GOP eyes redistricting in Ohio and Texas as it looks to bolster slim majorityNew Foto - GOP eyes redistricting in Ohio and Texas as it looks to bolster slim majority

Republicans are eyeing potential redistricting opportunities in Ohio and Texas as they seek extra cushion to protect their thin majority in the House next year. In Ohio, redistricting lawsmandate a redrawahead of 2026 because the last map passed without bipartisan support. And in Texas, redistrictingcould be addedto an upcoming special session agenda as the White Housereportedly pushesthe Lone Star State to consider redrawing to protect the party's numbers. Defending a narrow 220-212 majority, Republicans are bracing for a competitive election cycle as they look to defy traditional headwinds typically associated with the president's party in midterm years. "I think the Speaker and party leadership look at even a handful of districts as really important, particularly if the natural trend — given the president's popularity at this point and given historic midterm conditions — means that the Republican Party starts out assuming they're going to lose a couple districts right off the bat," said Justin Levitt, a law professor at Loyola Marymount University who founded the database "All About Redistricting." "Ohio is going to have to redraw, one way or the other. Texas is mulling whether to redraw. And there are a lot of competing pressures." Each state redraws its maps once a decade, after the U.S. Census. But in Ohio, the lines used for the last four years are up for a redraw under a wonky state law that effectively sped up the expiration date because they didn't earn bipartisan support. Should Republicans decide to make the maps more competitive, Ohio Democratic Reps. Marcy Kaptur and Emilia Sykes, who represent Ohio's 9th and 13th Congressional Districts respectively, would likely be impacted. President Trump won Kaptur's district, which includes Toledo, by close to 7 points, while Sykes's seat, which includes Akron, was essentially tied by Trump and former Vice President Harris in 2024,according to The Downballot. Both are already competitive for Democrats, though both Kaptur and Sykes have been strong candidates despite the political terrain. "It's no surprise that special interests in Washington and Columbus want to ignore the voters and rig the game," Sykes campaign spokesman Justin Barasky said in a statement. Kaptur campaign political director David Zavac projected confidence over the congresswoman's election next year, while also pointing out that the state will have seen three different maps this decade alone. "The Congresswoman looks forward to a spirited campaign next year," Zavac said in a statement, "but will let the GOP focus on what will surely be another messy primary ahead once they finish their illegal gerrymandering process to try and rig the maps further in their favor." The Ohio Constitutionlays out detailed rulesfor drawing House districts , meaning that only certain counties and cities can be divided, some of that based on population stipulations. Ahead of the required 2025 redistricting, Democrats had sought to pass an amendment to the state Constitution last year that would have reformed the redistricting process in the state, giving the party a better chance of making seats more competitive between the parties. But voters rejected the ballot measure amid confusion over the amendment language; the Ohio Ballot Board approved language that said the amendment would "repeal constitutional protections against gerrymandering" when its supporters said the initiative stated it would do the opposite. While the redistricting process offers Republicans a unique opportunity to reconfigure better maps for its House members, it's not without its own perils. "I do think the best pressure that could force them to do some things that are more reasonable would be Republicans in nearby districts saying, 'Don't carve up our districts, we like our [districts], we don't want them to change,'" said former state Democratic Party Chair David Pepper. In Texas, where there are no specific timing rules for re-making maps, state lawmakers arereportedly under pressurefrom the White House and national Republicans to consider making mid-decade changes that could help shore up GOP numbers. The state legislature just gaveled out their latest regular session, with thenextnot slated until 2027. But amid the chatter about redistricting, Gov. Greg Abbott (R) called a special session to kick off July 21. Though redistricting isn't among the governor'sofficial "initial agenda" items, there's still time for the matter to be added to the docket or included in a future special session. "The Republicans in Congress are looking at a very, very narrow majority, and they're looking for every opportunity around the country to increase that majority with things like redistricting [and] the election. They're gonna use every tool at their disposal to do that," said Texas Republican strategist Brendan Steinhauser. "Texas is a very red state, so if they can pick up two seats or three seats, then they might give it a try. And even if it makes a seat in a very deep red state a little more competitive, so be it. I think that's some of the thinking," he said. One Republican strategist who requested anonymity to speak candidly told The Hill that the party will be on "offense" regardless of how either state's map shakes out ahead of 2026. A second GOP strategist pointed out that there's more Democrats – 13 – that won in Trump districts, while there's only three Republicans hailing from districts won by former Vice President Harris in 2024 overall. "The numbers are in our favor," the GOP strategist said. "It's a game of inches right now." If Republicans do decide to redraw lines in Texas, it could blunt challenges to themapsthat Texas drew after the 2020 census, includingan ongoing trial in El Pasoin which voter advocates allege that the maps discriminate against some Black and Latino voters. The 2021 mapswere already seen as shoring up Republican power in the Lone Star State, but proponents of redistricting reportedly think the GOP's 25-12 congressional edge could expand by several seats. The situation has given some lawmakers a sense of deja vu. Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-Texas) was among the more than 50 state lawmakers who fled Texas for Oklahoma to deny Republicans a quorum in 2003 as the GOP revisited drawing the state's congressional lines. Texas Republicans, however, were ultimately successful at redrawing favorable lines for their party. "It's just a total partisan power grab that's gonna completely mess with representation in Texas," Castro, who was a freshman during the 2003 walkout, told The Hill last month. "And I hope that cooler minds will prevail, and they'll do redistricting when they're supposed to, which is after the end of the decade." Another layer of uncertainty is how the courts could weigh in on potential redistricting challenges. Both Texas and Ohio have conservative majorities on the state Supreme Courts, but legal challenges over redistricting from other states have been brought up to the U.S. Supreme Court. While the high court, too, has a conservative majority, itnotably struck down Alabama's maps in 2023, saying they likely violated the Voting Rights Act. But while shifting voters from solidly red districts to bluer ones could make Democratic-held seats more competitive, it could similarly blunt the edge of some now-safe GOP seats. The House Democrats' campaign suggested in a statement that the predicament is a lose-lose situation for Republicans. "House Republicans are running scared because they know they will lose the House majority next November, and their only solutions are corrupt attempts to suppress battleground voters' voices," Madison Andrus, a spokeswoman for the House Democrats' campaign arm, said in a statement. "Any changes they try to make to existing maps may endanger existing Republican-held seats," she continued, "and in an environment where the public is wildly unhappy with the Republican agenda of broken promises, they should be careful what they wish for." Ahead of the midterms, though, that might be a risk some are willing to take to put more districts in play for Republicans. "Republican redistricting was key to flipping the House in 2022, preserving the majority in 2024, and can help defend it again in 2026," said Adam Kincaid, executive director of the National Republican Redistricting Trust. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. For the latest news, weather, sports, and streaming video, head to The Hill.

GOP eyes redistricting in Ohio and Texas as it looks to bolster slim majority

GOP eyes redistricting in Ohio and Texas as it looks to bolster slim majority Republicans are eyeing potential redistricting opportunities i...
Gov. Tony Evers' re-election decision looms over battleground WisconsinNew Foto - Gov. Tony Evers' re-election decision looms over battleground Wisconsin

In one of the nation's most closely divided battleground states, there's one big question on both parties' minds: Is Gov. Tony Evers going to run for a third term next year? The answer will have reverberating consequences in Wisconsin, where one of five Democratic-controlled governorships is up for grabs in 2026 in states President Donald Trump won last year. Evers, 73, has said he would announce whether he'd run again after he reached a budget deal with Republicans, who control both chambers of the Legislature. But with anagreement rapidlysigned, sealed and delivered last week, some Wisconsin Democrats are growing impatient for his decision. "I'd like to see him make a decision, hopefully sooner rather than later, because I do think we've got a lot of elections that we need to be winning and focusing on," Democratic state Sen. Kelda Roys, who ran against Evers in the 2018 Democratic gubernatorial primary,said last month. "If the governor makes a decision, I hope that's going to be soon." One dynamic hanging over Evers' decision is the possibility he wouldn't have to deal with a combative Legislature fully controlled by Republicans, as he has throughout his tenure. A landmark 2023 Wisconsin Supreme Court decision from anewly installed liberal majorityprompted the state's gerrymandered maps to be redrawn, giving Democratic amuch more realistic pathto taking control of either the state Assembly or Senate in 2026. "One question he's weighing is, 'Do I try to stay around for one more term and possibly have one, if not both, lower chambers to work with, versus just trying to haggle with Republicans and push the veto pen every single f-----g time," said one Democratic operative in the state who requested anonymity to speak candidly about the race. Some Democrats also feel that Evers, with the benefit of incumbency, still represents the party's best shot at winning next year's gubernatorial election. "There's no question that Evers is the most equipped to win next year," said Joe Zepecki, a Milwaukee-based Democratic strategist who finished second in last month's race to be the chair of the Wisconsin Democratic Party. "Why would we not want to have an incumbent Democratic governor who is the most popular politician in the state, beloved by the Democratic base. That makes all the sense in the world in what will be a good political environment for Democrats." But othershave warnedthat Democrats should not continue to rely on septuagenarian candidates and should clear the way for new voices, particularly following their experience with then-President Joe Biden in 2024. Evers' allies have hit back at that narrative, pointing to recent polling. One Wisconsin Democratic operative familiar with Evers' thinking, who requested anonymity to speak candidly while Evers' decision-making process is ongoing, added, "That just doesn't match with what we're hearing from Democrats and from the Marquette Poll." That refers to aMarquette University Law School poll of registered Wisconsin voters releasedlast month showing that Democrats remain widely supportive of Evers running again — even as the general electorate in the purple state remains more split. The survey found that 83% of Democrats said they supported Evers seeking a third term. That poll also found that 42% of all registered voters said they wanted Evers to run again, compared to 55% who said they did not. That support level, the pollsters noted, is still strong by historical standards. Back in 2016, ahead of Republican Gov. Scott Walker's decision to run for a third term, the same poll found that just 36% of registered voters wanted him to run a third time, compared to 61% who did not. Walker ran again in 2018 and lost to Evers. Evers' approval ratings in the poll — 48% of voters said they approved of his job performance, compared to 46% who said they didn't — is in line with the levels he's seen in that survey throughout his two terms in office in the swing state. If Evers ultimately declines to run, there are several Democrats who could seek to replace him, including state Attorney General Josh Kaul, Lt. Gov. Sara Rodriguez, Secretary of State Sarah Godlewski, Milwaukee County Executive David Crowley and Milwaukee Mayor Cavalier Johnson. But some Wisconsin Democrats expressed concern that an Evers exit could lead to an expensive and divisive primary. "It would be a big field if he doesn't run. That could get messy," said the Democratic operative familiar with Evers' thinking. Representatives for the political operations of Kaul, Rodriguez and Crowley didn't respond to questions. Johnson spokesperson Thad Nation said in an email that "the Mayor has deep respect for that leadership and certainly hopes the Governor will choose to run again," but that "if Governor Evers decides not to seek re-election, Mayor Johnson would be in a strong position to enter the race." Evers' decision isn't likely to have much bearing on who decides to run for the Republican nomination. Currently, the only declared candidate in the race is Josh Schoemann, the county executive of Washington County, an exurban area northwest of Milwaukee. Alsoweighing bidsare businessman Eric Hovde, who narrowly lost a 2024 U.S. Senate race to Democrat Tammy Baldwin, and Tim Michels, who lost to Evers in 2022. U.S. Rep. Tom Tiffany alsohasn't ruled outa campaign. Strategists in both parties said that Evers' decision to wait until after a budget deal was reached with state lawmakers could present the governor with an opportunity to leave on a high note, or help build his case for a third term. "Evers got most of what he wanted. He is now in a position to say, 'I've done what I needed to do. I got funding back to UW [the University of Wisconsin system], I got funding for child care, we've saved the kids in Wisconsin.' We've got a kids budget — I think that gives him an out," said Brandon Scholz, a Wisconsin Republican strategist. "He can go out on top." Evers' allies said delaying his announcement provided him with maximum leverage during budget discussions with Republicans. "I think it probably did make better his ability to work with Republicans in the Legislature to get to what appears to now be a reasonable budget," Zepecki said. Responding to questions about whether the governor would be announcing his decision imminently now that the state budget process has wrapped, Evers senior adviser Sam Roecker said only that "the governor has been clear he won't make a decision on 2026 until the budget process concludes." But some Democrats said the prospects of a friendlier Legislature, Evers' poll numbers and the ability to avoid a fractured primary all pointed in one direction. "I think he has decided, and I think he will run," Zepecki said. "If I had to bet money today, that's where we are."

Gov. Tony Evers' re-election decision looms over battleground Wisconsin

Gov. Tony Evers' re-election decision looms over battleground Wisconsin In one of the nation's most closely divided battleground sta...
Rafaela homers as Red Sox rout Nationals 10-3 for 10,000th win in franchise historyNew Foto - Rafaela homers as Red Sox rout Nationals 10-3 for 10,000th win in franchise history

WASHINGTON (AP) — Ceddanne Rafaela homered, Walker Buehler earned his first road victory since April 26, and the Boston Red Sox routed the Washington Nationals 10-3 to earn the 10,000th victory in franchise history Saturday. Romy Gonzalez had three hits for Boston (45-45), which has won five of seven. The Red Sox are the second American League franchise to reach 10,000 victories, joining the New York Yankees. Daylen Lile extended his hitting streak to 12 games for Washington (37-52), which is tied for a season-high 15 games under .500. The Nationals fell to 18-27 at home, the third-worst record in the majors behind Colorado and the Athletics. Just as they did inFriday's 11-2 victory over Washington, the Red Sox broke it open with a seven-run inning. Roman Anthony made it 3-0 in the third with an RBI single, and four batters laterJarren Duran hit a two-run triple. Nationals starter Mitchell Parker (5-9) misplayed Abraham Toro's grounder to allow Duran to score, andRafaela hit the next pitch into the seats in left fieldto make it 8-0. Gonzalez tacked on a two-out RBI single to finish the outburst. Gonzalez and Rob Refsnyder had RBI doubles in the first to open the scoring. Buehler (6-6) allowed three runs — two earned — in five-plus innings. He improved to 3-1 with a 2.67 ERA in six lifetime appearances against Washington. Parker tied a career high with nine runs allowed, though only four were earned. He gave up 10 hits and struck out four in six innings. Key moment Parker's third-inning error led to four unearned runs, expanding Boston's lead from 5-0 to 9-0. Key stat Washington has allowed at least 10 runs in consecutive games for the first time since April 13-14. Up next Boston LHP Garrett Crochet (8-4, 2.34 ERA) starts Sunday's series finale. LHP Shinnosuke Ogasawara (1-1, 4.50 in six starts at three minor league levels) will be called up to make his major league debut for Washington. ___ AP MLB:https://apnews.com/hub/mlb

Rafaela homers as Red Sox rout Nationals 10-3 for 10,000th win in franchise history

Rafaela homers as Red Sox rout Nationals 10-3 for 10,000th win in franchise history WASHINGTON (AP) — Ceddanne Rafaela homered, Walker Buehl...
Saints RB Alvin Kamara asks for a do-over after brutal first pitch at Wrigley FieldNew Foto - Saints RB Alvin Kamara asks for a do-over after brutal first pitch at Wrigley Field

Alvin Kamara's first pitch at Wrigley Field on Saturday wasn't quite 50 Cent bad, but then he did something maybe even more surprising. He asked for a do-over. After pulling and bouncing the ball in a throw to the Chicago Cubs mascot, the New Orleans Saints running back held out his glove and requested the ball back for a second pitch. He waved to the crowd and fired a better pitch, but still missed the strike zone by a few feet. The Chicago crowd gave him some polite applause as he embraced the mascot after the pitches. Saints running back Alvin Kamara asked for a redo on his first pitch 😂pic.twitter.com/bcEPjiapqz — Marquee Sports Network (@WatchMarquee)July 5, 2025 Kamara wasreportedlyin town as part of his job as a NASCAR ambassador, with the city set to host its third Grant Park 165 at the Chicago Street Course on Sunday. A Saints employee was apparently still with Kamara at Wrigley Field, though, and posted a video of his first pitch. But just the second one, of course. AK with the 🔥🔥🔥@A_kamara6|@Cubspic.twitter.com/BHbI871jF0 — New Orleans Saints (@Saints)July 5, 2025 Kamara also thanked the Cubs for their hospitality. Chicago went on tolose its game 8-6 against the St. Louis Cardinals. Nun mediocre!!! Haha thanks for having me@Cubs💙💙💙💙💙https://t.co/AYwNdKNFZb — Alvin Kamara (@A_kamara6)July 5, 2025 Kamara is entering his ninth NFL season, having so far spent his entire career with the Saints. He's coming off a bounce-back season in which he posted 1,493 yards from scrimmage, his most since his last All-Pro season in 2020, plus eight touchdowns.

Saints RB Alvin Kamara asks for a do-over after brutal first pitch at Wrigley Field

Saints RB Alvin Kamara asks for a do-over after brutal first pitch at Wrigley Field Alvin Kamara's first pitch at Wrigley Field on Satur...
Musk announces forming of 'America Party' in further break from TrumpNew Foto - Musk announces forming of 'America Party' in further break from Trump

By David Brunnstrom and Bhargav Acharya WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The dispute between Republican President Donald Trump and his main campaign financier Elon Musk took another fractious turn on Saturday when the space and automotive billionaire announced the formation of a new political party, saying Trump's "big, beautiful" tax bill would bankrupt America. A day after asking his followers on his X platform whether a new U.S. political party should be created, Musk declared in a post on Saturday that "Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom." "By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it!" he wrote. The announcement from Musk comes after Trump signed his self-styled "big, beautiful" tax-cut and spending bill into law on Friday, which Musk fiercely opposed. Musk, who became the word's richest man thanks to his Tesla car company and his SpaceX satellite firm, spent hundreds of millions on Trump's re-election and led the Department of Government Efficiency from the start of the president's second term aimed at slashing government spending. The first sign of investor dissatisfaction with Musk's announcement followed later in the day. Investment firm Azoria Partners will postpone the listing of a Tesla exchange-traded fund, Azoria CEO James Fishback said in a post on X. Fishback is asking Tesla's board to clarify Musk's political ambitions and said the new party undermines the confidence shareholders had that he would be focusing more on the company after leaving government service in May. Musk said previously that he would start a new political party and spend money to unseat lawmakers who supported the bill. Trump earlier this week threatened to cut off the billions of dollars in subsidies that Musk's companies receive from the federal government. Republicans have expressed concern that Musk's on-again, off-again feud with Trump could hurt their chances to protect their majority in the 2026 midterm congressional elections. Asked on X what was the one thing that made him go from loving Trump to attacking him, Musk said: "Increasing the deficit from an already insane $2T under Biden to $2.5T. This will bankrupt the country." There was no immediate comment from Trump or the White House on Musk's announcement. The feud with Trump, often described as one between the world's richest man and the world's most powerful, has led to several precipitous falls in Tesla's share price. The stock soared after Trump's November reelection and hit a high of more than $488 in December, before losing more than half of its value in April and closing last week out at $315.35. Despite Musk's deep pockets, breaking the Republican-Democratic duopoly will be a tall order, given that it has dominated American political life for more than 160 years, while Trump's approval ratings in polls in his second term have generally held firm above 40%, despite often divisive policies. (Reporting by Bhargav Acharya, additional reporting by Gnaneshwar Rajan; Editing by Diane Craft, Nick Zieminski and Christian Schmollinger)

Musk announces forming of 'America Party' in further break from Trump

Musk announces forming of 'America Party' in further break from Trump By David Brunnstrom and Bhargav Acharya WASHINGTON (Reuters) ...
What Trump—And the U.S.—Can't Understand About Air StrikesNew Foto - What Trump—And the U.S.—Can't Understand About Air Strikes

The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture.Sign up for it here. When Donald Trump ordered air strikes on key Iranian nuclear-enrichment sites last month and immediately declared that the targets had been "completely and totally obliterated," he was counting on a single display of overwhelming air power to accomplish a major strategic goal. Though initially hesitant to join Israel's 10-day-old bombing campaign against Iran, the president came to believe that the United States could finish off Tehran's nuclear ambitions all at once. After what he called a "very successful attack," Trump demanded that Israel and Iran stop fighting, declaring, "NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE!" In reality, the U.S. attack may have only delayed the Iranian program by months. Trump ended up short-circuiting both his own efforts at diplomacy with Iran and an extraordinary Israeli campaign that required years of elaborate preparation, rendered Iran's air-defense network inoperable, and allowed Israeli forces to methodically work through a long list of target sites across the country over the course of a week and a half. Destroying a military target from the air usually requires multiple raids on the site—not one night and a victory declaration on Truth Social. Israeli military planners had clearly hoped to enlist American help in attacking Iran but may not have anticipated that it would be for one night only. To some extent, Trump's approach is typical of American leaders, who have routinely underestimated the true complexities of military tasks and assumed that a burst of overwhelming force will secure U.S. objectives and allow Washington to impose its version of peace. Recent events—not just in the Middle East but also in Ukraine—suggest that smaller countries with fewer resources than the United States have a far more urgent understanding specifically of how to use air power and generally of how to defeat their enemies. [Read: Trump's One-and-Done Doctrine] An unbounded faith in American military might, combined with a desire not to get bogged down in long foreign engagements, has led to excesses of optimism in the past: the constant escalation cycle in Vietnam, when it was said that more force would bring victory; the infamous mission accomplished banners after U.S. forces deposed Saddam Hussein's regime in Iraq. In conflicts since the end of World War II, the U.S. military has prevailed in individual battles, but it has won only one clear victory in a war: Operation Desert Storm in 1991. This conundrum has led to far less introspection than it deserves. One of the reasons might be that U.S. military power has been so extensive that the military, and policy makers, have not had to think too deeply about the process of winning wars. For 80 years, the U.S. military could be deployed to occupy territory, blow up structures, or destroy an enemy force—and was able to do it. It could inflict a frightening toll on its enemies at remarkably little cost to itself. The risk of overestimating American capabilities may be greatest in decisions about applying air power. The U.S. has the most awesome air force the world has ever seen. (Not coincidentally, the successful Desert Storm campaign involved purposeful and relentless air attacks on enemy targets.) Such power has immense costs, however, one of which is the destructive luxury of not having to think deeply about just what it means to win a war. American policy makers feel able to lecture smaller powers about what they should and should not do. Trump pushed Israel—which had, remarkably, achieved the ability to move freely in Iranian airspace—to stand down before the U.S. could reliably ascertain whether its own air strikes had been effective. Since 2022, bad instructions from the United States have been devastating to Ukraine's effort to fight off Russian invaders. Under the Biden administration, the United States feared escalation with Russian President Vladimir Putin and kept Ukrainians from using Western-made long-range weaponry to strike legitimate military targets inside Russia. In effect, the American veto created a large safe space in Russia, and gave the Russians the flexibility to plan and execute a hugely destructive strategic air campaign against Ukraine. Until Ukraine began developing its own systems, it was nearly powerless to stop the Russians from unleashing drones and missiles on Ukrainian military and civilian targets. Instead, the Ukrainians were forced to concentrate their resources on a bloody land war fought in trenches and by drones; despite large casualties on both sides, the fighting has produced only tiny changes in territorial control. Ukraine has done its best to change this dynamic, by working to expand its own long-range capabilities andusing those weapons against targets in Russia. The tragedy for Ukrainians is that the Biden administration stood in their way for three years—and was succeeded by a Trump administration that, perhaps because of a broad sympathy with Putin, seems intent on letting Russia win. [Read: The problem with Trump's cease-fire] For all its advanced weaponry, the United States would benefit from listening to smaller, more inventive militaries that are fighting larger adversaries in a rapidly evolving technological environment. Ukraine, for example, has developed enormous expertise in designing and deploying unmanned aerial vehicles, which—as the recent attacks on Russian airfields thousands of miles away from the Ukrainian border showed—create new vulnerabilities at traditional military facilities. Unfortunately, nothing about recent U.S. actions suggests that the country's leaders have any intention to learn from others. Under Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, the Pentagon seems obsessed with "lethality"—the idea that the United States wins wars by bringing greater lethal force to every direct engagement with the enemy. But although that focus might sound macho and hyper-militaristic to him and Trump, it may be the precursor to more events like Trump's Iran strikes: showy tactical attacks that fail to accomplish any strategic goals of substance. Article originally published atThe Atlantic

What Trump—And the U.S.—Can’t Understand About Air Strikes

What Trump—And the U.S.—Can't Understand About Air Strikes The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories ...
Roman Anthony hype train has passed. Now Red Sox mega-prospect faces 'the gap'New Foto - Roman Anthony hype train has passed. Now Red Sox mega-prospect faces 'the gap'

WASHINGTON — It's a strange existence, this life as baseball's No. 1 prospect. The greater glory is often in anticipation, the projection of minor league greatness to big league excellence, and the parlor game of just when a buzzworthy talent will land at the game's highest level. Roman Anthonyreached that apex on June 8, when he hit a497-foot grand slamfor Class AAA Worcester, a blast that figuratively punched his ticket from central Massachusetts toFenway Park. Days later came the hurried drive east, the first big league start, hit and RBI and the fan delirium of what might come next. And then, the hard part. "You kind of understand that as a player – when you're a prospect in the minor leagues and then when you come up here, nobody really cares anymore about your prospect status," Anthony tells USA TODAY Sports. "It's time to help the team win." To that point, Anthony, 21, has been wildly successful, even if his first almost month in the major leagues has not yet produced a sizzle reel worth of sharable moments. It would be hard to match the hype: Anthony's ascent as a hitting savant since the Red Sox chose him with the 79thoverall pick in 2022 crested these past two seasons, as an .879 career minor league OPS zoomed to .940 at Class AAA. So when Anthony began his career with two hits in his first 27 at-bats – an .074 average and .416 OPS – the hype machine cooled. And a maelstrom gathered around him: The club abruptly ended its cold war with All-Star slugger Rafael Devers and on June 15traded the designated hitter to San Franciscoin a blockbuster that roiled two franchises. Anthony had one major league hit to his name then, but the Red Sox did not consider spoon-feeding him; instead, they moved him to the No. 3 hole, and he's batted either second or third in 16 games since. They were rewarded with such foresight: Anthony has 16 hits in 50 at-bats since, a .314 average. One week ago, he had no multi-hit games; now, he has four, coinciding with the Red Sox winning five of seven to crawl back to .500 at 45-45 entering July 6. "Now," says Red Sox manager Alex Cora, "he's finding green. He's getting on base at a high rate. He's doing an outstanding job." Even if his contributions aren't the stuff of breathless anticipation. It's true: Home runs get the headlines. And Anthony hasn't homered in nearly three weeks and 56 at-bats, since his first and only big league dinger off Seattle's Logan Gilbert on June 16. That's not surprising given his batted-ball profile: Anthony's groundball rate of 55% is 11% higher than the league average. He has struggled most with spin, to be expected of a young player, with a 40.5% whiff percentage on breaking pitches, more than three times his rate against fastballs. And yet, he's ripped six doubles and makes the right contributions to keep the lineup whirring. Cora lauded his focus in drawing a walk with an eight-run lead Friday; the next day, he hit a ball to the right side to move a runner that scored, then rolled a pair of singles that way to aid the Red Sox's 10-3 victory over the Washington Nationals. That we are witnessing the building of a foundation as opposed to an instant smash is hardly a surprise in this era. Since the revamping of the minor leagues in 2022, the gulf between Class AAA and the big leagues has been widening. Anthony played just 93 games over two seasons at Worcester and was a month past his 21stbirthday when he debuted in Boston. He was tossed into a grind where three-city, nine-game road trips are common, whereas the minor leagues have largely shifted to a format where six-game series in one destination are commonplace. "I think the gap between minor league baseball and the big leagues is the biggest I have witnessed as far as stuff, execution, fastballs, obviously breaking ball stuff," says Cora. "Traveling, everything. This whole six days in one city – it doesn't prepare them for this. We played at 11 yesterday, we play at 4 today, tomorrow at 1, hop on a plane and then we got seven in a row in Boston. "Minor league baseball is not preparing these guys for what this is. They've done a good job adjusting. The organization does a good job with them when they get here, try to keep it as simple as possible. But it's a big adjustment period." Anthony adds another factor to this: The cutthroat nature of the majors, where the game becomes a binary – did you win or lose? – as opposed to the developmental priority of the minor leagues "I think the biggest adjustment is learning how to prepare yourself to help the team win every single day," says Anthony. "In the minor leagues, and coming to the big leagues, the idea of showing up every day to win is so much different than it is in the minor leagues. "My experience so far has been awesome." It doesn't hurt that the Red Sox are hitting an offensive high point in the post-Devers era, scoring double-digit runs in four of their last seven games. They haven't shown a consistency in all phases to compete in theAmerican League Eastbut encouraging performances of late from starters Lucas Giolito and Walker Buehler create some hope they may can stay in many more games than they were earlier this season. Cora admires Anthony's ability to flush outcomes with the aplomb of a much more veteran performer. "He's a consistent player, a consistent individual," says Cora. "He does not get caught up in results. He wants to put up good at-bats. "He wants to get better." Anthony, of course, is just one of a gaggle of mega-prospects who came up through Worcester in recent years, now playing alongside infielderMarcelo Mayer. The third piece of their Worcester triad one year ago, catcher Kyle Teel, was dealt to the Chicago White Sox in the Garrett Crochet trade this winter. Teel made his debut one week before Anthony, and the two talk or text frequently, Anthony admiringly noting that Teel is "killing it" on the South Side, with a .283 average and .400 OBP. Yet it is Anthony – who will officially lose his "prospect" status by around the All-Star break – that many in the game believe will produce a 15-year career. Become an elite hitter. And, eventually, elevate the ball, put more of them in the seats and remain the longtime cog in the Red Sox lineup. That's still a way off. And the new-car sheen of his debut has long faded. Yet the beginning of a long relationship is only just beginning – with Anthony quietly fulfilling his end of the bargain, with greater things to come. "I feel like AC trusts me and I feel like I've been having good at-bats and doing what I need to do to help the team. Continue to get better at that every day," says Anthony. "Credit to the staff, trusting me and putting me in that position to hit there with such a great lineup around me. "I'd much rather have it this way than be a prospect in the minor leagues. I'm in the big leagues and this is the dream – to be here. Just being a player on theBoston Red Soxwho is trying to help this team win." The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fast.Download for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Roman Anthony Red Sox stats improve after top prospect's ugly start

Roman Anthony hype train has passed. Now Red Sox mega-prospect faces 'the gap'

Roman Anthony hype train has passed. Now Red Sox mega-prospect faces 'the gap' WASHINGTON — It's a strange existence, this life ...

 

MARIO VOUX © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com