Wimbledon announces record $73M prize fund and $4M for singles championsNew Foto - Wimbledon announces record $73M prize fund and $4M for singles champions

LONDON (AP) — Wimbledon's prize money has risen to a record 53.5 million pounds (about $73 million) and the singles champions will each earn three million pounds ($4 million), All England Club officials announced on Thursday. The total amount is 3.5 million pounds ($6.8 million) more than last year, an increase of 7% — and exactly twice the pot handed out to competitors at the grass-court Grand Slam 10 years ago. "We're immensely proud of the fact that if you look back 10 years, you can see the increase over that period and 7% this year," All England chair Deborah Jevans said. "And we have listened to the players, we have engaged with the players." The 2025 winners' checks represent an 11.1% jump on last year's prizes for the men's and women's singles champions and comes amid growing player demands for a bigger share of grand slam profits. Players who lose in the first round of singles will get 66,000 pounds, up 10% year on year. "The focus on just the prize money at four events, the Grand Slams, does not get to the heart of what the challenge is for tennis," Jevans added. "The challenge with tennis is the fact that the players don't have an offseason which they want, they have increasing injuries that they're speaking about, and we've always said that we as Wimbledon are willing to engage and talk with the tours to try and find solutions, and that door remains open." Wimbledon starts on June 30 and runs until July 13. For the first time in the oldest Grand Slam,line judges will be replacedwith electronic line-calling. ___ AP tennis:https://apnews.com/hub/tennis

Wimbledon announces record $73M prize fund and $4M for singles champions

Wimbledon announces record $73M prize fund and $4M for singles champions LONDON (AP) — Wimbledon's prize money has risen to a record 53....
Thunder vs. Pacers: How Indiana's bench beat OKC in Game 3 of NBA Finals — 'Our second group really won us the game'New Foto - Thunder vs. Pacers: How Indiana's bench beat OKC in Game 3 of NBA Finals — 'Our second group really won us the game'

INDIANAPOLIS — The Pacers are who they are because of Tyrese Haliburton — because of the way his predilection toward frenetic and decentralized possessions produces one of the NBA's most efficient and effective offenses; because of his swashbuckling swagger; because of his growing highlight reel of unbelievable late-game shot-making. The Pacers are who they are because of Pascal Siakam — because of the matchup nightmare he presents opponents on offense; because of the gap-plugging boost he offers Indiana's defense; and because of how perfectly his ever-revving motor fits within the Pacers' offensive ecosystem. But throughout this postseason, as Indiana's All-Stars have received praise for their roles in propelling and prolonging a magical run that now sitsjust two wins away from an NBA championship, those stars — and head coach Rick Carlisle — have refused to accept too much individual acclaim. Instead, they've repeatedly insisted that it's something else that makes them special: The Pacers are who they are because oftheir depth— because of how many damn good players they have; because of how their ability to contribute has allowed Carlisle to avoid overloading his stars and starters in Indiana's frenzied and fast-paced two-way approach; and because of how consistently they've tilted the run of play in Indiana's favor. "Look, this is the kind of team that we are," Carlisle said after Indiana scored a116-107 winin Game 3 of the 2025 NBA Finals on Wednesday. "We need everybody to be ready. It's not always going to be exactly the same guys that are stepping up with scoring and stuff like that, but this is how we gotta do it, and we gotta do it as a team, and we gotta make it as hard as possible on them." Which is precisely what Bennedict Mathurin, T.J. McConnell, Obi Toppin and the rest of Indiana's reserve corps did against the Thunder on Wednesday night at a raucous Gainbridge Fieldhouse. "Honestly, our second group really won us the game," Haliburtontold NBA TV. In a game decided by three possessions, Indiana's bench outscored Oklahoma City's 48-19. Twenty-seven of those 48 points belonged to Mathurin — a career playoff high, tied with Jalen Rose for themost ever scored by a Pacer off the bench in a playoff game, and tied with Manu Ginóbili and Jason Terry for thethird-most ever by a reserve in a Finals game. The third-year swingman has seen his effectiveness, minutes and opportunities wax and wane in this postseason, but he was absolute nails from the second he checked in at the start of the second quarter on Wednesday. "I think he was great being aggressive," Siakam said. "That's who we want him to be — when he's aggressive, he's active on defense, he's picking up full-court, he's cutting. Like, when he's doing that … I mean, it looks easy out there for him." Mathurin met the Thunder's vaunted athleticism and physicality with plenty of his own, attacking the paint, finding opportunities to get to his spots, and never once wavering on a night that saw him go 9-for-12 from the field, with five of those buckets coming in the paint — more than any Pacer scored on the interiorin Game 2— and a couple more coming between the paint and the arc. "I thought he did just a great job of playing within what we do so well," Haliburton said. "He did a great job of coming off handoffs, reading the pocket, rising up from the midrange. This is a defense that will give that [midrange shot] up — analytically, that's not the best shot — but I thought he did a great job of hunting that and getting downhill." And when he got downhill, he did what he does better thanall but a few wing players in the NBA: hunt contact, drawing seven fouls in just 22 minutes of work and going 7-for-8 from the free-throw line — vital points in a series where Indiana has often struggled to consistently generate offense in the half-court. "That's kind of what he does: He's a scorer," said Thunder guard Alex Caruso. "We let him get to his fastball for the night, which is impact the game by scoring the basketball. Granted, he made a couple of tough ones, but we probably didn't make it tough on him to start initially." Players this century to score 25+ in a Finals game at 22 or younger:Bennedict MathurinKawhi LeonardLeBron JamesTony ParkerKobe Bryantpic.twitter.com/arYhHZiUrZ — NBA (@NBA)June 12, 2025 Coming up with a game this big on a stage this big — the youngest player to score 25 in a Finals game since Kawhi Leonard in 2014, the youngest player to score 25 off the bench in a Finals game since they started tracking starters and bench players in 1970 — had to feel particularly sweet for Mathurin, who missed all of Indiana's run to the 2024 Eastern Conference finals after suffering a torn labrum in his right shoulder about five weeks before the start of the playoffs, and who'd been counting the days until he could have his moment. No, like, literally. "After he sustained the injury — it was either in February or early March — you can order these calendars that start on a specific day, and then they count days," Carlisle recalled Wednesday. "And so — I think it was Dr. [Neal] ElAttrache that did the surgery — there was a calendar sitting in our training room. And every day, he would come in and take one off, take one off. He was counting the days down to being cleared sometime in August, and then be able to begin training camp, begin 5-on-5 with our guys in September, and then be in training camp, really, with his eyes firmly set on an opportunity in the playoffs." "As much as this is a dream right now, I'm not trying to live in my dream," said Mathurin. "I'm trying to, like, live in the present and make sure the dream ends well, which means winning [the] next game and winning a championship." Joining Mathurin in wreaking havoc in the second unit: backup point guard McConnell, who became just the16th playerto score 10 points, dish 5 assists and snag 5 steals in a Finals game since the NBA started tracking steals in 1973 … and the first to ever do it off the bench. T.J. MCCONNELL: ALL HEART, ALL HUSTLE😤 10 PTS😤 5 AST😤 5 STLFirst player since 1973-74 to record these numbers off the bench in a Finals game 🤯🤯pic.twitter.com/sKcwp9U1d4 — NBA (@NBA)June 12, 2025 Three of the five steals came in the first four minutes of the second quarter, a stretch that saw the Pacers rip off an 11-2 run to erase Oklahoma City's early lead and put themselves in position to actually play with the advantage for the first time in this series. "We didn't start the game the way we wanted to," Haliburton said. "I thought our first quarter was poor. But our second unit did a great job of giving us energy to start that second quarter, and we just rode the wave from there." Three of the five also came on inbounds passes, alongtime McConnell specialty, with two leading directly to Pacers scores — which, again, in a game that wound up being decided by just three possessions, were massive plays for Indiana, ratcheting up the intensity on the bench and in the stands to a hysterical degree. "Yeah, I mean, I feel like that's my job, the job of people that come off the bench," McConnell said in the Pacers' locker room after the game. "… It's the NBA Finals. We've got to bring that energy — all of us. Because if we don't, it's doing a disservice to these fans and this organization. We've got to continue to bring energy to the highest level." "When T.J. is playing with that type of energy — I mean, obviously, the crowd loves him," Siakam said. "So it's great for us, because every time he does something good, they go crazy." (Haliburton joked about McConnell's, um,specialconnection with the Indiana fanbase: "I call him the 'Great White Hope.'") Those momentum-swinging steals are also, in turn, massively deflating for Oklahoma City. "Yeah, those plays hurt, especially because they're very controllable," said NBA MVP Shai Gilgeous-Alexander. "They sucked," added Thunder forward Jalen Williams. Mathurin's downhill aggressiveness, McConnell's mix of defensive playmaking and pedal-to-the-metal attacking, Obi Toppin'sexceedinglyathletictwo-waycontributions (which included a couple ofslickpassesin the second quarter) and what Carlisle praised as Ben Sheppard's "absolute, full-capacity effort all the time" in teaming with Andrew Nembhard to guard Gilgeous-Alexander gave the Pacers exactly what they needed on Wednesday to bounce back in a big way from their Game 2 loss, get back on top in this best-of-seven series — and put Oklahoma City in anexceedingly uncomfortable positionheading into Game 4 on Friday. Whether all of the Pacers' reserves can replicate that production remains to be seen. Given the array of options to whom Carlisle can turn, though, Indiana will enter Game 4 feeling pretty good about the chances thatsomebody, and possibly several somebodies, will come through with precisely what the team needs once again. "That's the great thing about the Finals, great thing about basketball," Haliburton said. "When you have a team with this much depth, it can be anybody's night."

Thunder vs. Pacers: How Indiana's bench beat OKC in Game 3 of NBA Finals — 'Our second group really won us the game'

Thunder vs. Pacers: How Indiana's bench beat OKC in Game 3 of NBA Finals — 'Our second group really won us the game' INDIANAPOLI...
House will vote on Trump's request to cut funding for NPR, PBS and foreign aidNew Foto - House will vote on Trump's request to cut funding for NPR, PBS and foreign aid

WASHINGTON (AP) — House Republicans are moving to cut about $9.4 billion in spending already approved by Congress as PresidentDonald Trump's administration looks to follow through on work by the Department of Government Efficiency when it was overseen byElon Musk. The package to be voted on Thursday targets foreign aid programs and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which provides money for National Public Radio and the Public Broadcasting Service, as well as thousands of public radio and television stations around the country. Republicans are characterizing the spending as wasteful and unnecessary, but Democrats say the rescissions are hurting the United States' standing in the world. "Cruelty is the point," Democratic leaderHakeem Jeffriesof New York said of the proposed spending cuts. The Trump administration is employing a tool rarely used in recent years that allows the president totransmit a requestto Congress to cancel previously appropriated funds. That triggers a 45-day clock in which the funds are frozen pending congressional action. If Congress fails to act within that period, then the spending stands. The benefit for the administration of a formal rescissions request is that passage requires only a simple majority in the 100-member Senate instead of the 60 votes usually required to get spending bills through that chamber. So, if they stay united, Republicans will be able to pass the measure without any Democratic votes. The administration is likening the first rescissions package to a test case and says more could be on the way if Congress goes along. Republicans, sensitive to concerns that Trump's sweeping tax and immigration bill wouldincrease future federal deficits, are anxious to demonstrate spending discipline, though the cuts in the package amount to just a sliver of the spending approved by Congress each year. They are betting the cuts prove popular with constituents who align with Trump's "America first" ideology as well as those who view NPR and PBS as having a liberal bias. In all, the package contains 21 proposed rescissions. Approval would claw back about $900 million from $10 billion that Congress has approved for global health programs. That includes canceling $500 million for activities related to infectious diseases and child and maternal health and another $400 million to address the global HIV epidemic. The Trump administration is also looking to cancel $800 million, or a quarter of the amount Congress approved, for a program that provides emergency shelter, water and sanitation, and family reunification for those forced to flee their own country. About 45% of the savings sought by the White House would come from two programs designed to boost the economies, democratic institutions and civil societies in developing countries. The Republican president has also asked lawmakers to rescind nearly $1.1 billion from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which represents the full amount it's slated to receive during the next two budget years. About two-thirds of the money gets distributed to more than 1,500 locally owned public radio and television stations. Nearly half of those stations serve rural areas of the country. The association representing local public television stations warns that many of them would be forced to close if the Republican measure passes. Those stations provide emergency alerts, free educational programming and high school sports coverage and highlight hometown heroes. Advocacy groups that serve the world's poorest people are also sounding the alarm and urging lawmakers to vote no. "We are already seeing women, children and families left without food, clean water and critical services after earlier aid cuts, and aid organizations can barely keep up with rising needs," said Abby Maxman, president and CEO of Oxfam America, a poverty-fighting organization. Rep. Jim McGovern, D-Mass., said the foreign aid is a tool that prevents conflict and promotes stability but the measure before the House takes that tool away. "These cuts will lead to the deaths of hundreds of thousands, devastating the most vulnerable in the world," McGovern said. "And at a time when China and Russia and Iran are working overtime to challenge American influence." Republicans disparaged the foreign aid spending and sought to link it to programs they said DOGE had uncovered. Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, said taxpayer dollars had gone to such things as targeting climate change, promoting pottery classes and strengthening diversity, equity and inclusion programs. Other Republicans cited similar examples they said DOGE had revealed. "Yet, my friends on the other side of the aisle would like you to believe, seriously, that if you don't use your taxpayer dollars to fund this absurd list of projects and thousands of others I didn't even list, that somehow people will die and our global standing in the world will crumble," Roy said. "Well, let's just reject this now."

House will vote on Trump's request to cut funding for NPR, PBS and foreign aid

House will vote on Trump's request to cut funding for NPR, PBS and foreign aid WASHINGTON (AP) — House Republicans are moving to cut abo...
'He's lost it': Newsom slams Trump's mental acuity, echoing president's criticism of BidenNew Foto - 'He's lost it': Newsom slams Trump's mental acuity, echoing president's criticism of Biden

California Gov. Gavin Newsom is questioningPresident Donald Trump's mental acuity in the pair'srunning clash over immigration enforcementin Los Angeles, echoing the president's campaign criticism of his predecessor,Joe Biden. Newsom saidTrump commended the National Guard early on June 8for quelling violence before troops arrived on the scene, made up a conversation about discussing the deployment and got the date of their phone conversation wrong. "They weren't even deployed and he claimed victory. He's lost it. He hasn't lost a step – and I saw him trip on the steps today,"Newsom told Fox News in Los Angeleson June 8. "This is serious. He is not the same person that I dealt with just four years ago. He's incapable of even a train of thought. He's making things up." For his part, Trump has called Newsom "grossly incompetent" andsaid he could be arrestedfor obstructing federal authorities enforcing immigration laws. Newsom's criticism of Trump echoed how the president attacked Biden's mental and physical ability. Trump repeatedly referred to Biden tripping on March 19, 2021,while climbing the steps of Air Force One, which his press secretary at the time blamed on the wind, according to ABC News.Trump ordered an investigationof Biden's use of an autopen to sign official documents while in office. Newsom mentioned Trump stumblingon June 8while boarding Air Force One. Newsom's press officemocked Trump for misspeaking, such as on June 11 when the president said the governor's "primarily crime is running for governor." The Trump's 16-minute call to Newsom was early June 7 on the East Coast or late June 6 – the first day of protests – on the West Coast, according to acall log he gave Fox News. Newsom has ridiculed Trump for referring to that call happening days later. "Trump doesn't even know what day it is,"Newsom said June 10 on social media. Trump has since told reporters he threatened during that call to deploy the National Guard if Newsom didn't do more to combat the protests. But Newsom contends the guard never came up during the conversation. "Stone-cold liar,"Newsom told Fox News in Los Angeles. "He made that up, like he makes up so many other things. He never said that." This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Newsom slams Trump's mental ability in immigration feud

'He's lost it': Newsom slams Trump's mental acuity, echoing president's criticism of Biden

'He's lost it': Newsom slams Trump's mental acuity, echoing president's criticism of Biden California Gov. Gavin Newsom ...
Sean McVay: Aaron Rodgers to Rams was 'a possibility'New Foto - Sean McVay: Aaron Rodgers to Rams was 'a possibility'

Aaron Rodgers finally ended up with the Pittsburgh Steelers after a long flirtation, but the star quarterback nearly had another offseason suitor. Los Angeles Rams coach Sean McVay acknowledged on Wednesday that his team considered making a play for Rodgers before sticking with Matthew Stafford. Speaking with NFL Media, McVay said, "Our first priority, which was consistently communicated, was, 'Hey, let's work out something with Matthew,' and we were very fortunate that it worked out that way. "If that wasn't able to occur, then (pursuing Rodgers) was definitely conversations and a possibility for us. I have a ton of respect for the body of work, and I've gotten to know Aaron and enjoy the conversations and just the approach -- the way that he thinks about the game and in life. That was a possibility." McVay added of Rodgers landing with the Steelers, "I'm really glad that worked out. I know there's a lot of people in Pittsburgh that are really excited that's come to fruition, and I'm a big fan of his." The Rams and Stafford agreed to a new contract in early May that will pay the 37-year-old veteran $44 million in 2025, and he would get $40 million if he sticks with the club in 2026. Stafford, who led the Rams to the Super Bowl championship after the 2021 season, owns a 34-23 record after Los Angeles' starter after going 74-90-1 as the Detroit Lions' starter from 2009-20. Rodgers, 41, also has one Super Bowl ring, from the 2010 season with the Green Bay Packers. The four-time NFL Most Valuable Player landed a one-year deal in Pittsburgh that reportedly will pay him $13.65 million, including a $10 million guarantee. Rodgers owns a 153-87-1 record as a starter with the Packers (2005-22) and New York Jets (2023-24). --Field Level Media

Sean McVay: Aaron Rodgers to Rams was 'a possibility'

Sean McVay: Aaron Rodgers to Rams was 'a possibility' Aaron Rodgers finally ended up with the Pittsburgh Steelers after a long flirt...
2025 U.S. Open payouts: Purse, winner's share for tournament at Oakmont Country ClubNew Foto - 2025 U.S. Open payouts: Purse, winner's share for tournament at Oakmont Country Club

It pays to play well at the2025 U.S. Open. First-round action at the 125th annual U.S. Open tees off on Thursday, June 12 at theOakmont Country Clubin Pennsylvania, near the suburbs of Pittsburgh, for a record 10th time.A field of 156 golfers will battle it outfor not only the United States Open Championship Trophy, but also the multi-million dollar prize money. The United States Golf Association (USGA) announced that the 2025 U.S. Open will have a $21.5 million purse for the second consecutive year, with $4.3 million being awarded to the next champion. Although the U.S. Open purse didn't increase, the prize money still outranks the first two majors of the year.The 2025 Masters purse was $21 million, withchampion Rory McIlroytaking home $4.2 million, while the2025 PGA Championship purse was $19 million, with championScottie Schefflerpocketing $3.42 million in winnings. "We didn't raise our purse this year. When I started at the USGA just four years ago, our purse was $12.5 million, so I feel comfortable that we've been a leader in moving fast and bigger," USGA CEO Mike Whansaidin a press conference on Wednesday. "We know that this probably isn't really about the money for the person who (wins), but at the same time, we want the money to be commensurate with the achievement." US OPEN FORECAST:Thursday weather updates for first round PAIRING, TEE TIMES:Complete Thursday schedule It won't be easy to cash in. Whan said theOakmont Country Club will provide "golf's toughest test,"adding that of the 1,385 players to have played a major championship on this venue, only 2% has finished under par across four rounds. Here's what you need to know about the 2025 Masters prize payout: The U.S. Open purse has exponentially increased over the years, jumping $2.14 million over the course of four years. Here's a look at how much the winner has been paid out every year since 2020: 2024 winner's share:$4.3 million (Bryson DeChambeau; Pinehurst) 2023 winner's share:$3.6 million (Wyndham Clark; LACC) 2022 winner's share:$3.15 million (Matt Fitzpatrick; The Country Club) 2021 winner's share:$2.25 million (Jon Rahm; Torrey Pines) 2020 winner's share:$2.16 million (Brooks Koepka; Erin Hills) The tournament won't announce a full purse breakdown until cuts are made ahead of the weekend. However, the prize money breakdown should be on par with last' year's purse's figures, as the $21.5 million total purse remains the same. Last year,Bryson DeChambeauwalked away with $4.3 million in winnings after finishing one stroke above runner up Rory McIlroy, who walked away with $2.32 million for his second place finish. Here's the 2024 U.S. Open purse breakdown: 1. Bryson DeChambeau:$4.3 million 2. Rory McIlroy: 2.32 million T3. Patrick Cantlay:$1.23 million T3. Tony Finau:$1.23 million 5. Matthieu Pavon:$843,765 6. Hideki Matsuyama: $748,154 T7. Russell Henley:$639,289 T7. Xander Schauffele:$639,289 T9. Sam Burns:$502,391 T9. Corey Conners:$502,391 T9. Davis Thompson:$502,391 The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fast.Download for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:2025 U.S. Open payouts: Purse, winner's share

2025 U.S. Open payouts: Purse, winner's share for tournament at Oakmont Country Club

2025 U.S. Open payouts: Purse, winner's share for tournament at Oakmont Country Club It pays to play well at the2025 U.S. Open. First-ro...
Most US adults say Trump's military parade is not a good use of money, a new AP-NORC poll findsNew Foto - Most US adults say Trump's military parade is not a good use of money, a new AP-NORC poll finds

WASHINGTON (AP) — As Washington prepares fora military paradethis weekend to honor the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army, a new survey finds that U.S. adults are more likely to approve than disapprove of PresidentDonald Trump's decision to hold the festivities, which officials have said will costtens of millions of taxpayer dollars. But about 6 in 10 Americans also say that Saturday's parade is "not a good use" of government money, including the vast majority of people, 78%, who neither approve nor disapprove of the parade overall, according to the poll fromThe Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research. The survey found that about 4 in 10 U.S. adults "somewhat" or "strongly" approve of the parade, while about 3 in 10 "somewhat" or "strongly" disapprove. About 3 in 10 neither approve nor disapprove. Carol Sue Quillen, 69, of Live Oak, Florida, said she sees the parade as a way to honor the country's service members, who she said include her late father — an Air Force test pilot killed on a helicopter training mission when she was a baby — and her son-in-law, who serves in the special forces. "I don't necessarily think we appreciate our military as much as we should," said Quillen, a retiree who described herself as a Trump supporter — although she said the Republican president's personality "can be a bit overwhelming." "All branches should be celebrated for what they do," Quillen said. "That just boosts morale." Democrats and independents say parade is not good use of money Featuring hundreds of military vehicles and aircraft and thousands of soldiers, the celebration on Saturday, which also happens to be Trump's birthday, has grown extensively in scope and size since Army planners started working on a festival two years ago to mark the military branch's anniversary. Besides a military parade — which Trump hadunsuccessfully pushed forduring his first term — there will also beconcerts, fireworks, NFL players, fitness competitionsand displays all over the National Mall for daylong festivities. The Army expects as many as 200,000 people could attend and says putting on the celebration will cost anestimated $25 million to $45 million. Most Republicans, around two-thirds, approve of the event, and a similar share sees it as a good use of money, but about one-third say it's not a good use of government funds. Democrats overwhelmingly say the parade is not a good use of public money, as do independents. And while about half of Democrats disapprove of the parade, about half of independents neither approve nor disapprove, suggesting that they may have heard less about it or have less strong feelings about it generally. Matt Wheeler, 40, called the display "extremely wasteful" and "a bit of a performance" that "just sends a bad message" in terms of the overt military display. "The only other time I can think about this, it's been in old throwbacks to the USSR or things you see out of North Korea," said Wheeler, who works in nonprofit fundraising in Los Angeles and described himself as a lifelong Democrat. "It's a direction this administration is inclined to move in that isn't in line with what I thought our country really was." Few think military spending is too low Sam Walters, 45, who works in restaurants in Fort Worth, Texas, described himself as a former conservative who now has more libertarian leanings. Walters, who voted for Trump in last year's election, said he appreciated that Trump had "really kind of stuck to his guns" concerning many of the issues on which he campaigned, assessing his second term so far as "a pretty good job." But when it comes to the military parade, Walters said he was concerned about why so much additional funding was needed for military-adjacent activities, given the country's overall defense spending price tag. "When they're getting hundreds of billions a year for funding, more than for anything else, it seems kind of hard to justify them spending extra for that," Walters said, referencing the parade. Americans are generally divided on whether the government is devoting too much money to the military. About 3 in 10 say the government is spending "too much" on the military, while a similar share says the government is spending "too little." About 4 in 10 say the government is spending "about the right amount." Those numbers are largely unchanged froman AP-NORC poll conducted in January. Trump's approval is unchanged About 4 in 10 Americans approve of the way Trump is handling his job as president, which is unchanged froman AP-NORC poll conducted last month. The poll was conducted June 5-9, meaning the field period began before protests started in Los Angeles over Trump's immigration crackdown and ended after the National Guard was deployed but before active-duty Marines arrived in the city. It did not include questions about the protests or military deployment. Approval of his handling of immigration, at 46%, continues to be higher than approval of his handling of the economy or trade negotiations with other countries, which both landed at 38%. Andrew Thomsen, 31, of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, said that he has voted for Trump in general elections and that he would "generally approve" of the direction in which the country is headed. Thomsen, who works in education, said that, while he appreciates any intent of the parade and associated events "to celebrate those who have given of themselves to the service of our protection," he wasn't a fan of attempts to show off U.S. military might. "If it is a march of rows and rows of members from our different branches while showboating our tanks, missile systems, and other equipment to show how strong we are, then I don't support that," he said. ___ The AP-NORC poll of 1,158 adults was conducted June 5-9, using a sample drawn from NORC's probability-based AmeriSpeak Panel, which is designed to be representative of the U.S. population. The margin of sampling error for adults overall is plus or minus 4 percentage points. ___ Kinnard reported from Chapin, S.C., and can be reached athttp://x.com/MegKinnardAP.

Most US adults say Trump's military parade is not a good use of money, a new AP-NORC poll finds

Most US adults say Trump's military parade is not a good use of money, a new AP-NORC poll finds WASHINGTON (AP) — As Washington prepares...

 

MARIO VOUX © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com