Best tennis match ever? Carlos Alcaraz's French Open win ushers in new rivalryNew Foto - Best tennis match ever? Carlos Alcaraz's French Open win ushers in new rivalry

So, tennis fans, how'd you like another decade or so ofthat? After Sunday'sFrench Open men's final– a 5-hour, 29-minute epic that somehow ended with Carlos Alcaraz holding up the trophy for a second consecutive year – we can now officially close the book on the so-called Big Three era. There's a new game in town. And it's as spectacular to watch as anything tennis has ever seen. Yes,Alcaraz's improbable comeback to beat Jannik Sinner 4-6, 6-7 (4-7), 6-4, 7-6 (7-3), 7-6 (10-2)is the story of the day. Not only did Alcaraz win his fifth Grand Slam title at just one month into his 22nd year of life – an absurd accomplishment on its own – but he did it by summoning a competitive aura only the all-time greats possess. He is, already, a legend. And that might have been the greatest match in the history of the sport. But the best part of Sunday's match is that it's not the end of the story. In many ways, it's just the beginning. HIGHLIGHTS:Alcaraz outlasts Sinner in epic French Open final The first Slam final between Alcaraz and Sinner not only exceeded every possible expectation, it sets an entirely new narrative for the sport. As Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal faded into retirement – most likely followed by Novak Djokovic in the next year or two – there was deep concern about what would come next after a 1½-decade battle between arguably the three best to ever hold a racket. Now we know definitively. Tennis is in the safest of hands. And barring something unforeseen, these two spectacular athletes are going to be doing battle in Grand Slam finals for many, many years to come. If you managed to watch the whole thing, or even just the last couple sets, it was easy to understand why that's such a tantalizing possibility. Let's start with the level of play. In a word, spectacular. Though Sinner and Alcaraz are each elite individually, combining to win the last six Grand Slam titles, the greatness they manage to draw out of each other is unique. Though different players stylistically and tactically, they have now twice played matches that could be considered among the best in the history of the sport in terms of ballstriking, endurance and the high standard it took to win a single point. When they played a US Open quarterfinal deep into the night in 2022, with Alcaraz emerging after 5 hours, 15 minutes, it showed the possibility of a friendly rivalry between two generational talents that had stretched back to childhood. It has widely been considered the best match of the decade, not just for the length of the match but the drama and the quality they both laid on the line. It only took three years to exceed that standard. Which leads to the second element of this ongoing story. What it took for Alcaraz to win that match – to beat Sinner on this particular day – was a sustained effort that few players in history could have managed. Maybe Djokovic. Maybe Nadal. Maybe. Because even though the all-time greats have all come back from two sets down and saved match points on the way to Grand Slam titles, few have had so little help from an opponent. Sure, there may be a shot or two that Sinner would want back after failing to convert three match points in the fourth set, then failing to serve out the tournament in the next game. But mostly, from that point until the final winner came off Alcaraz's racket, it was mostly about his greatness and his relentless shotmaking. Even in the fifth set, with Sinner clearly tiring more quickly than his opponent, he summoned enough energy to erase Alcaraz's early break of serve and send the match to a final tiebreak where – guess what – Alcaraz continued to pound clean winners off impossible angles. Sinner did not lose this match. Alcaraz just got up off the clay and stole it. We can debate where this final ranks among the 2008 Wimbledon final between Nadal and Federer or the 1980 Wimbledon final between John McEnroe and Bjorn Borg when you factor in all the intangibles. But if we're just talking about the quality of tennis played by two men over that length of time? It would be difficult to say there's ever been a better match. If the world was watching Sunday, it had to love what it saw. And when you realize what's ahead between them – more finals, more trophies, more history – this one felt like a moment to mark in time. One chapter of tennis closes, another begins. And it's going to be as entertaining as any we've seen. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Carlos Alcaraz wins French Open, kickstarts Jannik Sinner rivalry

Best tennis match ever? Carlos Alcaraz's French Open win ushers in new rivalry

Best tennis match ever? Carlos Alcaraz's French Open win ushers in new rivalry So, tennis fans, how'd you like another decade or so ...
Clayton Kershaw gets 1st win this season with 5 sharp innings as Dodgers beat Cardinals 7-3New Foto - Clayton Kershaw gets 1st win this season with 5 sharp innings as Dodgers beat Cardinals 7-3

ST. LOUIS (AP) — Clayton Kershaw allowed one run in five innings to record his first win since last August, and the Los Angeles Dodgers beat the St. Louis Cardinals 7-3 on Sunday to avoid a three-game sweep. Kershaw (1-0) threw 82 pitches, gave up six hits,struck out sevenand walked none. The 37-year-old left-hander had not struck out at least seven since June 8, 2023, at Cincinnati, and his last win was also at St. Louis, on Aug. 18, 2024. Tommy Edman drove in three runs with two hits and a sacrifice fly, and Mookie Betts homered for the Dodgers. Shohei Ohtani hit a leadoff double and went 1 for 4. St. Louis starter Michael McGreevy (1-1) was 7 years old when Kershaw made his major league debut on May 25, 2008, against the Cardinals. The 24-year-old right-hander, recalled from Triple-A Memphis to make his first start this season, gave up four runs in six innings. Edman had an RBI single and Hyeseong Kim hit a two-run triple to put LA ahead 3-0 in the second. Edman added a run-scoring double in the fourth. St. Louis scored against Kershaw in the fifth on a two-out RBI double by Masyn Winn. Key moment With a runner on third and two outs in the second inning, shortstop Winn fielded a hard grounder by Betts on the grass behind second base, twirled and fired to first baseman Willson Contreras for the out. The Dodgers unsuccessfully challenged the call. Key stat Kershaw, who is 17 strikeouts shy of 3,000 in his career, improved to 12-6 lifetime against the Cardinals. Up next Dodgers: Begin a three-game series at San Diego on Monday night with Dustin May (3-4, 4.09 ERA) on the mound. Cardinals: At Toronto for a three-game series starting Monday nigth with Andre Pallante (4-3, 4.91) against the Blue Jays' José Berríos (2-2, 3.67). ___ AP MLB:https://apnews.com/hub/mlb

Clayton Kershaw gets 1st win this season with 5 sharp innings as Dodgers beat Cardinals 7-3

Clayton Kershaw gets 1st win this season with 5 sharp innings as Dodgers beat Cardinals 7-3 ST. LOUIS (AP) — Clayton Kershaw allowed one run...
Explainer-Does U.S. law allow Trump to send troops to quell protests?New Foto - Explainer-Does U.S. law allow Trump to send troops to quell protests?

By Dietrich Knauth President Donald Trump has deployed National Guard troops to California after two days of protests by hundreds of demonstrators against immigration raids, saying that the protests interfered with federal law enforcement and framing them as a possible "form of rebellion" against the authority of the U.S. government. California Governor Gavin Newsom on Sunday said he had formally requested that the Trump Administration rescind "its unlawful deployment of troops in Los Angeles County" and return them to his command. WHAT LAWS DID TRUMP CITE TO JUSTIFY THE MOVE? Trump cited Title 10 of the U.S. Code, a federal law that outlines the role of the U.S. Armed Forces, in his June 7 order to call members of the California National Guard into federal service. A provision of Title 10 - Section 12406 - allows the president to deploy National Guard units into federal service if the U.S. is invaded, there is a "rebellion or danger of rebellion" or the president is "unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States." WHAT ARE NATIONAL GUARD TROOPS ALLOWED TO DO UNDER THE LAW CITED IN TRUMP'S ORDER? An 1878 law, the Posse Comitatus Act, generally forbids the U.S. military, including the National Guard, from taking part in civilian law enforcement. Section 12406 does not override that prohibition, but it allows the troops to protect federal agents who are carrying out law enforcement activity and to protect federal property. For example, National Guard troops cannot arrest protesters, but they could protect U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement who are carrying out arrests. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR FREEDOM OF SPEECH? The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees the right to assembly, freedom of speech and the press. Experts have said that Trump's decision to have U.S. troops respond to protests is an ominous sign for how far the president is willing to go to repress political speech and activity that he disagrees with or that criticizes his administration's policies. IS TRUMP'S MOVE SUSCEPTIBLE TO LEGAL CHALLENGES? Four legal experts from both left- and right-leaning advocacy organizations have cast doubt on Trump's use of Title 10 in response to immigration protests calling it inflammatory and reckless, especially without the support of California's Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom, who has said Trump's actions would only escalate tensions. The protests in California do not rise to the level of "rebellion" and do not prevent the federal government from executing the laws of the United States, experts said. Title 10 also says "orders for these purposes shall be issued through the governors of the States," but legal experts said that language might not be an obstacle. Legislative history suggests that those words were likely meant to reflect the norms of how National Guard troops are typically deployed, rather than giving a governor the option to not comply with a president's decision to deploy troops. COULD CALIFORNIA SUE TO CHALLENGE TRUMP'S MOVE? California could file a lawsuit, arguing that deployment of National Guard troops was not justified by Title 10 because there was no "rebellion" or threat to law enforcement. A lawsuit might take months to resolve, and the outcome would be uncertain. Because the protests may be over before a lawsuit is resolved, the decision to sue might be more of a political question than a legal one, experts said. WHAT OTHER LAWS COULD TRUMP INVOKE TO DIRECT THE NATIONAL GUARD OR OTHER U.S MILITARY TROOPS? Trump could take a more far-reaching step by invoking the Insurrection Act of 1792, which would allow troops to directly participate in civilian law enforcement, for which there is little recent precedent. Casting protests as an "insurrection" that requires the deployment of troops against U.S. citizens would be riskier legal territory, one legal expert said, in part because mostly peaceful protests and minor incidents aren't the sort of thing that the Insurrection Act were designed to address. The Insurrection Act has been used by past presidents to deploy troops within the U.S. in response to crises like the 1794 Whiskey Rebellion and the rise of the Ku Klux Klan in the immediate aftermath of the American Civil War. The law was last invoked by President George H.W. Bush in 1992, when the governor of California requested military aid to suppress unrest in Los Angeles following the Rodney King trial. But, the last time a president deployed the National Guard in a state without a request from that state's governor was 1965, when President Lyndon Johnson sent troops to protect civil rights demonstrators in Montgomery, Alabama. (Reporting by Dietrich Knauth in New York and Tom Hals in Wilmington, Delaware, Editing by Alexia Garamfalvi, Amy Stevens and Aurora Ellis)

Explainer-Does U.S. law allow Trump to send troops to quell protests?

Explainer-Does U.S. law allow Trump to send troops to quell protests? By Dietrich Knauth President Donald Trump has deployed National Guard ...
The history of National Guard deployments in LA: What to knowNew Foto - The history of National Guard deployments in LA: What to know

The National Guard has beendeployed to Los Angelesseveral times in response to civil disorder and natural disasters. In previous years, the National Guard was sent at the request of state and local officials. In January, California Gov. Gavin Newsomapproved a requestfrom Los Angeles County to deploy the state National Guard to support law enforcement during the wildfires. Thousands of Guard members were sent to the region to assist in firefighting efforts and tohelp local law enforcementwith checkpoints and patrols in the evacuation areas. While Vice President J.D. Vance has referred to the protesters as "insurrectionists" and senior White House aide Stephen Miller described the protests as a "violent insurrection," PresidentDonald Trumphas not invoked the Insurrection Act. Under the 1807 law, the president may have the legal authority to dispatch the military or federalize the Guard in states that cannot control insurrections under or are defying federal law. In June 2020,USA TODAY reportedthat Trump hadconsidered invoking the Insurrection Actover protests in response to the murder ofGeorge Floyd, a Black man who died after a former Minneapolis police officer knelt on his neck on a street corner in May 2020. Protestorsclashed with police across the country, including in Los Angeles, which promptedthen-Mayor Eric Garcettito ask Newsom for members of the Guard to be sent to the city. At the time,Defense Secretary Mark Esperand others urged against deploying domestic troops to quell civil unrest. In 1994, a magnitude 6.7 earthquake ‒ known as the Northridge earthquake – shook the San Fernando Valley, which is about 20 miles northwest of downtown Los Angeles. The earthquake caused an estimated $20 billion in residential damages, according to theCalifornia Earthquake Authority. The Guard was sent as part of the disaster assistance operation. Thelast time the Insurrection Act was invokedwas in 1992 by former President George H.W. Bush, when the acquittal of the Los Angeles Police Department officers who beat Rodney King sparked civil unrest in Los Angeles, which left more than 60 people dead and 2,300 injured, according to theBill of Rights Institute. Thousands of members of the Guard, the U.S. Army and the Marine Corps were deployed in the city. In 1965, nearly 14,000 Guard troops were sent to Los Angeles amid the Watts riots at the request of the California lieutenant governor, according to Stanford University'sMartin Luther King, Jr., Research and Education Institute. Contributing: Reuters This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Past National Guard deployments in LA: What to know

The history of National Guard deployments in LA: What to know

The history of National Guard deployments in LA: What to know The National Guard has beendeployed to Los Angelesseveral times in response to...
Athletics acquire Wynns from Reds for cash while Brewers claim Avans off waivers from A'sNew Foto - Athletics acquire Wynns from Reds for cash while Brewers claim Avans off waivers from A's

WEST SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — The Athletics acquired catcher Austin Wynns from the Cincinnati Reds for cash on Sunday. In another move announced Sunday, the Milwaukee Brewers claimed outfielder Drew Avans off waivers from the Athletics and assigned him to their Triple-A Nashville affiliate. The 34-year-old Wynns had batted .400 with a .442 on-base percentage, three homers and 11 RBIs in 18 games with the Reds. He has batted .241 with a .287 on-base percentage, 16 homers and 74 RBIs in 256 career games with the Baltimore Orioles (2018-21), San Francisco Giants (2022-23), Los Angeles Dodgers (2023), Colorado Rockies (2023) and Reds (2024-25). Avans, who turns 29 on Friday, had gone 1 for 15 in seven games with the Athletics this season. He had hit .328 with a .414 on-base percentage, four homers, 34 RBIs and 16 steals in 48 games with the Athletics' Triple-A Las Vegas affiliate. ___ AP MLB:https://apnews.com/hub/MLB

Athletics acquire Wynns from Reds for cash while Brewers claim Avans off waivers from A's

Athletics acquire Wynns from Reds for cash while Brewers claim Avans off waivers from A's WEST SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — The Athletics a...
NCAA Baseball Tournament: Louisville, Arizona advance to College World SeriesNew Foto - NCAA Baseball Tournament: Louisville, Arizona advance to College World Series

Ten teams have an opportunity to advance to the 2025 Men's College World Series with a win in Super Regional play on Sunday. Arizona and North Carolina had a decisive Game 3 in their best-of-3 series while Miami and Louisville, in addition to Florida State and Oregon State were also tied at 1-1. Elsewhere in the Super Regionals, Arkansas has a 1-0 lead over defending national champion Tennessee and winning on Sunday would send them to Omaha. LSU also won its opener versus West Virginia, as did Duke over Murray State and UCLA versus UTSA. Coastal Carolina wasthe first to team to qualifyfor the MCWS by finishing a sweep of Auburn on Saturday. Eddie King Jr.'s 2-out double scored Jake Munroe in the seventh inning to put the Cardinals on top. Jake Schweitzer, Justin West and Brennyn Cutts combined for a scoreless final two innings to put Louisville (40-22) among the eight teams going to Omaha. EDDIE KING JR FOR THE LEAD‼️B7 | Cards 3, Canes 2📺 ESPN#GoCards|@EddieKingJr17pic.twitter.com/Oyizirye7o — Louisville Baseball (@LouisvilleBSB)June 8, 2025 Ethan Eberle pitched five innings for Louisville, giving up a 2-run homer to Max Galvin among his six hits allowed. Schweitzer got the win with three scoreless innings, while Cutts earned the save by retiring the final Hurricanes batter of the game. For Miami (35-27), Reese Lumpkin gave up two runs and five hits in 3 2/3 innings. But Will Smith was tagged with the loss after allowing King's RBI double. It was only the second hit he allowed in 2 2/3 innings with four strikeouts and two walks. Galvin and Daniel Cuvet each had two hits for Miami. The Wildcats join the Chanticleers in Omaha, defeating the Tar Heels on their home field. Arizona took a 4-3 lead with a 3-run eighth inning as its first four batters reached base, helped out by an two throwing errors by UNC. Tommy Splaine first scored on a bunt single from Easton Breyfogle. Brendan Summerhill then walked to load the bases and Mason White drove in two runs with a single. 🗣️ TUCSON STAND UP FOR YOUR HOMETOWN KID!pic.twitter.com/ElNaIFPkLA — Arizona Baseball (@ArizonaBaseball)June 8, 2025 A 3-run homer by Jackson Van De Brake gave North Carolina a 3-1 lead in the fifth inning, following consecutive singles from Carter French and Kane Kepley. Arizona starter Smith Bailey was charged with those three runs with five hits allowed, four strikeouts and three walks in six innings. Ryan Lynch pitched seven innings for the Tar Heels, allowing three runs (two earned) with five strikeouts. Walker McDuffie took the loss after he allowed the go-ahead run to reach base in the eighth. The Racers rebounded decisively after losing Saturday's Super Regionals opener to Duke, 7-4. Dom Decker and Will Vierling each drove in four runs, while Dan Tauken had three RBI to send the series to a decisive Game 3 on Monday. Duke took a 2-0 lead in the first inning on back-to-back homers by AJ Gracia and Ben Miller, but Murray State answered in the bottom of the frame with three runs beginning with Jonathan Hogart's leadoff home run. Both teams eventually traded five-run innings, but the Racers blew the game open with a nine-run seventh. Racers bat around in the 7th, Dan Tauken makes it 17-8 Racers on his 11th homer of the season.#GoRacers🏇pic.twitter.com/frCPObssYl — Murray State Baseball (@RacersBaseball)June 8, 2025 The Blue Devils' Kyle Johnson and Racers' Isaac Silva each allowed six runs as starting pitchers. Yet while Jacob Hustedde and Graham Kelham combined to give up another three runs in 3 2/3 innings of relief, Duke's bullpen could not keep Murray State's lineup from lighting up the scoreboard. Seven more pitchers took the mound for the Blue Devils with five of them allowing two or more runs. Gabe Nard and Mark Hindy each gave up three runs in a combined 1 1/3 innings.

NCAA Baseball Tournament: Louisville, Arizona advance to College World Series

NCAA Baseball Tournament: Louisville, Arizona advance to College World Series Ten teams have an opportunity to advance to the 2025 Men's...
Is Musk Starting a New Political Party Amid Trump Feud?New Foto - Is Musk Starting a New Political Party Amid Trump Feud?

Elon Musk speaks during a Town Hall event at the KI Convention Center in Green Bay, Wisconsin, on March 30, 2025. Credit - Joshua Lott—The Washington Post In an escalation ofElon Musk's fractured relationship with President Donald Trumpand his Republican allies, the Tesla CEO has floated the idea of starting a new political party to rival the two-party system. Muskconducted a pollvia his social media platform X (formerly Twitter), asking his 220 million followers: "Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle?" The public results show that around 80% of respondents voted yes. "The people have spoken. A new political party is needed in America to represent the 80% in the middle!"Musk said,reacting to the results of his Thursday, June 5, poll. "And exactly 80% of people agree…This is Fate." On Friday, Musk shared a potential name: "The America Party." The moniker echoes that of his super political action committee (PAC), America PAC, which was founded in 2024 to support Trump's efforts to return to the White House. The super PAC reportedly spentaround $200 millionto help elect Trump. Musk's donations made him Trump's largest, and most prominent, donor in the 2024 election. Read More:5 Things To Watch As the Trump-Musk Meltdown Proceeds Meanwhile, when talking to NBC News on Saturday, Trump said that Musk will "have to pay the consequences" if he opts to fund Democratic candidates in light of their feud. The President declined to say what those consequences would be. "I'm not going to say, but he'll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that," Trump said. In 2016 and 2020, Muskvoted for Trump's Democratic opponents—Hillary Clinton and former President Joe Biden, respectively. But during the 2022 midterm elections, Musk said he intended to vote Republican, and that later developed into him becoming Trump's close ally, which was cemented when the President positioned him as lead of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE),a role he held until recently. However, Trump and Musk have nowhad an explosive fall-out,which has played out in the public arena via social media over the past few days. It started with Musk's disapproval over Trump's "Big, Beautiful Bill," which he called an "abomination" andtold his social media followersto "call your Senator, call your Congressman… kill the bill." On Thursday, the back-and-forth between the two influential men escalated, with Musk alleging that Trump is listed in the files related to the late financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. "That is the real reason they have not been made public,"Musk said. He did not provide evidence pertaining to this and, as of early Saturday morning,the post has been deleted. Musk also,in another since-deleted X post, endorsed a message that said: "Trump should be impeached" and that Vance "should replace him." Trump has argued on his ownsocial media platform, Truth Social,that "Elon was wearing thin" and that he asked the Tesla CEO to leave the White House. Read More:Musk's Major Allegation Against Trump Disappears From Social Media: 'That Post Has Been Deleted' When talking to reporters aboard Air Force Oneon Friday night, Trump said he didn't have any plans to speak with Musk. But some lawmakers are convinced that the feud between Trump and Musk will soon thaw, and that the latter's idea for a new political party won't come to fruition. On Friday, RepublicanRep. Jimmy Patronis of Florida told NewsNation's Blake Burman: "Elon Musk is not gonna create a new political party... Trump knows that sometimes you're going to have [a] falling out with those that you trust, you like, that you're friends with. It happens with us in D.C. all the time. Mark my words, about a month from now, these guys will be hanging around again." Contact usatletters@time.com.

Is Musk Starting a New Political Party Amid Trump Feud?

Is Musk Starting a New Political Party Amid Trump Feud? Elon Musk speaks during a Town Hall event at the KI Convention Center in Green Bay, ...

 

MARIO VOUX © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com