Trump says he has 'two or three' choices to replace Fed's PowellNew Foto - Trump says he has 'two or three' choices to replace Fed's Powell

By Jasper Ward WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump said on Tuesday he has two or three top choices to replace Jerome Powell as Federal Reserve chair. Powell, whose term ends in May 2026, was nominated by Trump to lead the U.S. central bank during his first administration. When asked abroad Air Force One whether he has a top choice to succeed Powell, Trump told reporters, "I have two or three top choices," but declined to provide further information. The Wall Street Journal reported last week that Trump is considering former Fed governor Kevin Warsh and National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett as replacements. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is also being pitched as a potential candidate, according to the newspaper, which also listed former World Bank President David Malpass and Fed governor Christopher Waller as potential nominees. According to the Journal, Trump has toyed with the idea of selecting and announcing a replacement as early as September or October. However, Bessent told Bloomberg TV on Monday that the Trump administration is considering using the next expected Federal Reserve Board of Governors vacancy in early 2026 for appointing a successor. Since returning to the White House in January, Trump has criticized Powell and other Fed governors for deciding not to lower interest rates, which are currently in the 4.25%-4.50% range. Fed chairs have long been seen as insulated from presidential dismissal for reasons other than malfeasance or misconduct, but Trump has threatened to test that legal premise with frequent threats to fire Powell. A Supreme Court ruling in May eased concerns that Trump could fire Powell as the justices called the Fed "a uniquely structured, quasi-private entity." (Reporting by Jasper Ward; Editing by Daniel Wallis)

Trump says he has 'two or three' choices to replace Fed's Powell

Trump says he has 'two or three' choices to replace Fed's Powell By Jasper Ward WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Tru...
US Senate budget bill slashes money to fill oil reserveNew Foto - US Senate budget bill slashes money to fill oil reserve

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The budget bill passed by the U.S. Senate on Tuesday slashes the amount of money available to replenish the Strategic Petroleum Reserve even though President Donald Trump vowed on his first day in his second term to fill it "right to the top". Former President Joe Biden conducted several sales from the SPR including 180 million barrels, the most ever, after Russia invaded Ukraine. The sales left the SPR at its lowest level in 40 years, when the U.S. was far more dependent on oil imports. The budget bill slashed the amount of money for crude oil purchases to replenish the SPR to $171 million from $1.3 billion. That's only enough to buy about 3 million barrels instead of 20 million barrels at today's prices. Rapidan Energy, a consultancy group, told clients in a note that the funding was hit by the Senate's struggle to find budget cuts elsewhere as it softened some of the cuts to green energy in a version of the House bill. The bill now heads to the U.S. House, but it was unclear when lawmakers there would vote. Trump said on Tuesday that he plans to fill up the SPR when the market conditions are right, but it was unclear when or how. Even deliveries of oil to the SPR that were scheduled after Biden bought back some crude last year are as much as seven months delayed. Biden scheduled 15.8 million barrels of deliveries to the SPR from January through May. So far, only 8.8 million of that has been delivered to the reserve, a situation the Trump administration blamed on maintenance. The Senate bill kept a measure to cancel 7 million barrels in congressionally-mandated sales. Lawmakers could cancel further mandated sales in legislation later in the year. The SPR has nearly 403 million barrels, far less than the 727 million barrels it held in 2009, the most ever. It is still the world's largest emergency reserve of oil. The U.S. hit record oil output under Biden, production Trump is looking to expand. (Reporting by Timothy Gardner, Editing by Franklin Paul)

US Senate budget bill slashes money to fill oil reserve

US Senate budget bill slashes money to fill oil reserve WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The budget bill passed by the U.S. Senate on Tuesday slashes t...
2025 Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Contest odds: Joey Chestnut (-2500) is a massive favorite in his returnNew Foto - 2025 Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Contest odds: Joey Chestnut (-2500) is a massive favorite in his return

The 2025 Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Contest will take place at 12 p.m. ET Friday on ESPN2 andfeatures the return of 16-time champion Joey Chestnut. Chestnut was banned from the event last year as a result of his partnership with Impossible Foods, a rival brand. Chestnut and Nathan's seem to have resolved their differences, as he returns to the contest and is a massive favorite at sportsbooks. Chestnut opened as a -2500 favorite (bet $25 to win $1) atBetMGMto win this year's contest, with last year's champion, Patrick Bertoletti, owning the second-best odds all the way back at 16-1 (bet $1 to win $16). Bertoletti consumed 58 hot dogs last year, but will almost assuredly have to best that number by a good deal to compete with Chestnut. Chestnut's record is 76 hot dogs eaten back in 2021 and the over/under at BetMGM for total hot dogs eaten by Chestnut at the 2025 event is 71.5, with the over juiced to -140. For comparison, Perlotti's over/under is only 50.5 hot dogs. Bettors can also wager on Chestnut (-2500) or the field (+900) to win the contest or an adjusted hot dog over/under of 76.5 for Chestnut (over +250, under -350). The winner of the contest receives $10,000 and the coveted mustard yellow belt.

2025 Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Contest odds: Joey Chestnut (-2500) is a massive favorite in his return

2025 Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Contest odds: Joey Chestnut (-2500) is a massive favorite in his return The 2025 Nathan's Hot Dog Eatin...
Alex Delvecchio, Hall of Famer and Detroit Red Wings legend, dies at 93New Foto - Alex Delvecchio, Hall of Famer and Detroit Red Wings legend, dies at 93

The last surviving star from Detroit's greatest sports dynasty, Alex Delvecchio helped the Red Wings reach the pinnacle in the 1950s, struggled mightily as they hit bottom in the 1970s and segued into an elder statesman with a retired number, a bronze statue and ceremonial roles celebrating the franchise's renaissance in the 1990s. Always popular among fans, players and press, universally heralded as one of the NHL's 100 greatest players but always considered underrated by his peers, and a three-time Lady Byng winner on the ice but a lifelong Lady Byng winner off the ice, Delvecchio died Tuesday, July 1, surrounded by his family at age 93, the team announced. The team issueda statement from Delvecchio's family on Tuesday: "Alex was more than a Hockey icon, he was a devoted husband, loving father, grandfather, great grandfather, cherished friend, and respected teammate to so many. While the world knew him as an incredible hockey player with numerous accomplishments on the ice, we knew him as someone whose humility, strength, competitiveness, kindness and heart were even greater than his professional achievements. For decades, your love and support meant everything to Alex and to all of us. We are deeply grateful and thankful to everyone." Delvecchio's hockey story parallels the nearly 100-year story of the Red Wings franchise. Delvecchio's mentor played in the first game at the Old Red Barn on Grand River and Delvecchio's statue sparkles at the state-of-the-art arena on Woodward. He had ties to the earliest days of Detroit's franchise, when it was owned by a grain and shipping magnate, and he relished its rebirth as Hockeytown, when it was owned by a pizza baron. If not for Gordie Howe, his legendary linemate known as Mr. Hockey, Delvecchio could have been Mr. Red Wing: Only Howe played in Detroit longer than Delvecchio's 24 seasons. Only Steve Yzerman was a captain in Detroit longer than Delvecchio's 12 seasons. Only Nicklas Lidstrom played more games in a career spent with a single NHL franchise than Delvecchio's 1,550. And only Howe had more points in NHL history when Delvecchio retired in 1973. "When you think of the Red Wings, you think of Howe," future Hall of Fame center Phil Esposito told Sport magazine in 1971. "But Alex is the most underrated player in the game today — underrated by everyone but the players." Delvecchio was approaching his 40th birthday at the time. Late in the 1964-65 season, his 15th in the NHL, Delvecchio recorded a point in 17 consecutive games, a Red Wings record until Yzerman broke it 23 years later. "He's like a magician with the puck," goaltender Eddie Giacomin said during a Hall of Fame career. A left-handed shot, Delvecchio played on three Stanley Cup championship teams — all in his first four full seasons, all before he turned 24. As a rookie in 1951-52, when the Wings swept Toronto and Montreal in the playoffs for the Cup, Delvecchio centered the third line. In 1953-54, on a line with Howe and Ted Lindsay, Delvecchio's nine points tied Howe for the Wings' playoff scoring lead. In 1954-55, Delvecchio scored 15 points in 11 playoff games and the first and last goal in the Cup-clinching 3-1 victory over the Canadiens in Game 7. "I felt proud to be among so many players that were true stars of the game," Delvecchio said decades later. After 1955, the Wings wouldn't win another Stanley Cup for 42 years. A dynamic skater, a gifted passer and frequently the center on the second iteration of the Production Line with Howe and Lindsay, Delvecchio also was an ironman in the NHL's Original Six days. He never missed a game from age 25 until nearly 33. During a 12-year stretch, he played in 840 of 842 possible games. In 1956-57, his seventh season, a broken ankle sidelined him for 22 games; he then missed only 14 games the last 17 seasons of his career. "You don't get hurt in this game," he once told Sport magazine, "if you keep your head up and watch what's going on around you." In the 1950s and '60s, players also lived in fear that in a six-team league, with jobs scarce, every injury jeopardized their careers. "You just didn't want anybody to come in," Delvecchio said, "because you're gone if they shine." Unlike his Hall of Fame teammates from the 1950s — when the Wings finished atop the regular-season standings eight of nine years and won four Stanley Cups — Delvecchio wasn't banished in an ill-conceived trade (like Sid Abel in 1952, Terry Sawchuk in 1955, Lindsay in 1957, Red Kelly in 1960 and Marcel Pronovost in 1965) or given a do-nothing front office title (like Howe in 1971). In the early 1970s, Delvecchio turned down a lucrative offer to join Howe and his teenaged sons Mark and Marty with the Houston Aeros in the upstart World Hockey Association. "I'd spent my whole life with the Wings," Delvecchio explained, "and, what the heck, I'd better finish with them." "He was a pure Red Wing, for sure," said Jimmy Devellano, a Hall of Fame executive for the team. "Not only was he a great player, he never went anywhere else, and he managed and coached the team." Delvecchio did think he had been traded on Nov. 7, 1973, a few weeks before his 42nd birthday. A distraught Delvecchio, coming off a stellar 71-point season, planned to retire on the spot. And he did retire that evening — because general manager Ned Harkness asked him to coach the Wings. Delvecchio agreed to take over a 2-9-1 team about to lose its top playmaker, whose skills stood out as much as he did on the ice with his salt-and-pepper hair in an era without helmets. Harkness also cut Delvecchio's $125,000 salary. Delvecchio later would call it "the most terrible job of my career." He coached for parts of four seasons and was the general manager for most of three. A decade known by Wings fans as "Darkness with Harkness" turned even worse under Delvecchio's watch. The U.S.-based franchise with the most Stanley Cups was derided as the Dead Wings. After owner Bruce Norris fired Delvecchio and hired Lindsay in March 1977, Delvecchio was devastated, declared he was "ticked off" and decided "the hell with 'em." That was harsh talk from a respected, classy and even-keeled hockey figure who three times won and three other times nearly won the Lady Byng Trophy for sportsmanship and gentlemanly conduct. The bad blood faded when Little Caesars founder Mike Ilitch purchased the franchise for a pittance from Norris five years later. Delvecchio spent time in the broadcast booth in the 1980s (sometimes subbing for an ailing Abel). His number was retired in the 1990s (in a dual ceremony with Lindsay). His statue was unveiled in the 2000s (two days before Lindsay's). He was included in the festivities after teams captained by Yzerman or Lidstrom won four Stanley Cups (appearing with Howe and Lindsay). Delvecchio appreciated it all. When his No. 10 jersey was hung with Lindsay's No. 7 from the Joe Louis Arena rafters before roaring fans in 1991 — joining Howe's No. 9 retired in 1972 — Delvecchio declared: "I've been inducted into the Hall of Fame, I've won Stanley Cups, but this is better." This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press:Alex Delvecchio, Detroit Red Wings legend, dies at 93

Alex Delvecchio, Hall of Famer and Detroit Red Wings legend, dies at 93

Alex Delvecchio, Hall of Famer and Detroit Red Wings legend, dies at 93 The last surviving star from Detroit's greatest sports dynasty, ...
DOJ looking at denaturalization for American citizens convicted of certain crimesNew Foto - DOJ looking at denaturalization for American citizens convicted of certain crimes

The Department of Justice is prioritizing revoking citizenship from some naturalized Americans who commit certain crimes, according to a DOJ memo posted online. In the memo dated June 11, Assistant Attorney General Brett Shumate is giving U.S. attorneys wide discretion to decide when to pursue the denaturalization process in order to "advance the Administration's policy objectives" as the Trump administration pursues its ongoingimmigration crackdown. While attorneys are urged to prioritize cases involving individuals who "pose a potential danger to national security," the memo also states that they can seek out "any other cases referred to the Civil Division that the Division determines to be sufficiently important to pursue." MORE: In a new tactic, ICE is arresting migrants at immigration courts, attorneys say "The Civil Division shall prioritize and maximally pursue denaturalization proceedings in all cases permitted by law and supported by the evidence," Shumate wrote. Some of the cases U.S. attorneys should pursue are those against individuals who have engaged in torture, war crimes, human trafficking, and human rights violations, the memo says. While the denaturalization process and requirements are codified into law, immigration attorney Rosanna Berardi says the memo changes how aggressively the Department of Justice plans to pursue these cases. "The memo clearly signals that DOJ is going to pursue more of these cases, and not just against terrorists or war criminals, even cases involving undisclosed criminal records or procedural errors during naturalization are now on the radar," Berardi told ABC News. "In the past 28 years of my practice, the government has generally left naturalized U.S. citizens alone. This is a departure from that mentality." According to a report conducted by the Immigrant Legal Resource Center in 2020, the government pursued denaturalization cases at a very low rate, averaging only 11 cases per year from 1990-2017. But those cases skyrocketed under Trump's first administration. In 2018, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services said it intended to refer 1,600 cases to DOJ for persecution, the report says. The DOJ memo also lays out four other priorities for the department, which include "ending antisemitism" and taking legal action against sanctuary states and jurisdictions.

DOJ looking at denaturalization for American citizens convicted of certain crimes

DOJ looking at denaturalization for American citizens convicted of certain crimes The Department of Justice is prioritizing revoking citizen...
Trump's big tax bill is a win. It could also be a big problem for GOPNew Foto - Trump's big tax bill is a win. It could also be a big problem for GOP

Sen. Thom Tillis was fed up, and took to the Senate floor to unload on PresidentDonald Trump's megabill. As the bill cleared a key hurdle, Tillis issued a warning. He attributed his rise to U.S. senator from North Carolina to blowback against former President Barack Obama's 2010 health care law,the Affordable Care Act, which fueled crushing Democratic losses across the country. Republicans won control of the U.S. House, stopping Obama's legislative agenda in its tracks. The GOP is now rushing into similarly perilous territory, Tillis implied, by cutting more than $1 trillionfrom Medicaid. "Republicans are about to make a mistake on health care andbetraying a promise," he said. More:Medicaid 'churn': How working Americans could lose coverage under Trump tax bill The speech capped a consequential 24 hours for Tillis. He came out against Trump's legislation because of deep cuts to the federal health insurance program for low-income Americans, prompting the president tothreaten a primary challenge. Tillis thenannounced he wouldn't seek reelection in 2026. Tillis' experience sums up theexplosive politicssurrounding a nearly 1,000-page bill that has deeply divided the GOP. Many Republicans are touting it as a landmark achievement, but others are worried the unpopular measure hurts vulnerable people, goes against the party's working-class outreach, balloons the deficit and could cost Republicans dearly in the next election. Elon Musk, the multibillionaire former Trump adviser, is threatening to primary GOP lawmakers and even start a new political party over his deficit concerns. Looming over the debate is a president who threatens retribution against those who oppose him, and is pushing to have the legislationon his desk by July 4. Term-limited and free from facing voters again, Trump is looking for a legacy achievement. His supporters predict the bill will prove out over time. Sen.Jim Justice, R-West Virginia, compared the controversy to someone sticking their hand in a bucket of water and jerking it out. More:Thom Tillis, key Republican holdout on Trump's tax bill, won't seek reelection "The water's turbulent for a little while but then it'll just settle right out," he told USA TODAY. "That's what I think will happen." The bill narrowly cleared the Senate by a 51-50 vote on July 1 - three Republicans and every Democrat opposed it ,and Vice PresidentJD Vancehad to break the tie in a dramatic flourish - after a different version earlier passed the House. It now heads back to the House for final approval, where lawmakers have expressed concerns that the spending cuts either go too far, or not far enough. Trump said July 1 it would be "wise" for Republicans to get on board. "It's a great bill," Trump said, adding: "Great for the border, great for low taxes, and I would say that they have to do it." Despite some of the GOP resistance, bucking the president is politically perilous – as Tillis experienced − and Trump appears poised for a major legislative victory. The billwould enact key campaign promisesinto law – including cutting taxes on tipped wages and overtime pay and greatly expanded deportation efforts, which would receive a massive funding increase. It also makes permanent the sweeping tax reductions Trump passed in 2017, cementing his record as a big tax cutter. Trump launched his second term with an aggressive policy agenda, but hasrelied on executive ordersthat can easily be undone if Democrats reclaim the White House. His megabill – dubbed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act - is a more lasting achievement, one that will help define his legacy. Yet like other major policy proposals from past presidents, the politics of the legislation have been difficult to navigate. Obama's health care bill divided Democrats, with 34 voting against it in the House. To help offset lost tax revenue, Trump's bill makes big cuts,most notably to Medicaid. That has some Republicans nervous. Any political victory from the bill could be short lived if it results in major blowback in the 2026 midterms. The legislation could complicate the GOP's pitch to blue collar voters. "This is a debate over the soul of the Republican Party," said Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Missouri. "Are we going to be a working class party or not?" More:Religious leaders protest GOP tax, Medicaid bill: 'It hurts working people' Democrats are eager to run against the bill, casting it as a largely benefiting the wealthy while hurting the poor. "The different ways in which this bill bites working families over and over is going to make it a problem for Republicans in the House and the Senate all the way through November of 2026 and beyond," Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Massachusetts, told USA TODAY. An analysis of the House bill released last month by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office found that the poorest households would lose about $1,600 a year under the legislation, largely because of cuts to Medicaid and food aid. The wealthiest households would gain about $12,000 a year,according to the CBO. The Senate bill has more aggressive cuts than the House. The CBO estimatesthat nearly 12 million people would lose Medicaid under the Senate bill, with the program facing roughly $1 trillion in cuts. More than250 people protestedthe deep cuts across from the Capitol at the steps of the Supreme Court on June 30, surrounded by dozens of caskets covered with statistics of how many people would lose Medicaid and food assistance in each state. The crowd chanted "you will not kill us and our people without a fight." Warren said criticism of the bill is resonating not just in blue states, but also red states, pointing to polling showing it's broadly unpopular. She recently drew 1,500 people to atown hall in Tennesseeblasting the legislation. "When people know anything about the Republican tax bill they hate it," she told USA TODAY. Republican lawmakers have largely rallied around Trump, accusing Democrats of misrepresenting the legislation. Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, said individual elements of the bill poll well but conceded the GOP has some "work to do" to sell the legislation. Trump ran a populist campaign that targeted blue collar voters with proposals such as tax cuts on tips and overtime, and Republicans have pointed to those provisions in the bill to counter criticism that it benefits the wealthy. But some Republican lawmakers worry cutting Medicaid could undermine GOP inroads to the working class. "You cannot be a working-class party if you are taking away healthcare for working class people," Hawley said over the weekend. Yet Hawley still supported the legislation, a sign of how intense the pressure is to deliver for Trump, who also is facing resistance from fiscal conservatives over projections the bill will increase the federal budget deficit by $3.3 trillion. Deficit hawks in the Senate ultimately caved and voted for the bill, and now attention turns to the House, where critics of the legislation's fiscal impact are being egged on by billionaire Elon Musk. "It is obvious with the insane spending of this bill, which increases the debt ceiling by a record FIVE TRILLION DOLLARS that we live in a one-party country – the PORKY PIG PARTY!!"Musk wrote in a June 30 post on X. "Time for a new political party that actually cares about the people." Muskthreated primary challengesagainst GOP lawmakers who support the bill. Trump, meanwhile, is urging his party to fall in line and lashing out at dissenters such as Tillis and Rep. Thomas Massie, who voted against the legislation in the House. In the process, some lawmakers are bowing out. In addition to Tillis,Rep. Don Bacon, a moderate Nebraska Republican who has criticized Trump's megabill, announced he won't seek reelection. Losing lawmakers with bipartisan appeal could make it harder for the GOP to maintain their majorities. The North Carolina Senate race already was a toss up before Tillis resigned, noted University of Virginia political science professor Larry Sabato. It's even more competitive now, he said in a social media post. "Dems should send Trump a fruit basket of thanks,"Sabato said. Contributing: Sarah Wire This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Trump's big bill is a win. But it could also be a big problem for GOP

Trump's big tax bill is a win. It could also be a big problem for GOP

Trump's big tax bill is a win. It could also be a big problem for GOP Sen. Thom Tillis was fed up, and took to the Senate floor to unloa...
What do Bucks' moves mean for Giannis Antetokounmpo's future in Milwaukee?New Foto - What do Bucks' moves mean for Giannis Antetokounmpo's future in Milwaukee?

Who would've thunk the Indiana Pacers and Milwaukee Bucks would become strange bedfellows this offseason? The Pacers could've very well kept franchise mainstay Myles Turner following their run to Game 7 of the NBA Finals, but Tyrese Haliburton's Achilles injury has seemingly led them to punting on next season and avoiding the luxury tax while their point guard recovers. The Bucks didn't seem to have any route to improve while Damian Lillard, their aging point guard, recovered from the same exact injury, and while facing the loud ticking clock known as Giannis Antetokounmpo. Somehow, the Bucks found a way toacquire Turnerwith cap space they didn't have by using the stretch provision on Lillard,waiving himand the remaining $113 million on his contact that was slated to last for the next two years. Now that money will be evenly distributed as a salary cap hit for the next five years at $22 million, creating the opening for the 30-year-old Turner. Lillard knew something was coming, sources told Yahoo Sports, believing a trade was in the works and not this development. He can sign with a team if he chooses, perhaps for the minimum because any money he signs for will be offset by what the Bucks owe him. Or he can continue to rehab with his physical therapist, who wasn't a team employee. Remember, Lillard wanted Miami when exiting Portland before the Bucks swooped in, and after dealing with a blood clot then returning for the Bucks' first-round series, he tore his Achilles — an unfortunate turn of developments. But what does this mean for Antetokounmpo? He just had another stellar season — which we almost take for granted at this point — averaging 30.4 points, 11.9 rebounds, 6.5 assists and 1.2 blocks. He's turning 31 in December, and the Bucks have had more coaches (three) since winning a championship in 2021 than playoff series wins (one), thus creating a constant state of urgency. [Get more Bucks news: Bucks team feed] It's led to every move the franchise has made in the last five years. Trading for Jrue Holiday in 2020 led to the 2021 triumph, as well as Antetokounmpo re-signing with the Bucks. Trading Holiday for Lillard two years ago hasn't been so successful, but the extension Antetokounmpo signed in the wake of that trade will kick in this season. He's under contract until 2027-28, when he has a player option for $62.7 million. But he can press the "trade me" button at any point if he feels the Bucks aren't in position to compete for a championship. The developments in the Eastern Conference are as follows: Haliburton's injury, Jayson Tatum's injury and subsequent Celtics teardown, and Knicks uncertainty. In theory, had the Bucks not been dealing with Lillard's career-altering injury, they could've convinced themselves 2025-26 would be the year to make a run through a ravaged conference anyway, but Lillard going down changed everything. The Bucks have mortgaged more of their future in using the provision, even as it created the opening for Turner. Turner can help Antetokounmpo defensively with his mobility and shot-blocking, as well as spacing the floor. He was critical in doing that for Haliburton and the Pacers' pace-and-spread offense. But is it enough to satisfy Antetokounmpo? According to a report, he's not happy with the Bucks waiving Lillard. But why would the Bucks make such a move with long-lasting effects without consulting the player they're doing it all for? It's hard to imagine general manager Jon Horst and that front office only letting Antetokounmpo in on half the plan. That would be franchise malpractice and practically unethical in dealing with the franchise player. Lillard wouldn't have been able to help the Bucks on the floor next season anyway, so the money was a sunk cost. And it's clear the Bucks have no intention of just allowing Antetokounmpo to stew in unhappiness when he's appeared to look for reasons to stay as opposed to leaving. The Bucks retained Bobby Portis, Kevin Porter Jr. and Gary Trent Jr. along with bringing in Gary Harris as a free agent from Orlando. Kyle Kuzma is on the books for two more years after being brought in for veteran Khris Middleton, but had a disastrous first round against the Pacers. Does Horst have another move in place to bring on a point guard or take a swing on some of the vets in free agency like Russell Westbrook or Spencer Dinwiddie? For the Pacers, they're now stripped down and face an uncertain future, partially of their own choosing. For the Bucks, they keep trying and face an uncertain present, partially of their own choosing.

What do Bucks' moves mean for Giannis Antetokounmpo's future in Milwaukee?

What do Bucks' moves mean for Giannis Antetokounmpo's future in Milwaukee? Who would've thunk the Indiana Pacers and Milwaukee B...

 

MARIO VOUX © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com