The 10 biggest ways Trump has changed our politics, 10 years laterNew Foto - The 10 biggest ways Trump has changed our politics, 10 years later

It's now been 10 years since Donald Trump rode down that golden escalator and launched his 2016 presidential campaign. And plenty of people – raising my hand here – initially dismissed him as a passing novelty. Little did we know at the time that this man would not only become president (twice), but would completely flip the political script in our country. Regardless of what happens from here, Trump has changed the course of our politics, in multiple ways. So what are the biggest ones? Here are 10 that rise to the top. The Republican Party bears little resemblance to the GOP of even a decade ago, when Trump first started running. The biggest policy shifts, to my mind: It has gone from a more hawkish party to a more non-interventionist one – especially when it comes to combatting Russia in Ukraine. The percentage of Republicans who said it would be best if we "stay out of world affairs" rosefrom about 30% in 2015 to 53% in 2023, according to a Chicago Council on Global Affairs poll. It has deemphasized high-minded ideals like democracy and morality, in favor of a more Machiavellian brand of politics. It has embraced the baseless challenging of election results. And it's declined to hold moral failings againstits candidates and top officials(like Trump) and human rights failings against foreign countries (like Russia and Saudi Arabia). While it once defined itself as the party of free trade and "no new taxes," it's now pursuing a massive, protectionist trade war – one that involves, for all intents and purposes, large tax increases on goods decided upon by Trump alone. It's alldecidedly un-Reagan. At this point, Trump's falsehoods often aren't even treated as news. And that's because, strictly speaking, they're not new. He spoutedmore than 30,000 false and misleading claimsin his first term, according to The Washington Post. That averages out to nearly one every hour for four years. And it hasn't stopped. Many people blanched when Trump adviser Kellyanne Conway referred to his team's "alternative facts" three days after he first took office, but that has become a way of life for the president and his allies. More significant than Trump's willingness to spout false claims, though, is that much of the country has decided this is not a deal-breaker. Whether because they believe what Trump is saying or they have decided it's not important (or that it's even strategic), nearly half the country has decided it's just not a big deal for the president to be grounded in the truth. Trump effectively launched his national political ambitions with a conspiracy theory about how then-President Barack Obama wasn't born in the United States. And there's been plenty more where that came from. Back in 2019, I counted23 conspiracy theories Trump had promoted. And that was long before his biggest one: the false stolen election claims that spurred the January 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol. But more than Trump's willingness to traffic in these things is his party's willingness to believe them. It's become a situation in which Trump claims something, and it oftengradually becomes an article of faith for many in the GOP: the "stolen" 2020 election, the "great replacement theory," various claims about the "deep state" targeting Trump, and last yearthe idea that Haitian migrantswere eating pets in Ohio. Conspiracy theories aren't new to politics, and Republicans aren't the only ones who believe in them; some of this is about the decline of traditional media and rise of social media, on which unverified claims flourish. But Trump, more than anyone else, has effectively weaponized these theories to build his base. Whether through happenstance, the Democrats' own failings or Trump's ability to block out the sun, the Trump era has left a remarkablevacuum in Democratic leadership. The party in two successive presidential campaigns has nominated politicians who weren't exactly towering figures. (Joe Biden won in 2020, but largely because of Trump's own problems.) Its aged leadership in Congress has struggled to adjust to the new paradigm of the Trump era. Democrats have bled support among key demographicslike Latinos and Black men(at least for now). And the party's image numbers are as bad as they've been in decades,if not worse. None of it means Democrats won't rebound in 2026. Merely being the opposition party generally means you gain ground in midterm elections. But rarely have we seen a party so devoid of a true identity and plan for the path forward. Trump has demonstrated a talent for confounding his opponents, and the Democratic Party as an institution has clearly been confounded. You've probably read a lot over the last 15 or so years about how Congress is stuck in a state of "gridlock." The Trump era is not just about gridlock but the effective sidelining of Congress altogether. Increasingly, Congress doesn't even try – both because it doesn't want to, and because Trump doesn't want it to. Earlier in the 21st century, this took the form of Congress effectively handing the president war powers the Constitution gave it, because members didn't want to take hard votes on using force. Today, the Republican-controlled Congress has stood by as Trump has taken over its tariff powers and its power of the purse. The administration has pushed to cancel congressionally appropriated spending, and Congress is doing almost nothing to reclaim these powers. The attitude increasingly seems to be: It's just easier to let the president do it, if possible. Republican lawmakers might disagree with Trump on issues like tariffs or the war in Ukraine, but they often decline to assert power even where it's prescribed to them in the Constitution, because they fear his attacks or the prospect of a primary challenge. The result: Trump signed ahistorically low five billsin his first 100 days. Meanwhile, heset a record for executive actions– exceeding even the first 100-day clip of Franklin D. Roosevelt, who was combatting the Great Depression. One of the biggest questions right now is how much more authoritarian the American government might become under Trump. He's flirted with this for years, and whether you think the a-word is appropriate, many of his early moves are geared toward consolidating power. And as all of that's happened, Trump's base has warmed to the idea and created a more ripe environment. Polls for years have shown Republicans souring on checks and balances andmoving infavor ofa version of governmental power that's centralized in the presidency – or more aptly, Trump. A survey earlier this year showed76% of Republicanssaid Trump should keep deporting people even if the courts tell him to stop.Another last yearshowed just 26% of Republicans said it would be good for a president to rule "without having to worry about Congress or the courts," but that number rose to 57% when the president in question was Trump. Congressional Republicans, too, have greased the skids. Many of them have basically saidwhatever Trump wants is what they should do, and they've roundly criticized the judiciary when it stands in his way – even as Trump's moves transparently test the bounds of the law. Trump has turned his party into one that's defined by loyalty to him, in large part by turning it against other major institutions. He's basically made himself into the one true answer, because, in his telling, nobody else can be trusted. Republicans were always suspicious of big government and especially the media, but that's been put on steroids. Gallup polling in recent years has shownfewer than 1 in 5 Republicans express confidencein Congress, the media, public schools, the criminal justice system and big business. And theirlevel of trustin most institutions issignificantlylower than Democrats'. Trump – the first convicted felon ever to become president – has also significantly devalued and politicized the justice system. He's done so by regularly attacking the courts, but also by rewarding allies (see: the January 6 pardons andhis many pardons of allies) and wielding investigative powers to target his opponents. And of late, Trump has turned his focus to wielding the powers of government against major institutions he dislikes, like law firms, universities and the media – in ways that are often transparently political. There have beenmyriad examples of political violencein recent years – most notably an assassination attempt a year ago that nearly killed Trump and the shootings of twoMinnesota state lawmakersover the weekend. And repeatedly in recent years, Trump himself hastoyed with the prospect of political violence. Regardless of how much Trump is at fault for anything, it's clear his rise has created a tinderbox in our politics. A number of Republicans who have run afoul of Trump have said part of the reason their colleagues have stayed in line was because of not just the fear of political blowback, but fear for their own safety. I ran throughseveral examples hereafter January 6. And there have beenmore since. And then there is the increasing tolerance for it. Polling after January 6, but before the Trump assassination attempts, suggested that Americans were increasingly likely tosay political violence can sometimes be justified. Republicans were more likely to say this. While the shift of Latinos and Black men toward Trump was the big demographic story of the 2024 election, perhaps the most significant and durable demographic shift of the Trump era is education. Put plainly: Democrats have become the party of the educated, while Republicans have become the party of the working class. When Trump launched his 2016 campaign,Gallup pollingshowed every education level except those with postgraduate degrees were pretty evenly divided between Democrats and Republicans. Those without college degrees now lean clearly Republican, while those with college degrees lean Democrats. The gap between non-college and college-educated voters has gone from virtually nil to around 20 points. It's even bigger when you look at postgrads. When Trump came on to the scene in 2015, the Republican Party was in an unusual spot. While it had for years decried illegal immigration, it had decided after a disappointing 2012 election – particularly with Latino voters – that a change in tone was necessary. You might remember the "autopsy." Trump almost immediately lit that portion of the autopsy on fire, making a series of broad and hyperbolic claims about how migrants were "rapists" and criminals. And more than any issue, harsh immigration enforcement is now front and center to our politics. Of late, this has meant some of the lowest border-crossing numbers of the 21st century – a major political win for Trump and a development that has lent credence to Trump's argument that all we really needed was a president with willpower. But the immigration debate is also bigger than that right now. It forms the basis of the power struggles in Washington, with Trump using what he thinks is Americans' thirst for deportations to test the limits of his power, both with the courts and the American public. Thus far, the courts have repeatedly blocked him, and Americansdon't seem to like all of what he's doing. Whether he is allowed to push forward will go a long way toward determining how powerful he ultimately becomes. For more CNN news and newsletters create an account atCNN.com

The 10 biggest ways Trump has changed our politics, 10 years later

The 10 biggest ways Trump has changed our politics, 10 years later It's now been 10 years since Donald Trump rode down that golden escal...
US seeks dismissal of Naval Academy case after ending race-conscious admissionsNew Foto - US seeks dismissal of Naval Academy case after ending race-conscious admissions

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. Justice Department on Monday asked a federal appeals court to dismiss a lawsuit challenging race-conscious admissions at the U.S. Naval Academy after the elite military school said it changed its policy under Republican President Donald Trump. The Naval Academy, located in Annapolis, Maryland, disclosed in March that it was no longer considering race or ethnicity in its admissions decisions following directives from Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. The Justice Department and an anti-affirmative action group that had sued the academy, jointly told the court on Monday that the policy change rendered the legal dispute moot. "This Department is committed to ending illegal discrimination and restoring merit-based opportunity throughout the federal government," Attorney General Pam Bondi said in a statement. The filing, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, also asks the court to vacate a federal judge's ruling last year finding that the prior race-conscious policy was legal. Democratic President Joe Biden's administration defended affirmative action at the Naval Academy after the U.S. Supreme Court exempted U.S. military academies from its 2023 ruling barring consideration of race in college admissions. The Naval Academy had long relied on its prior policy to raise its enrollment of Black, Hispanic and other minorities. U.S. conservatives and the Trump administration have argued that such policies disadvantage white and certain other applicants and do not improve military readiness. (Reporting by Andrew Goudsward and Caitlin Webber; Editing by Ryan Patrick Jones and Bill Berkrot)

US seeks dismissal of Naval Academy case after ending race-conscious admissions

US seeks dismissal of Naval Academy case after ending race-conscious admissions WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. Justice Department on Monday ...
Novak Djokovic says he intends to defend men's singles title at 2028 Olympics in Los AngelesNew Foto - Novak Djokovic says he intends to defend men's singles title at 2028 Olympics in Los Angeles

When the 2028 Olympics begin in Los Angeles, Novak Djokovic will be ready to go. The 38-year-old intends to defend his men's singles title at the 2028 Games, heannounced Monday. That shouldn't come as a major surprise considering Djokovic's excellence. Despite his age, Djokovic is still playing at a high level. He's reached the semifinals at both the Australian Open and French Open in 2025, and is the No. 5-ranked men's player in the sport. But his age is a major question. Following Djokovic's elimination from the French Open, the Serbian hinted at the matchpossibly being his lastat Roland Garros. All of his major rivals — Roger Federer, Andy Murray and Rafael Nadal — are all retired. Djokovic is the only member of that group still playing. While Djokovic will be 41 when the 2028 Olympics begin, he intends to play at the event. Not only that,but Djokovic saidthat's his main motivation tokeep going at this pointin his career, per Olympics.com. "The only thing that at this moment, professionally speaking, I have in my vision at this point," Djokovicsaid in an interview. "And it's interesting when we talk about these achievements and the Olympics that stand out and redemption, the only thing that I have in my head, which gives me motivation, is the Olympics of 2028 in Los Angeles. "And playing for the national team and Grand Slams. But not even the Grand Slams, not as much as the Olympics." Djokovic has competed at the Olympics five times. He won a bronze medal in 2008 and secured the gold at the 2024 Games. If Djokovic manages to pull off another gold-medal victory in 2028, he would become only the second men's player to defend his Olympics title, joining Murray. Given everything he's accomplished over his career, Djokovic doesn't need another Olympics win to add to his legacy. If he retired today, he would go down as one of the best to ever do it. He's won every single Grand Slam multiple times and already has a gold medal. Even with Djokovic's career winding down, the allure of another gold medal will keep him going. Winning the Olympics at 41 might prove difficult, but — given everything he's accomplished — Djokovic shouldn't ever be counted out.

Novak Djokovic says he intends to defend men's singles title at 2028 Olympics in Los Angeles

Novak Djokovic says he intends to defend men's singles title at 2028 Olympics in Los Angeles When the 2028 Olympics begin in Los Angeles...
Five college football sleepers that could contend for national championshipNew Foto - Five college football sleepers that could contend for national championship

You know thecollege footballfavorites by now. They've been at the head of the odds list for some time. It's the same two teams that met for aCollege Football Playoffsemifinal thriller in January, the same two teams that will meet in a season opener in Columbus, Ohio. Ohio State and Texas are deserving front-runners. Each will transition to a new starting quarterback, but those quarterbacks are ballyhooed blue-chippers,Julian Sayin at Ohio StateandArch Manning at Texas. And coaches Ryan Day and Steve Sarkisian possess a deft hand with quarterbacks. Across other positions, those teams remain steeped in talent. If I could select those two teams or have the field in a quest to pick the 2025 national champion, I'd be tempted to ride with B&B: Bevo and theBuckeyes. Behind those two teams, the oddsmakers' consensus likes Georgia, Penn State, Oregon, Notre Dame and Alabama next in the pecking order. That still leaves a handful of teams that intrigue me as national championship longshots. How do I define a longshot? Their odds are worse than 12-to-1. Here are my top national championship sleepers for the 2025 season: BetMGM odds:20-to-1 Brian Kelly got LSU's donor game squared away this offseason. It shows in the Tigers' transfer class. Nobody secured a better portal haul than Kelly. That includes additions like defensive linemen Patrick Payton (Florida State) and Jack Pyburn (Florida) who should fortify a defense that's sagged for years. Pair that with proven quarterback Garrett Nussmeier and a gifted wide receiver room, and it's understandable why Kelly says this is his best LSU roster. A tough schedule plots land mines en route to the playoff, but on talent alone, LSU is better positioned to pursue a national title than it's been in years. BetMGM odds:13-to-1 What's not tolike about Clemson? The Tigers returned gobs of production, making them the decisive ACC frontrunner. Much like LSU, they feature a seasoned quarterback (Cade Klubnik) and a talented batch of wide receivers. Clemson hosts LSU in a Week 1 prove-it game. Clemson boasts several players who should hear their name called early in next year's draft, like defensive linemen Peter Woods and T.J. Parker. The offensive line is seasoned and solid. Plus, Dabo Swinney added three transfers – gasp! – who buoy the two-deep. There's plenty to like, plus a clear path to the playoff from the ACC. DABO'S DONE IT:How Clemson is poise for run at national title WHO DOES 16 HELP?:The teams that benefit from playoff expansion BetMGM odds:22-to-1 Michigan finished last season by upsetting Ohio State and Alabama, and it did so while lacking a competent quarterback. Hello, Bryce Underwood, the nation's No. 1-ranked recruit in this past class. Underwood might not look the part of polished quarterback by September, but Michigan's forgiving schedule provides a runway for the Wolverines to improve throughout the season and make the playoff. Transfer quarterback Mikey Keene (Fresno State) provides cushion if Underwood needs some time. Michigan returned several starters from a stout defense. If it can get right at quarterback, it can make the playoff, at a minimum. BetMGM odds:25-to-1 Few teams generated more hype last summer thanOle Miss. The Rebels came up a victory short of the playoff, and widespread expectations for this team are substantially less. That feels like an overcorrection. If quarterback Austin Simmons becomes a breakout performer – he's talented enough do it – consider Ole Miss a playoff contender. The Rebels lost a lot of production off a 10-win team, but nobody does the annual transfer dance better than Lane Kiffin. He assembled another fine group of newcomers, including wide receivers Harrison Wallace III (Penn State) and De'Zhaun Stribling (Oklahoma State). The offense remains in good shape. The question is whether a rebuilt defense can flourish like last year's group did in a takedown of Georgia. BetMGM odds:66-to-1 Oklahoma's roster looks substantially better on the heels of a losing season that sparked Brent Venables to bring in quarterback John Mateer from Washington State. Mateer's offensive coordinator, Ben Arbuckle, followed the quarterback to Norman to run Oklahoma's offense. Win-win. Another win: Landing standout running back Jadyn Ott, a California transfer. Oklahoma returned a lot of production, and it surely can't be as injury plagued as last season. That leaves the manhole, though, of arguably the nation's most daunting schedule, which could swallow even an improved Sooners team. Blake Toppmeyeris the USA TODAY Network's national college football columnist. Email him atBToppmeyer@gannett.comand follow him on X@btoppmeyer. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:College football national championship sleepers for 2025 season

Five college football sleepers that could contend for national championship

Five college football sleepers that could contend for national championship You know thecollege footballfavorites by now. They've been a...
US senator moves to limit Trump's war powers on Iran, as Mideast conflict escalatesNew Foto - US senator moves to limit Trump's war powers on Iran, as Mideast conflict escalates

By Patricia Zengerle WASHINGTON (Reuters) -A Democratic senator introduced legislation on Monday to prevent U.S. President Donald Trump from using military force against Iran without Congress's authorization, as an escalating battle between Israel and Iran raised fears of broader conflict. Tim Kaine of Virginia has tried for years to wrest back Congress's authority to declare war from the White House. During Trump's first term, in 2020, Kaine introduced a similar resolution to rein in Trump's ability to wage war against Iran. That measure passed both the Senate and House of Representatives, winning some Republican support, but did not garner enough votes to survive the Republican president's veto. Kaine said his latest war powers resolution underscores that the U.S. Constitution gives Congress, not the president, the sole power to declare war and requires that any hostility with Iran be explicitly authorized by a declaration of war or specific authorization for the use of military force. "It is not in our national security interest to get into a war with Iran unless that war is absolutely necessary to defend the United States. I am deeply concerned that the recent escalation of hostilities between Israel and Iran could quickly pull the United States into another endless conflict," Kaine said in a statement. Under U.S. law, war powers resolutions are privileged, meaning that the Senate will be required to promptly consider and vote on the matter. Israel's military launched attacks on Iran on Friday with the stated aim of wiping out Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile programs. Iran, which says its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes, responded with missile attacks on Israel. Both countries have kept up their attacks, killing and wounding civilians and raising concern among world leaders meeting in Canada this week that the biggest battle between the two old enemies could lead to a broader regional conflict. Trump has lauded Israel's offensive while denying Iranian allegations that the U.S. has taken part and warning Tehran not to widen its retaliation to include U.S. targets. Before leaving for the summit in Canada on Sunday, Trump was asked what he was doing to de-escalate the situation. "I hope there's going to be a deal. I think it's time for a deal," he told reporters. "Sometimes they have to fight it out." (Reporting by Patricia Zengerle; Editing by Saad Sayeed)

US senator moves to limit Trump's war powers on Iran, as Mideast conflict escalates

US senator moves to limit Trump's war powers on Iran, as Mideast conflict escalates By Patricia Zengerle WASHINGTON (Reuters) -A Democr...
Poll: Americans overwhelmingly want Trump to obey court rulings, but MAGA Republicans are splitNew Foto - Poll: Americans overwhelmingly want Trump to obey court rulings, but MAGA Republicans are split

The vast majority of American adults believe the Trump administration must comply with federal court orders, though the president's strongest supporters are split over the issue, according to a new NBC News Decision Desk Pollpowered by SurveyMonkey. In the poll, 81% of U.S. adults say that if a federal court rules that an administration action is illegal, then the administration has to follow its ruling, while 19% say the administration can ignore the ruling and continue its action. But among people who consider themselves supporters of the MAGA movement, there's a sharper divide. According to the poll, supporters of President Donald Trump are split, 50%-50%, over whether he should comply with federal court orders. Democrats are almost unanimous on the issue, with 96% saying the administration has to follow court orders. Among independents, 87% say the administration must obey court orders, while 13% say Trump can ignore them. The issue of whether the White House can ignore rulings from federal courts has come to the fore as the administration carries out executive actions, including itsdeportation program, at rapid speed. White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Millerargued last monththat "Marxist judges" were conducting a "judicial coup" by constraining the president's authority when a judge ordered the release of a Tufts University student in Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention. Several federal judges, meanwhile, have considered whether to hold executive branch officials in contempt forwhat one called "willful disregard" of judicial orders. The issue has also arisen in the high-profile case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia. He was deported to an El Salvadoran prison in what the government initially called an "administrative error." The case rose to the Supreme Court, whichordered the Trump administration to "facilitate"his return. The Trump administration held out against pushing for that for nearly two months before Abrego Garcia was returned to the United States early this month toface federal chargesalleging human smuggling. The poll found that 55% of Americans have favorable opinions of the Supreme Court, while 45% view it unfavorably. Republicans are more supportive of the court than Democrats: 75% view it favorably, compared with 34% with favorable views among Democrats. Yet one key finding is that Americans generally don't hold strong views of the Supreme Court right now: 11% have strongly favorable opinions, while 12% are strongly unfavorable. The large remainder rates the court "somewhat" favorably or unfavorably. The poll was conducted ahead of the Supreme Court'straditional season for its highest-profile rulings, and it has yet to rule this year on contentious cases like one concerning birthright citizenship, which could affect public opinion of the court. The court isn't expected to rule on the merits of whether Trump can end birthright citizenship, which haslong been considered a clear rightunder the 14th Amendment, via executive order. Rather, the current case focuses on thepower of judgesto block presidential policies through nationwide injunctions. If the court rules in Trump's favor, district judges would be limited from using nationwide injunctions to temporarily block an administration policy. There have been at least39 such rulingsduring Trump's second term. Trump said in aninterview with NBC News' "Meet the Press" last monththat he has "great respect" for the Supreme Court. The NBC News Decision Desk Poll powered by SurveyMonkey was conducted online from May 30-June 10 among a national sample of 19,410 adults ages 18 and over. The margin of error is plus or minus 2.1 percentage points.

Poll: Americans overwhelmingly want Trump to obey court rulings, but MAGA Republicans are split

Poll: Americans overwhelmingly want Trump to obey court rulings, but MAGA Republicans are split The vast majority of American adults believe...
Worst to first? Ranking 8 NFL teams' chances to jump to top of division in 2025New Foto - Worst to first? Ranking 8 NFL teams' chances to jump to top of division in 2025

Editor's note: This story is a part of a series by USA TODAY Sports calledProject: June. We will publish at least one NFL-themed story every day throughout the month because fans know the league truly never sleeps. For just the third time in the last 22 years, the NFL in 2024 didn't have a single team go from worst to first within a division. But don't declare parity dead just yet. Look no further than theWashington Commandersfor the example that has provided hope to much of the rest of the league throughout the offseason. After going 4-13 in 2023, the franchise opted to wipe the slate clean, bringing aboard coach Dan Quinn, general manager Adam Peters and quarterback Jayden Daniels. Most figured that such an extensive reworking would lead to a transition season, but Washington rocketed to a 12-5 mark and an appearance in the NFC championship game for the first time since the 1991 season. But the organization's rise still eventually hit its ceiling, with thePhiladelphia Eaglescapturing both the NFC East title and rolling the Commanders in the conference title game to reach Super Bowl 59. Now, as teams prepare to break for the summer, many of the league's incumbent cellar-dwellers are holding out hope for a similarly stark turnaround – and maybe even a little more. Identifying teams capable of making such a stark surge can be tricky, as the Commanders ranked low on this list last year. But here is our ranking of the league's eight last-place finishers based on the likelihood they can pull off a worst-to-first transformation this fall: What's working for them:It's easier to bounce back rather than build from the ground floor. Having reached at least the conference championship game four times and won the division three times in the five years prior to last season, San Francisco clearly has the solid foundation that so many others on this list lack. That starts at both coach, where Kyle Shanahan's adroit play-calling confers a massive advantage, and quarterback, with Brock Purdy now no longer facing questions about his worth after reaching afive-year, $265 million extensionthat hardly seems lofty. The 2024 edition of the squad was snakebitten at an unparalleled level, so getting back the likes ofChristian McCaffrey,Brandon AiyukandTrent Williamsafter injury-riddled seasons is sure to fuel an offensive upswing. The defense also has hopes for better days ahead, too, with Robert Saleh sizing up as the right man to clean up various issues as he begins his second stint as a coordinator with the organization. The NFC West seems at least somewhat manageable to navigate after having the smallest gap between in wins (five games) between any division's champion and last-place finisher. What's working against them:Recapturing their previous winning ways isn't merely a matter of the 49ers calling a mulligan on last year. There's been significant attrition, especially on a defense that needs several young replacements – especially along the defensive line – to step up. With Aiyuk still working his way back from torn anterior cruciate and medial collateral ligaments andDeebo Samuel Sr. traded to the Commanders, second-year receiver Ricky Pearsall will have to make a sizable mark to keep the passing game going. Rediscovering a finishing touch will be essential after the 49ers were outscored 165-88 in the fourth quarter and had dreadful results in the red zone on both sides of the ball. The NFC West doesn't offer any easy outs, either, and the Los Angeles Rams shouldn't be expected to slide. Bottom line:There's usually a clear front-runner annually in this exercise, and San Francisco clearly stands apart from the other entrants. There's enough change in the last 12 months that an immediate return to form is hardly a foregone conclusion, but this version of the 49ers might have what it takes to reclaim the divisional crown, even if it has ceded its place as the definitive favorite. What's working for them:Cam Wardmight not have cleared the cliched bar of a "generational" quarterback prospect, but it's easy to see why Titans brass figured he could be a transformative figure for the franchise. In combining high-end pocket poise with unique out-of-structure ability, he can immediately recalibrate an offense that was too frequently thrown off tilt by Will Levis' backbreaking mistakes in the face of pressure. The offensive line also looks to be as solid as it has been in years thanks to the signings of left tackle Dan Moore Jr. and right guard Kevin Zeitler. New special teams coordinator John Fassel, who is widely regarded as one of the league's most innovative minds in his concentration, should clean up the rampant mistakes that further doomed last year's team. With theJacksonville Jaguarsand Indianapolis Colts undergoing their own major adjustments and the Houston Texans yet to assert themselves as truly dominant, the AFC South seems more open than many other divisions. What's working against them:If only it were so easy for every talented young quarterback to follow in the footsteps of C.J. Stroud, who engineered the league's last worst-to-first bid in 2023, and Daniels. Handing the keys over to a rookie typically entails a series of setbacks, and Ward has several overaggressive tendencies that will need to be tamped down in order to avoid a repeat of last season. But for all of the focus on how the No. 1 pick will fare, it might be the defense that ultimately drags this group down. Tennessee simply didn't do enough to upgrade a group that ranked 30thin scoring, and it undoubtedly will cost them in the short term. And while the Texans might not be world-beaters, they don't need to be in top form to remain several notches above the Titans and the rest of the division. Bottom line:If Ward's playmaking prowess carries over to the pros without a rough patch, watch out. But even with the most fortuitous circumstances, the Titans will be hard-pressed to vault all the way to the top of the AFC South. What's working for them:There might not have been a more consequential offseason addition than Ben Johnson. Not only could the new head coach and play-caller revolutionize the Bears' long stagnant attack, his decision to come aboard after a famously discerning approach to exploring opportunities cemented Chicago as an organization to be reckoned with in the coming years. Caleb Williams weathered the calamitous conditions of his rookie season about as admirably as anyone could ask, and his abundant creativity could finally be unlocked by Johnson. And between the overhauling of the interior line and the continued boosting of the receiving corps, there's room for this group to make a seismic leap in the fall. On defense, coordinator Dennis Allen should be a steadying force, especially as Johnson learns the ropes of handling the top job. What's working against them:It's easy to get excited about everything new to the Bears in 2025. But don't assume it all will click right away. How Williams handles the demands Johnson places on operating within structure and on schedule will bear watching, as it could be an early pain point. Meanwhile, merely importing several veterans up front might not be a cure-all after Chicago posted a league-worst sack rate of nearly 10%. And with the NFC North featuring three playoff teams – two of which vied for the conference's No. 1 seed in the final week – it'd take almost everything hitting right for Chicago to climb past all of the competition. Bottom line:Johnson's appeal stems not only from his play-calling acumen but also his ability to implement the culture refresh that helped the Detroit Lions flourish under Dan Campbell. Bears fans should keep the latter point in mind as the organization makes progress that might not be linear or lead to the mountaintop by the end of the coach's debut season. What's working for them:With patience running thin in Foxborough at the beginning of the post-Bill Belichick era just as it did at end of the legendary coach's run, Robert Kraft again took drastic action to reshape the organization from top to bottom. And in flocking to free agency to patch holes throughout the roster, the Patriots made it clear they expect to return to at least the precipice of postseason competition in short order. Mike Vrabel is a fitting choice to take on that task, and the former Titans coach no doubt will be looking to restore a culture of accountability after things reached a breaking point at the end of Jerod Mayo's lone season. The drumbeat regarding the upward trajectory of Drake Maye's development has only amplified throughout the offseason, and the installation of Josh McDaniels' more streamlined offense and the addition of several formidable weapons (receivers Stefon Diggs and Kyle Williams as well as running back TreVeyon Henderson) should only accelerate the quarterback's ascent. But the personnel overhauls might provide the most immediate returns on defense, where defensive end Milton Williams, cornerback Carlton Davis III and linebacker Robert Spillane can be difference-makers for a unit desperate to add more. What's working against them:For all the change here, was enough done to lift up an offensive line that repeatedly let Maye and the running game down? First-round left tackle Will Campbell sparked plenty of questions regarding whether he can hang on the blind side against NFL edge rushers, and the other additions weren't exactly splashy. Even if the front does eventually come together, it might take some time before a group that ranked 31st inESPN's pass block win rate metricand last in run block win rate finds its footing. An edge rush counting on castoffs Harold Landry III and K'Lavon Chaisson to provide a boost remains lackluster at best. And barring a long-term injury to Josh Allen, the Bills seem to have more than enough to again trample the rest of the division for their sixth consecutive AFC East title. Bottom line:Lots of new pieces here. How quickly they all coalesce will determine the extent of the Year 1 improvement. Bet on a boost – perhaps even to the level of relevance in the wild-card race – but don't get carried away. What's working for them:For once, there's change afoot in New Orleans. After several years of stagnation led to the franchise bottoming out with its worst mark (5-12) in nearly 20 years, the Saints are embarking on a new path rather than repeatedly doubling down on an aging and costly roster, with Kellen Moore taking over as the NFL's youngest head coach. The pivot begins behind center, where rookie Tyler Shough seems to have the inside track to replaceDerek Carrafter the veteran's retirement. The second-round signal-caller has the arm strength and confidence to take advantage of arguably the league's speediest receiving corps, featuring downfield blazers Chris Olave, Rashid Shaheed and Brandin Cooks. One of the biggest elements in New Orleans' favor, however, extends beyond personnel: The NFC South seems far more fluid than most other divisions, with the Saints having split their series against the Carolina Panthers and Atlanta Falcons last year. What's working against them:This rebuild is still something of a half measure, with a sizable amount of cap work still to be done in the coming years before a clean slate will come into sight. Given his struggles to make snap decisions, Shough could be in for a shock to the system as he adjusts to NFL speed - a problem that could be exacerbated by the Saints' uneven offensive line. The aerial attack also might struggle to find its form if Olave again misses substantial time after sitting out nine games last season. The 30th-ranked defense will have to depend on new coordinator Brandon Staley to cover for its myriad shortcomings, especially in a suspect secondary bound to feel the sting of Paulson Adebo's departure. And while the division might not be as imposing as others, it seems unlikely that theTampa Bay Buccaneers' grasp, which has lasted four years, will loosen anytime soon. Bottom line:Sorting out the bottom half of these rankings essentially amounts to dartboard throws. The Saints' problems have compounded for years, and they might take a similar timeline to unwind. Moore likely will have to endure some tough times before the franchise can launch its true reset in earnest. What's working for them:If the Raiders' core aim is to establish baseline competitiveness, Pete Carroll and Geno Smith seem to be fitting leaders for that mission. With Chip Kelly designing the offense, the coach and quarterback could rekindle the spark that allowed them to defy expectations in Seattle. Heisman Trophy runner-up Ashon Jeanty's arrival should immediately change the complexion of a historically putrid ground game, while the receiving corps added pieces to lighten the load on Brock Bowers and move on from the disappointing Davante Adams era. And the Silver and Black might be the only ones in their home city who can count on better luck in short order after their -16 turnover differential finished tied for the second-worst mark in the NFL. What's working against them:Chiefly (no pun intended), it's the division. If Kansas City's nine-year claim to the AFC West is to come to an end in 2025, the Los Angeles Chargers and Denver Broncos – both returning playoff outfits – would be the natural candidates to assume the top spot. Las Vegas was one of only two teams to go winless in its division last season, and an overall talent deficiency will be hard to compensate for. That particularly seems like the case on defense, where a unit that doesn't offer much beyond Maxx Crosby will be relying on several veteran stopgap solutions to make up for several free agency losses, which Carroll admitted the group couldn't afford. Bottom line:If this list were merely about odds of improvement, Las Vegas would surely claim an elevated spot. But with the organization focused on finally getting back to a place of legitimacy after several rocky years, the Raiders should take a page from Carroll and focus on competing against themselves rather than measuring their progress against their AFC West competitors, though closing the gap would certainly constitute a significant win. What's working for them:While the Giants resisted blowing things up at the very top of the organization, the team took a far more aggressive tack to reconfigure the quarterback room, which welcomed Russell Wilson, Jameis Winston and first-rounderJaxson Dart.With Wilson set to take over as starter, Big Blue will no doubt be more aggressive in attacking downfield, with Malik Nabers and Darius Slayton looking more than up to the task of hauling in the veteran's signature "moon balls." More big plays also seem in store for a defense that fortified its greatest strength in its pass rush, as adding Abdul Carter alongside Brian Burns and Kayvon Thibodeaux could make this one of the league's most effective crews at creating chaos. And if Dexter Lawrence again plays at a level that will put him in conversation for NFL Defensive Player of the Year, New York's front could be a legitimate problem. The Giants were 1-7 in one-score games last season – even if some, such as the Thanksgiving flop against Dallas, weren't as close as they appeared – so a bit of improved fortune could be a boon to the bottom line. What's working against them:Wilson didn't prove to be a tenable starting option for a Pittsburgh Steelers team that offered far more support than New York does. If the Giants fall in an early hole – which seems likely given that the first month brings matchups with the Commanders, Cowboys, Chiefs and Chargers – how long will Brian Daboll keep Dart on the shelf? A shoddy offensive line looks ill-equipped to support either option and could spoil any visions of a more prolific passing game. Then there's the matter of the NFC East. Between the Eagles and Commanders being entrenched as established contenders and the Cowboys possibly in line for a bounce back, the climb out of the basement appears steep. Bottom line:Keeping a hot-seat coach often has catastrophic results, and the Giants might be the latest to rue retaining their current regime for another year. Short of Wilson engineering a stunning late-career renaissance or Dart getting an early look and dazzling, there's not enough ammo here for a substantial turnaround. What's working for them:Things can't be as bad as last year ... right? However uninspiring the teams' quarterback choices are,Deshaun Watson's ineffectivenessand Jameis Winston's interception-happy play proved to be an anchor on the entire operation, leaving the once-dominant defense repeatedly saddled with unfavorable situations. With mainstay left guard Joel Bitonio indicating earlier in June that the Kevin Stefanski-helmed attack looks due to get back to its run-centric roots, even small strides in efficiency for a group that tied for the NFL lead with 34 giveaways could have a significant ripple effect. Myles Garrett and Denzel Ward remain elite presences capable of pacing the defense, and first-round defensive tackle Mason Graham and second-round linebacker Carson Schwesinger help provide the youthful backing that went missing in recent years with the team's draft capital sapped by the Watson trade. What's working against them:The shortage of talent behind center might make this one of the shakiest quarterback competitions of the last quarter-century. Even if the ask of the passing game is minimized, how reasonable is it to count on the ground game to rediscover its previous form given how unstable the front has been amid injuries and the loss of offensive line coach Bill Callahan? Linebacker Jeremiah Owusu-Koramoah already being ruled out for the season as he continues to recover from a neck injury seems like a bad harbinger for a roster that still is short on talent. And the AFC North landscape is nothing short of treacherous. Bottom line:With general manager Andrew Berry passing up the chance to take Travis Hunter in order to add another first-rounder for 2026, it feels as though the franchise is admitting its focus has advanced beyond this season. Cleveland has the longest active drought for a divisional crown – dating back to their 1989 capture of the AFC Central – and looks as far off as ever from ending it. All the NFL news on and off the field.Sign up for USA TODAY's 4th and Monday newsletter. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Ranking NFL teams' odds of going worst to first in 2025 season

Worst to first? Ranking 8 NFL teams' chances to jump to top of division in 2025

Worst to first? Ranking 8 NFL teams' chances to jump to top of division in 2025 Editor's note: This story is a part of a series by U...

 

MARIO VOUX © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com