Israel's military warns people to evacuate the area around Iran's Arak heavy water reactorNew Foto - Israel's military warns people to evacuate the area around Iran's Arak heavy water reactor

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) — Israel's military warned people Thursday to evacuate the area around Iran's Arak heavy water reactor. The warning came in a social media post on X. It included a satellite image of the plant in a red circle like other warnings that proceeded strikes. The Arak heavy water reactoris 250 kilometers (155 miles) southwest of Tehran. Heavy water helps cool nuclear reactors, but it produces plutonium as a byproduct that can potentially be used in nuclear weapons. That would provide Iran another path to the bomb beyond enriched uranium, should it choose to pursue the weapon. Iran had agreed under its 2015 nuclear deal with world powers to redesign the facility to relieve proliferation concerns. In 2019, Iran started up the heavy water reactor's secondary circuit, which at the time did not violate Tehran's 2015 nuclear deal with world powers. Britain at the time was helping Iran redesign the Arak reactor to limit the amount of plutonium it produces, stepping in for the U.S., which had withdrawn from the project after President Donald Trump's decision in 2018 to unilaterally withdraw America from the nuclear deal. The International Atomic Energy Agency, the United Nations' nuclear watchdog, has been urging Israel not to strike Iranian nuclear sites. IAEA inspectors reportedly last visited Arak on May 14. Due to restrictions Iran imposed on inspectors, the IAEA has said it lost "continuity of knowledge" about Iran's heavy water production -- meaning it could not absolutely verify Tehran's production and stockpile. Already, Israel's airstrike campaign has targeted Iran's enrichment site at Natanz, centrifuge workshops around Tehran and a nuclear site in Isfahan.

Israel’s military warns people to evacuate the area around Iran’s Arak heavy water reactor

Israel's military warns people to evacuate the area around Iran's Arak heavy water reactor DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) — Israel...
Hegseth, Slotkin spar in heated congressional hearingNew Foto - Hegseth, Slotkin spar in heated congressional hearing

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth sparred with some Democratic senators as he was grilled at a congressional hearing Wednesday about the Trump administration's latest military actions. The former Fox News host, who faced acontentious confirmationhearing, got into a heated exchange before the Senate Armed Services Committee with Sen. Elissa Slotkin, D-Mich., who questioned him over the military's authority to arrest and detain protesters. "It's sort of amusing the extent to which the speculation is out there," Hegseth said. "So what is the order? Then list it out for us. List it out for us. Be a man. Did you authorize them to detain or arrest?" Slotkin, a former CIA analyst who served in Iraq, said. The senator questioned Hegseth about the possibility of an order given for the military to use lethal force against protesters. MORE: Hegseth shouted threat to 'polygraph' top military officials: Sources "I'm just asking the question. Don't laugh," Slotkin said after Hegseth brushed off the question. "What is that based on?" Hegseth responded. "What evidence do you have that that order has ever been given?" Slotkin responded that his predecessor, Mark Esper, didn't accept such an order during the first administration. She cited Esper'smemoirwhere he claimed Trump inquired if the military could shoot protesters who demonstrated in the streets during the 2020 George Floyd protests. "He had more guts and balls than you because he said, I'm not going to send in a uniformed military to do something that I know in my gut isn't right … You're pooh-poohing this," the senator said. Hegseth testified that there was "zero indication that an order was given to shoot protesters and that has not happened." But when she asked whether troops could use force against unarmed civilians, Hegseth wouldn't say. "I'd be careful what you read in books and believing it. Except for the Bible," he said. Hegseth responded similarly when questioned by Sen. Jacky Rosen, D-Ariz, earlier in the hearing. Rosen asked about thefiringsof several top national security officials, including the director of the National Security Agency, Gen. Timothy Haugh, that were allegedly done at the request of far-right social media influencer Laura Loomer. "She's been denounced even by Republicans, and the idea is that any leaders within our agency responsible for our nation's security, somebody would be dismissed based on the advice of a social media influencer," Rosen said. MORE: Loomer, far-right activist, urged Trump to remove NSA director and others: Sources Hegseth reiterated that the panel should not be "believing everything you read in the media." "I don't discuss who I talk about anything with, but ultimately, this is my decision and he serves at the pleasure of the president and that's why he's no longer there," he said. "Do you believe it's appropriate for social media to influence personnel decisions in your department, yes or no?" Rosen asked. Time then expired. The chairman left a moment for Hegseth to answer the question, as witnesses often do after a lawmaker has asked their final question. Hegseth took a beat, and said, "I believe your time is up." Rosen pushed back. "Oh, it is not up to you to tell me when my time is up. I am going to say, Mr. Secretary, you're either feckless or complicit. You're not in control of your department," she replied. "You [are] unserious. ... I yield back and I don't appreciate the smirk, sir. You are the secretary of defense."

Hegseth, Slotkin spar in heated congressional hearing

Hegseth, Slotkin spar in heated congressional hearing Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth sparred with some Democratic senators as he was grilled...
NFL announces full list of 2025 training camp joint practice sessionsNew Foto - NFL announces full list of 2025 training camp joint practice sessions

Nothing like some friendly competition to get NFL players fired up ahead of the regular season. TheNFLannounced Wednesday that 29 of the league's 32 teams will participate in joint practices during the 2025 preseason. According to the NFL and NFL Players Association'scollective bargaining agreement, teams are allowed to participate in up to four joint practices during the preseason. This year, all but three teams – theKansas City Chiefs,Cincinnati BengalsandNew Orleans Saints– will have at least one joint practice with another team. That isn't new for the Chiefs, but it is a change from the Bengals' and Saints' offseason plans from last year. NFL OFFSEASON SCHEDULE:When does training camp start in 2025? New Orleans, notably, has a new head coach in formerPhiladelphia Eaglesoffensive coordinator Kellen Moore. On the flip side, theLas Vegas Raiders, who hired veteran head coach Pete Carroll in the offseason,arehaving a joint practice after not participating last year. And perhaps after a 1-4 start in 2024, the Bengals are trying to change up their preseason schedule. Here's what to know about this year's NFL joint practice sessions: The NFL announced the full schedule of joint practice sessions for this year's preseason on Wednesday. The full list of 24 joint practices for NFL teams during training camp in August:pic.twitter.com/YJrJa3UtXF — Tom Pelissero (@TomPelissero)June 18, 2025 Aug. 5:Indianapolis Colts@Baltimore Ravens Aug. 5:Los Angeles Rams@ Dallas Cowboys Aug. 6:Cleveland Browns@Carolina Panthers Aug. 6:Washington Commanders @New England Patriots Aug. 7:Denver Broncos@San Francisco 49ers Aug. 7:Tennessee Titans@Tampa Bay Buccaneers Aug. 8:Miami Dolphins@ Chicago Bears Aug. 12:New York Giants@New York Jets Aug. 12:Tennessee Titans @ Atlanta Falcons Aug. 13:Cleveland Browns @ Philadelphia Eagles Aug. 13:Los Angeles Rams @ Los Angeles Chargers Aug. 13:Miami Dolphins @ Detroit Lions Aug. 13:New York Jets @ New York Giants Aug. 13:New England Patriots @ Minnesota Vikings Aug. 14:Tampa Bay Buccaneers @ Pittsburgh Steelers Aug. 14:Arizona Cardinals@ Denver Broncos Aug. 14:Carolina Panthers @Houston Texans Aug. 14:Green Bay Packers@ Indianapolis Colts Aug. 14:San Francisco 49ers @ Las Vegas Raiders Aug. 15:Buffalo Bills@ Chicago Bears Aug. 21:Baltimore Ravens @ Washington Commanders Aug. 21:Houston Texans @ Detroit Lions Aug. 21:Jacksonville Jaguars @ Miami Dolphins Aug. 21:Seattle Seahawks@ Green Bay Packers This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:NFL training camp schedule: Joint practice sessions announced

NFL announces full list of 2025 training camp joint practice sessions

NFL announces full list of 2025 training camp joint practice sessions Nothing like some friendly competition to get NFL players fired up ahe...
Caitlin Clark's Fever coach sounds off on referees after six technicals, three ejectionsNew Foto - Caitlin Clark's Fever coach sounds off on referees after six technicals, three ejections

INDIANAPOLIS –Indiana Fevercoach Stephanie White knew there was something brewing in Gainbridge Fieldhouse on Tuesday night. Indiana was playing Connecticut, a notoriously physical team and known — as much as a 2-9 team can be — for its defense. The Fever and Sun have already played once this season, and that matchup included Fever guard Sophie Cunningham getting her front tooth chipped and injuring her ankle on a hard screen. The chippiness didn't stop in the teams' second meeting,an 88-71 Fever win. Indiana starCaitlin Clarkand Sun guardJacy Sheldonstarted jawing in the first quarter. Officials quickly separated the two, but didn't call any fouls. Then, it escalated in the third quarter. "The contact by Mabrey did not rise to the level of an ejection," crew chief Ashley Gloss said in a pool report conducted by IndyStar. "Additionally, it did not meet the criteria for a flagrant foul 2 penalty." Sheldon, guarding Clark, poked her in the eye while Clark was trying to pass the ball. Clark immediately recoiled, grabbing her face and turning back to Sheldon. The two shoved each other as their teammates ran into the scrum, Sun center Tina Charles getting in the middle of them. Sun guard Marina Mabrey then ran into the scrum, puffing her chest out andknocking Clark to the ground. Clark fell and players were quickly separated by the referees and the two coaching staffs. But it was too little, too late, White thought, as the officials let the game get out of control. "I think it was pretty obvious that stuff was brewing, right?" White said postgame. "When the officials don't get control of the ballgame, when they allow that stuff to happen, and it's been happening all season long … you've got competitive women who are the best in the world at what they do, and when you allow them to play physical, and you allow these things to happen, they're going to compete, and they're going to have their teammates backs. It's exactly what you expect out of fierce competition. "I started talking to the officials in the first quarter, and we knew this was going to happen. You could tell it was going to happen. So they got to get control of it. They got to be better." After a long review, officials upgraded Sheldon's foul to a flagrant 1 and assessed technical fouls to Clark, Mabrey and Charles. The officials' decision to not eject Mabrey for shoving Clark to the ground was surprising, both to the broadcast and for many media members and fans. A BIG dust up between the Fever and Sun as Jacy Sheldon pokes Caitlin Clark in the eye, then Clark reacts with a shove.A lot more people get involved, and Marina Mabrey knocks CC to the ground.Officials are reviewing.pic.twitter.com/ossV4kU6DV — Chloe Peterson (@chloepeterson67)June 18, 2025 But it wasn't surprising to Connecticut coach Rachid Meziane. "No, I wasn't surprised, because I don't think her reaction was very big," Meziane said. "She just tried to be between two players, but no, I don't think she deserved to be ejected. This is not my job. I am a coach. The ref has to do their job, to clean up the game and make sure the best team won the game and not just who is more physical. I don't think my players deserved this ejection." The pool report also stated Clark and Charles were assessed technical fouls because they acted in an "unsportsmanlike manner." Sheldon's foul was upgraded to a flagrant 1 because "in the judgment of the officials, the foul by Sheldon was unnecessary, the contact to Clark's face. Furthermore, there was windup and impact, and the contact to the face carries a potential for injury." Clark was not injured in the play, and she stayed in through the fourth quarter. The crowd was active for the rest of the game, heavily booing Mabrey and Sheldon whenever they touched the ball and cheering even louder when the Sun would turn the ball over or miss a shot. That, too, was something Clark leaned into. After hitting a 3-pointer to put Indiana up 20 with just under four minutes left, Clark turned to the Connecticut bench. She stared down the bench, which included Mabrey at the time, while she jogged back to play defense. Then, after the Fever called a timeout to sub Clark and the other Fever starters out, Clark turned to the crowd, pumping her arms. The crowd obliged, cheering loudly as she checked out of the game. "I was just excited. I made a shot, my first 3 in the second half," Clark said. "... At the end of the day, I'm here to play basketball, and that's my job. That's what I'm gonna do. I was excited. Honestly, the review took too long for me. I wanted to get playing basketball again, and that's exactly what I did the rest of the third quarter. I made all three free throws, and then I, you know, it was a tough 3. I was excited about a 3. And honestly, I got to give our crowd a lot of credit, too. I thought they were tremendous." Indiana was up by double-digits in the final minute of the game, with mostly backups playing out the final few minutes. But the dustups still weren't over. With 46 seconds left and Indiana up by 17, Sophie Cunningham grabbed Sheldon's head while she was going up for a layup. Sheldon fell to the ground but immediately got back up, and she and Sun guard Lindsay Allen both rushed Cunningham. The fight spilled over into the fans at the baseline, and Cunningham pulled Sheldon's hair while Sheldon and Allen grabbed her by the arms. "I thought it was a flagrant," White said simply when asked about Cunningham's foul. She said the same thing when asked if she thought Cunningham was protecting Clark. Another dust up, this time between Jacy Sheldon and Sophie Cunningham.Cunningham fouled Sheldon, then Sheldon reacted, pushing Cunningham into the crowd.pic.twitter.com/9eFa50sSjA — Chloe Peterson (@chloepeterson67)June 18, 2025 Cunningham received a flagrant 2 because the contact was "unnecessary and excessive," according to the pool report, and she was ejected from the game. Officials also felt like that scuffle turned into a fight, so Sheldon and Allen were both assessed technicals for fighting and also ejected. It was a game that got out of control at times and one the officials were not prepared to handle. Subpar officiating is something White said she has seen numerous times this season, both with the Fever and across the league. And as the league grows and improves, White said, the officials will have to, too. "Players are faster, they're better, they're bigger, they're stronger," White said. "They're as good as they've ever been there, as athletic as they've ever been. The game is fast. Now, things are happening quickly. Everybody's getting better, except the officials. So we got to find a way to remedy it. I mean, you've heard every coach talk about it, so I don't know what the answer is." This article originally appeared on Indianapolis Star:Fever coach sounds off on WNBA refs after Caitlin Clark knocked around

Caitlin Clark's Fever coach sounds off on referees after six technicals, three ejections

Caitlin Clark's Fever coach sounds off on referees after six technicals, three ejections INDIANAPOLIS –Indiana Fevercoach Stephanie Whit...
The risks for Trump of 'regime change' in Iran: Just ask George W. BushNew Foto - The risks for Trump of 'regime change' in Iran: Just ask George W. Bush

Regime change is harder than it looks. Just ask George W. Bush. The decision now facing PresidentDonald Trumpon Iran over whether to try to overthrow an unfriendly government is one that previous commanders-in-chief have wrestled with in countries from Iraq to Cuba − often with catastrophic consequences. "I may do it,"Trump told reporterson the White House lawn on Wednesday, on June 18. "I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do." For John F. Kennedy, the CIA-backed Bay of Pigs invasion in 1961 was a Cold War disaster that left Fidel Castro in power. Emboldening the Soviet Union, it contributed to the Cuban missile crisis a year later, bringing the world to the brink of a nuclear war. And for the younger President Bush, the Iraq war, launched in 2003, succeeded in overturning Saddam Hussein's rule, but enmeshed the United States in a war that lasted more than eight years and had repercussions that continue to ripple through the region. The toll of the U.S. invasionand occupation of Iraq included at least 4,480 Americans killed and 32,000 wounded. More than 100,000 Iraqi civilians died. The financial cost was at least $806 billion. Now Trump is making some of the same calculations that Bush did: Allegations of a nuclear threat. The urging of allies, in this case Israeli Prime MinisterBenjamin Netanyahu, that the regime is weak and ripe to be toppled. And the appeal of making a bold stroke that solves a problem, once and for all, that has frustrated previous presidents. No one may know what Trump will do, but what he wants to have happen is clear: "UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER" was his demand in a post on Truth Social, using all capital letters to underscore his determination to end the Iranian nuclear threat that Presidents Barack Obama andJoe Bidenstruggled to contain. Iranian Supreme LeaderAyatollah Ali Khameinei,rejected that prospect out of hand. "The Iranian nation cannot be surrendered," said the supreme leader, who has been in power since the elder Bush, President George H.W. Bush, was in the White House more than 30 years ago. "The Americans should know that any U.S. military intervention will undoubtedly be accompanied by irreparable damage." The question is whether Trump will deploy America's huge bunker-busting bombs against some of Iran's nuclear facilities, which are buried deep underground and are believed to have survived Israel's bombing campaign, at least so far. But that move would draw the United States directly into the war between Iran and Israel. It could escalate the conflict and further destabilize the volatile region. Trump has renewed his call for Iran to negotiate − or else. "Why didn't you negotiate with me before all this death and destruction?" he demanded in comments that interrupted the raising oftwo new flagpoleson the north and south lawns of the White House. "Why didn't you negotiate with me two weeks ago? You could have done fine. You would have had a country." Negotiating sessions between the U.S. and Iran were stopped when theIsrael bombardmentbegan a week earlier. Was it too late? "Nothing's too late," Trump replied. But he warned, "There's a big difference between now and a week ago." Trump has another parallel with George W. Bush. Bush came into office promising a "humble" foreign policy and a focus on "compassionate conservatism" at home. But his agenda was rewritten with the 9/11 terror attacks on New York and Washington just eight months into his tenure. Trump came into office promising an "America First" foreign policy and an aversion to "stupid endless wars" in the Middle East. Now aides have said he is "warming" to the idea of ordering U.S. forces into action, a possibility that has alarmed some of his most avid supporters. Conservative provocateurTucker Carlsonhas blasted Republican "warmongers" and former Trump strategist Steve Bannon has declared that a drive to war by the "deep state" would "blow up" the Trump coalition. EvenTulsi Gabbard, a member of Trump's Cabinet as director of National Intelligence, last week warned that "political elite and warmongers" were "carelessly fomenting fear and tensions." "I don't care what she said," Trump told reporters when asked about her comments. "I think they were very close to having a weapon." For Bush, the allegations of Iraq's nuclear program proved to be overblown, undercutting the main stated reason for invading. Instead of being "greeted as liberators," as then-Vice President Dick Cheney predicted, U.S. troops faced an insurgency. And while Saddam's regime was quickly beheaded, the region has had two decades of chaos and conflict since then. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:The risks for Trump of 'regime change' in Iran: Just ask Bush

The risks for Trump of 'regime change' in Iran: Just ask George W. Bush

The risks for Trump of 'regime change' in Iran: Just ask George W. Bush Regime change is harder than it looks. Just ask George W. Bu...
US to end LGBT suicide prevention service, says general hotline sufficientNew Foto - US to end LGBT suicide prevention service, says general hotline sufficient

(Clarifies in second paragraph that funding was not renewed from earlier mention of fund being pulled) By Kanishka Singh WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump's administration is ending funding for an LGBT suicide prevention hotline that it says encourages "radical gender ideology," a move that the project running the service called "devastating." The Trevor Project, a non-profit that provides free, specialized support to LGBT youth, said on Wednesday that its hotline would soon close as a result of the funding not being renewed. "I am devastated and heartbroken. The @TrevorProject received official notice that The Trump administration has ordered the closure of the national LGBTQ+ youth suicide lifeline in 30 days," Trevor Project CEO Jaymes Black said in a statement on Instagram. A spokesman for the White House Office of Management and Budget said funding would continue for 988 Lifeline, a wider suicide prevention hotline. "The president's Budget funds the 988 at $520 million – the same number as under (former President Joe) Biden. It does not, however, grant taxpayer money to a chat service where children are encouraged to embrace radical gender ideology by 'counselors' without consent or knowledge of their parents," the spokesman added. Since taking office in January, Trump has signed multiple executive orders aimed at restricting transgender rights and dismantling diversity, equity and inclusion practices in the government and private sector. The Trump administration says such steps restore fairness, but civil rights and LGBT advocates say they leave marginalized groups more vulnerable. "The administration is eliminating a critical, life-saving resource that was part of this nation's public health infrastructure," said Black, adding that it seemed the country "has failed our LGBTQ+ young people." The hotline had serviced over 1.3 million young people since its inception in 2022, Black added. (Reporting by Kanishka Singh in Washington; Editing by Rosalba O'Brien)

US to end LGBT suicide prevention service, says general hotline sufficient

US to end LGBT suicide prevention service, says general hotline sufficient (Clarifies in second paragraph that funding was not renewed from ...
Travis Kelce's decision to return for another season with Chiefs wasn't much of a decision at allNew Foto - Travis Kelce's decision to return for another season with Chiefs wasn't much of a decision at all

KANSAS CITY, Mo. (AP) —Travis Kelcesaid the decision to return for his 13th season with theKansas City Chiefswasn't much of a decision at all. In fact, the four-time All-Pro tight end indicated Wednesday that No. 14 isn't out of the question. "I got one year on this contract, I know that. And we'll try to figure out something for next year," Kelce said after the second day of the Chiefs' mandatory three-day minicamp, which was moved partially indoors because of lightning in the area. "The Chiefs organization knows how much I love them. I can't see myself playing anywhere else," Kelce continued. "We'll deal with (2026) down the road, when the time is right. But right now, I'm focused on winning a championship this year." The question of whether the 35-year-old would hang up his cleats was among the biggest to follow the Chiefs' lopsided loss to the Eagles in the Super Bowl. While he still played at a high level last season, Kelce's production dipped noticeably — 97 catches for 823 yards and just three touchdowns for a team that won 15 regular-season games. Throw in Kelce's myriad business interests, including a successful media career thanks in part to his popular podcast, and a long-term relationship with pop superstarTaylor Swift, and it made sense to wonder how much longer he would play. Yet it only took a matter of weeks for Kelce to decide to chase another championship. Part of it was the way last season's run had ended. Kelce had a throwback game in the divisional round against Houston with seven catches for 117 yards, but he only had four for 39 in the 40-22 loss to the Eagles in the Super Bowl. "Really didn't feel like it was my last game. Just felt like I had a lot more to prove," he said. "Yeah, you want to let the emotions die down; you don't want to make a decision off initial emotions. Once they died down, I felt like I still had that fire in my chest to come in and keep building and chase another Super Bowl, man." The Chiefs made it to the Super Bowl despite playing most of the season without their top two wide receivers, Rashee Rice and Marquise Brown, both of whom are fully healthy now after their injuries. They also made it despite massive issues at left tackle, which the Chiefs hope to have solved by drafting Ohio State standout Josh Simmons in the first round. Now, they have a motivated — and noticeably slimmer — Kelce back at tight end. There were reports that he had dropped about 25 pounds since the end of last season, though Kelce insisted that may have been an exaggeration. "Don't believe all you read on the internet, guys. I'm down some weight from the end of last season — last year — but each year is different, man. You have to rebuild it," he said. "This year, I had some time to really focus on some form running and some things early in the offseason that I didn't have time for last year. Certainly feeling good and I think it'll pay off." Patrick Mahomes certainly hopes so. After leading one of the NFL's most productive offenses early in his career, Mahomes has struggled to get the Chiefs on track the past couple of seasons, largely because of injuries and offensive line trouble. Still, the Chiefs' star quarterback said he never put any pressure on Kelce to return for another season. "I think you have in the back of your mind, for anybody that's played a lot of seasons, there's always the chance if they're going to come back and put in the work," Mahomes said. "For him, I think it was just recalibrating, seeing where he was at, and from what I've seen, he's ready to go. He's put in the work this offseason and he's excited to make another run at it." The Chiefs wrap up their three-day minicamp on Thursday, then break for about a month, before reuniting at Missouri Western State University for training camp. And while the thought of spending a few weeks living in college dorm rooms probably doesn't sound very enticing to Kelce, the prospect of starting another championship run there clearly drives him. "I love this game. It's still my childhood dream," Kelce said. "When I really thought about it this offseason, I got back to wanting to focus on this game and getting the most out of this game as I can, while I'm still putting on the cleats and pads. This will always be No. 1 in terms of my business world and career path." ___ AP NFL:https://apnews.com/hub/NFL

Travis Kelce's decision to return for another season with Chiefs wasn't much of a decision at all

Travis Kelce's decision to return for another season with Chiefs wasn't much of a decision at all KANSAS CITY, Mo. (AP) —Travis Kelc...

 

MARIO VOUX © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com