How do top NFL contracts compare to Shai Gilgeous-Alexander's extension?New Foto - How do top NFL contracts compare to Shai Gilgeous-Alexander's extension?

Oklahoma City ThunderguardShai Gilgeous-Alexanderjust became the richest player in NBA history by annual salary with thesuper max extensionhe signed Tuesday. But how does it compare to some of the top contracts in the NFL? By total value, Gilgeous-Alexander's $285 million contract would rank third of all active NFL players right now. OnlyKansas City ChiefsquarterbackPatrick MahomesandBuffalo BillsquarterbackJosh Allenhave signed bigger deals by total value. However, the fact that Gilgeous-Alexander's deal is for four years – not 10 like Mahomes' or six like Allen's – means the average annual value of his salary exceeds that of any NFL player. USA TODAY Sports has compiled the top-10 NFL contracts by total value and average annual value to show how they compare to that of the NBA's new leader in average annual value: Here are the top NFL contracts by total value and where Gilgeous-Alexander's new contract extension would rank if he were an NFL player: 1. Patrick Mahomes, QB, Kansas City Chiefs: $450 million 2. Josh Allen, QB, Buffalo Bills: $330 million 3. Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, G, Oklahoma City Thunder: $285 million T-4. Joe Burrow, QB,Cincinnati Bengals: $270 million T-4. Trevor Lawrence, QB,Jacksonville Jaguars: $270 million 6. Brock Purdy, QB,San Francisco 49ers: $265 million 7. Justin Herbert, QB,Los Angeles Chargers: $262.5 million 8. Lamar Jackson, QB,Baltimore Ravens: $260 million 9. Jalen Hurts, QB,Philadelphia Eagles: $255 million 10. Dak Prescott, QB,Dallas Cowboys: $240 million SGA CONTRACT:Gilgeous-Alexander, Thunder agree to record $285M contract extension Here are the top NFL contracts by average annual value and where Gilgeous-Alexander would rank if he were an NFL player: 1. Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, G, Oklahoma City Thunder: $71.25 million/year 2. Dak Prescott, QB, Dallas Cowboys: $60 million/year T-3. Josh Allen, QB, Buffalo Bills: $55 million/year T-3. Joe Burrow, QB, Cincinnati Bengals: $55 million/year T-3. Jordan Love, QB,Green Bay Packers: $55 million/year T-3. Trevor Lawrence, QB, Jacksonville Jaguars: $55 million/year 7. Tua Tagovailoa, QB, Miami Dolphins: $53.1 million/year T-8. Jared Goff, QB, Detroit Lions: $53 million/year T-8. Brock Purdy, QB, San Francisco 49ers: $53 million/year 10. Justin Herbert, QB, Los Angeles Chargers: $52.5 million/year This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:How SGA's extension stacks up to highest paid NFL players

How do top NFL contracts compare to Shai Gilgeous-Alexander's extension?

How do top NFL contracts compare to Shai Gilgeous-Alexander's extension? Oklahoma City ThunderguardShai Gilgeous-Alexanderjust became th...
Tight end Darren Waller coming out of retirement, traded to Miami DolphinsNew Foto - Tight end Darren Waller coming out of retirement, traded to Miami Dolphins

Tight end Darren Waller is coming out of retirement, and he's being traded to the Miami Dolphins,NFL Network's Tom Pelisseroreported Tuesday. The New York Giants, whom Waller last played for in 2023, are on the other end of the deal with the Dolphins. In addition to Waller, the Giants are giving up a conditional 2027 seventh-round pick, but, in return, New York is receiving a 2026 sixth-round pick from Miami,according to Pelissero. ESPN's Adam Schefterreportedthat Waller agreed to a one-year deal with the Dolphins that's worth up to $5 million. Waller will turn 33 in September. The one-time Pro Bowlerretired last Juneafter eight NFL seasons, but now he's back in the league after a one-year hiatus. The Dolphins are adding Waller a day aftertrading tight end Jonnu Smith to the Pittsburgh Steelers. Smith was part of a blockbuster deal that also sent seven-time Pro Bowl cornerback Jalen Ramsey to the Steelers. In exchange, Miami got back five-time Pro Bowl safety Minkah Fitzpatrick, who spent his first two NFL seasons with the Dolphins in 2018-19. Smith was highly productive during his lone season in Miami, earning his first Pro Bowl nod. The 2017 third-round pick — who previously played for the Tennessee Titans (2017-20), New England Patriots (2021-22) and Atlanta Falcons (2023) — caught 88 passes for 884 receiving yards, both the most by a tight end in Dolphins single-season history, plus notched a team-best eight receiving touchdowns. Only Brock Bowers of the Las Vegas Raiders, Trey McBride of the Arizona Cardinals and George Kittle of the San Francisco 49ers ranked ahead of Smith in tight end receiving yards last season. Notably, Smith skipped Miami's offseason practices while searching for a new contract. Waller will now headline a Dolphins tight end room that also includes an eighth-year journeyman in Pharaoh Brown and a third-year player in Julian Hill — who have a combined 90 receptions in their careers — as well as former undrafted free agents Tanner Conner, Hayden Rucci and Jalin Conyers. Waller decided to retire from football last June, ahead of Giants mandatory minicamp. At the time, the 2015 sixth-round pickaddressed his decision in a YouTube video. He mentioned hisdivorce from WNBA star Kelsey Plumand unpacked an off-the-field medical scare he experienced during the 2023 season that he said forced him to re-evaluate things. While Waller didn't share his diagnosis or what his medical condition was, he described how he ended up spending three-and-a-half days in a hospital midway through the 2023 season. It occurred while he was away from the team dealing with a hamstring injury he suffered in Week 8 against the New York Jets. "Last season in New Jersey, we played the Jets on October 29," Waller said in the video. "I got hurt that game. The following week, the Giants were playing the Raiders in Vegas. ... I started to feel like this fever coming on. ... The fever starts to build, I start to get the chills and stuff like that. By the time I pull into my parking garage at my condo and get out of the car, I'm, like, shaking pretty violently, like uncontrollably." Waller said he "couldn't breath" in his bed the next morning. That's when he called 911, the paramedics responded, and he started his hospital stay. "The worst possible thing for ... somebody like me would be to think that I am supposed to choose one lane of life, one path and stick with it like most of the world does," Waller said in the video. Close to 13 months later, Waller is returning to the NFL. He started 12 games for the Giants in 2023. That season, he reeled in 52 passes for 522 receiving yards and a touchdown. Although he began his career with the Baltimore Ravens in 2015, he's best known for his five-season run with the Raiders from 2018-22. Waller was suspended twice with the Ravens for violating the NFL's substance-abuse policy. His second suspension cost him the entire 2017 season. With the Raiders, though, Walleremerged as a starwho was vocal about the steps he had taken to overcome his struggle with substance abuse. He stitched together back-to-back 1,000-yard receiving seasons in 2019-20 and made the Pro Bowl in the second of those two breakout campaigns. In 2020, Waller logged 107 receptions, 1,196 receiving yards and nine receiving touchdowns. Waller has yet to tally more than 665 receiving yards in a season since.

Tight end Darren Waller coming out of retirement, traded to Miami Dolphins

Tight end Darren Waller coming out of retirement, traded to Miami Dolphins Tight end Darren Waller is coming out of retirement, and he's...
Major reports about how climate change affects the US are removed from websitesNew Foto - Major reports about how climate change affects the US are removed from websites

WASHINGTON (AP) — Legally mandated U.S. national climate assessments seem to have disappeared from the federal websites built to display them, making it harder for state and local governments and the public to learn what to expect in their backyards from a warming world. Scientists said thepeer-reviewed authoritative reportssave money and lives. Websites for the national assessments and the U.S. Global Change Research Program were down Monday and Tuesday with no links, notes or referrals elsewhere. The White House, which was responsible for the assessments, said the information will be housed within NASA to comply with the law, but gave no further details. Searches for the assessments on NASA websites did not turn them up. NASA did not respond to requests for information. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, which coordinated the information in the assessments, did not respond to repeated inquiries. "It's critical for decision makers across the country to know what the science in the National Climate Assessment is. That is the most reliable and well-reviewed source of information about climate that exists for the United States," said University of Arizona climate scientist Kathy Jacobs, who coordinated the 2014 version of the report. "It's a sad day for the United States if it is true that the National Climate Assessment is no longer available," Jacobs said. "This is evidence of serious tampering with the facts and with people's access to information, and it actually may increase the risk of people being harmed by climate-related impacts." Harvard climate scientist John Holdren, who was President Obama's science advisor and whose office directed the assessments, said after the 2014 edition he visited governors, mayors and other local officials who told him how useful the 841-page report was. It helped them decide whether to raise roads, build seawalls and even move hospital generators from basements to roofs, he said. "This is a government resource paid for by the taxpayer to provide the information that really is the primary source of information for any city, state or federal agency who's trying to prepare for the impacts of a changing climate," said Texas Tech climate scientist Katharine Hayhoe, who has been a volunteer author for several editions of the report. Copies of past reports are still squirreled away inNOAA's library. NASA'sopen science data repositoryincludes dead links to the assessment site. The most recent report, issued in 2023, included an interactive atlas that zoomed down to the county level. It found that climate change is affecting people's security, health and livelihoods in every corner of the country in different ways, with minority and Native American communities oftendisproportionately at risk. The1990 Global Change Research Actrequires a national climate assessment every four years and directs the president to establish an interagency United States Global Change Research Program. In the spring, theTrumpadministration told the volunteer authors of the next climate assessment that their services weren't needed and ended the contract with the private firm that helps coordinate the website and report. Additionally, NOAA's main climate.gov website was recently forwarded to a different NOAA website. Social media and blogs at NOAA and NASA about climate impacts for the general public were cut or eliminated. "It's part of a horrifying big picture," Holdren said. "It's just an appalling whole demolition of science infrastructure." The national assessments are more useful than international climate reports put out by the United Nations every seven or so years because they are more localized and more detailed, Hayhoe and Jacobs said. The national reports are not only peer reviewed by other scientists, but examined for accuracy by the National Academy of Sciences, federal agencies, the staff and the public. Hiding the reports would be censoring science, Jacobs said. And it's dangerous for the country, Hayhoe said, comparing it to steering a car on a curving road by only looking through the rearview mirror: "And now, more than ever, we need to be looking ahead to do everything it takes to make it around that curve safely. It's like our windshield's being painted over." ___ Associated Press writer Will Weissert contributed to this report. ___ The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP'sstandardsfor working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas atAP.org.

Major reports about how climate change affects the US are removed from websites

Major reports about how climate change affects the US are removed from websites WASHINGTON (AP) — Legally mandated U.S. national climate ass...
What's next for Trump's tax bill? Arguing House RepublicansNew Foto - What's next for Trump's tax bill? Arguing House Republicans

WASHINGTON –President Donald Trump's big tax bill haspassed the U.S. Senate, teeing up major changes to Medicaid and food stamps, extended income tax cuts, and new tax cuts for corporations, tips and overtime. But it's still a few steps away from Trump's desk – and the route to get there will not be simple. House Republicansare already slamming the changes made to the bill in the Senate, from moderate members concerned about cuts to Medicaid and fiscal conservatives who are concerned about the bill's massive price tag. It will add a projected $3.3 trillion to the national debt over the next 10 years, according to the Congressional Budget Office. "The United States is $37 TRILLION in the red. This is unsustainable," wrote Rep. Keith Self, R-Texas,on X. "I supportPresident Trumpand his tax cuts, but we cannot saddle our children and grandchildren with TRILLIONS upon TRILLIONS in new debt." However, House SpeakerMike Johnsonindicated in a statement that he plans to push his conference to accept the bill in order to meet the president's self-imposed deadline of July 4. "The House will work quickly to pass the One Big Beautiful Bill that enacts President Trump's full America First agenda by the Fourth of July. The American people gave us a clear mandate, and after four years of Democrat failure, we intend to deliver without delay," he said in a statement. "This bill is President Trump's agenda, and we are making it law." A key House committee plans to meet in the afternoon to begin the process of advancing the Senate's bill in the chamber. Trump indicated that he may be willing to budge on the July 4 deadline given the complications of passing it in the House. "I'd love to do July 4th, but I think it's very hard to do July 4th," Trump told reporters. "It can go longer, but we'd like to get it done by that time if possible." This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:What's next for Trump's tax bill? Quarreling House Republicans

What's next for Trump's tax bill? Arguing House Republicans

What's next for Trump's tax bill? Arguing House Republicans WASHINGTON –President Donald Trump's big tax bill haspassed the U.S....
Ohio governor grants Browns public funding for new stadiumNew Foto - Ohio governor grants Browns public funding for new stadium

TheCleveland Brownsare one step closer to moving to the suburbs. They had already bought the plot of land, and on Monday night, they got the public funding. Ohio governor Mike DeWinesigned a new budgetinto law on Monday that allocates $600 million in unclaimed funds to partially fund the Browns' new stadium project in the southeastern Cleveland suburb, according to92.3 The Fan. The budget decision came three days after the Haslam Sports Group officially purchased a 176-acre plot of land for $76 million, according to Cuyahoga County Fiscal Office viaSportico. The Browns originally revealed the plans to move to Brook Park in August 2024, at the time calling it "a modern, dynamic, world-class venue that would greatly enhance the fan experience and enable the State of Ohio and our region to compete for some of the biggest events in the world 365 days a year." BROWNS NEWS:Haslams grateful for 'responsible way to support' Browns stadium funding after budget signed The Browns estimate the project to build a new, domed stadium will cost $2.4 billion in total. They've now received $600 million from the state of Ohio for the stadium, and the team expects to use an additional $400 million from Brook Park's income taxes for the new Huntington Bank Stadium. Haslam Sports Group has also committed $2 billion to mixed-use area development surrounding the stadium. Though they've officially received the public funding, the Browns still have a bit to go before they can begin building the stadium. According to theColumbus Dispatch, former Ohio Attorney General Marc Dann and former state Rep. Jeff Crossman announced they would immediately file a lawsuit if the state budget included funding the Browns' stadium project with unclaimed funds. BROWNS STADIUM LAWSUIT:Former Ohio leaders say they will sue over plan using unclaimed funds That said, Gov. DeWine already helped the Browns clear another potential road bump by adjusting language in the Modell Law. The law is nicknamed after infamous former Browns owner Art Modell, who moved the team to Baltimore in 1996. Its actual title isOhio Revised Code 9.67, which requires any Ohio-based team to give their city six months' notice to allow "political subdivision or any individual or group of individuals who reside in the area the opportunity to purchase the team." DeWine passed an amendment that changes language in the Modell Law to only apply to teams attempting to leave the state. SHEDEUR SANDERS:Browns rookie pays speeding tickets, addresses citations at team event Thrilled to move forward on a transformative project with generational impactpic.twitter.com/gym7FVv2o2 — Cleveland Browns (@Browns)July 1, 2025 With the Ohio governor backing their project and providing a sizable portion of the state's budget, the Browns are pushing ahead. Team principal owner Jimmy Haslam says he hopes to break ground in Brook Park by early next year. "We respect the firm commitment and leadership that Governor DeWine, and the Ohio Senate and House have shown in their collaborative work to find a responsible way to support such a transformative project, one that will create a generational impact for our region and the State," the Haslams said in a statement. "Our fans deserve a world-class facility, and we are committed to building a state-of-the-art enclosed stadium that resonates with Cleveland, highlighting our loyal and passionate fans and the Dawg Pound, while also incorporating innovation, bold design, and an immersive experience. The new enclosed Huntington Bank Field will be completely fan-centric, a first-of-its-kind design in the NFL, and a dynamic venue that draws visitors from across Ohio and beyond, for concerts and significant sporting events throughout the year. "This premiere facility will anchor a major lifestyle and entertainment development and be a catalyst for one of Northeast Ohio's largest economic development projects ever and something our community will be proud of and can enjoy for years to come. We appreciate the support of State leaders and their belief in this transformative project." This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Browns stadium: Ohio governor grants team $600 million in funds

Ohio governor grants Browns public funding for new stadium

Ohio governor grants Browns public funding for new stadium TheCleveland Brownsare one step closer to moving to the suburbs. They had already...
Dallas Cowboys Cheerleader Addresses 'No. 1 Question' She Gets About Her Rare HairstyleNew Foto - Dallas Cowboys Cheerleader Addresses 'No. 1 Question' She Gets About Her Rare Hairstyle

Sam Hodde/Getty Ava Lahey of the Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders addressed in an Instagram Reel why she styles her hair straight, as opposed to the iconic curls her squad is known for wearing at games The Florida native explained that her hair would "fall flat" after approximately 20 minutes, ruining the curls she put in place Lahey acknowledged that her straightened hairstyle isn't the "big and bouncy curls" the DCC is known for wearing; however, she confirmed she got the "reassurance" she needed It's all about the hair. The Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders are synonymous with their long, bouncy locks that whip and flip on the field as they perform their famed choreography during each game; however, Ava Lahey's 'do is an exception. In a recentInstagram Reel, Lahey — who also stars in Netflix's hitAmerica's Sweetheartsseries — addressed why she's allowed to wear her hair straight as opposed to the iconic curly, like the rest of the Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders on the team. "The number one question I get asked as a Dallas Cowboys Cheerleader is 'Why do I get to wear my hair straight?'" she said in a voiceover shared on Saturday, June 28. "Well, here's the real story," she began in the clip. Richard Rodriguez/Getty "When I made it to training camp for the first time, I tried curling my hair, but it never really held," the Florida native explained while demonstrating how she styles her hair. "It would just fall flat after 20 minutes and look really stringy." "My hair is naturally really soft and fine," she added. "During rookie makeovers, they told me to try wearing it straight, and I'll never forget it. When I went back to rehearsal, one of the comments was, 'It dances better'." "I did end up getting cut from training camp that year, but when I made it back to training camp again, I wore it straight right off the bat," Lahey continued. "Now fast forward to makeovers again, they said they loved it straight, sleek and blonde, and I was so happy!" "It just feels so me," she admitted, adding, "And now, it's my signature look." Lahey noted that she's asked for "reassurance" about her straight hair a few times, but confirmed that her unique look is "still the vibe" for her, despite the Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders being "typically known for their big and bouncy curls." Fortunately, Lahey's outward appearance effortlessly aligned with her internal spirit, which is what resonates with the Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders' motto. "It's all about looking your best and standing out while still fitting the DCC image," she shared, concluding, "Wearing my hair straight is what makes me feel and look my best!" Ava Lahey/Instagram The Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders have been known for theirstrict rules and guidelinesregarding their appearance as a franchise synonymous with its iconic image. Members of the squad have opened up about it in the past, in addition to it being highlighted in the Netflix series. For hair specifically, it must be worn down. Even during rehearsals, the locks must be flowing. "We not only have our hair styled and down the entire game, but our dances almost always have some form of 'hairography,' " a third-year vet named Melissa told PEOPLE in 2016. In fact, Cowboys cheerleader choreographer Judy Trammell previously told PEOPLE that the movement of the hair is more important than the length. Whether short or long, hairstylesshould be "current" and never hide one's face. The girls must maintain the look they established with DCC officials, which is how they appear in their publicity photos. Richard Rodriguez/Getty All upkeep takes place year-round at the DCC's official salon, Tangerine. "That's actually kind of exciting and that's a real fun perk, especially for the girls that come from small towns and went to a little local beauty parlor and then you come to this Dallas salon with two stories, 20 stylists, and equipment that looks like you could fly to the moon in it," Finglass said. "It's really quite glamorous," she added. In December 2024, DCC member Armani Latimer wentviral for dancing without a wigfor the first time since revealing her alopecia diagnosis — and was praised for doing so,leaving her teammates, coaches and fans inspired. "Confidence takes center stage for Alopecia Awareness 💙#MyCauseMyBoots | #DCCheerleaders," the caption read on the post. Read the original article onPeople

Dallas Cowboys Cheerleader Addresses 'No. 1 Question' She Gets About Her Rare Hairstyle

Dallas Cowboys Cheerleader Addresses 'No. 1 Question' She Gets About Her Rare Hairstyle Sam Hodde/Getty Ava Lahey of the Dallas Cowb...
Key Senate holdout says he'll vote for Trump's megabillNew Foto - Key Senate holdout says he'll vote for Trump's megabill

Republican Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin -- a staunch deficit hawk has been critical of President Donald Trump's sweeping tax and immigration bill -- signaled Monday that he would back the bill when it comes to a vote. On Saturday Johnson flipped his vote to support a motion to move the One Big Beautiful Bill Act to the Senate floor only after huddling with Republican leaders about further reductions to the federal debt. CNN's Jake Tapper prompted Johnson to say he was a yes vote on the bill, to which the senator corrected him, saying he was "a yes on the motion to proceed" and "hopefully" add a provision that would prevent new enrollees in Medicaid expansion states from receiving Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP) if they are are not disabled and don't have dependent children. MORE: Trump admin live updates: Senate begins 'One Big Beautiful Bill' vote-a-rama Johnson then pivoted to signal his support for the final bill, which will come to a floor vote when an ongoing vote-a-rama wraps up. "This is about as good as we can get. I don't like it. I would like to get a lot more. But at some point in time you have to recognize reality. And if we don't pass this bill, we have a massive $4 trillion tax increase," Johnson said. The FMAP amendment, led by fellow conservative holdout Sen. Rick Scott of Florida, had not yet been considered Monday evening. The Senate plowed ahead toward a final vote on the bill as Republicans rush to get it across the finish line by July 4, with lawmakers voting on amendments through the night into Tuesday morning. The self-imposed deadline by Trump meant a rare weekend session for lawmakers, one filled with partisan drama and some GOP infighting. On Monday morning, senators began the "vote-a-rama" -- a series of votes on proposed amendments to the megabill. There is no limit to the number of amendments lawmakers can seek. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, the chamber's top Democrat, promised his party would bring amendment after amendment during the marathon session. Democrats forced a reading of the 940-page bill over the weekend, which took nearly 16 hours. "Every senator will soon have an opportunity to reject this nonsense and vote for common-sense budgeting. Americans will be watching," Schumer said on Monday as he slammed Trump's bill as a break for billionaires that will hurt working-class families. Democrats used the early hours of the vote-a-rama to force votes highlighting cuts the megabill makes to Medicaid, SNAP and rural hospitals and to hammer Republicans on the tax cuts they say the measure gives to the wealthiest Americans. The Senate voted down, 47-53, an amendment led by Schumer that he said would have undone "the travesty that is at the core of the Republican bill." "Their bill the so-called big beautiful bill, which is really a big, ugly betrayal, cuts taxes for billionaires by taking away health care for millions of people. So what my amendment simply says, if people's health care costs go up, the billionaire tax cuts vanish," Schumer said. Democratic Sen. Ed Markey's effort to strip provisions that would negatively impact rural hospitals due to cuts to Medicaid also failed, but did receive the support of two Republicans: Sens. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine. The two moderate Republicans, who both have a history of voting across party lines, have raised concerns about how cuts to Medicaid and SNAP would hit their constituents. In total, Murkowski supported five Democratic-led measures in the ongoing vote-a-rama and Collins supported four. Collins proposed her own amendment that aimed to increase the amount of money in the rural hospital relief fund. It failed by a vote of 22-78, with Collins subsequently criticizing what she called the "hypocritical approach" of the Democrats that voted against it. Sen. Amy Klobuchar, the top Democrat on the Senate Agriculture committee, argued that the SNAP provisions in the bill creates "chaos for state budgets and hardship for families" and violate budget rules. Her motion related to SNAP was waived by Republicans. Senate Majority Leader John Thune defended the bill as delivering Trump's campaign promises to eliminate tax on tips and overtime pay while boosting spending for defense and border security. "It's been a long debate," Thune said in his own floor remarks ahead of the votes on amendments. "I know people are weary. But at the end of the day, we want to get this done so that this country is safer and stronger and more prosperous, not only for today but for future generations of Americans." So far, Republicans have defeated all Democratic efforts to modify or reconsider the bill -- but the session ran into Tuesday morning. As he walked off the floor in the early hours of Tuesday, Thune was asked if he could pull the bill back or if he may be forced to hold a final passage vote on the bill, even if he knows it will fail. "Those are options I don't want to have to worry about," Thune replied. Senate Finance Committee chairman Mike Crapo, a Republican, argued against several of the Democratic amendments. "The reality is, the reforms we are putting into place are to try to reign in control of wasteful and fraudulent and abusive spending that actually diverts resources away from the people who these programs really deserve to receive," Crapo said of Schumer's amendment on Medicaid. The vote-a-rama is the last hurdle before a vote on final passage of the bill in the Senate. There is little room for error in the Republican-controlled chamber. A procedural vote on Saturday night to open debate on the bill narrowly passed in a 51-49 vote after two Republican defections. GOP Sens. Rand Paul of Kentucky and Thom Tillis of North Carolina voted against advancing the bill. Tillis railed against the changes to Medicaid in the bill, saying it would hurt his constituents and would represent a betrayal of Trump'spromise not to touch the entitlement programupon which millions of people rely for health care coverage. MORE: GOP Sen. Tillis won't run for reelection after Trump primary threat Tillis' opposition drew Trump's ire, with the president threatening to support a primary challenger to the two-term senator. Tillis then suddenly announced he would not seek reelection, saying later he texted Trump on Saturday night suggesting he "probably needed to start looking for a replacement." "I respect President Trump. I support the majority of his agenda, but I don't bow to anybody. When the people of North Carolina are at risk. And this bill puts them at risk," Tillis said. As of early Tuesday morning, the GOP leadership were still pushing for sufficient support. One of the main targets was Murkowski, whose indecision came after reports that the Senate parliamentarian may have ruled some carve out provisions meant for her home state of Alaska's Medicaid recipients out of order. Also under pressure were Scott and Sen. Mike Lee, who were yet to receive a vote on their amendment that strips back additional funding for Medicaid. Collins had also not yet said which way she would vote. Paul, meanwhile, offered an amendment that would significantly reduce the amount of money attributed to raise to the federal debt limit. The current bill raises the debt limit by $5 trillion dollars. Paul's amendment would raise it by only $500 billion. If the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" passes in the Senate, it will have to go back to the House for members to consider the changes made to the bill. House Republican leaders say Wednesday is the earliest chance for a megabill vote. "Members are advised that votes are now expected in the House as early as 9 a.m. Wednesday, July 2. Please stay tuned to future updates for additional information regarding this week's schedule," a notice from Majority Whip Tom Emmer's office said. Speaker Mike Johnson expressed optimism that the Senate's version of the One Big Beautiful Bill will pass in the GOP-led House despite opposition from moderates and conservatives. "We're going to pass this bill one way or the other," Johnson said leaving the Capitol Monday evening. "And I have prevailed upon my Senate colleagues to please, please, please, put it as close to the House product as possible. I have been very consistent from the very beginning. Johnson did not rule out passing the Senate version as is and said, "there's still a lot of amendments, and a lot of game to play." Asked if GOP House leaders would make changes to what the Senate sends over, Johnson said, "We'll see what the final product is. I am very hopeful as always. We will get this job done. We'll see what happens." The speaker did not respond to a question about passing the bill by the Fourth of July deadline. Republican leaders have told members they will receive 48 hours notice before a vote is called and will have 72 hours to review the bill text. The House passed the Trump megabill by just one vote back in May. The Senate version of the bill will face an uphill battle in the House, given the GOP's razor-thin majority. MORE: Republican-led House passes Trump agenda bill by a single vote California moderate Republican Rep. David Valadao said he will vote no given the Medicaid changes in the Senate bill. Several conservatives, including Reps. Chip Roy of Texas, Josh Breechen of Oklahoma and Eric Burlison of Missouri have also expressed opposition to the Senate's version of the bill. Johnson and other Republican leaders worked through the weekend to lock down the votes even as several lawmakers have expressed opposition to the Senate's version, which is still not finalized. Johnson can only afford to lose three defections if all members are voting and present. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said President Trump was working "hand in hand" with Johnson and Thune, and that the two leaders had met with him at the White House earlier Monday. "Republicans need to stay tough and unified during the home stretch, and we are counting on them to get the job done," Leavitt said during the White House briefing. But sources familiar with the matter told ABC News Thune and Johnson have not met with President Trump at the White House, and as of now the two leaders have no current plans to meet with the president on Monday as the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" progresses in the Senate. A spokesman for Thune said he is preoccupied as the Senate moves through amendments to the megabill. "Teams are obviously in close contact/coordination, as always, but we're continuing to move through vote-a-rama in the Senate as we work to move this bill one step closer to the president's desk," the spokesman said in a post on X. Speaker Johnson is in Washington working through House members' concerns as the Senate works through the bill, including several provisions that could spell problems later in the week if the bill is sent back to the House. ABC News' John Parkinson contributed to this report.

Key Senate holdout says he'll vote for Trump's megabill

Key Senate holdout says he'll vote for Trump's megabill Republican Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin -- a staunch deficit hawk has been ...

 

MARIO VOUX © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com