A Gaza-bound aid boat carrying Greta Thunberg and other activists has been diverted to IsraelNew Foto - A Gaza-bound aid boat carrying Greta Thunberg and other activists has been diverted to Israel

JERUSALEM (AP) — Israeli forces stopped a Gaza-bound aid boat carrying Greta Thunberg and other activists early Monday and diverted it to Israel, enforcing a longstanding blockade of the Palestinian territory that has been tightened during the war with Hamas. "The 'selfie yacht' of the 'celebrities' is safely making its way to the shores of Israel," the Foreign Ministry said in a social media post. "The passengers are expected to return to their home countries." It said the humanitarian aid aboard the ship would be transferred to Gaza through established channels. It later circulated footage of what appeared to be Israeli military personnel handing out sandwiches and water to the activists, who were wearing orange life vests. The Freedom Flotilla Coalition, which had organized the voyage to deliver humanitarian aid to the Gaza Strip and protest Israel's blockade and wartime conduct, said the activists had been "kidnapped by Israeli forces" and released pre-recorded messages from them. Thunberg, a climate campaigner, was among 12 activists aboard the Madleen, which set sail from Sicily a week ago. Along the way, it had stopped on Thursdayto rescue four migrantswho had jumped overboard to avoid being detained by the Libyan coast guard. Rima Hassan, a French member of the European Parliament who is of Palestinian descent, was also among the volunteers on board. She has beenbarred from entering Israelbecause of her opposition to Israeli policies toward the Palestinians. After a 2½-month total blockade aimed at pressuring Hamas, Israel started allowing some basic aid into Gaza last month, but humanitarian workers havewarned of famineunless the blockade is lifted and Israel ends its military offensive. An attempt last month by Freedom Flotilla to reach Gaza by sea failed after another of the group's vessels wasattacked by two droneswhile sailing in international waters off Malta. The group blamed Israel forthe attack, which damaged the front section of the ship. Israel and Egypt have imposed varying degrees of blockade on Gaza since Hamas seized power from rival Palestinian forces in 2007. Critics of the blockade say it amounts to collective punishment of Gaza's roughly 2 million Palestinians. Israel sealed Gaza off from all aid in the early days of the war ignited by the Hamas-led attack on southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, but later relented under U.S. pressure. In early March, shortly beforeIsrael ended a ceasefire with Hamas, the country again blocked all imports, including food, fuel and medicine. Hamas-led militants killed around 1,200 people, mostly civilians, in the Oct. 7 attack and abducted 251 hostages, more than half of whom have since been released in ceasefire agreements or other deals. Hamas is still holding 55 hostages, more than half of them believed to be dead. Israel's military campaign has killed more than 54,000 Palestinians, according to the Gaza Health Ministry, which has said women and children make up most of the dead. It doesn't say whether those killed are civilians or combatants. The war has destroyed vast areas of Gaza and displaced around 90% of the territory's population, leaving people there almost completely dependent on international aid. ___ Follow AP's war coverage athttps://apnews.com/hub/israel-hamas-war

A Gaza-bound aid boat carrying Greta Thunberg and other activists has been diverted to Israel

A Gaza-bound aid boat carrying Greta Thunberg and other activists has been diverted to Israel JERUSALEM (AP) — Israeli forces stopped a Gaza...
Sen. Cory Booker says he won't accept campaign donations from Elon MuskNew Foto - Sen. Cory Booker says he won't accept campaign donations from Elon Musk

Sen. Cory Booker said Sunday he would not accept campaign donations from tech mogul Elon Musk but urged the former Trump adviser to "get involved right now in a more substantive way" in Democrats' push against the sweeping GOP-backed spending bill. "This bill is disastrous for our long-term economy," Booker said on NBC News' "Meet the Press." "This is an American issue, and I welcome Elon Musk not to my campaign. I welcome him right now not to sit back and just fire off tweets — get involved right now in a more substantive way in putting pressure on Congress people and senators to not do this." Asked directly whether he would ever accept campaign funding from Musk, Booker said, "I would not accept money from Elon Musk for my campaign, but I would be supportive of anybody, including Elon Musk, putting resources forward right now to let more Americans know" about the bill. Other Democrats,like Rep. Ro Khanna of California, have floated welcoming Musk into the Democratic Party after his feud with President Donald Trump exploded into public view last week. "We should ultimately be trying to convince him that the Democratic Party has more of the values that he agrees with," Khannatold Politicolast week after Musk and Trump fired off a series of social media posts criticizing each other. The falling-out started afterMusk calledthe budget bill a "disgusting abomination" on X. In subsequent posts on Truth Social,Trump accusedMusk of "wearing thin" and said "he just went crazy." Musk lateraccused Trump of "ingratitude"in another post on X and accused Trump of links to deceased sex offender Jeffrey Epstein in a now-deleted post after he spent $250 million boosting Trump's campaign in 2024. Trump said Saturday in a phone call with NBC News that he hasno desire to repair their relationshipafter their public spat. He also responded to a direct question about what might happen if Musk decided to financially support Democrats in the 2026 midterm elections, days after Muskwrote on X,"In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people," appearing to refer to Republicans who voted for the GOP-backed spending bill in the House. "If he does, he'll have to pay the consequences for that," Trump said, adding that there could be "serious consequences." In May, House Republicanspassed a sweeping domestic policy billcalled the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act," which would extend tax cuts passed in the first Trump administration, increase funding for border security and eliminate federal taxes on tips and overtime pay. The bill has also drawn scrutiny from Democrats because it would slash funding for Medicaid and some food stamps and add work requirements for Medicaid, which provides health care for low-income people. Musk and some Senate Republicans have blasted the bill for estimated effects it could have on the federal debt and the deficit. Trump and House Republicans have downplayed those concerns. "More Americans have to understand that if this bill passes, average Americans are going to see their costs skyrocket as this president again pushes legislation that is indicative of his chaos, corruption and cruelty towards Americans," Booker said Sunday.

Sen. Cory Booker says he won't accept campaign donations from Elon Musk

Sen. Cory Booker says he won't accept campaign donations from Elon Musk Sen. Cory Booker said Sunday he would not accept campaign donati...
Best tennis match ever? Carlos Alcaraz's French Open win ushers in new rivalryNew Foto - Best tennis match ever? Carlos Alcaraz's French Open win ushers in new rivalry

So, tennis fans, how'd you like another decade or so ofthat? After Sunday'sFrench Open men's final– a 5-hour, 29-minute epic that somehow ended with Carlos Alcaraz holding up the trophy for a second consecutive year – we can now officially close the book on the so-called Big Three era. There's a new game in town. And it's as spectacular to watch as anything tennis has ever seen. Yes,Alcaraz's improbable comeback to beat Jannik Sinner 4-6, 6-7 (4-7), 6-4, 7-6 (7-3), 7-6 (10-2)is the story of the day. Not only did Alcaraz win his fifth Grand Slam title at just one month into his 22nd year of life – an absurd accomplishment on its own – but he did it by summoning a competitive aura only the all-time greats possess. He is, already, a legend. And that might have been the greatest match in the history of the sport. But the best part of Sunday's match is that it's not the end of the story. In many ways, it's just the beginning. HIGHLIGHTS:Alcaraz outlasts Sinner in epic French Open final The first Slam final between Alcaraz and Sinner not only exceeded every possible expectation, it sets an entirely new narrative for the sport. As Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal faded into retirement – most likely followed by Novak Djokovic in the next year or two – there was deep concern about what would come next after a 1½-decade battle between arguably the three best to ever hold a racket. Now we know definitively. Tennis is in the safest of hands. And barring something unforeseen, these two spectacular athletes are going to be doing battle in Grand Slam finals for many, many years to come. If you managed to watch the whole thing, or even just the last couple sets, it was easy to understand why that's such a tantalizing possibility. Let's start with the level of play. In a word, spectacular. Though Sinner and Alcaraz are each elite individually, combining to win the last six Grand Slam titles, the greatness they manage to draw out of each other is unique. Though different players stylistically and tactically, they have now twice played matches that could be considered among the best in the history of the sport in terms of ballstriking, endurance and the high standard it took to win a single point. When they played a US Open quarterfinal deep into the night in 2022, with Alcaraz emerging after 5 hours, 15 minutes, it showed the possibility of a friendly rivalry between two generational talents that had stretched back to childhood. It has widely been considered the best match of the decade, not just for the length of the match but the drama and the quality they both laid on the line. It only took three years to exceed that standard. Which leads to the second element of this ongoing story. What it took for Alcaraz to win that match – to beat Sinner on this particular day – was a sustained effort that few players in history could have managed. Maybe Djokovic. Maybe Nadal. Maybe. Because even though the all-time greats have all come back from two sets down and saved match points on the way to Grand Slam titles, few have had so little help from an opponent. Sure, there may be a shot or two that Sinner would want back after failing to convert three match points in the fourth set, then failing to serve out the tournament in the next game. But mostly, from that point until the final winner came off Alcaraz's racket, it was mostly about his greatness and his relentless shotmaking. Even in the fifth set, with Sinner clearly tiring more quickly than his opponent, he summoned enough energy to erase Alcaraz's early break of serve and send the match to a final tiebreak where – guess what – Alcaraz continued to pound clean winners off impossible angles. Sinner did not lose this match. Alcaraz just got up off the clay and stole it. We can debate where this final ranks among the 2008 Wimbledon final between Nadal and Federer or the 1980 Wimbledon final between John McEnroe and Bjorn Borg when you factor in all the intangibles. But if we're just talking about the quality of tennis played by two men over that length of time? It would be difficult to say there's ever been a better match. If the world was watching Sunday, it had to love what it saw. And when you realize what's ahead between them – more finals, more trophies, more history – this one felt like a moment to mark in time. One chapter of tennis closes, another begins. And it's going to be as entertaining as any we've seen. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Carlos Alcaraz wins French Open, kickstarts Jannik Sinner rivalry

Best tennis match ever? Carlos Alcaraz's French Open win ushers in new rivalry

Best tennis match ever? Carlos Alcaraz's French Open win ushers in new rivalry So, tennis fans, how'd you like another decade or so ...
Clayton Kershaw gets 1st win this season with 5 sharp innings as Dodgers beat Cardinals 7-3New Foto - Clayton Kershaw gets 1st win this season with 5 sharp innings as Dodgers beat Cardinals 7-3

ST. LOUIS (AP) — Clayton Kershaw allowed one run in five innings to record his first win since last August, and the Los Angeles Dodgers beat the St. Louis Cardinals 7-3 on Sunday to avoid a three-game sweep. Kershaw (1-0) threw 82 pitches, gave up six hits,struck out sevenand walked none. The 37-year-old left-hander had not struck out at least seven since June 8, 2023, at Cincinnati, and his last win was also at St. Louis, on Aug. 18, 2024. Tommy Edman drove in three runs with two hits and a sacrifice fly, and Mookie Betts homered for the Dodgers. Shohei Ohtani hit a leadoff double and went 1 for 4. St. Louis starter Michael McGreevy (1-1) was 7 years old when Kershaw made his major league debut on May 25, 2008, against the Cardinals. The 24-year-old right-hander, recalled from Triple-A Memphis to make his first start this season, gave up four runs in six innings. Edman had an RBI single and Hyeseong Kim hit a two-run triple to put LA ahead 3-0 in the second. Edman added a run-scoring double in the fourth. St. Louis scored against Kershaw in the fifth on a two-out RBI double by Masyn Winn. Key moment With a runner on third and two outs in the second inning, shortstop Winn fielded a hard grounder by Betts on the grass behind second base, twirled and fired to first baseman Willson Contreras for the out. The Dodgers unsuccessfully challenged the call. Key stat Kershaw, who is 17 strikeouts shy of 3,000 in his career, improved to 12-6 lifetime against the Cardinals. Up next Dodgers: Begin a three-game series at San Diego on Monday night with Dustin May (3-4, 4.09 ERA) on the mound. Cardinals: At Toronto for a three-game series starting Monday nigth with Andre Pallante (4-3, 4.91) against the Blue Jays' José Berríos (2-2, 3.67). ___ AP MLB:https://apnews.com/hub/mlb

Clayton Kershaw gets 1st win this season with 5 sharp innings as Dodgers beat Cardinals 7-3

Clayton Kershaw gets 1st win this season with 5 sharp innings as Dodgers beat Cardinals 7-3 ST. LOUIS (AP) — Clayton Kershaw allowed one run...
Explainer-Does U.S. law allow Trump to send troops to quell protests?New Foto - Explainer-Does U.S. law allow Trump to send troops to quell protests?

By Dietrich Knauth President Donald Trump has deployed National Guard troops to California after two days of protests by hundreds of demonstrators against immigration raids, saying that the protests interfered with federal law enforcement and framing them as a possible "form of rebellion" against the authority of the U.S. government. California Governor Gavin Newsom on Sunday said he had formally requested that the Trump Administration rescind "its unlawful deployment of troops in Los Angeles County" and return them to his command. WHAT LAWS DID TRUMP CITE TO JUSTIFY THE MOVE? Trump cited Title 10 of the U.S. Code, a federal law that outlines the role of the U.S. Armed Forces, in his June 7 order to call members of the California National Guard into federal service. A provision of Title 10 - Section 12406 - allows the president to deploy National Guard units into federal service if the U.S. is invaded, there is a "rebellion or danger of rebellion" or the president is "unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States." WHAT ARE NATIONAL GUARD TROOPS ALLOWED TO DO UNDER THE LAW CITED IN TRUMP'S ORDER? An 1878 law, the Posse Comitatus Act, generally forbids the U.S. military, including the National Guard, from taking part in civilian law enforcement. Section 12406 does not override that prohibition, but it allows the troops to protect federal agents who are carrying out law enforcement activity and to protect federal property. For example, National Guard troops cannot arrest protesters, but they could protect U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement who are carrying out arrests. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR FREEDOM OF SPEECH? The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees the right to assembly, freedom of speech and the press. Experts have said that Trump's decision to have U.S. troops respond to protests is an ominous sign for how far the president is willing to go to repress political speech and activity that he disagrees with or that criticizes his administration's policies. IS TRUMP'S MOVE SUSCEPTIBLE TO LEGAL CHALLENGES? Four legal experts from both left- and right-leaning advocacy organizations have cast doubt on Trump's use of Title 10 in response to immigration protests calling it inflammatory and reckless, especially without the support of California's Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom, who has said Trump's actions would only escalate tensions. The protests in California do not rise to the level of "rebellion" and do not prevent the federal government from executing the laws of the United States, experts said. Title 10 also says "orders for these purposes shall be issued through the governors of the States," but legal experts said that language might not be an obstacle. Legislative history suggests that those words were likely meant to reflect the norms of how National Guard troops are typically deployed, rather than giving a governor the option to not comply with a president's decision to deploy troops. COULD CALIFORNIA SUE TO CHALLENGE TRUMP'S MOVE? California could file a lawsuit, arguing that deployment of National Guard troops was not justified by Title 10 because there was no "rebellion" or threat to law enforcement. A lawsuit might take months to resolve, and the outcome would be uncertain. Because the protests may be over before a lawsuit is resolved, the decision to sue might be more of a political question than a legal one, experts said. WHAT OTHER LAWS COULD TRUMP INVOKE TO DIRECT THE NATIONAL GUARD OR OTHER U.S MILITARY TROOPS? Trump could take a more far-reaching step by invoking the Insurrection Act of 1792, which would allow troops to directly participate in civilian law enforcement, for which there is little recent precedent. Casting protests as an "insurrection" that requires the deployment of troops against U.S. citizens would be riskier legal territory, one legal expert said, in part because mostly peaceful protests and minor incidents aren't the sort of thing that the Insurrection Act were designed to address. The Insurrection Act has been used by past presidents to deploy troops within the U.S. in response to crises like the 1794 Whiskey Rebellion and the rise of the Ku Klux Klan in the immediate aftermath of the American Civil War. The law was last invoked by President George H.W. Bush in 1992, when the governor of California requested military aid to suppress unrest in Los Angeles following the Rodney King trial. But, the last time a president deployed the National Guard in a state without a request from that state's governor was 1965, when President Lyndon Johnson sent troops to protect civil rights demonstrators in Montgomery, Alabama. (Reporting by Dietrich Knauth in New York and Tom Hals in Wilmington, Delaware, Editing by Alexia Garamfalvi, Amy Stevens and Aurora Ellis)

Explainer-Does U.S. law allow Trump to send troops to quell protests?

Explainer-Does U.S. law allow Trump to send troops to quell protests? By Dietrich Knauth President Donald Trump has deployed National Guard ...
The history of National Guard deployments in LA: What to knowNew Foto - The history of National Guard deployments in LA: What to know

The National Guard has beendeployed to Los Angelesseveral times in response to civil disorder and natural disasters. In previous years, the National Guard was sent at the request of state and local officials. In January, California Gov. Gavin Newsomapproved a requestfrom Los Angeles County to deploy the state National Guard to support law enforcement during the wildfires. Thousands of Guard members were sent to the region to assist in firefighting efforts and tohelp local law enforcementwith checkpoints and patrols in the evacuation areas. While Vice President J.D. Vance has referred to the protesters as "insurrectionists" and senior White House aide Stephen Miller described the protests as a "violent insurrection," PresidentDonald Trumphas not invoked the Insurrection Act. Under the 1807 law, the president may have the legal authority to dispatch the military or federalize the Guard in states that cannot control insurrections under or are defying federal law. In June 2020,USA TODAY reportedthat Trump hadconsidered invoking the Insurrection Actover protests in response to the murder ofGeorge Floyd, a Black man who died after a former Minneapolis police officer knelt on his neck on a street corner in May 2020. Protestorsclashed with police across the country, including in Los Angeles, which promptedthen-Mayor Eric Garcettito ask Newsom for members of the Guard to be sent to the city. At the time,Defense Secretary Mark Esperand others urged against deploying domestic troops to quell civil unrest. In 1994, a magnitude 6.7 earthquake ‒ known as the Northridge earthquake – shook the San Fernando Valley, which is about 20 miles northwest of downtown Los Angeles. The earthquake caused an estimated $20 billion in residential damages, according to theCalifornia Earthquake Authority. The Guard was sent as part of the disaster assistance operation. Thelast time the Insurrection Act was invokedwas in 1992 by former President George H.W. Bush, when the acquittal of the Los Angeles Police Department officers who beat Rodney King sparked civil unrest in Los Angeles, which left more than 60 people dead and 2,300 injured, according to theBill of Rights Institute. Thousands of members of the Guard, the U.S. Army and the Marine Corps were deployed in the city. In 1965, nearly 14,000 Guard troops were sent to Los Angeles amid the Watts riots at the request of the California lieutenant governor, according to Stanford University'sMartin Luther King, Jr., Research and Education Institute. Contributing: Reuters This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Past National Guard deployments in LA: What to know

The history of National Guard deployments in LA: What to know

The history of National Guard deployments in LA: What to know The National Guard has beendeployed to Los Angelesseveral times in response to...
Athletics acquire Wynns from Reds for cash while Brewers claim Avans off waivers from A'sNew Foto - Athletics acquire Wynns from Reds for cash while Brewers claim Avans off waivers from A's

WEST SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — The Athletics acquired catcher Austin Wynns from the Cincinnati Reds for cash on Sunday. In another move announced Sunday, the Milwaukee Brewers claimed outfielder Drew Avans off waivers from the Athletics and assigned him to their Triple-A Nashville affiliate. The 34-year-old Wynns had batted .400 with a .442 on-base percentage, three homers and 11 RBIs in 18 games with the Reds. He has batted .241 with a .287 on-base percentage, 16 homers and 74 RBIs in 256 career games with the Baltimore Orioles (2018-21), San Francisco Giants (2022-23), Los Angeles Dodgers (2023), Colorado Rockies (2023) and Reds (2024-25). Avans, who turns 29 on Friday, had gone 1 for 15 in seven games with the Athletics this season. He had hit .328 with a .414 on-base percentage, four homers, 34 RBIs and 16 steals in 48 games with the Athletics' Triple-A Las Vegas affiliate. ___ AP MLB:https://apnews.com/hub/MLB

Athletics acquire Wynns from Reds for cash while Brewers claim Avans off waivers from A's

Athletics acquire Wynns from Reds for cash while Brewers claim Avans off waivers from A's WEST SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — The Athletics a...

 

MARIO VOUX © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com