Senate confirms new FAA administrator at a time of rising concern about air safetyNew Foto - Senate confirms new FAA administrator at a time of rising concern about air safety

WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. Senate on Wednesday confirmed Bryan Bedford to lead the Federal Aviation Administration, putting him in charge of the federal agency at a precarious time for the airline industry after recentaccidents, including the January collision near Washington, D.C. that killed 67 people. Bedford was confirmed on a near party-line vote, 53-43. Republicans and industry leaders lauded PresidentDonald Trump'schoice of Bedford, citing his experience as CEO of regional airline Republic Airways since 1999. Sen.Ted Cruz, the chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, called Bedford a "steady leader with executive experience." But Democrats and flight safety advocates opposed his nomination, citing Bedford's lack of commitment to the 1,500-hour training requirement for pilots that was put in place by Congress after a 2009 plane crash in New York. Bedford declined during his confirmation hearing to commit to upholding a rule requiring 1,500 hours of training for pilots, saying only that he would not "have anything that will reduce safety." Sen.Maria Cantwell, the top Democrat on the Commerce panel, accused Bedford of wanting "to roll back safety reforms and unravel the regulatory framework that made the United States the gold standard" in aviation safety. Congress implemented the 1,500-hour rule for pilot training and other safety precautions after the2009 Colgan Air crashnear Buffalo, New York. In that flight, the pilot had not been trained on how to recover froma stall in the aircraft. His actions caused the plane carrying 49 people to fall from the sky and crash into a house, where another man was killed. Families of the victims of the Colgan crash pushed for the stricter training requirements and remain vocal advocates for airline safety. They joined Senate Democratic leaderChuck Schumerat a press conference at the U.S. Capitol to express concern about Bedford's nomination. Marilyn Kausner, the mother of a passenger on the 3407 flight, said she and other families requested a meeting with Transportation SecretarySean Duffyafter Bedford's confirmation hearing. Her husband, she said, was "discouraged" after hearing what Bedford had to say at his hearing. Pilot Chesley "Sully" Sullenberger, made famous for safely landing a plane in the Hudson River, also opposedDonald Trump's pick, posting onsocial media that"with the nomination of Bryan Bedford to be FAA Administrator, my life's work could be undone." Republican Sen.Todd Young, who is also on the committee, called the 1,500-hour rule an "emotional topic" but maintained that Bedford's approach to safety is clearly "analytical," prioritizing what "we ascertain leads to the best safety for passengers." "All you have to do is look at his credentials and his testimony to be persuaded that he's the right person for the job," Young said. Bedford has support from much of the industry. The air traffic controllers union noted his commitment to modernize the outdated system. Airlines for America, a trade association for major airlines, called Bedford a "superb choice." And United Airlines CEO Scott Kirby said, having worked with Bedford, he had "total confidence in his ability to lead the FAA."

Senate confirms new FAA administrator at a time of rising concern about air safety

Senate confirms new FAA administrator at a time of rising concern about air safety WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. Senate on Wednesday confirmed ...
US tariffs on South Africa set to hit white farmers Trump has embracedNew Foto - US tariffs on South Africa set to hit white farmers Trump has embraced

By Wendell Roelf CITRUSDAL, South Africa (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump's threatened 30% tariff on South African exports is set to deal an economic blow to a community he has vocally and controversially championed: white farmers. Citing false claims that white South Africans are being persecuted, Trump has cut aid to the country, publicly berated its president in the Oval Office and invited Afrikaners - descendants of early European settlers - to come to the United States as refugees. But for white farmers who remain rooted in their homeland and aspire to keep making a living from the land, the tariffs due to come into effect on August 1 are an assault on those ambitions. "It doesn't make sense to us to welcome South African farmers in America and then the rest that stays behind ... to punish them," said Krisjan Mouton, a sixth-generation farmer in Western Cape province's citrus heartland. "It's going to have a huge impact," he said, standing among rows of trees heavy with navel oranges on his farm near the town of Citrusdal. "It's not profitable to export anymore to the USA." After a three-month pause, Trump escalated the global trade offensive he launched in April, announcing tariffs on more than a dozen countries on Monday, including South Africa. Its citrus fruit, along with wine, soybeans, sugar cane and beef, had previously benefited from duty-free access to the U.S. under the Africa Growth and Opportunities Act. Helped by that trade initiative, South Africa, the world's second-largest citrus exporter after Spain, generates $100 million annually from the U.S. market. The new tariff ends that preferential treatment. And with three-quarters of South Africa's freehold land white-owned, white farmers will face the immediate economic fallout though they will not be the only casualties. Boitshoko Ntshabele, chief executive of the Citrus Growers' Association of Southern Africa (CGA) said the levy will hurt all South African farmers and farm workers, no matter their race. "A 30% tariff would wreak havoc on communities that have, for decades, focused on producing specifically for the U.S. market," he said. 'FARMERS WILL GO BANKRUPT' Its location in the Southern Hemisphere means South Africa produces citrus at times of the year when the U.S. doesn't, with its exports giving U.S. consumers year-round access to fruit. While the United States accounts for only around 6% of South Africa's citrus exports, some farming areas produce specifically for the U.S. market. Redirecting produce grown for the U.S. to other markets is not simple, as size and plant health requirements vary from country to country. Nestled in a valley in Western Cape's rugged Cederberg mountains, Mouton's family farm employs 21 permanent workers, and nearly triple that number during peak picking season. The CGA has said about 35,000 jobs are at risk in Citrusdal alone, as the tariffs risk making South African citrus uncompetitive compared to fruit from Peru, Chile, and Australia. South African President Cyril Ramaphosa has said trade talks with Washington will continue and argued that the 30% rate was based on an inaccurate understanding of the two countries' trade. In the meantime though, the CGA wants to speed up an expansion of exports to new markets including China and India. High tariffs in some countries and stringent plant health requirements in the European Union, for example, make that a complicated prospect, however. Not far from Mouton's farm, workers are carrying on as usual, for now, sorting and packing fruit at the 14,000-square-metre Goede Hoop Citrus warehouse. But if the 30% levy remains in place, that won't last long, managing director Andre Nel told Reuters. "Farmers will go bankrupt. For sure there would be job losses within our sector," he said. "I don't even want to think about it." ($1 = 17.8568 rand) (Reporting by Wendell Roelf, Siyanda Mthethwa and Nelson Banya; Editing by Olivia Kumwenda-Mtambo and Joe Bavier)

US tariffs on South Africa set to hit white farmers Trump has embraced

US tariffs on South Africa set to hit white farmers Trump has embraced By Wendell Roelf CITRUSDAL, South Africa (Reuters) -U.S. President D...
NFL uniforms ranked: Where do Commanders, Saints land after revealing new alternates?New Foto - NFL uniforms ranked: Where do Commanders, Saints land after revealing new alternates?

With full-blown training camp practices still a few weeks away, the NFL is enjoying what should be the laziest portion of its calendar. But talking about America's most popular sports league never goes out of fashion – even if you simply want to talkaboutits fashion. And while none of the 32 teams unveiled a significant uniform overhaul for 2025 – theCommanders did reveal a new alternate Tuesday morningand some other teams will follow suit in the coming days − that doesn't mean you won't see some fresh originality this season. Not only will the league allow clubs to wear alternate or throwback uniforms from their "closet" ("kits" are for soccer, football fashionistas) up to four times this season – previously, the max utilization was three times per year – restrictions that previously prevented them from combining alternate helmets with classic uniforms are being loosened. For example, we might now see the Bengals' white tiger helmet worn with their black jerseys, a combo heretofore verboten. There's more. Nike is launching "Rivalries" uniforms and gear this year for AFC East and NFC West teams. And while details are currently under lock and key, USA TODAY Sports has learned it would be accurate to say the new threads will generally be adjacent to the NBA's popular "City Edition" uniforms or Major League Baseball's "City Connect" jerseys. Along with the uniform, the "Rivalries" look will also mean another helmet in the closet for those eight teams in 2025 and the following three years, according to a person familiar with the rollout. That person requested anonymity given the NFL's and Nike's desire for secrecy around the unis ahead of their launch. Per the NFL, "Each participating team will wear a unique Rivalries uniform with designs rooted extensively in local community insights during a single home game against a division rival. The designs have been brought to life by pulling inspiration from the history of each market and the aspects of the community that only that team's city embodies." The other 24 teams will incrementally be added in groups of eight to the program through the 2028 season. USA TODAY Sports will bring you more on this front in the coming weeks and looks forward to reviewing and assessing the new looks. But the July interlude seemed like a good time to roll out our annual uniform power rankings, listed from worst to best (previous rank in parentheses): The hardest-core purists will disagree ... and I suspect most of them live in northeast Ohio. But the colors are ugly, and the logo-less uniforms are boring. Full stop. And unless the soon-to-be-revealed alternate helmet features the Dawg Pound insignia fans and players picked two years ago − and fat chance of that − then why bother? and the winner is...Introducing our new official dog logo!! 🐾🎉#DawgPoundpic.twitter.com/zny6NxobHy — Cleveland Browns (@Browns)June 12, 2023 more than meets the eye 🧐🦴pic.twitter.com/iwJ7i1kN6a — Cleveland Browns (@Browns)June 12, 2023 Not only do they look outdated, as most 1990s get-ups do, the Panthers just can't stop tinkering – literally using 10 different uniform combinations in 2024. Talk about a lack of identity. Interesting fact about the logo: it's meant to resemble the fused outline of North and South Carolina. It also looks better recessed like a shadow into the team's alternate black helmets – Panthers thrive with camouflage, y'all. Otherwise? Keep the color scheme but reimagine everything below the neckline. Been a turbulent few years, the franchise mothballing its long-worn uniforms – which it was finally compelled to do – in favor of the barebones "Washington Football Team" interim versions and then thesemi-disastrous rollout of the Commanders rebranding. The current road jerseys with the gradient numbering remain eyesores. The original black Commanders alternates are pretty slick, the D.C. flag on the sleeves a nice detail, but many fans think it's too similar to the Steelers. Personally, I've never minded that the franchise retained its traditional colors, including the return of gold pants in 2024, to keep some linkage to its glory days − though some believe it would have been best to make a complete break from its 87-year run using a nickname that's defined as a racial slur. Little chance of such a pivot now, the team essentially readopting the uniforms from its glory years Wednesday. The only noticeable difference in thenew alternates, which resemble what the team wore in its four Super Bowl appearancesbetween the 1982 and '91 seasons is the current Commanders "W" logo standing in for the former Indian head insignia. Weaving past and presentWe're adding back the Super Bowl Era threads to our uniform rotationpic.twitter.com/9nKrTYVABk — Washington Commanders (@Commanders)July 9, 2025 While teams like the Panthers are something of a mess, the Titans seem to at least understand less is more – though even that's problematic to a degree. They wore seven combinations in 2024, most notably the glorious Houston Oilers throwbacks, but had several more permutations at their disposal. However the Oilers unis won't come out of the closet this season – yes, the Titans left Texas in 1997 and took their branding with them – and "Titans Blue" will become the primary home color (instead of navy). The whole thing is probably moot given a major redesign seems to be coming in 2026. I'd venture most NFL fans – and certainly those in the Boston market – would like to see them go back to "Pat Patriot" full time and relegate the "Flying Elvis" logo to the Tom Brady era, though the slightly more understated contemporary version is preferable to the one TB12 wore. The Pats' "Rivalries" unis have a chance to be distinctive given the wealth of American history that's occurred in the region. Though now well past that disastrous two-tone gold and black helmet, they suffer – to a lesser degree – from the same issues as the Panthers, whom the Jags entered the NFL with in 1995. Jacksonville had eight separate uniform combinations last season, adding a white helmet to their closet … for whatever reason. The addition of the "Prowler Throwbacks," a nod to the club's early yearswasnice. Suggestion: what might make the contemporary unisnicerwould be a little feline spotting as part of the striping pattern. They swung the pendulum from excessively busy uniforms tofairly boring ones two years ago– though low key is definitely the preferable side of that spectrum. Admittedly, there's only so much creative space when you're stuck with a non-threatening bird that subsists on insects and (non-playoff) seeds as your mascot – yet it's worth noting the St. Louis Cardinals have long been one of MLB's best-looking squads. Here's hoping the football Cards' "Rivalries" look has some kind of nod to former DB Pat Tillman nearly a quarter-century after he played his final game for the club. I've long contended they look like bruises – which is somehow apropos given the tough guy football identity this franchise has almost always had. And when you're mainly adorned in black and purple, that's going to happen. The Maryland flag baked into the shoulder crest remains the best detail. And give them credit fortrying the "Purple Rising" look last season, which featured a forward-facing bird on the helmet. But meh. They just about nailed it at their inception point in 1966 – uniforms that now serve as their throwbacks – featuring their best logo and the red, black, white and gold color combination that served as a dual tip of the cap to the University of Georgia and Georgia Tech. In later years, they tried silver pants and then black helmets – and it's fair to say anything Deion Sanders wore in his five-year stint (1989-1993), including the Jerry Glanville and MC Hammer days, would look awesome now. But the Falcons have been steadily degrading with a pair of ugly rebrands this century – though, thankfully, their gradient "ATL" jerseys haven't been seen since 2022. Though, more amazingly, the team hasn't worn red ones of any kind since 2019. It's high time the Falcons got back to basics in a more permanent way. Thankfully their 100th season is over … and we won't have to see those ancient throwbacksfeaturing Montreal Canadiens jerseys paired with khaki-colored pants, which they wore (just once) last season. Their 1980s retro uniform remains their best look, and the bland red-and-white roadies (which inexplicably lack any blue notes) remain problematic. The aqua and orange is distinctly South Florida, though the dolphin logo introduced in 2013 – time flies, right? – has never eclipsed its forebear, the aquatic mammal wearing the white helmet adorned with an orange "M." Who knows what their "Rivalries" look will entail, but I'd venture something akin to a "Miami Vice" or "Vice City" theme would be wicked. The current avatar on the Dolphins' X account provides reason to hope. No spirit can outlast the one that's building beneath the surface.Our 2025 schedule is here 🐬😤pic.twitter.com/QDkteHcGQi — Miami Dolphins (@MiamiDolphins)May 15, 2025 They retooled behind center in 2024 with the arrival of rookie QB Bo Nix and retooled their look, too. And while Nix was pretty much an unqualified success, the jury remains out on the unis – whicharebetter than the previous iteration and attempt to incorporate Colorado charm, prevalent triangular "summit markers" on the jersey and back of helmet plus "5280" to reference the number of feet the Mile High City is above sea level. Another team determined to work a white helmet shell into its rotation, here's hoping the Broncos make more use of the 1977 "Orange Crush" throwbacks they rocked twice last season. A new era forged by#BroncosCountry.pic.twitter.com/LaK3ZfsoZ9 — Denver Broncos (@Broncos)April 22, 2024 Classic, traditional and lacking flash ... their fantastic suite of socks notwithstanding. The "GSH" on the sleeve has always been a nice touch honoring founder George Halas. The alternate orange helmets look like pumpkins but maybe they'll only appear half as bad now that they can be worn with the navy jerseys. More monochromatic combinations might help – Chicago hasn't gone white on white, which takes you back to Walter Payton's heyday, since 2009. And it would be especially nice if a team that likes to use the Michigan-esque throwbacks instead went with a white "C" on the helmet in a nod to the Halas-Butkus-Sayers days. The altered number fonts and uniform striping last season were upgrades. And who's to say if the all-black alternates coach Dan Campbell wanted back helped the NFC North champs to a franchise record 15 regular-season wins? Shame, though, that they didn't keep the "Honolulu Blue" helmet with the throwback logo and Ford Mustang striping used to celebrate the club's 90th season in 2023. Gone, too, are the "WCF" initials on the sleeve that honored former owner William Clay Ford – perhaps apropos given he didn't win championships like Halas did. Not sure how you responsibly incorporate "Mafia" into the "Rivalries" uniform, but Nike can doubtless figure it out. (And, please, don't be tempted by buffalo wings.) Still, some flair doesn't hurt here. The charging buffalo logo is nifty, yet it's a bummer that the AFL-era grazing buffalo hasn't made an appearance in four years. The Bills seem pretty content to wear their conservative blue jerseys and white pants (or the inverse) as often as possible. One of the league's oldest teams has remained pretty firmly rooted in tradition – rarely making changes to its classic look since the 1960s, when it was perhaps the greatest dynasty in NFL history. But the Pack has sported a nice green-over-green alternate since 2021 and introduced an all-white (helmet included) "Winter Warning" look in 2024. (Sigh.) Maybe the new throwbacks that are coming this year,per Sportslogos.net, will somehow spice things up a bit more … though spice isn't usually part of this brand's formula. It tracks that the NFL's youngest team – the Texans are entering their 24th season – is the only one to never change its primary helmet logo, the bull's head featuring the design of the Texas state flag an underrated one. And whether or not you liked the results,give Houston credit for taking a big swing last yearby tweaking its primary home and road uniforms while rolling out two drastically reimagined alternates for their closet. Again, here's hoping the oh-so-sweet Oilers uniforms get returned to Houston at some point. We owe them a debt as their iconic horns became the first logo to adorn an NFL helmet back in 1948 – and the modern iteration has settled in even if there was never much reason to mess with it. However the remainder of their present look is a mixed bag. The new-ish roadies have allowed the Rams to move away from the "bone" uniforms initially intended for that role – but LA only wore them twice in 2024. And the gradient jersey numbers on the blue home jerseys have got to go. Given the civic history, their "Rivalries" look could go any number of ways – but hopefully it truly smacks of Los Angeles, as some of the Clippers' alternates have in recent years. And throwbacks would be nice, preferably navy jerseys and helmets with white ram horns. Do it for Deacon Jones. They've long sported a classic look, crowned by the interlocking "KC" in the arrowhead helmet logo … and that's about it. And, hey, it's certainly been working for them in recent years, and it's not like it makes sense to wear their Dallas Texans uniforms from the 1960s. Their somewhat problematic team name also limits their creative space. Still, feels like there's some room for variance, but owner Clark Hunt hasn't been open to it. And, heck, maybe he's right. No one's begging for gold pants or jerseys here for theonly team in the league without an alternate or throwbackoption. They've long sported a classic look, crowned by the interlocking "SF" in the helmet logo, and even their throwbacks tend not to deviate much. Even their black alternates have been mothballed since a three-year trial apparently ended following the 2017 season. (But at least San Francisco tries new things, so we'll give them the nod over the Chiefs ... for once.) Here's hoping the Niners are willing to go a little further afield with this year's "Rivalries" unis – we'd definitely be down for a helmet featuring the Golden Gate Bridge and/or Alcatraz … even if the team now lives in Silicon Valley (no microchips, please). However, they seem to be teasing some fundamental changes that pay homage to Northern California, 19th century western history and possibly more utilization of the gold palette and introduction of cream-colored elements. Mapping out a bold new path 🗺️An inside look at our visual refresh ⬇️ — San Francisco 49ers (@49ers)May 13, 2025 Love them or hate them, the league's most visible club sports an iconic, clean look. "America's Team" has traditionally worn white at home for decades, legendary former team president Tex Schramm wanting his home fans to experience different color visuals provided by visiting teams wearing their traditional home jerseys. White also kept the Cowboys a bit cooler in Texas' heat. Personally, I always thought their dark blue jerseys looked better, but they also evidently bring bad luck – a theory floated long before the club's current three-decade Super Bowl drought. Their pair of alternate white helmets and throwback look has never been especially inspiring. The coolest thing the Cowboys do is add a red stripe to their helmet in recent years during the NFL's Salute to Service program, a touch used to honor the military, veterans and Medal of Honor winners. (Prior to 2021, the red stripe was only worn during the 1976 season, which coincided with America's bicentennial celebration.) If ever there was a team that should just stick to its basic uniform, it might be this one – and the Colts, signature helmet horseshoe and all – have largely done exactly that. Even they seem to know it, breaking out their "Indiana Nights" alternates with the ugly black helmet just once each of the past two seasons – naturally for 1 p.m. ET kickoffs. They finally (and wisely) adopted their 1980s look as their primary uniform last season … for all the good it did Aaron Rodgers and Co. Their Super Bowl 3 era throwbacks and all-black alternates with the black helmet are generally fine, if not home runs. Hard to say what Nike will draw upon when designing the Jets' "Rivalries" look for this season, but there does seem to be an opportunity for some kind of exhilarating "Top Gun" type of treatment – especially given how staid the Giants tend to be – particularly given New York's annual Fleet Week celebration. A unique "Rivalries" design for the helmet would mark the Jets' sixth different-looking crown over a three-season span. The horns they've sported on their helmets since the franchise's inaugural season in 1961 have long been one of the league's slickest logos. Their current uniform has another nice Norse touch with the sleeve stripes that evoke the image of a Viking longboat. The club further embraced its Scandinavian – which is to say local – heritage bedebuting its all-white "Winter Warrior" duds in 2024, a nice way to imply snow given the Vikings have rarely played outdoor home games since vacating Metropolitan Stadium after the 1981 season. They earned beaucoup points (and their first Super Bowl berth) in 1981 when they stopped looking like Browns knock-offs – gross – and literally changed their stripes. They've unnecessarily monkeyed with the jerseys and pants over the years and last season's monochrome orange debut … nah. But the primary uniform is in a good place, and the white tiger alternates are as good as anyone's – though that helmet doesn't actually need to suddenly be mixed into other combinations. One must be careful before conferring too much credit on the 1970s and '80s Bucs – remember, starting in 1976, this was an organization that lost its first 26 games. But if you were a kid who grew up drawing NFL logos when you got bored in class, then you know "Bucco Bruce" had some swag and offered a much more satisfying challenge than the Bears or Packers, for examples, offered up. And the "Florida Orange," aka "Creamsicle," brought a unique dash to the league, even if you wouldn't be caught dead in it. After an absence of more than a decade due to since-relaxed helmet rules, the Creamsicles have been back since 2023, and the road version is apparent set to return this season, the club's 50th. Yet the less-celebrated aspect of the Buccaneers is that they, like their expansion brethren Seahawks, have evolved so nicely over the years − the digital alarm clock number fonts and messy unis worn from 2014-19 the notable exception. If only the Panthers and Jags, who appeared two decades later, could say the same. I've long considered them the recipients of Nike's best rebrand – and (coincidentally or not) the 'Hawks have basically been a near-perennial contender since debuting their current look in 2012. And, given the franchise's relative youth – Seattle is also about to embark on its 50th season – why not be something akin to the NFL version of the University of Oregon? And even if you don't like the updated osprey totem logo or feathers on the pants, collars and subtly tapering down the centerline of the helmet, almost everyone can agree that the return of the Seahawks' original uniforms – largely at the expense of their highlighter green alternates – is another huge win. The white roadies the team wore for most of the 1980s and '90s are also returning in 2025,per SportsLogos.net. And don't be surprised if their "Rivalries" presentation – whether it includes the Space Needle, coffee beans, Sasquatch, the Pacific Northwest wilderness, a Pearl Jam tribute or whatever else – is likely to be bold and maybe polarizing, which is just fine for this kind of uniform treatment. (But let's not bring back the mess of blue-ish hues the team used when it first moved into Lumen Field in 2002.) They've got all the ingredients. Few colors are better paired than black and gold, though the deeper "Old Gold" the team favored in yesteryear might be a touch preferable to the lighter, contemporary shade. Few teams can boast a logo better civically intertwined than the Saints' fleur-de-lis, which looks especially cool running down the center of the club's alternate black helms. And those lids might look even better atop what could be all-black monochromatic looks this season. And entering the repertoire Wednesday is analternate white helmet with the logo and goldand something akin to a vanilla ice cream pattern on a shell adorned in black flecks. But I still think what the Saintsshoulddo is develop one starkly different uniform from what's already in their closet – namely a version with a purple, green, and gold scheme as a nod to Mardi Gras. Honestly, why has it taken this long? New alternative helmet being added to the arsenal. ⚪️pic.twitter.com/u1JiOrAt0t — New Orleans Saints (@Saints)July 9, 2025 The return of their classic "Kelly Green" and silver uniforms as throwbacks two years ago was long overdue, their absence forced by the league's formerly restrictive rules and then the extra time Nike needed to replicate the look once it was reinstated. And while some of the team's fans would probably like to see the (not Chip) Kelly look restored as the primary one, the "Midnight Green" threads the team has mainly worn since 1996 are not only underrated but now inextricably linked with the most successful era in club history – three Super Bowl trips and two titles over the past eight seasons. Winning almost always, ahem, looks better. The black helmet the team occasionally uses seems extraneous, particularly given how dark their typical helmets already are. Sorry, Saints, but no team is more seamlessly linked to its hometown than the Steelers. Black and gold, also worn by Major League Baseball's Pirates and the NHL's Penguins, is inescapable throughout the 'Burgh, where even the bridges are gold. And the Steelmark symbol used by the American Iron and Steel Institute with the trio of hypocycloids on the right side of the helmet is identifiable to both the team and city. The Steelers' Dark Knight Color Rush always looks sharp. They will also debut a new throwback for their October 26 game − too cold for bumblebees − againstnew QB Aaron Rodgers'former team, the Packers. (But what's up with the practice jerseys, guys?) Steelers Pre-camp position previews: Quarterbackhttps://t.co/tucfwtsWWA — Dale Lolley (@dlolley_pgh)June 29, 2025 The colors, the logo, the clean simplicity of the pants and jersey – it's close to a perfect football uniform. The Silver and Black's only sartorial sin remain not embracing their inner (and outer) Darth Vader. Why can't we see the helmets and pants go primarily black with silver trim to complete a seriously menacing look? It'd be a serious commitment to football fashion excellence. The colors, the logo, the suite of combinations (including a new alternate uniform in 2025) – it's close to a perfect football uniform. The Bolts' only sartorial sin of late has been their reliance on white helmets while changing up the color of the lightning emblem depending on whether they're wearing white, "Powder Blue," navy or royal. Personally, I preferred the Junior Seau-era navy helmets with white lightning – though it's worth noting the Chargers are 0-6 in their current navy unis. Others might like a royal dome and gold bolt honoring the Air Coryell teams. Thankfully, it does seem like a new helmet color is inbound, which should only make a team that's become increasingly watchable more fun to look at, too. All NFL news on and off the field.Sign upfor USA TODAY's 4th and Monday newsletter. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:NFL uniform rankings: Commanders rise after 2025 alternates reveal

NFL uniforms ranked: Where do Commanders, Saints land after revealing new alternates?

NFL uniforms ranked: Where do Commanders, Saints land after revealing new alternates? With full-blown training camp practices still a few we...
Brazil coach Carlo Ancelotti sentenced to one-year jail term in Spain over tax fraudNew Foto - Brazil coach Carlo Ancelotti sentenced to one-year jail term in Spain over tax fraud

MADRID (AP) — A Spanish court on Wednesday sentenced Brazil coach Carlo Ancelotti to a one-year prison term for tax fraud when he was Real Madrid manager in 2014. The Madrid court also fined Ancelotti €386,000 ($452,187). Spanish prosecutors accused Ancelotti of defrauding the state of 1 million euros ($1 million) in 2014 and 2015. State prosecutors sought a prison sentence of up to four years and nine months ontwo counts of tax fraud. In March 2024, they accused Ancelotti of having used shell companies to hide his true earnings. Prosecutors claimed Ancelotti, for example, used one company that lacked "any real (economic) activity" in the Virgin Islands as part of an alleged scheme. Carlos Sánchez, Ancelotti's press officer, told The Associated Press that the coach "will not make comments for now." Brazil's soccer confederation said in a statement that it was following the case. The Italian coach is the latest in a string of major soccer profiles to face a crackdown by Spanish authorities over unpaid taxes, although none have actually been sent to prison so far. That list includes star players Lionel Messi and Cristiano Ronaldo, as well as Jose Mourinho, another former Madrid coach. In Spain a judge can suspend a sentence of less than two years for first-time offenders. Brazil's soccer confederation did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Ancelotti, who turned 66 last month, is one of soccer's most successful coaches. He is the only coach to have won the Champions League five times, three with Madrid and twice with AC Milan, and the only coach to have won domestic league titles in England, Spain, Italy, Germany and France. Ancelottileft his second stint at Real Madridto take over Brazil's national team. ___ This story has been corrected to reflect that Ancelotti's birthday is June 10, not July 10. ___ AP soccer:https://apnews.com/hub/soccer

Brazil coach Carlo Ancelotti sentenced to one-year jail term in Spain over tax fraud

Brazil coach Carlo Ancelotti sentenced to one-year jail term in Spain over tax fraud MADRID (AP) — A Spanish court on Wednesday sentenced Br...
Former DOGE official rushed grant to Trump-backed Gaza aid group over staff objectionsNew Foto - Former DOGE official rushed grant to Trump-backed Gaza aid group over staff objections

By Jonathan Landay WASHINGTON (Reuters) -A top U.S. State Department official waived nine mandatory counterterrorism and anti-fraud safeguards to rush a $30 million award last month to a Gaza aid group backed by the Trump administration and Israel, according to an internal memorandum seen by Reuters. Jeremy Lewin, a former Department of Government Efficiency associate, signed off on the award despite an assessment in the memorandum that the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation's (GHF) funding plan failed to meet required "minimum technical or budgetary standards." The June 24 action memorandum to Lewin was sent by Kenneth Jackson, also a former DOGE operative who serves as an acting deputy U.S. Agency for International Development administrator. The pair has overseen the agency's dismantling and the merger of its functions into the State Department. Lewin also overrode 58 objections that USAID staff experts wanted GHF to resolve in its application before the funds were approved, according to two sources familiar with the matter. Lewin, who runs the State Department's foreign aid program, cleared the funds only five days after GHF filed its proposal on June 19, according to the June 24 "action memorandum" bearing his signature seen by Reuters. "Strong Admin support for this one," Lewin wrote to USAID leaders in a June 25 email - also seen by Reuters - that urged disbursement of the funds by the agency "ASAP." The action memorandum was first reported by CNN. Lewin and Jackson did not respond to requests for comment. The documents underline the priority the Trump administration has given GHF despite the group's lack of experience and the killing of hundreds of Palestinians near its Gaza aid distribution hubs. GHF, which closely coordinates with the Israeli military, has acknowledged reports of violence but says they occurred beyond its operations area. Lewin noted in the email that he had discussed the funds with aides to Steve Witkoff, President Donald Trump's negotiator on Gaza, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio's office. He acknowledged that authorizing the funds would be controversial, writing: "I'm taking the bullet on this one." The White House did not respond to requests for comment. Witkoff and Rubio did not reply to a question about whether they were aware of and supported the decision to waive the safeguards. The State Department said in a statement that the $30 million was approved under a legal provision allowing USAID to expedite awards in response to "emergency situations" to "meet humanitarian needs as expeditiously as possible." "The GHF award remains subject to rigorous oversight, including of GHF's operations and finances," the statement said. "As part of the award, GHF was subject to new control and reporting requirements." RAISING THE RISK In response to a request for comment, a GHF spokesperson said: "Our model is specifically designed to prevent waste, fraud, and abuse. Every dollar we receive is safeguarded to ensure all resources — which will eventually include American taxpayer funds — reach the people of Gaza." The spokesperson added that such requests for clarification from the U.S. government about fund applications were routine. Speaking about the nine conditions that were waived, the spokesperson said: "We are addressing each question as per regulations and normal procedure and will continue to do so as required." GHF says its operation is preventing Hamas from hijacking food aid and using it to control the enclave's population, charges denied by the Islamist militants who ran Gaza. In the June 24 action memorandum, Jackson wrote that GHF is "uniquely positioned to operate in areas with restricted access," and said it has delivered millions of meals and diluted Hamas' control over Gaza's 2.1 million Palestinians. He acknowledged that GHF "is a new organization that has not met USAID's various formal criteria for eligibility" for the $30 million award. Jackson listed nine conditions that applicants normally must satisfy before receiving USAID funds, explicitly outlining the terms of each and the risks of waiving them. For instance, he noted a "legal requirement" that aid organizations working in Gaza or the West Bank undergo vetting for ties to extremist organizations before they are awarded USAID funds, the document said. "Waiving the requirement could increase the risk" that an aid group, its subcontractors or vendors "could be found ineligible due to terrorism-related concerns," said the document. Jackson also wrote that USAID was required to examine whether an organization has sufficient internal controls to manage awards. He warned that waiving the condition "could raise the risk of misuse of taxpayer resources," according to the document. GHF submitted a plan – required prior to approval of funds – that was incomplete on how it would deal with legal and operational risks of operating in Gaza, the document said. Waiving the need for a full plan "could risk programmatic diversion, reputational harm, and potential violations of U.S. counterterrorism laws," it continued. Despite the risks, Jackson recommended waiving all nine requirements and allowing GHF to fulfill them later because of the "humanitarian and political urgency" of its operation, the memo said. Lewin checked a box labeled "Approve" on each of the recommendations, it showed. In addition to waiving the nine requirements, two sources familiar with the matter said, Lewin overrode 58 objections from USAID staff reviewing GHF's application. Two former top USAID officials said they had never heard of a senior official like Lewin expediting an award over the objections of professional staff. "I oversaw something like 1,500 grants. I never saw it happen," said Sarah Charles, who led USAID's Bureau for Humanitarian Assistance from 2021-2024. "Very occasionally, we would do the vetting after an award in a sudden onset emergency - think earthquake - but that was at the recommendation of staff." In the review, the USAID experts questioned how GHF would ensure the safety of Palestinians collecting food packages at its sites; whether its staff had proper humanitarian training and its plans to distribute powdered infant formula in an enclave with scarce access to clean drinking water, the sources said. (Reporting by Jonathan Landay; Additional reporting by Humeyra Pamuk and Alexander Cornwell in Jerusalem; Editing by Don Durfee and Suzanne Goldenberg)

Former DOGE official rushed grant to Trump-backed Gaza aid group over staff objections

Former DOGE official rushed grant to Trump-backed Gaza aid group over staff objections By Jonathan Landay WASHINGTON (Reuters) -A top U.S. S...
Trump administration to subpoena Harvard for info on foreign studentsNew Foto - Trump administration to subpoena Harvard for info on foreign students

Washington —The Trump administration said Wednesday that it will be sending administrative subpoenas to Harvard University for information about its foreign students, the latest escalation in its ongoing battle with the Ivy League school. The Department of Homeland Securitysaidthe demand for information relates to Harvard's certification under the Student Visitor and Exchange Program, through which the university can enroll international students. The administration first demanded Harvard hand over detailed records on its foreign student visa holders' alleged "illegal and violent" activities in April. The school said in court filings that it turned over the information, but the Department of Homeland Security said it was "insufficient" andyanked the school's ability to enrollinternational students. Harvard has since sued the Trump administration, and a federal judge in Bostonbarred it from revokingthe school's ability to enroll foreign students last month. In announcing the subpoenas, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem accused Harvard and other unnamed universities of allowing "foreign students to abuse their visa privileges and advocate for violence and terrorism on campus." "If Harvard won't defend the interests of its students, then we will," shewrote on X. "We tried to do things the easy way with Harvard. Now, through their refusal to cooperate, we have to do things the hard way." The department also warned other universities that have received similar requests for information that they should "take note of Harvard's actions, and the repercussions" when deciding whether to comply. In response to the administration's demands, Harvard said in a statement that it is "committed to following the law, and while the government's subpoenas are unwarranted, the university will continue to cooperate with lawful requests and obligations." "The administration's ongoing retaliatory actions come as Harvard continues to defend itself and its students, faculty, and staff against harmful government overreach aimed at dictating whom private universities can admit and hire, and what they can teach," the university said. "Harvard remains unwavering in its efforts to protect its community and its core principles against unfounded retribution by the federal government." Separately, the Departments of Education and Health and Human Services threatened Harvard's accreditation. The two agencies said Wednesday they notified the New England Commission of Higher Education that Harvard violated federal antidiscrimination laws and therefore may fail to meet its accreditation standards. The Trump administration said late last month thatHarvard violated Title VIof the Civil Rights Act through its treatment of Jewish and Israeli students "By allowing antisemitic harassment and discrimination to persist unchecked on its campus, Harvard University has failed in its obligation to students, educators, and American taxpayers," Education Secretary Linda McMahon said in a statement. "The Department of Education expects the New England Commission of Higher Education to enforce its policies and practices, and to keep the Department fully informed of its efforts to ensure that Harvard is in compliance with federal law and accreditor standards." Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. pledged sustained oversight of Harvard. "When an institution — no matter how prestigious — abandons its mission and fails to protect its students, it forfeits the legitimacy that accreditation is designed to uphold," he said in a statement. Since President Trump returned to the White House in January, his administration has mounted persistent efforts to punish the school largely over what it said was its failure to condemn antisemitism and protect Jewish students on campus. Federal agenciesfroze billions of dollarsin grants and contracts, and targeted its international-student population. Mr. Trump has alsothreatened to revokeHarvard's tax-exempt status, and the university is under investigation by numerous agencies. Harvard has alsofiled a lawsuitagainst the Trump administration over its efforts to strip it of federal dollars. A hearing in that case is set for July 21. Mr. Trump said last month that his administration had been working with Harvard and suggested he could strike a "deal" with the school. Asked about the talks on Wednesday, the president said that the university would "absolutely" reach an agreement. "Harvard's been very bad. Totally antisemitic," he told reporters at the White House. Sneak peek: Who Killed Aileen Seiden in Room 15? Everything we know so far about the deadly Texas floods Trump meeting with African leaders at White House, sends more tariff letters

Trump administration to subpoena Harvard for info on foreign students

Trump administration to subpoena Harvard for info on foreign students Washington —The Trump administration said Wednesday that it will be se...
Trump administration sues California over transgender athlete policiesNew Foto - Trump administration sues California over transgender athlete policies

WASHINGTON (AP) — PresidentDonald Trump's administration sued the California Department of Education on Wednesday for allowingtransgender girls to compete on girls sports teams, alleging the policy violates federal law. The move escalates an ongoing battle between the Republican administration in Washington and Democratic-led California overtrans athletes competing in girls and women's sports. The lawsuit filed by the Justice Department says California's transgender athlete policies violateTitle IX, the federal law that bans discrimination in education based on sex. The department says California's rules "are not only illegal and unfair but also demeaning, signaling to girls that their opportunities and achievements are secondary to accommodating boys." "These discriminatory policies and practices ignore undeniable biological differences between boys and girls, in favor of an amorphous 'gender identity,'" the lawsuit says. "The results of these illegal policies are stark: girls are displaced from podiums, denied awards, and miss out on critical visibility for college scholarships and recognition." California has a more than decade-old law on the books that allows students to participate in sex-segregated school programs, including on sports teams, and use bathrooms and other facilities that align with their gender identity. Trump criticized the participation of a transgender high school student-athlete who won titles inthe California track-and-field championshipslast month. Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon wrote in a letter after the meet that the sports body running the final violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution by allowing trans girls to compete against other female athletes. The federal Education Department earlier this year launched an investigation into California's policies allowing athletes to compete on sports teams consistent with their gender identity. The agency said last month thatthe policies violate Title IX, and it gave the state 10 days to agree to change them. But the state this week refused. Trump alsosparred with Maine's Democratic governorover the state's transgender-athlete policies. Gov. Janet Mills told the president in February, "We'll see you in court," over his threats to pull funding to the state over the issue. His administrationfiled a lawsuit in Aprilalleging Maine violated Title IX by allowing trans girls and women to compete against other female athletes. Meantime, on his podcast in March, Gov. Gavin Newsom, D-Calif., angered some party allies when hequestioned the fairnessof trans girls competing in girls sports. GOP critics have called on the governor to back a ban, saying his remarks do not square with his actions. The issue is part of a nationwide battle over therights of transgender youthin which states have limited transgender girls from participating on girls sports teams, barred gender-affirming surgeries for minors and required parents to be notified if a child changes their pronouns at school. More than two dozen states have laws barring transgender women and girls from participating in certain sports competitions. Some of the policies have been blocked in court. Trumpsigned an executive orderin February aimed at barring trans girls and women from participating on sports teams consistent with their gender identity. Proponents of a ban, including the conservative California Family Council, say it would restore fairness in athletic competitions. But opponents, including the LGBTQ+ advocacy group Equality California, say bans are an attack on transgender youth.

Trump administration sues California over transgender athlete policies

Trump administration sues California over transgender athlete policies WASHINGTON (AP) — PresidentDonald Trump's administration sued the...

 

MARIO VOUX © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com