UEFA fines Chelsea $23.6M and Barcelona $17.7M for financial monitoring rules breachesNew Foto - UEFA fines Chelsea $23.6M and Barcelona $17.7M for financial monitoring rules breaches

GENEVA (AP) — Chelsea was fined 20 million euros ($23.6 million) for breaking financial monitoring rules and Barcelona was ordered to pay 15 million euros ($17.7 million) by UEFA on Friday. Both clubs must pay tens of millions of more euros (dollars) in future seasons if they miss financial targets set by UEFA. Chelsea had been under investigation for the 76.5 million pounds ($104.4 million) sale of two hotels between subsidiaries of Chelsea's holding company, Blueco 22 Ltd. Chelsea has been owned since 2022 by Todd Boehly and Clearlake Capital. Chelsea's fine matches the record 20 million euros ($23.6 million) sanction imposed in 2014 on Manchester City and Paris Saint-Germain by UEFA. Those were the first round of penalties in the system then called Financial Fair Play. In other investigations settled on Friday, UEFA fined financially troubled French club Lyon 12.5 million euros ($14.7 million) with future fines conditional on meeting targets. The club owned by American businessman John Textor is fighting an appeal case next week against being demoted from Ligue 1 amid its financial turmoil, and could yet be excluded by UEFA from the Europa League next season. ___ AP soccer:https://apnews.com/hub/soccer

UEFA fines Chelsea $23.6M and Barcelona $17.7M for financial monitoring rules breaches

UEFA fines Chelsea $23.6M and Barcelona $17.7M for financial monitoring rules breaches GENEVA (AP) — Chelsea was fined 20 million euros ($23...
23 days, 184 cyclists: Everything you need to know about the 2025 Tour de FranceNew Foto - 23 days, 184 cyclists: Everything you need to know about the 2025 Tour de France

The cycling world is gearing up for another showdown between titans Tadej Pogačar and Jonas Vingegaard in the 112th edition of the Tour de France, which departs Saturday from Lille. This year, the Tour stays entirely in France and features a grueling but stunning ride through the Pyrenees and the Alps. It ends in Paris on July 27, the 50th anniversary of the first time it ended on the famed Champs-Elysees. Pogačar, of Slovenia, and Vingegaard, of Denmark, have won the last five Tours between them, and Vingegaard — who lost to his rival by more than six minutes last year — is out to settle the score. But beating Pogačar has proven nearly impossible. He has won three Tours, nine one-day races called Monuments, the World Championship Road Race and the 2024 Giro d'Italia, Italy's grand tour. He signed cycling's biggest contract last year with his current team, UAE Team Emirates XRG, for $58 million over six years. While that might seem small by U.S professional sports standards, it's astronomical for the peloton. With so much money on the line, the stakes are higher than ever. "Everything the light touches is Tadej's kingdom," Pogačar's teammate Mikkel Bjerg, of Denmark, astutely points out in season three of the Netflix series "Unchained," which goes behind the scenes of the Tour de France. Bjerg made the observation last year from a skyscraper in Abu Dhabi, but the statement remains true. Pogačar has already solidified his place as one of the greatest cyclists of all time. At 26, he is seeking his fourth title at the Tour this year. If he does take home the yellow jersey, he will have won all three Grand Tours of 2025. Meanwhile, Vingegaard is angling for a third victory. His loss last year to Pogačar came on the heels of a horrific crash at the Itzulia Basque Country race in Spain that required nearly two weeks of hospitalization. As he landed near a concrete ditch, he sustained lung damage and rib and collarbone fractures, and he was carried away on a stretcher. Still, Vingegaard rode to second place in the Tour. He has spent most of this season training away from the cameras and racing only a handful of times. At the Critérium du Dauphiné race in the spring, the old Vingegaard seemed to be back. The biggest question now is whether a recovered Vingegaard can take on the reigning champion. Time is running out for Roglič, 35, to shake whatever curse has caused him to crash out of three Tours de France. Last month, Roglič was forced to abandon the Giro d'Italia after yet another crash, and the pressure is on for him to perform well after he joined a team whose title sponsor is the energy drink Red Bull. Roglič, a former Olympic ski jumper, has had luck in the past. He won titles in the Giro and the Vuelta a España, the Spanish grand tour, and in the Olympic road race, but the Tour de France has remained out of reach. In 2020, he came in second to Pogačar. This year, the route itself could determine winners or losers. Saturday's opening stage is expected to launch what is referred to as a bunch sprint, when a large group of riders all accelerate toward the finish line at the same time. That could be the case on Day 1, when the peloton will be its largest before crashes or illness force some contenders to abandon. At least one sprinter, Alpecin–Deceuninck's Mathieu van der Poel, recently told reporters he worried that the stage's bunch sprint could pose serious safety risks. His teammate Jasper Phillipsen, already known as an aggressive rider who has drawn criticism for his tactics both inside and outside the peloton, told reporters at a pre-Tour news conference that he expected risks to be taken. The final stage on July 27 is also controversial among the cyclists. Rather than take the usual ceremonial ride into Paris with a paradelike finish that ends with a sprint, riders this year must tackle narrow cobbled streets as they climbMontmartre Hillthree times. The area is a maze of narrow streets that was featured last year during the Summer Olympics. An uphill finish adds suspense to a normally low-key last day. Historically, the overall winner of the Tour de France has already been decided before the last stage based on cumulative time standings from the previous three weeks. But a tough climb means more riders can go for the general classification, or winner of the race, if time standings are tight. That could lead to a nail-biting race to victory. According to The Associated Press, the last time a final stage was decisive was in 1989, when American Greg LeMond won his second Tour de France. Cycling has had a tough time rebounding in the United States since Lance Armstrong's doping scandal. But Visma–Lease a Bike has two top riders who are quickly putting the United States back on the map. Two years ago, Sepp Kuss, of Durango, Colorado, went from super domestique to Grand Tour winner at the Vuelta a España. Domestiques set the pace for team leaders, chasing and attacking opponents and even shielding their leader from headwinds that can slow him down. A tireless and reliable lieutenant, Kuss stepped up to briefly act as team leader in 2023 and became the first American in a decade to win a Grand Tour. He is expected to be a key worker for Vingegaard in the mountains this year. Joining Kuss and Vingegaard will be Matteo Jorgenson, who was born in Walnut Creek, California, and raised in Boise, Idaho. He has been on the team for only two seasons but has already claimed victories at some of the most elite spring races. He finished eighth overall last year at the Tour de France and has been mentioned as a likely contender for first in years to come.

23 days, 184 cyclists: Everything you need to know about the 2025 Tour de France

23 days, 184 cyclists: Everything you need to know about the 2025 Tour de France The cycling world is gearing up for another showdown betwee...
Hegseth halted weapons for Ukraine despite military analysis that the aid wouldn't jeopardize U.S. readinessNew Foto - Hegseth halted weapons for Ukraine despite military analysis that the aid wouldn't jeopardize U.S. readiness

The Defense Departmentheld up a shipment of U.S. weaponsfor Ukraine this week over what officials said were concerns about its low stockpiles. But an analysis by senior military officers found that the aid package would not jeopardize the American military's own ammunition supplies, according to three U.S. officials. The move to halt the weapons shipment blindsided the State Department, members of Congress, officials in Kyiv and European allies, according to multiple sources with knowledge of the matter. Critics of the decision included Republicans and Democrats who support aiding Ukraine's fight against Russia. A leading House Democrat, Adam Smith of Washington, said it was disingenuous of the Pentagon to use military readiness to justify halting aid when the real reason appears to be simply to pursue an agenda of cutting off American aid to Ukraine. "We are not at any lower point, stockpile-wise, than we've been in the 3½ years of the Ukraine conflict," Smith, the ranking member of the House Armed Services Committee, told NBC News. Smith said that his staff has "seen the numbers" and, without going into detail, that there was no indication of a shortage that would justify suspending aid to Ukraine. Suspending the shipment of military aid to Ukraine was a unilateral step by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, according to three congressional aides and a former U.S. official familiar with the matter. It was the third time Hegseth on his own has stopped shipments of aid to Ukraine, the sources said. In the two previous cases, in February and in May, his actions were reversed days later. A senior Pentagon official, Elbridge Colby, the undersecretary of defense for policy, has backed the moves, the sources said. Colby has long advocated scaling back the U.S. commitment in Ukraine and shifting weapons and resources to the Pacific region to counter China. Lawmakers from both parties were frustrated that they were not notified in advance and were examining whether the delayed shipment violated legislation mandating security assistance for Ukraine, according to congressional aides. Those lawmakers and some European allies were trying to determine just why the Pentagon ordered the suspension and were scrambling to get it reversed. The White House has defended the decision, saying it followed an ongoing review by the Defense Department of U.S. assistance to allies and partners abroad that began last month. The review began after Hegseth issued a memo ordering the Pentagon's Joint Staff to review stockpiles of all munitions. According to three officials familiar with the matter, the assessment found that some stockpiles of high-precision munitions were at lower levels but not yet beyond critical minimums. The Joint Staff concluded that providing continued assistance to Ukraine would not drain U.S. supplies below a required threshold needed to ensure military readiness, the officials said. The Pentagon did not respond to a request for comment Thursday. Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell called the assessment a "capability review" at a briefing Wednesday. "We can't give weapons to everybody all around the world," Parnell said. "Part of our job is to give the president a framework that he can use to evaluate how many munitions we have where we're sending them. And that review process is happening right now and is ongoing." Ukraine has issued urgent appeals to Washington for more air defense systems as Russia has stepped up its bombardment of Ukrainian cities. Over the weekend,Russia launched its biggest aerial attackof the three-year-old conflict, firing 60 missiles and 477 drones across the country. The delayed shipment included dozens of Patriot interceptors, coveted weapons for Ukraine to knock out incoming missiles, as well as 155 mm artillery rounds, Hellfire missiles, precision-guided missile systems known as GMLRS, grenade launchers, Stinger surface-to-air missiles and AIM air-to-air missiles for Ukraine's small fleet of F-16 fighter jets. In Poland and other European countries, some of the U.S. weapons had already been loaded onto trucks, ready to be delivered to Kyiv to help its government fend off Russian missile attacks and hold the line against ground forces in the country's east. Then, military officers and officials handling the shipment got word that the delivery had been called off, said two sources with knowledge of the matter. The weapons shipment was approved during the Biden administration, three U.S. officials said. Some of the weapons were pulled from U.S. stockpiles, with the Pentagon receiving funds to replenish them. Other munitions fall under a program that provides money to buy new weapons for Ukraine from American defense companies, the officials said. Those weapons are not drawn from U.S. supplies. Since the United States began sending large shipments of weapons to Kyiv after Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, U.S. officials and commanders have grown concerned about the state of American stockpiles of munitions and other equipment. The aid effort has laid bare the inadequacy of the defense industrial base to replenish those weapons stocks. That has, in some cases, put the Pentagon at dangerously low levels of some munitions, including 155 mm artillery rounds, according to multiple U.S. officials and former military officers. In aletter to President Donald Trump, Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick, R-Pa., requested an emergency briefing from the White House and the Defense Department to review the decision "to withhold urgent, lifesaving military assistance to Ukraine." He arguedthat it was possible to both maintain adequate weapons supplies for the U.S. military and send arms badly needed by Kyiv. Dan Caldwell, a former senior Pentagon official, defended the pause by Hegseth and Colby. "They are prioritizing the safety and readiness of our own military over pleasing the foreign policy establishment, who often seem in denial about the real constraints the United States military is facing," Caldwell said. Hegseth has twice before suspended aid to Ukraine without apparent coordination with lawmakers on Capitol Hill or even within the administration. The first time, in February, drew a prickly response from the chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Roger Wicker, R-Miss., who called the move "a rookie mistake." The next time was in early May, according to a Senate aide. In both cases, the suspensions of aid were reversed within days. Rep. Michael McCaul, R- Texas, a staunch supporter of military aid to Ukraine, said it was crucial to show Russia that the United States would stand behind Ukraine. "We can't let Putin prevail now. President Trump knows that too and it's why he's been advocating for peace," McCaulwrote on social media. "Now is the time to show Putin we mean business. And that starts with ensuring Ukraine has the weapons Congress authorized to pressure Putin to the negotiating table."

Hegseth halted weapons for Ukraine despite military analysis that the aid wouldn’t jeopardize U.S. readiness

Hegseth halted weapons for Ukraine despite military analysis that the aid wouldn't jeopardize U.S. readiness The Defense Departmentheld ...
Republicans passed the 'big, beautiful bill.' Will it come back to haunt them?New Foto - Republicans passed the 'big, beautiful bill.' Will it come back to haunt them?

WASHINGTON – PresidentDonald Trump's legislative package of tax reductions and Medicaid cuts passed out of Congress on July 3 and will soon be signed into law. Up next for Congressional Republicans: Surviving the midterms. Many Republicans argue that voters will feel the economic benefits of their bill and reward them by sending them back to Washington. Democrats say the bill is deeply unpopular and they'll use it to clobber the GOP in the November 2026 election. History, in this case, favors the Democrats' argument. The party that does not hold the White Housetypically wins the Housein the midterm elections as voters express frustrations with the new president's policies. This trend applies regardless of party in modern history, with some exceptions. And public polling about the Republican bill already indicates voters aren't thrilled about it.A Fox News pollpublished in mid-June found 38% of respondents favored the legislation and 59% opposed it. Polls from Quinnipiac, The Washington Post, KFF and Pewreflected similar sentiments. "This will cost Republicans the House," said Rep. Suzan DelBene, D-Washington, chair of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, which is responsible for helping Democrats keep and win House seats. The bill's Medicaid cuts are expected to leave11.8 million Americanswithout insurance over the next ten years – a deeply "damaging" result that will drive up healthcare costs for families, DelBene said. Democrats have likened this bill to Republicans'2017 attemptto repeal the Affordable Care Act, after whichRepublicans lost 40 seatsin the House. "People want representatives that are going to stand up for them," she argued, "and this bill is an example of Republicans turning away from their constituents." Republicans have "written the script" for 2026, said Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Maryland. "I'm certainly going to be talking about it all of the time," he told USA TODAY. "I mean, nothing could better capture the way that the Republican party just serves Donald Trump and our would-be monarchs and oligarchs." It's not just Democrats who have identified the Medicaid cuts as a potential political threat. During a meeting with House Republicans on July 2, as GOP leadership scrambled to find the votes for the package, Trump said they shouldn't touch three things if they wanted to win elections – Medicaid, Medicare and Social Security,according to the news site NOTUS. One member reportedly responded: "But we're touching Medicaid in this bill." Rep. Don Bacon, R-Nebraska, represents a swing district and recently announced heplans to retire from Congress. He has been a vocal opponent of the Medicaid cuts in the bill, but he said before the vote that he would approve the measure because it would save the average Nebraskan $141 per month in taxes and pour billions into the defense budget. Bacon said he believes the Senate's version, which implemented deeper cuts to Medicaid, makes it easier for Democrats to paint the package in a negative light during the midterm elections. "I could have defended the House bill every day. It was easy," he said. "But in the end, do I want to raise taxes on the middle class? No. Do I want to fix defense? Yes." Some Republicans are confident they can explain their reasoning to voters, including those who raised concerns about Medicaid cuts. Rep. Jeff Van Drew, R-New Jersey, argued before the vote that his concerns were allayed by provisions in the bill that would allow hospitals in his district to continue to draw down sufficient federal funds. "I've said all along that we have to do this in an intelligent way. I believe that it seems we've charted a way to do that. Where we started a few months ago, people were saying we're going to gut Medicaid. We're a long ways off from that." House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-Louisiana, said he believed the bill would prop up Republicans in the 2026 midterm elections. "Every Democrat (in the) House and Senate voted no," Scalise said on July 3. "The American people are going to see great benefits from this bill, and they're going to know which party was fighting for them and which party was literally trying to hold up the vote for hours so that those families couldn't get that relief." "The Democratic Party still doesn't know why they lost in November. They're going to be reminded of that next year when they lose again," he added. The bill makes permanent the 2017 income tax cuts implemented during Trump's first term and pours $170 billion inborder securityfunding. In a memoon the bill, the National Republican Congressional Committee indicated it plans to argue Republicans prevented "the largest tax hike in generations" and delivered a historic funding boost for border security. "This vote cemented House Democrats' image as elitist, disconnected, snobby, unconcerned with the problems Americans face in their daily lives, and most of all – out of touch," Mike Marinella, NRCC spokesman, said in a statement. "House Republicans will be relentless in making this vote the defining issue of 2026, and we will use every tool to show voters that Republicans stood with them while House Democrats sold them out." This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Will Trump's big tax bill come back to bite the GOP in 2026?

Republicans passed the 'big, beautiful bill.' Will it come back to haunt them?

Republicans passed the 'big, beautiful bill.' Will it come back to haunt them? WASHINGTON – PresidentDonald Trump's legislative ...
Blue Jays finish 4-game sweep of Yankees to take sole possession of first place in AL EastNew Foto - Blue Jays finish 4-game sweep of Yankees to take sole possession of first place in AL East

There is only one first-place team in the AL East right now, and it's the Toronto Blue Jays. With an 8-5 win over the New York Yankees on Thursday, the Blue Jays completed a sweep of their division rival and took over sole possession of first place in the process. Their record sits at 49-38 with the Yankees and Tampa Bay Rays each one game behind them at 48-39. The@BlueJayscomplete the sweep and sit alone atop the AL East!pic.twitter.com/DrJFjTE7fZ — MLB (@MLB)July 4, 2025 It's been nearly a decade since Toronto was in this position. The last time it held full control of first place in July or later was 2016, when it led the division for much of August and early September before the Boston Red Sox took over. In this case, the Jays got there with a four-game series that went from highly anticipated to downright cathartic. The first game was close, the second turned into a blowout,while the third game was nearly a disaster. Thursday's game was a back-and-forth. The Blue Jays struck first with an Addison Barger RBI double in the first inning, then Trent Grisham homered to tie the game in the third. George Springer hit a two-run homer to put Toronto ahead again in the bottom of the third, but New York responded with a two-run rally in the fourth. The big hit came in the game's longest at-bat. With two runners in scoring position, leadoff hitter Nathan Lukes faced off against Yankees reliever Clayton Beeter, who took over after starting pitcher Clarke Schmidt left the game with forearm tightness. He quickly fell behind 0-2, then fouled off eight pitches to stay alive. On the 14th pitch of the at-bat, Lukes hit the go-ahead double. FOURTEEN PITCHES LATER...Lukes Delivers!pic.twitter.com/rjS5fZRkQ5 — Toronto Blue Jays (@BlueJays)July 4, 2025 Barger added a solo homer an inning later to make it a three-run lead, which the Yankees cut to one with a two-run rally in the seventh inning. They nearly threatened again in the eighth, and then Cody Bellinger swung at a pitch flying toward his chest. The umpire ruled that Cody Bellinger swung at this pitch that hit him which ended the inningpic.twitter.com/U3w0KEwoh7 — Talkin' Yanks (@TalkinYanks)July 4, 2025 Springer homered again in the bottom of the eighth to put Toronto comfortably ahead. Across the series, the Jays designated hitter was 8 for 14 with four homers, four walks and 11 RBI. ANOTHER SPRINGER DINGER 😱pic.twitter.com/u0aKpJl51A — MLB (@MLB)July 4, 2025 Few expected the Blue Jays to be in this position as the All-Star break nears. The dominant conversation around the team in the offseason wasn't whether they would contend, it was whether they should sell if they couldn't convince star first baseman Vladimir Guerrero Jr. to stay long term. They checked off the extension box with a $500 million contract extension, but they're now in the process of trying to do something even harder. The peripherals, such as a plus-nine run differential (the Yankees are plus-100 and the Rays are plus-69), suggest they may be overperforming, but there has been some legitimate progress with this group, with breakout seasons by Barger and third baseman Ernie Clement. Staying ahead in the AL East will be a hard task, but just getting to this position more than three months into the season was arguably even harder. As recently as May 28, the Blue Jays were eight full games behind the Yankees. Toronto also has one of the easiest stretches going into the All-Star break, with series against the Los Angeles Angels, Chicago White Sox and Athletics.

Blue Jays finish 4-game sweep of Yankees to take sole possession of first place in AL East

Blue Jays finish 4-game sweep of Yankees to take sole possession of first place in AL East There is only one first-place team in the AL East...
What we know about the death of Liverpool soccer star Diogo Jota and his brotherNew Foto - What we know about the death of Liverpool soccer star Diogo Jota and his brother

Thesoccerworld is in mourning following the death ofLiverpoolandPortugalstarDiogo Jotain a car crash in Spain early on Thursday morning. He was 28. His brother, André Silva – who was also a professional footballer – also died in the accident at the age of 25. Jota married his long-term partner, Rute Cardoso, with whom he has three children, less than two weeks before the crash. The incident occurred around 12:30 a.m. local time on the A-52 road in Zamora, northwestern Spain, and was caused by a "burst tire while overtaking," the country's Guardia Civil said on Thursday. The vehicle that Jota and his brother were in left the road and subsequently caught fire, officials said. It is not known which brother was driving the car, which Spanish media reported was a Lamborghini. The authorities identified the remains based on documents recovered at the scene of the accident, as well as the car's license plate, CNN Portugal reported. Further forensic testing at a morgue in Zamora confirmed the brothers' identities, according to CNN Portugal. For investigation, the remains were moved to the nearby town of Puebla de Sanabria, a source close to the sub-delegate of the Spanish government in Zamora told CNN. The players' family was present in Puebla de Sanabria on Thursday afternoon to finalize the administrative requirements which allow the remains to be released and returned to Portugal, CNN Portugal reported. A source from the Government Sub-delegation in Zamora told PA that the crash is being investigated as "a possible speeding incident." A wake for Jota and André Silva's family began on Friday morning at a church in the brothers' hometown of Gondomar, near Porto, the church told CNN. It added that the doors at the Igreja Martiz de Gondomar will open to the public on Friday afternoon. A funeral is set to take place on Saturday at 10 a.m. local time (5 a.m. ET), the church said. Jota played an important role in the Liverpool team which lifted the Premier League trophy just over two months ago, equaling the English record of 20 top-flight titles. He featured in 26 of the club's 38 league games, scoring six goals and providing four assists. In total, he scored 65 goals across five years on Merseyside, also winning one FA Cup and two EFL Cups. Jota was part of the Portugal national team which won the Nations League in June this year, having also won the competition in 2019. André Silva played for Futebol Clube de Penafiel in the Liga Portugal 2, the country's second division. In total, he scored 12 goals and contributed 10 assists in 105 matches at full and youth level throughout his career. Tributes from the soccer world came flooding in throughout Thursday. Portuguese great Cristiano Ronaldo wrote that his compatriot's death "does not make sense," while former Liverpool manager Jürgen Klopp, who signed Jota for the club in 2020, offered "prayers, thoughts and power" to Jota and André Silva's family. Current Liverpool manager Arne Slot also paid his respects, writing: "When the time is right, we will celebrate Diogo Jota, we will remember his goals and we will sing his song. For the time being, we will remember him as a unique human being and mourn his loss. He will never be forgotten." Tributes also came in from beyond soccer, from the likes of NBA star LeBron James and the United Kingdom's Prince William, who said he was "deeply saddened." CNN's Alan Goodman and Duarte Mendonca contributed to reporting. For more CNN news and newsletters create an account atCNN.com

What we know about the death of Liverpool soccer star Diogo Jota and his brother

What we know about the death of Liverpool soccer star Diogo Jota and his brother Thesoccerworld is in mourning following the death ofLiverpo...
Inside the 24 hours that Trump willed his agenda bill over the finish lineNew Foto - Inside the 24 hours that Trump willed his agenda bill over the finish line

After nearly 20 hours straight of working the phones – using both threats and assurances to cajole Republicans into supporting his sweeping domestic agenda bill – President Donald Trump seemed to grow exasperated while watching coverage of the plodding floor process on television. "What are the Republicans waiting for??? What are you trying to prove??? MAGA IS NOT HAPPY, AND IT'S COSTING YOU VOTES!!!" Trump posted on social media at midnight, as the vote seemed stalled. Fourteen hours later, the bill had passed, with only two Republican defections. Trump is expected to sign it in a major ceremony on Friday afternoon at the White House – punctuated by a fly-over of the B-2 bombers who dropped bunker-buster bombs on Iranian nuclear facilities last month, according to a White House official. The spectacle will only underscore what a consequential stretch of days it has been for the president, who now appears at the height of his political power roughly six months into his second term. Last week's Supreme Court decision paved the way for even more expansive use of executive authority. His strikes on Iran's nuclear sites appear to have created new momentum toward a ceasefire deal in Gaza. A NATO summit last week, tailored to his preferences, resulted in new defense spending commitments after years of pressure from Trump. At home, Trump is presiding over an economy that continues to create jobs, despite continued unease over the threat of tariffs. His hardline immigration enforcement tactics, decried by opponents as inhumane or illegal, have reportedly brought down unlawful crossings at the US southern border to historic lows. "I think I have more power now, I do," Trump said outside Air Force One Thursday, hours after his agenda bill passed the House. To Trump's detractors, his unshakeable grip on Republicans and his strong-arming of US allies abroad add up to an authoritarian-in-waiting, unchecked by the systems in place to ensure the country doesn't descend into autocracy. But to his supporters, the last two weeks have amounted to a thrilling culmination of his unlikely return to power and a rapid-pace fulfillment of the promises he made to his voters last year. "He's getting his agenda passed to a greater extent than he did his first term. He has better control over the apparatus," said Asa Hutchinson, the former Arkansas governor who challenged Trump for the presidency last year. "Part of it, I think, is that he's a second-term president, and he knows how to wield that power and use the office of the president. And you got a Supreme Court that's backed him up," Hutchinson went on. "It's a very powerful position that he's in. People recognize that. He also recognizes he has a very short amount of time, because he's only got four years now." No longer restrained by skeptical members of his own party, Trump is free to pursue his agenda and interests in ways that even some Republicans worry will come to haunt them in next year's midterm elections. Both supporters and opponents of Trump's bill seem to agree that — for better or worse — the measure passed Thursday will now form a major part of Trump's domestic legacy. It passed after intensive involvement from the president himself, who appeared acutely aware of the stakes for his own presidency and took to calling lawmakers into the night to convince them to vote yes. A senior White House official called Trump "the omnipresent force behind this legislation." "Dinner after dinner, engagement after engagement at Mar-a-Lago — you know, those relationships, and the president's focus on relationships, carried us through in kind of a cascade here," the official said, adding they had lost count of the number of meetings Trump held on the bill. Democrats have already begun formulating plans to tether Trump and Republicans to the new law's changes to Medicaid, singling out individual cases of Americans' deprived of care. Their argument was encapsulated by House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries' marathon speech on the House Floor on Thursday. "Leadership requires courage, conviction, compassion — and yet what we have seen from this administration and co-conspirators on the Republican side of the aisle is cruelty, chaos and corruption," Jeffries said in his address, which broke a record for the longest floor speech in modern history. Polling shows Americans are broadly skeptical of the bill, creating a task for Trump in the months ahead to change perceptions of the bill he worked assiduously to get passed. He could be aided by the bill's strategic sequencing, which enacts the tax cuts in the near-term but pushes off major changes to Medicaid and food assistance programs until after next year's midterm elections. Yet recent history is littered with presidents who, after using congressional majorities to push through major legislation meant to burnish their legacy, later lamented not doing enough to sell the bill to the American public – after their party members paid the price at the ballot box. Trump did, at various points over the last week, appear concerned that slashing the social safety net too deeply might pose political challenges for Republicans. "I don't want to go too crazy with cuts," he told CNN on Tuesday. "I don't like cuts." Even in private, Trump has told Republicans that making changes to Medicaid, Medicare and Social Security would be a losing political message, according to officials. In conversations with Republican lawmakers, White House officials sought to emphasize that changes to Medicaid wouldn't be felt for years, giving states and hospitals time to sort through the changes. Officials also reminded lawmakers that states had a significant role in dictating how Medicaid dollars are spent, and therefore control how and whether individuals lose coverage. Officials said Trump's team had taken lessons from a failed attempt to repeal Obamacare in 2017, working with Republicans on messaging and trying to present them with a clearer view into why the bill would work. Still, Trump's priority has largely been getting his own agenda enacted, not the political fortunes of Republicans in Congress. Any worries about next year's election were mostly put to the side as Trump squeezed GOP holdouts using both charm and threats of political retribution. White House officials privately acknowledged that the Democratic messaging on the bill has been effective, but noted that the focus from their party so far has not been on messaging, but on getting the bill passed. "We now have to shift to explaining the bill and how it will benefit our voters," one official said. "We are confident once we get that messaging across, the public perception of the bill will shift." From the beginning, Trump and his allies framed support for the bill as a loyalty test, advising senators in an official notice last week that failure to pass the measure would amount to an "ultimate betrayal." Trump treated Republican holdouts harshly, threatening to support primary challengers to Sen. Thom Tillis and Rep. Thomas Massie after the said they would oppose the bill. Ultimately Tillis announced last week he would retire, opting out of Trump's test of fealty. He warned from the Senate floor afterward that Trump had been "misinformed" about the effects of his bill, calling it "inescapable this bill will betray the promise Donald Trump made." Trump's hardline approach shifted Wednesday, when he hosted House Republicans at the White House. In those sessions, he appeared to adhere to an old adage as he worked to convince lawmakers to vote for his mega-bill: you catch more flies with honey than with vinegar. In meetings in the Cabinet Room and Oval Office, a magnanimous Trump signed place cards, took photos and paid his visitors compliments on their television appearances, according to people familiar with the sessions. He handed out mementos and showed guests around the constantly redecorated Oval Office. But he was also firm that after weeks of back-and-forth between the two chambers of Congress, there would be no more changes to the bill. "He wanted to get this done, and that was clear," one lawmaker who met with Trump said. "The message he sent to all of them was very clear, that this bill has been negotiated a lot, but there's not going to be any more changes to it," Rep. Steve Scalise, the House Majority Leader, said Thursday on Capitol Hill. "The time for that is over, and I think it took them still a few hours after to realize he was serious." When discussing the bill, the president urged the lawmakers to maintain GOP unity and avoid giving Democrats a victory by denying him his signature legislation, one person familiar with the meetings said. Outside Air Force One on Thursday evening, Trump said he offered "no deals – what I did is we talked about how good the bill is." And while Trump's threat of backing primary challenges to opponents of his bill remained ever-present in many Republicans' minds, the president opted to leave the warning mostly unsaid as he cajoled members in the West Wing on Wednesday. "The president was wonderful, as always," Tennessee Rep. Tim Burchett said in a video posted after the two-hour meeting. "Informative, funny, he told me he likes seeing me on TV, which was kind of cool." However, as the night went on and lawmakers argued at the Capitol, one source briefed on the conversations with conservative members said it was conveyed that if members held up this bill, they would be primaried – a message that moved some members towards a vote. "He is in the strongest position of anybody in generations – probably ever – in terms of impacting primaries for Congress," the source said. "So anybody coming from a hard-right district, which is most of the conference, will have to deal with that. And he's just not going to tolerate anyone going against his agenda." A White House official pushed back on the notion that there were any direct primary threats but acknowledged that the prospect always loomed over conversations. One person familiar with the meetings with House lawmakers said Trump spoke about the importance of the bill to Republicans' agenda and argued that economic growth would eclipse any concerns about expanding the deficit — arguments he and his team have been making publicly. He also promised hardline fiscal hawks he would use his executive authorities to vigorously enforce certain phaseout provisions for green energy tax credits to convince them to vote yes. "He did a masterful job of laying out how we could improve it, how he could use his chief executive office, use things to make the bill better," Rep. Ralph Norman of South Carolina, who originally planned to vote against the legislation but ultimately supported it, said on CNBC. Some Republicans had been vocal in their opposition to the Senate's slower timeline to phase out some energy tax credits, and Norman said it was important for them to get assurances on that from the White House. He said it was a major sticking point in the final hours of deliberations. "Up until late in the night, we were negotiating, you know, things that could change with, you know, the tax credits, which all were put in by Joe Biden, which needed to be extinguished," Norman said. In the dark hours of Thursday morning, Trump's patience in convincing holdout Republicans seemed to be wearing thin. "FOR REPUBLICANS, THIS SHOULD BE AN EASY YES VOTE," he wrote at 12:45 a.m. ET. "RIDICULOUS." A few phone calls later, the holdouts had relented. And Trump's signature bill was on track to pass. The headline of this story has been updated. For more CNN news and newsletters create an account atCNN.com

Inside the 24 hours that Trump willed his agenda bill over the finish line

Inside the 24 hours that Trump willed his agenda bill over the finish line After nearly 20 hours straight of working the phones – using both...

 

MARIO VOUX © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com