMBASSADOR GREER: --when the President-- MARGARET BRENNAN: -- through trade policy. AMBASSADOR GREER: When the President sees lawfare going on, he's going to impose a sanction through IEEPA that's been delegated by Congress. That's his job as the president. He's elected to assess the Foreign Affairs situation in the United States and take appropriate action. There's just no question that it's both from a legal perspective, it's completely permissible. And from a policy perspective, that's what he's elected to do. MARGARET BRENNAN: When it comes to trade, the big deal that is pending out there is how is the president going to deal with China? There's an August 12 deadline, and if that deadline is not met, you have said tariff levels could snap back to above 80%. Is that deadline going to slide? AMBASSADOR GREER: So that's what's under discussion right now. I would say that our conversations with the Chinese have been very positive. We have discussions at the staff level, at my level, you know, President Xi and President Trump have had conversations. MARGARET BRENNAN: They said that it's sliding. The Chinese said it's sliding. AMBASSADOR GREER: That's something we're working toward. That's what we talked about-- MARGARET BRENNAN: So you're not there yet. AMBASSADOR GREER: And so, so they want to do that. We're working on some technical issues, and we're talking to the president about it, you know, I think it's going in a positive direction. You know, I'm not going to get ahead of the President, but, you know, I don't think anyone wants to see those tariffs snap back to 84%. MARGARET BRENNAN: Did you get any commitments in those two days of talks in Stockholm? AMBASSADOR GREER: So yes, we did. Yes, we talked about, and I won't go into detail, because they're, you know, confidential conversations between two, two governments, but they really focused on rare earth magnets and minerals. You've probably heard some about that, that China has put a global control on the world, and so for the United States, we're focused on making sure that the flow of magnets from from China to the United States and the- and the adjacent supply chain can flow as freely as it did before the control, and I'd say we're about halfway there. MARGARET BRENNAN: Ambassador Greer, thank you for your time today. AMBASSADOR GREER: Thank you so much. MARGARET BRENNAN: And we'll be right back. Black swimmers teach others amid history of aquatic segregation Lawyer says political pressure helped Marine Corps veteran, wife reunite after her ICE detention Judge blocks Trump administration from closing sites that help at-risk kids

Transcript: U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan"

Transcript: U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan" The following is the transcript of...
'Is it worth it?': Red flags to watch with youth sports programsNew Foto - 'Is it worth it?': Red flags to watch with youth sports programs

USA Hockey didn't invent the line, but Ken Martel has used it when he talks about succeeding in sports. "As many as possible for as long as possible with the best environment possible," the organization's senior director of player and coach development told USA TODAY Sports in an interview last year. He was referring to the American Development Model program he helped install more than a decade and a half ago, when the sport was losing young players in our country. The ADM, which has become thecornerstone of USA Hockey's message, has helped bring them back to the ice in droves and, in Martel's thinking, continues to help generateworld junior championship titles. "When you have more kids playing, certainly a few more of them will turn out to be good and you'll see 'em on TV, right?" he says. USA Hockey created the ADM to help keep kids, parents and coaches engaged while, at least in theory, giving everyone a chance to organically develop to his or her full athletic potential. It starts with getting boys and girls enthused from an early age, infusing a love of competition (without a laser focus on winning) and engaging them into adulthood. USA Hockey reports 577,864 registered players (kids and adults) for 2024-25, up from 465,975 in 2008-09. "Geography is no longer a predetermining factor in who can be good in our sport," Martel says. USA TODAY reported Aug. 1, however, about how one NHL club has a monopoly over North Texas ice. It effectively controls the pathways by which the region's young players advance,Kenny Jacoby writes, and has reminded (and even threatened) parents they can block it at any time. "You get so beaten down, and you see your kid get screwed over for opportunities, and you decide, 'You know what? Maybe I do have to play by their rules to get where I want to be,' " says Kat Pierce, a hockey mom whom aDallas Starsemployee attempted to reprimand when she criticized them in a social media post. The power to decide to play a sport, and to stick with it, is ultimately the choice of our kids. As parents we have a right to speak up to a coach or organization without fear of them being penalized. We know from this story and others about the so-called "professionalism of youth sports" that the system isn't always that simple. Here are eight red flags to watch with youth sports programs: USA Hockey delegates much of its authority to regional affiliates. The Texas Amateur Hockey Association oversees Texas and Oklahoma. Member associations' votes are weighted by the number of players they register and, as USA TODAY reports, tilt heavily in the interests of those in Stars leagues or with teams that rent Stars ice. It's an issue with which many of us can relate, at least to some degree. Running a youth team or league is entrusted in the hands of a few – club owners or the board. All too often, it seems, they prioritize their own interests: Making a steep profit or giving their own kids All-Star slots. You should never feel you don't have power, though. Volunteer for the board, file a complaint with the league about a nepotistic coach or speak to other parents if something doesn't feel right. It probably isn't. Band together in your opposition. A board or coach can brush aside one complaint but collective one isn't as easily ignored, and it isn't good for business. Coach Steve:How do I deal with a bad coach? Here are three steps OK, maybe it's not that simple. When Jacoby, my USA TODAY colleague, reported about the Stars' heavy influence in North Texas, he came across a number of parents hesitant to raise concerns out of fear of retaliation against their kids. One dad who coached at a Stars complex inquired about coaching at a competing rink after he felt the Stars had failed to address a safety concern. The Stars fired him when he did so, according to emails he provided, and allegedly banned his 5- and 7-year-old daughters. (A Stars employee denied banning his daughters.) No one wants to risk putting their kids' dreams, or even their playing time, in jeopardy. But think about the concern for a moment. Is being on a team where you're afraid to rock the boat really a situation you want your child to have to endure? Before you do anything, talk to your son or daughter about their experience. They might not want to be there anyway. You always have a voice in their sports journey. Think of yourself as an investor in your team or league. Its leaders should be open to your constructive criticism on how to make it better. Don't take to social media to complain, where you risk making someone feel public embarrassment. Instead, schedule a private meeting where you can mention your concerns diplomatically. The reaction you get will give you a good indication of where you stand. If they aren't willing to consider spreading out rink fees over a larger group of teams, or giving every kid equal playing time when you're paying for a college showcase experience, for example, this might not be worth your time. No single team will make or break whether your child reaches an elite level of a sport, but asingle experiencemight determine whether they keep playing at all. We can help.Submit your feedback hereabout how the corporatization of youth sports has affected you and your kids. We wrote in a line specifically for those of you who've faced retaliation or threats. An internal study the NHL and NHL Players' Association conducted in 2018 found that out of the 700-plus players on rosters, 98% of them were multisport athletes as kids. "Get out, play multiple sports," says USA Hockey's Martel. "Look, if your passion's not ice hockey, you're never gonna really turn out to be a great player if you don't truly love it. And if you find a passion that happens to be another sport, wonderful." TheAmerican Development Modelrecommends multisport play until at least age 12. Arguments can be made to take it longer. "I am dead set against single-sport athletes (while kids are growing up)," former football coach Urban Meyerhas said. "When my son was playing baseball I had many people tell me that he should just stop playing other sports and focus on baseball. I got in big arguments with people, and a lot of those kids that (at) nine, 10 years old were great - they blew out. They burned out, andthey're not playing anymore." Meyer said he looked at kids who played football and another sport at a high level. Brenda Frese, another national championship-winning coach, also loves recruiting basketball players who play multiple sports. "We just see the benefits of it – you know, mentally, physical, socially, you name it," Frese's husband, Mark Thomas, told me in an interview for a 2023profile of the Maryland women's coachand her family. "At an early age, teams try to take over your calendar. A key little tool I learned is that as long as you're playing multiple sports, you give yourself some leverage that they can't take over your schedule completely because you have commitments to multiple teams. Eventually, you may have some hard-line coaches." When one of the couple's twin sons played club soccer in seventh grade, Thomas recalled the coach telling parents and players:We expect you to only play soccer now and if you're not just playing soccer, then we don't want you. "From the soccer club's end, why wouldn't you keep more kids involved?" Thomas said. "I mean, he was never a kid who was gonna be a professional or anything like that. I didn't understand the point." The National Athletic Trainers' Association recommends playing for one team at a time, playing a sport for less than eight months per year and at no more hours per week than your age. You can always specializethe year before high school if you are concerned about making a specific team, but playing other sports recreationally on the side will make you a better athlete. As Martel looked to reinvent American hockey, he discontinued a 12-and-under national championship. "The only pushback we got was from a few adults that run programs; it was more about them than it was about the kids," he says. "Why do we need to run across the country at 12 for a championship? If you're gonna run a 12U national championship, the 10U coach starts aggregating players because we need to get them all together so that they're ready by the time they're 12. And it juststarts the race to the bottomsooner." Project Play, a national initiative of the Aspen Institute to build healthy communities through sports, surveys children. When it asks them what they like most about playing sports, having fun and playing with friends always ranks at the top and by a lot, according to Aspen Sports & Society community impact director Jon Solomon. Solomon says winning games and chasing scholarships rank lower, such as in theWashington, D.C. State of Play report. Yes, kids thrive off game situations. But instead of loading up on age-specific travel tournaments, play the 8- through 12-year-olds together, as USA Hockey suggests. Prioritize small-sided games in practice over "boring" drills, as Martel calls them. "We do different things in that to get them to work on different technical abilities and different tactical situations," Martel says. "But kids have fun. They get to problem solve. There's autonomy to that. And you see that in our play." It costs a lot less, too. We love the adventure of traveling with our kids through their sports. Hitting the road can give them exposure to top competition. It's also a prime intersection for collusion. For years, according to USA TODAY reporting, three Stars executives organized tournaments that required out-of-town participants to book minimum three-night stays at select hotels. At the same time, they ran their own for-profit company that took a cut of the revenue. After our investigation, the Stars say they will be "loosening" the policies. Although stay-to-play arrangements remain common across youth sports, I have never encountered one over about eight years of traveling with my sons for their baseball teams. The hotels our team or a tournament recommends are always suggestions. I book at a better rate through my rewards program if I find one. We sometimes run into tournaments that are a couple of hours from home. Once the game times are announced, we might choose to return for one of the nights. Having that choice improves our quality of life, and our satisfaction with the team. The most effective coaches maintain a cordial yet arm's length rapport with parents. They lay out the ground rules in a meeting before the season – no parent coaching from the bleachers, perhaps? – and say something to parents who violate them. Playing for close friends is inevitable when kids are younger. When they are preparing to play high school ball or competing in front of college coaches, though, there are enough distractions without having to worry about your coach favoring someone over you. Brent Tully was a former defenseman who helped Team Canada win two world junior championships in the 1990s. He later became general manager for an elite junior hockey team in Ontario and has coached younger players. He's also a father of two athletes. He has seen first hand the long hours and travel, the tens of thousands of dollars spent, the living "hand-to-mouth," as Pierce, the Texas hockey mom, described in my colleague's story. All for what? "I can't imagine parents at the end of that last year (when) their child isn't drafted," Tully said in 2024. "And that's the end. The disappointment of the ending, it's all too frequent. "My oldest son, back when he was playing, they were an average to below average team. And they stayed that way, even beyond the years he had stopped playing. I knew some of the fathers pretty well. And one father, at the end of nine years of minor hockey - and he complained all the time, complained about his son's ice time, about the coaching -  I remember saying to him, 'So was that all worth it?' Was that fun? All the money you spent. Your son's now gone to college, and he's working a job and you could have had him play house league, probably left with a lot less frustration. And he can still play the game his whole life at the level he's playing. ... "Regardless of where a boy or girl plays, that should be a great experience." Coach Steve:10 questions athletes should consider if they play on a travel team With the right experience, his sport can be ingrained in someone from "cradle to grave," as USA Hockey's Martel describes. "Hockey is played with no contact in a lot of places," he says. "We have 70-and-over national championships. It's really low impact and it's a lot of fun. There's people that play when they're 100. So hopefully you come back to the sport and you're involved over a life. "You don't see that in American football. No one wants to go out and get tackled and have to go to work the next day." Steve Borelli, aka Coach Steve, has been an editor and writer with USA TODAY since 1999. He spent 10 years coaching his two sons' baseball and basketball teams. He and his wife, Colleen, are now sports parents for two high schoolers. His column is posted weekly.For his past columns, click here. Got a question for Coach Steve you want answered in a column? Email him atsborelli@usatoday.com This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Red flags in youth sports programs, how to spot and respond to them

'Is it worth it?': Red flags to watch with youth sports programs

'Is it worth it?': Red flags to watch with youth sports programs USA Hockey didn't invent the line, but Ken Martel has used it w...

 

MARIO VOUX © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com