Deals made by Trump since pausing his 'Liberation Day' tariffs remain sparseNew Foto - Deals made by Trump since pausing his 'Liberation Day' tariffs remain sparse

NEW YORK (AP) — Just over three months ago, PresidentDonald Trumpunveiled his most sweeping volley of tariffs yet— holding up large charts from the White House Rose Garden to outline newtariffsthat the U.S. would soon slap on goods from nearly every country in the world. But in line with much of Trump's on-again, off-again trade policy playbook, the bulk of those "Liberation Day" levies were postponedjust hours after they took effectin April. The 90-day suspension arrived in an apparent effort to quellglobal market panicand facilitate country-by-country negotiations. At that time, the administration set a lofty goal of reaching90 trade deals in 90 days. Since then, however, the U.S. has only announced pacts with the United Kingdom and Vietnam — as well as a"framework″ agreement with Chinain a separate trade dispute. And the overall outlook for implementation has been murky. News of these deals often trickled through social media posts from the president and, even when countries on both sides of a negotiation table made more official announcements, many key details — including timing — were sparse. The 90-day window was technicallyset to expire on July 9, but that deadline is now also getting an extension. On Monday, the U.S. begansendingout letters to certain countries warning that highertariffscould kick in Aug. 1 — not this week -- including to Japan and South Korea, which Trump saidwill both face 25% leviesnext month. Even with negotiations ongoing, most countries have still faced a minimum 10% levy on goods entering the U.S. over the past three months, on top of punishing new taxes targetingforeign steel and aluminumas well asauto imports.The current pause pushed back additional steeper rates, which Trump calls"reciprocal" tariffs, for dozens of nations. Here's what we know about the trade deals announced throughout the pause. Vietnam On July 2, Trumpannounced a trade deal with Vietnamthat he said would allow U.S. goods to enter the country duty-free. Vietnamese exports to the U.S., by contrast, would face a 20% levy. That's less than half the 46% "reciprocal" rate Trump proposed for Vietnamese goods back in April. But in addition to the new 20% tariff rate, Trump said the U.S. would impose a 40% tax on "transshipping'' — targeting goods from another country that stop in Vietnam on their way to the United States. Washington complains that Chinese goods have been dodging higher U.S. tariffs by transiting through Vietnam. It wasn't immediately clear when these new rates would go into effect or whether they would come on top of any other previously-imposed levies. Like most other countries, Vietnam has faced Trump's 10% baseline tariff for the last three months. United Kingdom On May 8, Trumpagreed to cut tariffson British autos, steel and aluminum, among other trade pledges — while the U.K. promised to reduce levies on U.S. products like olive oil, wine and sports equipment. The deal was announced in grandiose terms by both countries, butsome key details remained unknownfor weeks. When the deal was announced, for example, the British government notably said that the U.S. agreed to exempt the U.K. from its then-universal 25% duties on foreign steel and aluminum — which would have effectively allowed both metals from the country to come into the U.S. duty-free. But the timing for when those cuts would actually take effect stayed up in the air for almost a month. It wasn't until early June, when Trumphiked his steel and aluminum tariffsto a punishing 50% worldwide, that the U.S.acknowledged it was time to implementthe agreement. And even then, U.S. tariffs on British steel and aluminum did not go to zero. The U.K. was the only country spared from Trump's new 50% levies, but still faces 25% import taxes on the metals — and Trump said that rate could also go up on or after Wednesday. The U.K. did not receive a higher "reciprocal" rate on April 2, but continues to face the 10% baseline tax. China At its peak, Trump's new tariffs on Chinese goods totaled 145% — and China's countertariffs on American products reached 125%. But on May 12, the countries agreed to their own 90-day truce to roll back those levies to 30% and 10%, respectively. And last month, details began trickling in abouta tentative trade agreement. On June 11, following talks in London, Trump announced a "framework" for a deal. And late last month, the U.S. and China both acknowledged thatsome sort of agreement had been reached.U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said that China had agreed to make it easier for American firms to acquireChinese magnets and rare earth mineralscritical for manufacturing and microchip production. Meanwhile, without explicitly mentioning U.S. access to rare earths, the Chinese Commerce Ministry said that it would "review and approve eligible export applications for controlled items" and that the U.S. would "lift a series of restrictive measures it had imposed on China." More specifics about those measures — and when they would actually go into effect — were not immediately clear. But on Friday, the Ministry of Commerce acknowledged that the U.S. was resuming exports of airplane parts, ethane and other items to China. And when Trump first announced the framework on June 11, the U.S. had said it agreed to stop seeking to revoke the visas of Chinese students on U.S. college campuses. _________ Associated Press Staff Writers Josh Boak, Paul Wiseman and Fu Ting in Washington, D.C., Aniruddha Ghosal in Hanoi, and Huizhong Wu in Bangkok contributed to this report.

Deals made by Trump since pausing his 'Liberation Day' tariffs remain sparse

Deals made by Trump since pausing his 'Liberation Day' tariffs remain sparse NEW YORK (AP) — Just over three months ago, PresidentDo...
Biden advisers pushed early Trump debate to show 'strength,' memo showsNew Foto - Biden advisers pushed early Trump debate to show 'strength,' memo shows

WASHINGTON −Joe Biden's disastrous June 2024debate performance, when the nation witnessed a hoarse and feeble president losing his train of thought and struggling to finish sentences,ended his reelection campaign. Now, a newly surfaced campaign memo shows how aides persuaded Biden to debateDonald Trumpfrom what they said was "a position of strength" and before early voting began in many battleground states. "By holding the first debate in the spring, YOU will be able to reach the widest audience possible, before we are deep in the summer months with the conventions, Olympics and family vacations taking precedence," said the memo, which was revealed by journalists Josh Dawsey, Tyler Pager and Isaac Arnsdorf ina new book, "2024: How Trump Retook the White House and the Democrats Lost America." Throughout the memo – published July 7 by Politico – the advisers take pains to reiterate Biden's stature by addressing him as "YOU" in bold capital letters. The debate took place months before the fall debate timeline suggested by the Commission on Presidential Debates. "In addition, the earlier YOU are able to debate the better, so that the American people can see YOU standing next to Trump and showing the strength of YOUR leadership, compared to Trump's weakness and chaos," says the memo. It didn't turn out that way. After the June 27 calamity, when Biden, then 81, trailed off and froze at various points before a live television audience, hefaced mounting pressurefrominfluentialdonorsand some lawmakers to drop out of the race. Less than a month later, Biden announced he was stepping aside and endorsedVice President Kamala Harris, 59, as the Democratic nominee. Harris, who ran the shortest presidential campaign in history, was trounced by Trump in November, capping a remarkable comeback by the former president. The contents of the memo stand in sharp contrast to a narrative pushed by the Trump administration, which has accused those close to Biden, including former first lady Jill Biden, of acover-upby making sure the former president had minimal public exposure and of keeping his supposed cognitive decline under wraps. House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Kentucky, sent letters to Biden's physician and former White House aides in May demanding they appear for a transcribed interview as part of an investigation into Biden's health and use of the autopen to sign presidential documents. In June, Trump's Justice Department began aninvestigation into pardonsissued in the final days of Biden's presidency and "whether others were taking advantage of him through use of Autopen or other means." Biden announced last month that he had been diagnosed withan aggressive Stage 4 prostate cancer. Swapna Venugopal Ramaswamy is a White House correspondent for USA TODAY.You can follow her on X @SwapnaVenugopal This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Biden aides said fateful 2024 Trump debate would show 'strength'

Biden advisers pushed early Trump debate to show 'strength,' memo shows

Biden advisers pushed early Trump debate to show 'strength,' memo shows WASHINGTON −Joe Biden's disastrous June 2024debate perfo...
Heat, Clippers, Jazz trade grades: L.A. gets more size ... and Miami remains MiamiNew Foto - Heat, Clippers, Jazz trade grades: L.A. gets more size ... and Miami remains Miami

It's summer and time to chill for most, but three NBA teams had some business to tend to. Yes, we have a trade, folks. The Miami Heat, Utah Jazz, and Los Angeles Clippers are shuffling around pieces, so let's get into which pieces and why they were shuffled. Heat give up:Kevin Love, Kyle AndersonHeat get:Norman Powell Sigh. All right, Pat Riley. You don't want to rebuild, we get it. Heat culture! Winning! No tanking! It's all very, very adorable, but this Powell acquisition — which is a very strong return — runs the risk of Miami further indulging itself in what feels like an inevitable burnout. The move itself, in a vacuum, is almost unrealistically good, but the needle hasn't been moved enough in the direction of building championship equity. Powell (21.8 points, 41.8 3FG%) is a shooting guard who, well, very much plays the role of a traditional shooting guard. He isn't much of a playmaker (2.1 assists), is physically small (6-foot-3) and his play overlaps quite a bit with Tyler Herro. This isn't meant as criticism of Powell, who is frankly worth everyone's time, but more so confusion at how Miami sees the fit. What's the plan here, outside of maintaining "Heat Culture," which is basically the same culture as everyone else? At some point, it'd be nice to hear from the Heat how they envision themselves both this season and in the future. This deal has to be graded in two segments. Sorry, there is no other way. Return on value:A+"What are we doing?" direction:C- Clippers give up:Norman Powell, 2027 second-round pickClippers get:John Collins With James Harden still on the team, finding legitimate lob threats is always of interest, even if Ivica Zubac and Derrick Jones Jr. are on the roster. Collins is a bit more than just a lob-catcher, though. He averaged 19 points and 8.2 rebounds and posted damn-near 53/40/85 shooting splits this past season. Collins has divided waters for years now. Some argue his impact is limited, others that his defense is the problem, and then there are some who don't see him as much of a problem at all. I'm in the latter camp, because one has to judge Collins for what he is, not for what he isn't. For over half a decade, and before he even signed his second contract, it's been known what type of player he is. Collins is a scoring 4 who doesn't have the positional fluidity to play center for defensive purposes. But what he does give you is quality rebounding and a legitimate inside-outside option to play off your main playmaker. If you accept the parameters of what he is, there's a frighteningly good player in there, even if that player comes with the recipe of having specific archetypes on the roster to optimize him. Fortunately, the Clippers have that recipe. Collins could see his game grow, significantly, next to Harden. I'd like to give this a big, juicy grade, but the loss of Powell isn't insignificant. We have to bake that in. Grade:B (Now, if Bradley Beal ends up getting bought out of Phoenix and slides right into Powell's old spot, then we can certainly revisit this grade.) Jazz give up:John CollinsJazz get:Kyle Anderson, Kevin Love, 2027 Clippers second-round pick Hello, darkness, my old friend ... I'm just going to say it. If you give up John Collins, and you take back a return that has the same value as unwashed trousers, then it's always about the money. And look, it makes sense. The Jazz also want to clear the roster a bit to make room for Ace Bailey to take a million shots. This does achieve that, in addition to shaving off roughly $13 million for this season. Even so, it's amazing we've gotten to this point where a player like Collins, who does produce at a high level, is efficient and does offer big-man elements such as screen-setting and rebounding, is simply left out in the dust when it comes to trade value. You'd think — probably hope — a player of his caliber could return a better haul, but apparently that's become a ridiculous notion based off reasons that seem half-baked. As such, it means Utah spent two years trying to build up Collins' value, only to take back —gestures disappointingly— this. Ugh. It's not Utah's fault the market seems to have overcorrected on productive in-prime but not quite All-Star-level players, but unfortunately we have to judge the Jazz off the return, which isn't pretty. Grade:C- (Though, if the ripple effects of this deal lead to superstardom for Bailey, a new assessment will gladly be booked by yours truly.)

Heat, Clippers, Jazz trade grades: L.A. gets more size ... and Miami remains Miami

Heat, Clippers, Jazz trade grades: L.A. gets more size ... and Miami remains Miami It's summer and time to chill for most, but three NBA...
Sounders GK Stefan Frei 'home resting' after injury scareNew Foto - Sounders GK Stefan Frei 'home resting' after injury scare

Sounders goalkeeper Stefan Frei was "back home resting" on Monday after leaving Sunday's match in Seattle in an ambulance with an injury to his head and neck. Frei, 39, collided with Columbus Crew midfielder Amar Sejdic's knee while trying to collect a free kick during second-half stoppage time in the 1-1 draw. Medical personnel rushed onto the field and placed Frei onto a stretcher before loading him into an ambulance at Lumen Field. "I'm incredibly grateful to all the staff that looked after me and happy to be back home resting now," Frei posted on X early Monday morning. "What resonates is all the messages, calls and love I've received from so many of you. Thank you -- truly. It means more than I can put into words." Instead of resuming play after Frei's injury, Crew coach Wilfried Nancy and Sounders coach Brian Schmetzer successfully encouraged officials to end the match. "Wilfried, I appreciate what he did because the ref wasn't going to stop the game," Schmetzer said. "Everybody knew that the game should have been stopped. Good on him. So thank you, Wilfried." "I hope that everything's going to be okay with (Frei)," Nancy said. "Our job is not easy. When you see a situation like that, again, football is not the most important. We stay positive, and hopefully everything's going to be good for him." Frei has been minding the Sounders' net since the 2014 season. Including his time with Toronto from 2011-13, he has recorded 112 clean sheets in 371 career MLS matches. --Field Level Media

Sounders GK Stefan Frei 'home resting' after injury scare

Sounders GK Stefan Frei 'home resting' after injury scare Sounders goalkeeper Stefan Frei was "back home resting" on Monda...
Pam Bondi's botched handling of the Epstein filesNew Foto - Pam Bondi's botched handling of the Epstein files

The Trump administration's promises to release extensive and significant new information related to disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein appear to be petering out – depriving conspiracy-minded MAGA supporters of the smoking guns they have long sought as they've publicly tried to tie influential figures to Epstein's crimes. And to the extent those MAGA supporters are disappointed, the Trump administration has itself to blame. That especially applies to Attorney General Pam Bondi. TheJustice Department posted a memoMonday that says there is no evidence Epstein was murdered or that he kept anything amounting to a much-anticipated "client list." The department does not plan to release any new documents on the matter, an official told CNN. Axios was first to report details of the DOJ and FBI's decision. None of this is new or surprising to anyone who has followed the Epstein case closely. New York City's medical examiner had ruled the death a suicide. The attorney general in Trump's first term, Bill Barr, had come to the same conclusion, despite his initial suspicions of something more sinister. A Justice Department Inspector General report also pushed back on the idea the death was anything but a suicide, while criticizing staff failures that allowed such a thing to happen. And the Miami Herald's Julie K. Brown, one of the best-sourced reporters on the Epstein case, reported earlier this year: "Those who have worked with the FBI on the case for decades say there is no evidence Epstein kept a ledger or a list of clients who were involved with his sex trafficking operation." Still, the memo undercuts theories that continued to circulate, including that there was proof that influential figures were involved in Epstein's exploitation of underage girls. At their most pitched, these theories held that Epstein was able to blackmail those influential figures who appeared on a purported "client list." They also undercut Bondi's personal rhetoric. The new memo's key findings are very different from how Bondi billed them. Far-right activist Laura Loomer, who has demonstrated influence with the Trump administration and has frequently criticized Bondi over her handling of the Epstein investigation, called for Trump to fire his attorney general. "If she doesn't get fired over this Epstein memo, people are going to be so black pilled," Loomer wrote on X, using a term that some on the far-right use to signify a belief that the system is beyond repair. Let's run through what statements from Bondi the memo contradicts: The idea that Epstein kept a "client list" that potentially implicated influential figures has become an article of faith in some circles. Key Republican lawmakers have treated its existence as an established fact and pushed for its release. And a big reason for that was Bondi herself. During a February 21 interview on Fox News, host John Roberts asked whether DOJ would release a "list of Jeffrey Epstein's clients." "Will that really happen?" Roberts asked. Bondi responded: "It's sitting on my desk right now to review. That's been a directive by President Trump. I'm reviewing that." In other words, Bondi didn't commit to releasing such a list, but she affirmatively indicated it existed and that it was in her possession. And the question was specifically about the purported list – not other files related to Epstein. At Monday's White House briefing, press secretary Karoline Leavitt claimed under skeptical questioning from Fox News itself that Bondi hadn't actually been referring to a client list. "She was saying the entirety of all of the paperwork – all of the paper in relation to Jeffrey Epstein's crimes," Leavitt said. "That's what the attorney general was referring to, and I'll let her speak for that." Bondi had another chance to downplay the existence of such a list during a later March 1 interview on Fox, but declined to do so. Host Mark Levin suggested that Democratic-leaning officials in New York City might be withholding information because they "don't like the names on the list" and that they were "trying to protect a lot of names and individuals." Bondi leaned into the theory, saying she had "not reviewed the information yet," but added: "I think it's very interesting that they withheld that from us." The Justice Department now says not only is there no evidence of blackmail, but there is no evidence of such a list. "This systematic review revealed no incriminating 'client list,'" the DOJ memo says. "There was also no credible evidence found that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals as part of his actions." Elon Musk, who formerly served in the Trump administration and has previously alleged on social media that the "real reason" officials have not made more Epstein files public is because Trump's name is in them, has appeared totake shots at Bondion social media. "What's the time? Oh look, it's no-one-has-been-arrested-o'clock again,"Musk posted on Xaround 4 a.m. eastern time on Monday. In another puzzling claim, Bondi said there were "tens of thousands of videos" of Epstein "with children or child porn." Bondi first made the assertion ona secretly recorded video. Then she repeated the claim publicly, possibly in an effort to get ahead of that video's release. "There are tens of thousands of videos of Epstein with children or child porn, and there are hundreds of victims," Bondisaid publicly on May 7. But just a month later, FBI Director Kash Patelappeared to walk back Bondi's claim. He indicated to podcast host Joe Rogan there was no video of people committing crimes on Epstein's island. "Is there video from the island?" Rogan asked. "Not of what you want," Patel said. "So this narrative might not be accurate, that there's video of these guys doing this?" Rogan asked. "Exactly," Patel confirmed. Patel added at another point: "If there was a video of some guy or gal committing felonies on an island and I'm in charge, don't you think you'd see it?" Bondi's allegation puzzled lawyers and law enforcement officials involved in Epstein's criminal cases who were unfamiliar with any such trove of videos, an AP investigationreportedlast week. And now the new DOJ memo further undercuts Bondi's claim. The memo cites "over ten thousand downloaded videos and images of illegal child sex abuse material and other pornography." But that's both videos and images. And it only makes references to images of Epstein – not videos, let alone "tens of thousands" of them. While the DOJ memo in the above instances suggests Bondi oversold the evidence, it suggests she publicly undersold findings in another area: the number of victims. Bondi has on multiple occasions indicated there were around 250 victims. "This will make you sick," she told Fox in late February. "Two hundred victims, 200. So we have well over – over 250 actually." In the Levin interview on March 1, she cited "the 254 young girls, women who are victims of sex crimes and sex trafficking." Two days later, she doubled down on that number in a Fox interview with Sean Hannity. But the DOJ memo cites many more victims. It says its review "confirmed that Epstein harmed over one thousand victims. Each suffered unique trauma." This story has been updated to reflect additional developments. For more CNN news and newsletters create an account atCNN.com

Pam Bondi’s botched handling of the Epstein files

Pam Bondi's botched handling of the Epstein files The Trump administration's promises to release extensive and significant new infor...
Elon Musk announces 'America Party': What to know about third parties in the U.S.New Foto - Elon Musk announces 'America Party': What to know about third parties in the U.S.

Elon Muskhas announced he is forming anew political party, and he did it the day after PresidentDonald Trumpsigned themegabillthat the pair havepublicly sparred overfor weeks. The billionaire said in a post on his social media platform, X, July 5 that he iscreating the America Partybecause Americans are living in a "one-party system, not a democracy," a criticism aimed at the Republican Party for its support of the president's sweeping tax and spending bill. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office projects the legislation will increase the national debt by $3.4 trillion over a decade, an increase Musk has repeatedly lambasted. Musk, once a close ally to Trump and a major funder of his 2024 presidential campaign, said the party would aim to unseat the Republican lawmakers in Congress who backed the bill in next year's midterm elections. He is the world's richest person, worth $405 billion,according to Forbes, and he spent nearly$290 millionto help Trump and other Republicans win elections last year. 'Train wreck':Trump slams Musk after billionaire announces new political party Trump criticizedthe new party announcement on social media July 6, writing Musk has gone "off the rails" and that third parties "have never succeeded in the United States." The United States has maintained a two-party system through most of its history, dominated by the Republican and Democratic parties. While candidates of third political parties have never won a U.S. presidential election in the 20th and 21st centuries, they have had some level of influence in elections over the years. More:House passes Trump's megabill, securing a big win for the GOP agenda The two largest third parties in 2025 are the Libertarian and Green Parties, though neither is registered in all 50 states. That presents a considerable barrier in efforts to compete with the Democrats and the GOP. The Federal Elections Commission and individual states have their own sets of rules and requirements for a political party to register in elections, a system that can make formation of new parties difficult. Oftentimes, third parties have acted as vote siphons that threaten either Republican or Democratic candidates' ability to reach a majority, or have mobilized attention over voter issues. The last time a third party candidate made headway in a presidential race was in 1968, when American Independent Party nominee George Wallace won electoral votes from five Southern states. In 1992, Ross Perot of the Independent Party ran for president, and in 2000 Ralph Nader did the same representing the Green Party, but neither won any electoral votes. The most successful third-party candidacy was in 1912, according to Boston University political history expert Bruce J. Schulman, when Theodore Roosevelt finished second and got about 27% of the popular vote. Schulman said in aninterview in October 2024with the university's newspaper that third parties in the United States can be understood using historian Richard Hofstadter's analogy − that third parties are like bees, and once they have "stung," or got their message across, they die. "With the more substantial third parties, like those that get enough support to qualify for debates, they often form out of a social movement due to the two major parties not addressing a concern or constituency," Schulman said. He said that they "can produce important changes in the political system," including influencing a major political party to adopt its message, but that "none in the last century has ever threatened to take power." Musk has suggested he would use his proposed third political party to influence a select number of congressional races. "Given the razor-thin legislative margins, that would be enough to serve as the deciding vote on contentious laws, ensuring that they serve the true will of the people," Muskwrote on Xon July 4 after a poll he posted asking users to vote on whether he should create a third party. As of July 7, the social media poll has 1.2 million participants, and 65% have selected yes. A few public figures have expressed interest in supporting the party. Billionaire entrepreneur Mark Cuban saidon social mediathat he wants to help the party get on ballots, and Anthony Scaramucci, who briefly was Trump's White House director of communications in 2017,wrote on Xthat he would like to meet with Musk to discuss the party. Both have been outspoken critics of the Trump administration. In a2024 Gallup poll, 58% U.S. adults said a third major party is needed in the United States because the Republican and Democratic parties "do such a poor job" of representing the American people. The results were the 12th consecutive time Gallup recorded a majority response on the question, with an average 56% support level for a third party since 2003. The 2024 survey results were down 5 percentage points from2023's record high, according to Gallup data. Contributing: Zac Anderson, USA TODAY; Reuters Kathryn Palmer is a national trending news reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach her atkapalmer@usatoday.comand on X @KathrynPlmr. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Does the U.S. have third parties? Elon Musk announces 'America Party'

Elon Musk announces 'America Party': What to know about third parties in the U.S.

Elon Musk announces 'America Party': What to know about third parties in the U.S. Elon Muskhas announced he is forming anew politica...
British Open adds Aldrich Potgieter and Brian Campbell among six alternates to Portrush fieldNew Foto - British Open adds Aldrich Potgieter and Brian Campbell among six alternates to Portrush field

PORTRUSH, Northern Ireland (AP) — Aldrich Potgieter and Brian Campbell won PGA Tour events the last two weeks, and it wound up getting them into the British Open next week at Royal Portrush. The Open has a156-man field, and it became clear two weeks ago that it would have only 150 players who either qualified or met the various exemption criteria. The Open uses this week's world ranking for an alternate list. Potgieter was No. 123 in the world when hewon the Rocket Classictwo weeks ago, while Campbell was at No. 115 when hewon the John Deere Classicon Sunday. Both moved high enough in the world ranking to be among the leading six players not already exempt for the Open. The others added to the field were Nico Echavarria, Michael Kim, Bud Cauley and Davis Thompson, who narrowly got the final spot over Si Woo Kim. The Open is July 17-20. ___ AP golf:https://apnews.com/hub/golf

British Open adds Aldrich Potgieter and Brian Campbell among six alternates to Portrush field

British Open adds Aldrich Potgieter and Brian Campbell among six alternates to Portrush field PORTRUSH, Northern Ireland (AP) — Aldrich Potg...

 

MARIO VOUX © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com