Trump says U.S. trade deal with China is done after talks in LondonNew Foto - Trump says U.S. trade deal with China is done after talks in London

London —President Trump declared on Wednesday morning that a U.S. trade "deal with China is done." The U.S. leader offered a few key details of a"framework deal" reachedbetween senior U.S. and Chinese trade representatives in London on Tuesday, but he acknowledged that both he and Chinese President Xi Jinping were both yet to formally sign off on the agreement. The U.S. and Chinese trade teams wrapped up two days of marathon negotiations in London close to midnight on Tuesday, with the sides saying they had agreed on a new "framework deal" to easethe trade warbetween the world's two largest economies. The tension had only increased in recent weeks, despite anagreement reached in Genevaduring a first round of talks in May to put the steepest retaliatory tariffs on hold. Those record-high tariffs are due to kick back in on July 9, unless the agreement struck in London is in fact formalized by Trump and Xi. In month since the Geneva talks, Beijing had cut its exports of critical rare earth elements to the U.S. by half compared to the previous year, and the Trump administrationsaid it would "aggressively revoke"the visas of Chinese students in the U.S. who were found to be linked to the Chinese Communist party. While the announcement by Mr. Trump's top negotiators on Tuesday evening of an agreed framework was thin on details, the presidentsaid in a poston his own Truth Social media platform Wednesday morning that it was "done, subject to final approval with president Xi and me." Mr. Trump said the deal would see China maintain its current 10% tariffs on goods imported from the U.S., while the U.S. would keep 55% tariffs on Chinese imports. "President XI and I are going to work closely together to open up China to American Trade," Mr. Trump added in a subsequent post. "This would be a great WIN for both countries!!!" There was no immediate confirmation from China's government of any terms agreed to in the framework, or whether President Xi intended to sign off on the deal. In Geneva, Beijing and Washington agreed in May to put their unprecedented tariffs of more than 100% on each other's imports on hold for 90 days. That brought U.S. tariffs on Chinese imports down to their current level of 30% after they briefly soared to around 145%. Chinese tariffs currently stand at 10%, after hitting 125% before the Geneva round of talks. Speaking Tuesday, Vice Commerce Minister Li Chenggang, who took part in the talks in London, confirmed the agreement on a framework, "in principle." On Wednesday, China's state-run media said the delegations had "made new progress," but offered no details. "The framework deal puts meat on the bones of an agreement reached last month in Geneva to ease bilateral retaliatory tariffs," U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told reporters after the talks in London, which spanned six hours on Monday and then more than 12 hours into the evening on Tuesday. Lutnick said part of the objective of this week's second round of meetings was just to get "the negativity out" of the bilateral relationship, which had festered since the Geneva talks. "Now we can go forward to try to do positive trade, growing trade," he said. The U.S. wants China to resume and increase shipments of rare earths. The materials are vital to industries ranging from weapons and aerospace to electric vehicles and small consumer goods. On Wednesday, in his all-capital-letter social media post, Mr. Trump said under the agreement reached in London, "full magnets, and any necessary rare earths, will be supplied, up front, by China. Likewise, we will provide to China what was agreed to, including Chinese students using our colleges and universities." "Relationship is excellent!" added Mr. Trump. "At stake is the release of rare earths exports to U.S. manufacturers — stockpiles are dwindling fast — in exchange for aerospace parts and semiconductor programming technology to China," Carl Weinberg, chief economist at High Frequency Economics, told investors in a report. "A 'fail' would raise the risk of auto and aircraft production grinding to a halt as soon as next month. If that happens, economic growth will be severely dented for an unknown term." An accused woman skips her pedicure, kills her ex-husband LAPD chief speaks out about deployment of military forces to anti-ICE protests Sneak peek: The Day My Mother Vanished

Trump says U.S. trade deal with China is done after talks in London

Trump says U.S. trade deal with China is done after talks in London London —President Trump declared on Wednesday morning that a U.S. trade ...
After a boost from Trump, Jack Ciattarelli pivots in the New Jersey governor's raceNew Foto - After a boost from Trump, Jack Ciattarelli pivots in the New Jersey governor's race

DOVER, N.J. — Republican Jack Ciattarelli won Tuesday's primary for governor in New Jersey in part by touting President Donald Trump's endorsement. But the former state legislator is now looking to make his campaign against Democratic Rep. Mikie Sherrill about a different executive. Ciattarelli name-checked Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy's administration five times in the course of a nearly 7-minute interview with NBC News at a Colombian bakery here on Wednesday. He only mentioned Trump's name once, when prompted, and went on to call Sherrill "out of touch" with key state issues like affordability, education and immigration policies, suggesting she would be an extension of Murphy's administration if she wins the governorship. "This race is all about New Jersey," Ciattarelli said. "My opponent is going to want to talk about Donald Trump every day of the week, Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security — by the way, the way to save those programs is by getting rid of the fraud. I've got to hit the reset button here in New Jersey come January. We're going to keep the focus on New Jersey." "What people want to hear about [is] what are we doing about property taxes? What are we doing about public education? What are we doing about our infrastructure? What are we doing about the lawlessness? What are we doing about the over development? What are we doing about the cost of electricity? Those are all the failures of the Murphy administration. Mikie Sherrill has supported every one of his policies," Ciattarelli added. Ciattarelli's focus on Murphy comes as he is trying to win over independent voters and disaffected Democrats in the traditionally blue state. Trump significantly improved on his margin last year compared to 2020, but he still lost New Jersey by 6 points. Ciattarelli called out those voters in his victory speech Tuesday night, and on Wednesday he laid out how he plans to win them over. "They've had it, as have I," Ciattarelli said. "They've had it with sanctuary cities. They've had it with us being a sanctuary state. They've had it with our property taxes. We saw what went on on our Jersey Shore over the Memorial Day weekend, flash mobs, because we don't support our local police. It's across the board. Look what's happened in education. We just slipped from two to 12 on the national report card because of the performance or lack thereof of our students." Ciattarelli is, of course, still linked to Trump, who endorsed him and helped consolidate Republican primary voters behind him, helping fuelhis resounding re-nomination. On Tuesday night at a victory party in Holmdel, New Jersey, voters who spoke to NBC News emphasized Trump's endorsement as having "sealed the deal" for them. "If he continues with Trump and doesn't become like one of them RINOs [Republican In Name Only], if he continues going the right path, I think he's going to do great," one supporter said. On Wednesday, Ciattarelli said Trump is "really excited about the possibilities here in New Jersey. There's an opportunity for us to win this year, and that's exactly what we're going to do." Sherrill suggested in her primary victory speech Tuesday night that she plans to tie Ciattarelli to the president, referring to her opponent as a "Trump lackey." "This country is too beautiful to be beholden to the cruelty and self interest that Jack and Trump are trying to hoist on her," Sherrill said. For his part, Ciattarelli has been hesitant to publicly break with the president. The Republican told NBC News that he supports Trump's decision to federalize California's National Guard troops to respond to protests in Los Angeles against immigration raids, despite objections from Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom. "The first job of any elected official is public health and safety. If they feel the National Guard is needed, why not? I think our local police and our state police would welcome the National Guard here to help them," Ciattarelli said. Sherrill wrotein an X poston Sunday that the Trump administration's move was "a dangerous stunt designed to inflame divisions and further a political agenda" and that it was "disturbing" to see Ciattarelli applauding the decision. "I think it's a dangerous situation to put military on the streets of this country, trained in combat, as opposed to the police officers who know how to handle this," Sherrill told reporters after casting her primary ballot on Tuesday, noting a governor can ask the federal government for support. "That is not the case here," Sherrill said. "Governor Newsom surged law enforcement in and what Trump seems to be doing is trying to add fuel to the fire and really make a situation violent and bad. And I just think that's completely unacceptable." Immigration is expected to be a top issue in the governor's race, with around1 in 4 New Jersey residentsborn in another country, according to census data. The first of several Ciattarelli campaign events on Wednesday took place in a predominantly Latino area in Sherrill's congressional district. "Immigrants that are here legally want to achieve the American dream, and too many people right now don't feel like they can do that here in New Jersey," Ciattarelli said. "Whether it's get the job of their dreams, get the education they want, raise a family, start a business, retire here, those are all the things that people are terribly insecure about." "Those are all the failures of the Murphy administration," Ciattarelli added. Ciattarelli, who lost a close race against Murphy in 2021, said that this year is going to be different, in part because the state is not in the throes of the Covid-19 pandemic. "I thought we were going to win in '21, but I know we're going to win this race. The political landscape is very different," Ciatterelli said. "I'm not competing with a pandemic or a shelter-in-place order. I'm not going up against an incumbent. I'm going up against somebody who's totally out of touch with what it is that really matters and bothers New Jersey."

After a boost from Trump, Jack Ciattarelli pivots in the New Jersey governor's race

After a boost from Trump, Jack Ciattarelli pivots in the New Jersey governor's race DOVER, N.J. — Republican Jack Ciattarelli won Tuesda...
Celtics star Jaylen Brown undergoes knee surgery, expected to be ready for training campNew Foto - Celtics star Jaylen Brown undergoes knee surgery, expected to be ready for training camp

Another key member of the Boston Celtics is dealing with an injury. Jaylen Brown underwent anarthroscopic debridement procedureon his right knee Wednesday, the team announced. Brown, 28, will spend the offseason rehabbing from the injury. He is expected to be ready for training camp "without limitation," per the Celtics. Jaylen Brown today underwent a successful right knee arthroscopic debridement procedure. He is expected to participate in training camp without limitation.pic.twitter.com/KijF7Fc30G — Boston Celtics (@celtics)June 11, 2025 Brown won't be the only big-name Celtics player rehabbing an injury this offseason. Star Jayson Tatum sustainedan Achilles injuryduring the team's Game 4 loss to the New York Knicks. The team has not announced a timeline for Tatum's recovery. Since being selected with the third overall pick in the 2016 NBA Draft, Brown has developed into a superstar with the Celtics. While Brown struggled to put up big scoring numbers early in his career, he has averaged 23.5 points per game over the past five seasons. He's made four All-Star teams and has one appearance on the All-NBA second team over that period. Brown turned in yet another solid campaign last season, averaging 22.2 points and 5.8 rebounds. If the injury affected Brown in the playoffs, he didn't show it. He averaged 22.1 points and 7.1 rebounds in 11 postseason games before the Celtics were eliminated.

Celtics star Jaylen Brown undergoes knee surgery, expected to be ready for training camp

Celtics star Jaylen Brown undergoes knee surgery, expected to be ready for training camp Another key member of the Boston Celtics is dealing...
Report: Suns weighing Kevin Durant trade optionsNew Foto - Report: Suns weighing Kevin Durant trade options

The Phoenix Suns are actively working with Kevin Durant's business partner to weigh trade options, ESPN reported Wednesday. The Suns and Boardroom CEO Rich Kleiman have met "multiple times" in the past week to discuss potential destinations for the future Hall of Famer, per the report. Teams that have reportedly expressed interest in the 36-year-old forward include the Houston Rockets, Miami Heat, Minnesota Timberwolves, New York Knicks and San Antonio Spurs, although the report indicated that "several wild-card suitors" have recently entered the conversation. Durant is due to earn $54.7 million in 2025-26. If he is traded, the 15-time All-Star becomes eligible to sign a two-year extension worth up to $112 million in July. The Suns finished 36-46 this season despite having the highest payroll in NBA history, leading to the firing of head coach Mike Budenholzer and a demotion for general manager James Jones. A two-time NBA champion and four-time scoring champion, Durant averaged 26.6 points, 6.0 rebounds and 4.2 assists in 62 games (all starts) in 2024-25. --Field Level Media

Report: Suns weighing Kevin Durant trade options

Report: Suns weighing Kevin Durant trade options The Phoenix Suns are actively working with Kevin Durant's business partner to weigh tra...
Hegseth defends use of troops to protect immigration raids in Los AngelesNew Foto - Hegseth defends use of troops to protect immigration raids in Los Angeles

WASHINGTON (AP) —Defense Secretary Pete Hegsethdefended his decision to ordertroops to provide securityduring federal immigration raids in Los Angeles, telling senators on Wednesday it's about "maintaining law and order." Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., condemned the move as illegal, saying it erodes military readiness and questioning how it is being funded. It was the second day of harsh congressional questioning for Hegseth on the deployment of troops over the objections of California Gov. Gavin Newsom, continued military aid to Ukraine, a deal on a gifted Qatari jet and more. "The mission in Los Angeles, as you know well, sir, is not about lethality," Hegseth said in response to questions. "It's about maintaining law and order on behalf of law enforcement agents who deserve to do their job without being attacked by mobs of people." The exchange underscored confusion about the deployment ofmore than 4,000 National Guard troopsand 700 Marines to provide security at the immigration protests and operations in Los Angeles. Photos have shown Guard troops setting a security perimeter around agents as they make arrests in the city, moving them closer to law enforcement functions, which by law they are not allowed to do. About 2,000 of the Guard soldiers are in place in Los Angeles, initially sent to provide security. The Marines are at a nearby base and have not yet been used. Democrats press Hegseth on use of troops in US cities Speaking at a Senate defense appropriations subcommittee hearing, Reed said law and order is a civil function, not a job for the U.S. military. Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., added that the California deployment, along with President Donald Trump's threat to use force against protesters at the Army's 250th anniversary parade on Saturday, "should stop every one of us cold." She added that "threatening to use our own troops on our own citizens at such scale is unprecedented. It is unconstitutional. And it is downright un-American." Asked later what constitutional authority the department is using to deploy active duty Marines to the protests, Hegseth said he didn't know the specific provision but would provide it. Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who was testifying alongside Hegseth, was asked whether he sees evidence of "rebellion" in the U.S. That could be used to invoke the Insurrection Act to use the military for law enforcement functions. "There are definitely some frustrated folks out there," Caine said in response. Answering the same question, Hegseth repeated Trump's argument that "there has been an invasion" of migrants entering the country without legal permission, and he said the protests in Los Angeles could spread to other areas. Caine, asked if he believes the U.S. is being invaded by a foreign power, said, "I don't see any foreign, state-sponsored folks invading, but I'll be mindful of the fact that there have been some border issues." Lawmakers raise concerns about continuing US support for Ukraine Hegseth also faced bipartisan criticism for failing to provide details about theadministration's first proposed defense budgetand over an array of other decisions he's made during his tenure. The panel's chairman, Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., and other senators expressed frustration that Congress has not yet gotten a full defense budget from the Trump administration and that the current level does not have the U.S. spending enough on defense. McConnell also noted that the limited budget request that lawmakers have received has no funding for Ukraine security assistance, questioning whether that makes "lasting peace" more or less likely. Hegseth, in his opening remarks, said the department needed more time to pull a spending plan together but that he has moved quickly to kill wasteful programs and redirect funding to Trump's priorities. Hegseth said a negotiated peace in Ukraine makes America look strong, even though Russia is the aggressor. He said the budget includes hard choices and "reflects the reality that Europe needs to step up more for the defense of its own continent. And President Trump deserves the credit for that." Hegseth said some U.S. security spending for Ukraine is still in the pipeline, but he provided no details. Hegseth confirms no deal has been signed for the Qatari jet Hegseth repeatedly refused to provide details on plans for the Defense Department to accept a 747 jet offered by Qatar for use as Air Force One. He said budgeting and schedules forsecurity upgrades to turn the planeinto the president's aircraft are classified. Hegseth confirmed reports that the Qataris have not come to an agreement with the Trump administration over a memo that would allow the military to take possession of the aircraft. That also means no contracts have been signed to move forward on overhauling the Qatari jet. He refused to answer questions on the cost or potential timeframe of that upgrade — even though data on two other 747s being reconditioned by Boeing to serve as Air Force One is public. "A memorandum of understanding remains to be signed," Hegseth said. ___ AP writer David Klepper in Washington contributed to this report.

Hegseth defends use of troops to protect immigration raids in Los Angeles

Hegseth defends use of troops to protect immigration raids in Los Angeles WASHINGTON (AP) —Defense Secretary Pete Hegsethdefended his decisi...
Trump's EPA wants to repeal regulations on carbon emissions from power plantsNew Foto - Trump's EPA wants to repeal regulations on carbon emissions from power plants

The Environmental Protection Agency announced Wednesday that it will aim to eliminate existing limits on greenhouse gas emissions from coal- and gas-fired power plants, a move that would curb the agency's ability to combat climate change under the Clean Air Act. EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin said in a news conference that Biden-era carbon pollution standards for power plants "suffocate" the economy in order to protect the environment. Zeldin, who was appointed by President Donald Trump in January, stated that the agency's announcement was a huge step forward in energy dominance for the U.S., while promising that no power plants would emit more than they already do. Currently, the power sector accounts for a quarter of all U.S. emissions, according to thelatest EPA emissions data. Zeldin also said the EPA plans to weaken Biden-era regulations on mercury emissions from power plants. Environmental advocates say the EPA's proposal is an escalation in the Trump administration's ongoing push against climate action across federal agencies, including at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the Department of Energy and the National Weather Service. In 2024, the Biden administrationfinalizedthe most stringent carbon pollution standards for power plants to date in an effort to tackle the climate crisis — but now, those rules face an uncertain future. Gina McCarthy, a former EPA Administrator under President Joe Biden, called Zeldin's announcement a "political play" that defies "decades of science and policy review" in a statement on Wednesday. "By giving a green light to more pollution, his legacy will forever be someone who does the bidding of the fossil fuel industry at the expense of our health," McCarthy said. Jill Tauber, the vice president of litigation for climate and energy at Earthjustice, a nonprofit currently suing the Trump administration over several environmental rollbacks said: "Eliminating pollution standards from the largest industrial source of greenhouse gas pollution in the United States flies in the face of what the law requires, what the science tells us, and what we're seeing every day." Power plants in the U.S. are a huge contributor to global carbon emissions. Areportpublished by the Institute for Policy Integrity at the New York University School of Law found that if the U.S. power sector were its own country, it would be the sixth-largest emitter in the world. Under the first Trump administration, the EPA rolled back several Obama-era greenhouse gas standards on power plants, but this recent announcement marks the first time the agency has suggested outright repeals. Zeldin's move on power plants followshis promise in Marchto tackle the "climate change religion" by reconsidering or repealing 31 regulations surrounding tailpipe emissions, coal ash regulations and oil and gas wastewater management. The proposed rule, which will now move into its comment period, will face scrutiny from legal advocates and environmental nonprofits like Earthjustice and the Natural Resources Defense Council, which say the EPA is obligated to regulate greenhouse gas emissions by law — citing seminal cases like the 2007 Massachusetts v. EPA lawsuit, which determined that greenhouse gases must be regulated by the EPA under the Clean Air Act. "We'll be watching closely to see if the EPA proceeds with repealing these life-saving standards based on a legal theory that doesn't pass the laugh test," said Meredith Hawkins, the federal climate legal director at the Natural Resources Defense Council. "The NRDC stands ready to defend the public's right to breathe in court if needed." Cutting historic limits on greenhouse gas emissions from power plants would impact global climate change, but it could also cause ripple effects on human health and the economy. Harvey Reiter, an energy and utilities lawyer and a law professor at George Washington University, says that if the EPA moves forward with its planned repeals, he expects some energy companies and utilities that have retooled operations and made long-term investments in renewable energy to sue the Trump administration. "The biggest impacts of the proposed rules are uncertainty and instability," he said. "Nobody knows what to do next. It makes investment decisions harder. It makes decisions about hiring, staff and employees harder. It creates a lot of uncertainty in the market." Greenhouse gas emissions from power plants are not just a climate issue. Burning fossil fuels releases carbon dioxide as well as other air pollutants, including nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide, mercury and fine particulate matter, which are linked to increased risk of respiratory issues and cardiovascular disease. Regulating carbon emissions from power plants broadly reduces other air pollution for communities living near power plants, said Laura Kate Bender, the vice president of nationwide advocacy and public policy at the American Lung Association. "It works both ways. On the one hand, power plants burning fossil fuels contribute to climate change and cause health problems at the same time," said Bender. "And then climate change, in many cases, contributes to extreme heat, or more wildfire smoke, or more ozone smogs. Climate change is a health emergency, and cutting carbon in the power sector is a critical tool in the toolbox for fighting climate change."

Trump’s EPA wants to repeal regulations on carbon emissions from power plants

Trump's EPA wants to repeal regulations on carbon emissions from power plants The Environmental Protection Agency announced Wednesday th...
NCAA will allow coaches' challenges in men's and women's basketballNew Foto - NCAA will allow coaches' challenges in men's and women's basketball

INDIANAPOLIS (AP) — College basketball coaches will be able to challenge officials' calls next season for the first time, and the NCAA also said there is "positive momentum" toward switching the men's game from halves to quarters. The NCAA announced several minor rule changes Tuesday that affect both men's and women's basketball. Men's coaches will be able to challenge out-of-bounds calls, basket interference or goaltending, and whether a secondary defender was in the restricted area. Coaches will get at least one challenge per game but must have a timeout to use one. A successful challenge means a coach gets another one; if the challenge is unsuccessful, the coach may not challenge another call. On the women's side, coaches will be able to challenge out-of-bounds calls, backcourt violations, whether the correct player was called for a foul and whether a change in possession occurred before the ruling of a foul that leads to free throws. Women's coaches won't need a timeout to challenge a call, but an unsuccessful challenge would lead to a technical foul for the excessive timeout. The women's game already is played in quarters instead of halves, while the men's game with its 20-minute halves remains an outlier in basketball. An NCAA rules committee "recommended NCAA Division I conferences create a joint working group to provide feedback on the potential change from halves to quarters." On the men's side, the NCAA also implemented several points of emphasis for officials that it said would "improve the flow of the game." Those include telling officials "to address delay-of-game tactics, limit time spent at the monitor, improve game administration efficiency and reduce physicality." Officials also will have the option to call a Flagrant 1 foul for contact to the groin area. Previously, such contact could only be called a common foul or a Flagrant 2 foul, which triggers an ejection of the offending player. ___ AP college basketball:https://apnews.com/hub/college-basketball

NCAA will allow coaches' challenges in men's and women's basketball

NCAA will allow coaches' challenges in men's and women's basketball INDIANAPOLIS (AP) — College basketball coaches will be able ...

 

MARIO VOUX © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com