Hartenstein back in starting lineup for Thunder for Game 4 of the NBA Finals vs. IndianaNew Foto - Hartenstein back in starting lineup for Thunder for Game 4 of the NBA Finals vs. Indiana

INDIANAPOLIS (AP) — Oklahoma City went back to the lineup it used throughout the first three rounds of the playoffs on Friday night, returning Isaiah Hartenstein to the starting five for Game 4 of the NBA Finals against Indiana. Hartenstein started alongside MVP Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, Jalen Williams, Lu Dort and Chet Holmgren. The Hartenstein-Holmgren pairing gives the Thunder a pair of 7-footers in the opening five, and Oklahoma City was 12-4 in the Western Conference playoffs when starting that lineup. That fivesome was also 9-4 when starting games together in the regular season. The Thunder had Hartenstein coming off the bench for the first three games of the finals, with Cason Wallace starting in his place. Indiana took two of those three games. "We have a lot of optionality that we draw on, almost nightly," Thunder coach Mark Daigneault said earlier in the finals. "If you followed our team throughout the season, I think you know that flexibility and adaptability is the only constant. We're never staying the same. I know we started the same lineup in the playoffs, but our rotation night to night in these series has been incredibly variant. We think that's a strength of our team." The change comes after Indiana scored 50 points in the paint in Game 3, after managing only 34 in each of the first two games of the series. ___ AP NBA:https://apnews.com/nba

Hartenstein back in starting lineup for Thunder for Game 4 of the NBA Finals vs. Indiana

Hartenstein back in starting lineup for Thunder for Game 4 of the NBA Finals vs. Indiana INDIANAPOLIS (AP) — Oklahoma City went back to the ...
Defending champion Bryson DeChambeau and other top players miss the cut at US Open after another difficult dayNew Foto - Defending champion Bryson DeChambeau and other top players miss the cut at US Open after another difficult day

Some of the world's most recognizable names in golf, including defending champion Bryson DeChambeau, won't be around at the US Open this weekend after missing the cut at the brutal Oakmont Country Club. DeChambeau shot a 7-over 77 to put him at 10-over through the first two days of golf's third major of the year, a few shots more than the cutline that winnows the field before the third and fourth rounds. The two-time US Open champion was haunted by the thick rough around Oakmont's greens throughout the day, missed many of the course's narrow fairways and struggled to hit greens in regulation. It's the first time the defending champion has missed the cut at the US Open since 2020, when Gary Woodland failed to do so at Winged Foot Golf Club. But DeChambeau wasn't alone. Players like Shane Lowry, Tommy Fleetwood, Dustin Johnson, Justin Thomas and Justin Rose all fell short of securing themselves a tee time on Saturday. The leader through 36 holes is American Sam Burns, the No. 22-ranked player in the world who finished Thursday's round with three bogeys and one double bogey, looking like a changed man. Aside from one stray bogey as he began the back-nine, Burns hardly put a foot wrong to shoot a 5-under 65, only two shots off the course record. As the sun broke through the early haze on the relatively tree-less Oakmont course around midday, Burns stayed cool to par his last five holes. He finished the day 3-under for the tournament and was a shot behind leader JJ Spaun when he knocked in his final putt of the day. Burns finished ninth at this tournament last year at Pinehurst No. 2 in North Carolina and said that experience taught him to play more freely on tough courses. "I think for this golf course, you really just have to free it up. It's too hard to try to guide it around here. You're going to hit some in the rough, you're going to hit some in some bad spots, you might as well do it with authority," he told reporters. But while Burns appeared to solve Oakmont for the day, some players who performed well on Thursday got eaten alive by the nasty course on Friday. Sungjae Im finished Thursday's opening round at 2-under, shooting 68. He described himself as lucky to hit fairways during a solid round. That luck ran out quickly Friday morning. Im bogeyed four holes on the front nine and his two birdies on the back nine were canceled out by a double bogey on 18. While he only hit one fewer fairway than on Thursday, he struggled to find the green quickly and ended the day with a 7-over 77, leaving him 5-over for the tournament. Americans Ryan McCormick and Jordan Spieth shot even par on Thursday and lost their touch on Friday. Spieth shot a 5-over 75 to put himself in danger of missing the cut and McCormick played himself out of a weekend appearance with a 7-over 77. Spieth in particular cut a frustrated figure, dropping his club on the 9th tee after sending his drive into the tall grass and turning to curse in exasperation after hitting an approach shot on 11 that left him with a long putt for birdie. There were also moments of pure cringe brought on by Oakmont's difficult greens. On the par-5 No. 12, Justin Thomas had 26-and-a-half-foot for birdie. He ended up four-putting to finish with a double bogey, missing putts from three feet and four feet before finally putting in a two-footer. But for a period, the eyes of the tournament were firmly fixed on No. 1-ranked Scottie Scheffler, who started promisingly with a birdie before finding enough trouble that speculation soared over whether the PGA Championship winner would even be playing the weekend at the year's third major. Bogeys on 15, 17 and 1 – his group teed off on the course's 10th hole on Friday – had Scheffler sitting at 6-over for the tournament, which was right on the projected cut line. A birdie on No. 2 seemed to right the ship but was quickly followed by a painful bogey on the difficult No. 3 with its famous church pew bunker. Scheffler slammed his club in frustration as his drive found the lengthy bunker that is striped with raised bits of turf, giving the visual effect of benches in the sand and an absolutely painful experience to play out of. "When you get the ball out of position here, you've just got to try to get the ball back in play. That's really all there is to it," he said. "You can get lucky sometimes and get a lie and maybe be able to get something to the green. But that wasn't really happening for me today. I decided to just keep hitting it in the rough for some reason." The big Texan did well to get his second shot into the fairway but left the approach shot long. His par putt missed by an inch but slid on Oakmont's quick greens to a difficult spot. Scheffler sank the bogey put and, from there, salvaged his day. Birdies on No. 4 and No. 7 seemed to put an end to speculation about the three-time major champion missing the cut but a bogey on No. 9 put him at 4-over for the tournament. "Mentally this was as tough as I've battled for the whole day," Scheffler said of his round, which was his sixth consecutive over-par round at the US Open dating back to last year. The No. 2 ranked player in the world, Rory McIlroy, flirted with the cutline for most of Friday before turning in a spectacular end to his round. McIlroy's day started ominously with double bogeys on the first and third holes of the day. The double on No. 3 was particularly hard to watch. McIlroy's drive found a fairway bunker 109 yards away from the pin and the Northern Irishman's shot out didn't quite clear the side of the bunker, dropping his ball in thick rough just a few yards away. His approach shot then rolled off the green and he had to chip his way back onto the green. His bogey putt from 12 feet out missed and he tapped in for a double, sending him to 4-over on the day and 8-over for the tournament. But from then on McIlroy got it together and went 2-under for the rest of the day, including a birdie on the 18th hole that ensured he was going into the weekend. His approach shot to the 18th green, with a pin placement in a little basin surrounded by three ridges and the thick rough just off the green, was magnificent. The ball landed behind the hole with just enough backspin to send it over one of those ridges and it rolled neatly to inside five feet. He sank the putt and is hoping to find some momentum going into the weekend. The course toyed with other players as well. Thriston Lawrence started off his round with three straight birdies – and then had three straight bogeys immediately afterward. Thomas Detry at one point played himself into a share of the lead, going 3-under for the tournament. Two holes later, he was at 1-over having suffered through back-to-back double bogeys. J.J. Spaun, the leader after the first round on Thursday when he played bogey-free golf, had six bogeys on Friday to shoot 2-over and trail Burns. With the way the course is playing, Scheffler – and everyone else who finds themselves with a black number next to their name – isn't necessarily out of it. However, 11 of the 12 past winners of the US Open were in the top five at the end of the second round and only three players in history have won the tournament after being outside the top 20 at the end of the second day. "Mentally there's no just kind of gimme hole. There's no hole where you can get up there and just hit it and not really pay attention to what you're trying to do," Burns said. "I think it requires a lot of focus on every shot, and even when you're in the rough and you're trying to get it back in the fairway, it's just every shot is difficult. So, really, you're very focused and putting a lot into every shot mentally, and I think over time that's just pretty taxing." The standout moment of the day came on the par-3 No. 6 when Victor Perez bounced an ace into the cup 192 yards away. The Frenchman's shot was a high, arcing ball that took a big hop on the green, bounced on more time and then rolled true into the heart of the hole. He jumped for joy in celebration, chest bumping his caddie as the roar from the crowd echoed around the wide-open Oakmont course. Incredibly, Perez said it was the third hole in one he's had this month. "I guess I'm on a hole-in-one run at the moment. It might dry up for the next so years now, who know, so, yeah, really happy," he said. There wereother incredible shots– Detry's eagle on 14 from 141 yards that he dunked into the hole off the bounce, Tyrell Hatton's eagle on No. 12 that used every inch of the sloping green to roll into the cup, amateur Ben James' 297-yard drive on No. 17 that ended up within seven feet of the hole that he converted into an eagle. For more CNN news and newsletters create an account atCNN.com

Defending champion Bryson DeChambeau and other top players miss the cut at US Open after another difficult day

Defending champion Bryson DeChambeau and other top players miss the cut at US Open after another difficult day Some of the world's most ...
A reluctant brawler, Mayor Bass takes direct aim at Trump over immigration raidsNew Foto - A reluctant brawler, Mayor Bass takes direct aim at Trump over immigration raids

With Los Angeles reeling from immigration sweeps and unsettled by nightly clashes between protesters and police, Mayor Karen Bass was asked by a reporter: What did she have to say to President Trump? Bass, standing before a bank of news cameras, did not hold back. "I want to tell him to stop the raids," she said. "I want to tell him that this is a city of immigrants. I want to tell him that if you want to devastate the economy of the city of Los Angeles, then attack the immigrant population." After taking office in 2022, L.A.'s 43rd mayor carefully avoided public disputes with other elected officials, instead highlighting her well-known penchant for collaboration and coalition-building. The high-profile Democrat, who spent a dozen years in Congress, largely steered clear of direct confrontation with Trump, responding diplomatically even as he attacked her over her handling of the Palisades fire this year. Those days of tiptoeing around Trump, and avoiding head-to-head conflict, are over. Bass is now sparring with the president and his administration at a perilous moment for her city and possibly for democracy. At the same time, the tumultuous events of the last week have given her a crucial opportunity for a reset after the Palisades fire, recalibrating her public image while leading her city through another historic crisis. "Having two moments of crisis during the first six months of this year has really tested her mettle as mayor," said GOP political strategist Mike Madrid, a long-standing Trump critic. "I think it's fair to say she did not perform to expectations during the fires. I think she's considerably improved during the current situation." Since agents with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and other federal authorities fanned out across the region, searching for undocumented immigrants at courthouses, car washes and Home Depot parking lots, Bass has accused Trump of creating a "terrible sense of fear" in her city. Bass said Trump is on track to waste more than $100 million on troops who were neither requested nor needed. On multiple occasions, she said Trump wrongly gave credit to the National Guard for bringing calm to downtown L.A. last Saturday, when those troops had not arrived yet. In many ways, Trump has emerged as the ideal foil for a mayor who, for much of the last six months, had been on her back feet. Read more:'An outright lie': Fiery Bass delivers impassioned speech demanding ICE leave city In the immediate aftermath of the Palisades fire, which erupted when she was out of the country, Bass struggled to show a command of the details and was savaged by critics over what they viewed as a lack of leadership. Months later, she released a budget that called for the layoffs of 1,600 workers, drawing an outcry from labor leaders, youth advocates and many others. Bass has been quicker to respond this time around, announcing a nightly curfew for downtown, warning of consequences for those who vandalize or commit violence and spelling out the real-world impacts of the ICE arrests on her constituents. The resistancereached a crescendoThursday, when — with just a few hours' notice — Bass assembled more than 100 people from religious, community, business and civic groups to denounce the raids. It made for a potent tableau: a multi-ethnic, multiracial crowd of Angelenos cheering on the mayor as she declared that "peace begins with ICE leaving Los Angeles." Bass said she had received reports of ICE agents entering hospitals, workers not showing up to their jobs, parents afraid to attend their own children's graduations. An immigrant rights advocate said Trump had brought cruelty and chaos to Los Angeles. A church pastor from Boyle Heights said his parishioners "feel hunted." Trump and his administration have disparaged Bass and her city since the raids began. Stephen Miller, the president's deputy chief of staff,accused Bass on Xof using "the language of the insurrectionist mob" while discussing her city. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem called L.A."a city of criminals"whose lawbreakers have been protected by Bass. Republicans have begun threatening reprisals against outspoken Democrats, including Bass, with some hinting at criminal prosecution. Asked about Bass' comments over the last week, White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson said ICE agents would not be "deterred from carrying out their mission." "We will not apologize for enforcing immigration law and carrying out the mandate the American people gave President Trump in November: Deport illegal aliens," Jackson said. Fernando Guerra, who heads the Center for the Study of Los Angeles at Loyola Marymount University, said Angelenos fully expect their mayor to confront the president head on. Democrat Kamala Harris secured more than 70% of the vote in L.A. during last year's presidential election, while Trump received less than 27%. "I'm not surprised by what she's doing," Guerra said. "I would even suggest she push a little more. I don't think there's a cost to her politically, or even socially, to taking on Trump." The mayor is regularly calling in to TV and radio stations, as well as securing prime-time hits on national cable shows. In appearance after appearance, she has warned that L.A. is becoming "a grand experiment" — a testing ground for Trump to see if he can usurp the authority of Democratic mayors or governors in other states. On Tuesday, while addressing troops at Ft. Bragg, N.C., Trump described L.A. as "a trash heap" with entire neighborhoods he claimed are controlled by "transnational gangs and criminal networks." Hours later, Bass clapped back on MSNBC, saying: "I have no idea what he's talking about." Bass has spoken repeatedly about traumatized Angelenos who could not locate loved ones caught up in the ICE raids. "For the most part, the people that have been detained have been denied access to legal representation," Bass said during an appearance at the city's Emergency Operations Center. "This is unprecedented." The raids, and their impact on families and children, are deeply personal for a mayor who cut her teeth organizing with immigrant rights activists decades ago. Bass' own family reflects the multiethnic nature of her city. Her late ex-husband was the son of immigrants from Chihuahua, Mexico. Her extended family includes immigrants from South Korea, Japan and the Philippines. Immigration agents were recently seen making arrests outside her grandson's Los Angeles school, she said. The arrival of ICE, then the National Guard, then the Marines has caused not just Bass but several other Democrats to step out in ways they might have previously avoided. U.S. Sen. Alex Padilla, known for decades as a soft-spoken political leader, wasforcibly ejected and hancuffedat a news conference at the Wilshire Federal Building in Westwood on Thursday after interrupting Noem's remarks. Gov. Gavin Newsom recently accused Trump of a"brazen abuse of power,"calling him "unhinged" andfiling a lawsuitto block the deployment of the National Guard — not a huge departure for Newsom, who relishes both confrontation and the spotlight. Head-to-head accusations are much more out of character for Bass, who spent her first two years at City Hall touting her success in "locking arms" with her fellow elected officials on homelessness and other issues. In recent months, the mayor has praised Trump for the speedy arrival of federal resources as the city began cleaning up and rebuilding from the Palisades fire. Read more:With her city in flames, L.A. Mayor Karen Bass' political future hangs in the balance Long before winning city office, Bass prided herself on her ability to work with other politicians, regardless of party affiliation, from her early days as a co-founder of the South L.A.-based Community Coalition to her years in the state Legislature and Congress. Bass' strategy of avoiding public feuds with Trump during the first few months of his administration was no accident, according to someone with knowledge of her thinking who was not authorized to speak publicly. The mayor, that person said, viewed an extended tit-for-tat as an impediment to securing federal funding for wildfire relief and other urgent needs. "That's more her brand — to get things done with whomever she needs to get them done with," said Ange-Marie Hancock, who leads Ohio State University's Kirwan Institute for the Study of Race and Ethnicity. Mike Bonin, who heads the Pat Brown Institute for Public Affairs at Cal State L.A., said he thinks that Bass' career of building multiracial, multiethnic coalitions makes her uniquely suited to the moment. Now that Trump has "all but declared war on Los Angeles," Bass has no choice but to punch back, said Bonin, who served on the City Council for nearly a decade. "I don't see that she had any political or moral alternative," he said. Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared inLos Angeles Times.

A reluctant brawler, Mayor Bass takes direct aim at Trump over immigration raids

A reluctant brawler, Mayor Bass takes direct aim at Trump over immigration raids With Los Angeles reeling from immigration sweeps and unsett...
White House reviews SpaceX contracts as Trump-Musk feud simmers, sources sayNew Foto - White House reviews SpaceX contracts as Trump-Musk feud simmers, sources say

(Removes duplicate dateline.) WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The White House earlier this month directed the Defense Department and NASA to gather details on billions of dollars in SpaceX contracts following the public blowout between President Donald Trump and billionaire Elon Musk, four people familiar with the order told Reuters. Sparking an ongoing review, the administration ordered the agencies to scrutinize Musk's contracts to ready possible retaliation against the businessman and his companies, these people said. As Reuters reported on Thursday, Pentagon officials are simultaneously considering whether to reduce the role that SpaceX, Musk's space and satellite company, may win in an ambitious new U.S. missile defense system. Reuters couldn't determine whether the White House intends to cancel any of the approximately $22 billion in federal contracts SpaceX now has. But the review shows the administration is following through on a threat by Trump during his spat with Musk last week to possibly terminate business and subsidies for Musk ventures. "We'll take a look at everything," the president said, speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One on June 6. In an email to Reuters, a White House spokesperson didn't answer questions about Musk's business, saying the "Trump administration is committed to a rigorous review process for all bids and contracts." In a separate statement, a spokesperson at NASA said the agency "will continue to work with our industry partners to ensure the president's objectives in space are met." Neither SpaceX nor officials at the Defense Department responded to requests for comment. The people familiar with the order said the contract scrutiny is intended to give the administration the ability to move fast if Trump decides to act against Musk, who until recently was a senior advisor to the president and the head of the cost-cutting Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE. The review is "for political ammunition," one of the people said. Whether the U.S. government could legally, or practically, cancel existing contracts is unclear. But the possibility underscores concerns among governance experts that politics and personal pique could improperly influence matters affecting government coffers, national security and the public interest. "There's an irony here that Musk's contracts could be under the same type of subjective political scrutiny that he and his DOGE team have put on thousands of other contracts," said Scott Amey, a contracting expert and general counsel at the Project on Government Oversight, a watchdog group based in Washington. "Any decision shouldn't be based on the egos of two men but on the best interests of the public and national security." Musk's SpaceX in recent years has become a crucial partner of the U.S. government in much of its aerospace and defense work – launching satellites and other space cargo and potentially managing a crucial element of the "Golden Dome" missile shield planned by Trump. Although Musk in recent days has sought to walk back some of his critiques of the president  – such as calling for Trump's impeachment last week and linking him to a convicted sex offender – his outbursts nonetheless highlighted the government's reliance on SpaceX. Before reversing course, Musk threatened to decommission the company's Dragon spacecraft. The spacecraft, as part of a roughly $5 billion contract with NASA, is the only U.S. vessel currently capable of carrying astronauts to and from the International Space Station. SpaceX is also building a network of hundreds of spy satellites under a classified contract with the National Reconnaissance Office, a U.S. intelligence agency. The contract was a pivotal transaction for SpaceX, deepening its ties with U.S. defense and intelligence services. (Editing by Paulo Prada)

White House reviews SpaceX contracts as Trump-Musk feud simmers, sources say

White House reviews SpaceX contracts as Trump-Musk feud simmers, sources say (Removes duplicate dateline.) WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The White H...
Why is Murray State called the Racers? Explaining nickname amid College World SeriesNew Foto - Why is Murray State called the Racers? Explaining nickname amid College World Series

Murray State is the "party crasher" of the 2025College World Series. Led by coachDan Skirka, the Racers are just the fourth No. 4 seed to advance to the CWS, played at Charles Schwab Field Omaha in Omaha, Nebraska. But make no mistake about it, they belong at this stage. Murray State won the Missouri Valley Conference tournament championship and then proceeded to win the Oxford Regional and Durham Super Regional over No. 10 national seed Ole Miss and Duke, respectively. REQUIRED READING:Who's in College World Series? Updated bracket, schedule for NCAA baseball tournament The Racers are making their first-ever appearance at the CWS in 2025 and could make history. The biggest question fans may have about Murray State isn't if they belong at the College World Series, but rather, where does their nickname of the "Racers" come from? Here's what you need to know about Murray State's athletic nickname, history and more: According to Murray State's website, the school's athletic programs were nicknamed the "Thoroughbreds," representing the state of Kentucky's love for horse racing. However, journalists had issues fitting the team's moniker in headlines and used shortened names, such as: "T-Breds", "'Breds", "Race Horses" and "Racers." In the late 1950s, the Racers became the nickname for all of Murray State's athletic programs. That is, however, except for the baseball program. Until 2014, thebaseball team was still called the "Breds." Murray State's mascot is a costumed horse namedDunker.The mascot won the2023 MVC Mascot Madness competition, which was voted on by fans across the league on social media. In addition to Dunker, the Racers have a thoroughbred,nicknamed Racer One, who runs a celebratory lap on the running track around the football field. A different horse performs the duty each year, ridden by a student jockey. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Why is Murray State baseball called the Racers? What to know

Why is Murray State called the Racers? Explaining nickname amid College World Series

Why is Murray State called the Racers? Explaining nickname amid College World Series Murray State is the "party crasher" of the 20...
US Open forecast: Saturday weather updates for third roundNew Foto - US Open forecast: Saturday weather updates for third round

The125th U.S. Opencontinues as the world's best golfers enter the third round at Oakmont Country Club and the weather may present more challenges as the tournament progresses into the weekend. The first round of the event saw high temperatures in the 80s and a low of 59 degrees. This was followed by another warm day on Friday, with steady rain expected overnight, leading to wet conditions for the third round. The forecast indicates a high likelihood of thunderstorms for round three, with a high temperature near 75 degrees. The chance of rain on Saturday is a significant 90%, highlighting the unpredictable nature of the weather. Here is a look at the anticipated Saturday weather for the third round of the U.S. Open, the third major of the year. Where is the 2025 US Open?What to know about Oakmont Country Club The National Weather Servicereports that the weather in the Oakmont, Pennsylvania, area is expected to see showers with a few thunderstorms likely, with a high around 75 degrees. Saturday evening is expected to be cloudy with a few late showers developing with a low near 65 degrees. The 2025 U.S. Open will be broadcast on NBC and the USA Network, with USA Network airing the first round on Thursday, June 12. NBC and USA Network will share coverage of the second, third, and final rounds. All rounds will be live streamed on Peacock, usopen.com, the USGA app, and Fubo. Additionally, Peacock will offer "U.S. Open All-Access," a whiparound-style program, throughout the tournament. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:US Open weather forecast: Saturday updates for third round

US Open forecast: Saturday weather updates for third round

US Open forecast: Saturday weather updates for third round The125th U.S. Opencontinues as the world's best golfers enter the third round...
Iranian regime may struggle to recover, but could decide to push for bomb, experts sayNew Foto - Iranian regime may struggle to recover, but could decide to push for bomb, experts say

Israel's military strikes on Iran have struck at the heart of the country's military leadership and nuclear program, creating a possible vacuum at the top of the regime that could hinder its ability to recover from the onslaught, experts say. But — assuming that it still can — there is a scenario in which the strikes could lead Tehran to abandon negotiations over its nuclear program and instead rush toward building a bomb, according to analysts and former U.S. officials. The killing of top Iranian military officers as well as several nuclear scientists will likely have sparked fears in Tehran that Israeli intelligence had deeply penetrated the regime and that other senior figures could also be in danger. Israel has previously pulled off brazen assassinations inside Iran, targeting senior government scientists involved in the country's nuclear program and the political leader of the Iranian-backed Palestinian group Hamas when he was visiting Tehran. "You have to assume the system is shell-shocked," said Alex Vatanka of the Middle East Institute think tank. "They don't know… how badly they're infiltrated" by Israel. Iranian media and the Israeli military said Israel's strikes on Thursday killed Iran's top military officer, Mohammad Hossein Bagheri, as well as the commander of Iran's Revolutionary Guards, Hossein Salami, and a major general in the Revolutionary Guards, Gholam Ali Rashid. The senior military officers targeted had deep ties to Iran's regime and were known personally by the country's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, particularly Bagheri, according to Vatanka. KhameneipromotedBagheri to his post as chief of the armed forces in 2016. "There's a personal element here, which might be a factor in terms of what Khamenei decides to do," he said. Shahid Beheshti University said five professors were killed in Thursday's attack as well as "some" family members. The first wave of Israeli military strikes launched Thursday likely inflicted serious damage on Iran's nuclear program, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said that air raids will continue for "as many days as it takes" to ensure Iran does not develop a nuclear arsenal. But Iran still has buried nuclear facilities atFordowand elsewhere that it could potentially use if it chose to pull out of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and rescind its commitment not to pursue nuclear weapons. In that case, Iran would need to enrich uranium to weapon-grade levels, a short technical step with its current stockpile, and then build a nuclear warhead. That effort could take roughly a year or more, most experts estimate. The CIA declined to comment as to whether there were any indications that Iran was moving to pull out of the NPT and pursue nuclear weapons. U.S. President Donald Trump appears to be trying to use the Israeli military attack as leverage over Iran, pushing it to make concessions or else face even harsher military strikes. But Iran may calculate that the time for negotiations is over and opt to build nuclear weapons, according to Ali Vaez of the International Crisis Group think tank. "One of the strategic risks in targeting Iran's nuclear infrastructure is the potential for backlash," Vaez said. The strikes "could incentivize Tehran to reconstitute its program with renewed urgency, driven by a heightened resolve to achieve a credible nuclear deterrent," he said. Iran has invested decades of effort and trillions of dollars in building its nuclear program, and Iranian political leaders portray it as a point of national pride, a symbol of the country's independence and technological progress. Aaron David Miller, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace think tank, said Iran's leadership will likely choose to develop nuclear weapons rather than give up the program it sees as a patriotic endeavor. "It has become a symbol of national prestige and honor," Miller said on MSNBC. "When all is said and done, and this regime stays in power, which I suspect it will, the Iranians will probably make a decision to go all out in an effort to weaponize," Miller said. "And the Americans and the Israelis are going to have to figure out, over time, how to deal with it." Jonathan Panikoff, a former deputy national intelligence officer for the Near East at the U.S. National Intelligence Council, said that Iran may conclude that pursuing nuclear weapons is the only way to safeguard the regime. Iran "may determine that the Israeli strikes mean time is up for the regime to decide whether to obtain a bomb, if it hasn't done so already," Panikoff, now at the Atlantic Council think tank,wrote in an analysis. "The conclusion could be that it can no longer sit on the proverbial nuclear fence, and that it has to rush for a bomb or risk never having one." To many Iranian political leaders, securing a nuclear weapon -- or nuclear weapons capability -- is vital for the survival of the regime itself, he added. But it was unclear if Israel's military strikes could deliver a knock-out blow that would make it impossible for Iran to build nuclear weapons, some experts said. Alex Plitsas, a former senior Pentagon official and a fellow at the Atlantic Council, said it was likely that the Israeli assault, which included sabotage operations, had caused too much damage to Iran's nuclear sites and equipment to enable Iran to rush toward building a bomb. Iran was caught flat-footed by the Israeli attack, even though Israel had sent clear warnings for years and in recent months that it would not tolerate an advancing Iranian nuclear program, Plitsas said. "The Iranians have misread the signals from Israel again and again," he said. Even a successful series of strikes against Iran's nuclear sites might only delay Tehran's ability to develop the bomb by up to two years, according to past comments by U.S. officials and estimates by experts. In 2012, Robert Gates, shortly after he stepped down as defense secretary,said military strikes against Iran's nuclear programwould likely fail in the end to prevent Tehran from developing the bomb. "Such an attack would make a nuclear-armed Iran inevitable," Gates said at the time. "They would just bury the program deeper and make it more covert." Iran maintains its nuclear program is designed for purely civilian purposes to generate energy and research, but Western powers have long accused Tehran of laying the ground for a nuclear weapons project, citing enrichment activity far beyond what's required for peaceful uses. U.S. intelligence agencies concluded that Iran had a nuclear weapons program but halted the project in 2003. Areport in Mayfrom the International Atomic Energy Agency concluded Iran was not fully cooperating with U.N. inspectors and that the agency could not provide assurance that Iran's nuclear program was "exclusively peaceful." On Thursday, the IAEA censured Iran for failing to comply with nonproliferation obligations designed to prevent Tehran from developing a nuclear weapon. It was the first such censure in 20 years. Democratic lawmakers have criticized Trump for pulling, during his first term, the U.S. out of a 2015 nuclear agreement with Iran that imposed limits on its nuclear activities, saying that decision opened the way to the current crisis.

Iranian regime may struggle to recover, but could decide to push for bomb, experts say

Iranian regime may struggle to recover, but could decide to push for bomb, experts say Israel's military strikes on Iran have struck at ...

 

MARIO VOUX © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com